Evolution of Cellular Technologies Overview
Evolution of Cellular Technologies Overview
• With the user requirements on the ever increasing side cellular networks are facing greater than
ever competition from other technologies.
• HSPA & MBMS (multimedia broadcast & multicast service) has enhanced the 3G networks by
bringing important capabilities,
• but these improvements are still not enough to match broadcasting technologies broadband
wireless access (like WiMAX) for delivering modern services, e.g. mobile TV, Internet access & other
important services.
• In order to stay competitive in the long run, 3GPP has initiated activity on the LTE of UTRAN
(Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network),
• which is eyeing clearly beyond to what the WCDMA can do with HSDPA or HSUPA.
4
Brief History
7
Brief History
8
Brief History
10
Brief History
12
Demand
drivers for LTE
1. Growth in high bandwidth applications
14
Key requirements
for LTE design
1. Performance on par with wired broadband
15
• Requirements for LTE
key requirements & capability targets for the LTE are :
• Low latency : for both user plane & control plane, with a 5MHz spectrum
allocation the latency target is below 5 ms
• Bandwidth Scalability : different bandwidths can be used depending upon the
requirements (1.25 to 20 MHz)
• Peak Data Rates : 100 Mbps for DL , 50 Mbps for UL
• 2 to 3 times capacity over existing Release 6 scenarios with HSUPA
• 2 to 4 times capacity over existing Release 6 scenarios with HSDPA
• Only Packet Switched Domain support
• Improved Cell edge performance
• Inter-working with the existing 2G and 3G systems and non-3GPP systems
• Optimized for low mobile speed but also support high mobile speeds
• Reduction of complexity in both system & terminals
• Ease of migration from existing networks
• Simplification & minimization of the number of interfaces
1.4 Key Enabling Technologies
and Features of LTE
• LTE was required to deliver a peak data rate of 100 Mbps in the downlink and 50 Mbps in the
uplink.
• LTE was required to support a spectral efficiency three to four times greater than that of
Release 6 WCDMA in the downlink and two to three times greater in the uplink.
• Latency is another important issue, particularly for time-critical applications such as voice and
interactive games.
4. Multi-antenna Techniques
17
1.4 Key Enabling Technologies
and Features of LTE
1.4.1 Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM)
•Beamforming: The idea here is to focus the transmitted beam in the direction
of the receiver and away from interference, there by improving the received
signal to interference ratio (SIR).
•Multiuser MIMO: This allows multiple users in the uplink, each with a single
antenna, to transmit using the same frequency and time resource, is supported.
1.4.5 IP Based Flat Network Architecture
•“Flat” here implies fewer nodes and less hierarchical structure for the network.
•The lower cost & lower latency requirements drove the design toward a flat
architecture since fewer nodes implies a lower infrastructure cost.
•It also means fewer interfaces & protocol related processing, and reduced
interoperability testing, which lowers the development and deployment cost.
•The key aspect of LTE flat architecture is that all services, including voice,
supported on IP packet network using IP protocol.
1.4.5 IP Based Flat Network Architecture
1.5 LTE Network Architecture
Multicarrier Modulation:
Introduction:
• Multicarrier modulation used in many of the most successful
modern wireless systems, including
• Digital Subscriber Lines (DSL).
• Wireless LANs (802.11a/g/n).
• Digital Video Broadcasting.
• Beyond 3C cellular technologies such as WiMAX and LTE.
• The common feature of multicarrier modulation techniques is the
use of multiple parallel subcarriers, invariably generated by the
Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT).
• The most common type of multicarrier modulation is Orthogonal
Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM).
• Other examples Discrete Multi-Tone (DMT).
Multicarrier Modulation:
then be sent over L parallel subcarriers, maintaining the total desired data rate.
2. The data rate on each of the subcarriers is much less than the total flat a rate, and
so the corresponding subcarrier bandwidth is much less than the total system
bandwidth.
The number of sub-streams is chosen to ensure that each subcarrier has a
bandwidth less than the coherence bandwidth (CB) of the channel.
Multicarrier Modulation:
An Elegant Approach to Inter Symbol Interference:
• Multicarrier modulation divides the wideband incoming data stream
into L narrow band sub-streams.
• Each of which is then transmitted over a different orthogonal
frequency subcarrier.
• The number of sub-streams L is chosen to make the symbol time 𝑇𝑠
each sub-stream
much greater than the delay spread of 𝜏 the channel or, equivalently,
to make the sub-
stream bandwidth less than the channel coherence bandwidth.
This ensures that the sub-streams will not experience significant ISI.
• Multicarrier transmitter& Receiver: In Fig 3.1 a high-rate data signal of
rate ‘R’ bps & with a pass bandwidth ‘B’ is broken into ‘L’ parallel sub-
streams each with data rate ‘R/L’ & pass band bandwidth ‘B/L’.
• After passing through the channel H(f), the received signal would
appear as shown in Figure 3.3, no subcarrier overlap since the
subcarrier bandwidth very much smaller than the coherence
bandwidth CB, i,e. B/L << CB, then it can be ensured that each sub-
Multicarrier Modulation:
Receiving a series of OFDM symbols, as long as the guard time Tg is larger than the delay
spread of the channel 𝜏 , each OFDM symbol will only interfere with itself.
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
OFDM - Basics
OFDM transmissions allow ISI within an OFDM symbol.
But by including a sufficiently large guard band,
it is possible to guarantee that there is no interference between subsequent OFDM symbols.
•In summary, the use of cyclic prefix entails data rate and power losses that are both
•Therefore it both corrects the phase and equalizes the amplitude before the decision
device.
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
OFDM – Basics
An OFDM Block Diagram
The key steps in an OFDM communication system are briefly shown in Figure
An OFDM system in vector notation. In OFDM, the encoding and decoding is done in the
frequency domain, where X, Y. and 𝑋 contain the L transmitted, received, and estimated data
symbols.
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
OFDM – Basics
Transmitter operations:
Step 1: In OFDM, break a wideband signal of bandwidth 𝐵 into 𝐿 narrowband subcarriers each
of bandwidth 𝐵/𝐿 and each subcarrier experiences flat fading, or ISI-free communication,
as long as a cyclic prefix that exceeds the delay spread is used.
The 𝐿 subcarriers for a given OFDM symbol are represented by a vector 𝑋, which
contains the L current symbols.
Step 2: 𝐿 independent narrow band subcarriers are created digitally using an IFFT operation.
Step 3: IFFT/FFT decompose the ISI channel into orthogonal subcarriers, a cyclic prefix of
length 𝑣 must be appended after the IFFT operation.
The resulting 𝐿 + 𝑣 symbols are then sent in serial through the wideband channel.
Receiver operations:
At the receiver, the cyclic prefix is discarded, and the L received symbols are demodulated
using an FFT operation, which results in L data symbols, each of the form
𝑌𝑙 = 𝐻𝑙 𝑋𝑙 + 𝑁𝑙 for subcarrier 𝑙.
Each subcarrier can then be equalized via an FEQ by simply dividing by the complex channel
gain H[i] for that subcarrier. This results in
Where 𝐻𝑙 is the complex response of the channel at the frequency 𝑓𝑐+( 𝑙−1)∆ 𝑓, and therefore it
both corrects the phase and equalizes the amplitude before the decision device.
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
OFDM in LTE
•LTE systems used as an example to brief time and frequency domain interpretations of
OFDM.
•Figure shows view of a pass band OFDM modulation engine.
•The inputs to this figure are L independent QAM symbols (the vector X), and these L symbols
are treated as separate subcarriers.
Table: summary of Key OFDM parameters in LTE and example values for 10mHz
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
Timing and Frequency Synchronization
• In order to demodulate 10 OFDM signal, there are two important synchronization tasks
that need to be performed by the receiver.
• First, the timing offset of the symbol & optimal timing instants need to be determined.
This is referred to as timing asynchronization
• Second, the receiver must align its carrier frequency as closely is possible with the
transmitted carrier frequency: This is referred to as frequency synchronization.
Compared to single-currier systems, the timing synchronization requirements for
OFDM are in fact somewhat relaxed, since the OFDM symbol structure naturally ac
accommodates a reasonable degree of synchronization error.
• On the other hand, frequency synchronization requirements are significantly more
stringent, since the orthogonality of the data symbols is reliant on their being
individually discernible in the frequency domain.
• A representation of an OFDM symbol in time (top) & frequency (bottom).
• In the time domain, the IFFT effectively modulates each data symbol onto a unique
carrier frequency only two of the carriers are shown—the actual transmitted signal is
the superposition of all the individual curriers.
• Since the time window is T = 1sec & a rectangular window is used, frequency response
of each subcarrier becomes a "Sine" function with zero Crossings every 1/T = IMHz.
This can be confirmed using the Fourier Transform F{.} since
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
Timing and Frequency Synchronization
The power efficiency of an HPA can be increased by reducing the PAR of the transmitted
signal.
In addition to the large burden placed on the HPA, a high PAR requires high resolution for
both the transmitter's digital-to-analog convertor (DAC) and the receiver's
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
The Peak-to-Average Ratio (PAR)
In order to avoid operating the PA in the nonlinear region, the input power can be
reduced up to 10 amount about equal to the PAR.
This is very inefficient 101d will reduce the range and/or SINR of the system by the same
amount.
However, two important facts related to this IBO amount can be observed from Figure
First, sing the highest PAR values are uncommon, it might be possible to simply "clip" off
the highest peaks, at the cost of some hopefully minimal distortion of the signal.
Second , it can be seen that even for a conservative choice of IBO, say 10 dB, there is still a
distinct possibility that given.
OFDM symbol will have a PAR that exceeds the IBO and causes clipping.
Clipping, sometimes called "soft limiting," truncates the amplitude of signals that exceed
the clipping level as
where ck represents the clipped off signal in the frequency domain. In Figure, the
power spectral density of the original (X), clipped (X), und clipped-off (C) signals are
plotted for different clipping ratios y of 3, 5, and 7 dB.
The following deleterious effects are observed.
Now, d[n]is uncorrelated with the signal #[n] and the attenuation factor a is obtained
The attenuation factor a is plotted in Figure is a function of the clipping ratio . The
attenuation factor a is negligible when the clipping ratio a is greater than 8 dB, so for
high clipping ratios,
Gaussian input x[n] as
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
Clipping and Other PAR Reduction Techniques
The bit-error probability (BEP) can be evaluated for different modulation types
using the SNDR [12]. In the case of M-QAM and average power & the BEP can then
be approximated as
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
LTE's Approach to PAR in the Uplink
LTE has taken a pioneering new approach to PAR. In the downlink. PAR is less important
because the base stations are fewer in number and generally higher in cost, and so we
Figure 10: Bit error rate probibility for a clipped OFDM signal
Typically, the high PAR is basically tolerated and sufficient input power back off is
undertaken in order to keep the in-band distortion and spectral regrowth at an
acceptable level.
Single-Carrier Frequency Domain Equalization (SC-FDE)
• An alternative approach to OFDM is the less popular but conceptually similar single
carrier frequency domain equalization (SC-FDE) approach to ISI suppression .
• SC-FDE maintains OFDM's three most important benefits low complexity even severe
multipath channels excellent BER performance, close to theoretical bounds; and a
decoupling of ISI from other types of interference, notably spatial interference, which
is very useful when using multiple antenna transmission.
• By utilizing single-carrier transmission, the peak-to-average ratio is also reduced
significantly (by several dB) relative to multicarrier modulation.
SC-FDE System Description
• FDE is used in both OFDM & SC-FDE systems primarily in order to reduce the
complexity inherent to time-domain equalization.
• The black diagrams for OFDM & SC-FDE are compared .
• The only apparent difference between the two systems is that the IFFT is moved to the
end of the receive chain rather than operating at the transmitter, to create a
multicarrier waveform is in OFDM.
Single-Carrier Frequency Domain Equalization (SC-FDE)
An SC-FDE system still utilizes al cyclic prefix at least as long as the channel delay spread,
but now the transmitted signal is simply a sequence of QAM symbols, which have low
PAR, on the order of 4-5 dB depending on the constellation size.
Considering that an unmodulated sine wave has PAR of 3 dB, it is clear that the PAR
cannot be lowered much below that of an SC-FDE system.
Single-Carrier Frequency Domain Equalization (SC-FDE)
just is in OFDM, with the important distinction being that now the frequency domain
version Xm is not precisely the data symbols, but rather the FFT of the data symbols ZI.
Analogously, recall that in OFDM system the transmitted time-domain signal zn WALS not
the actual data symbols, but rather the IFFT of the actual data symbols.
The resulting signal can then be converted back into the time domain using an IFFT
operation to give in x[n], which are estimates of the desired data symbols. Naturally, in
practice H[m ]must be estimated at the receiver using pilot signals or other standard
methods
SC-FDE Performance vs. OFDM
OFDM SC-FDE
In General OFDM is more complex than SC-FDE Relatively less complex than OFDM
It has a lower-complexity receiver It has higher-complexity receiver
It has medium-complexity transmitter It has lower-complexity transmitter
LTE downlink could utilize OFDM LTE uplink could utilize SC-FDE
The Base Station as transmitter would perform 3 IFFT/FFT It perform only a single FFT operation at receiver
operations
The PAR is high in OFDM and high cost and more power It benefits of reduced PAR and the reduced cost and power
requirement. savings.
The channel estimation and synchronization are It include preamble is in the time domain so it is not as
accomplished via a preamble of known data symbols, and straightforward to estimate the frequency domain values.
then pilot tones.
The preamble can be inserted at known positions in all It is not possible to insert pilot tones on a per frame basis.
subsequent OFDM symbols Hence it uses DFT and IFFT at the transmitter
OFDM has a nominally less dispersive spectrum. SC-FDE has a nominally more dispersive spectrum.
OFDM's sharper spectrum results in less co-channel Due to dispersive spectrum results more co-channel
interference and/or Less restrictive RF roll-off requirements. interference and/or more restrictive RF roll-off requirements.
The combination of OFDM with MIMO is a natural and best The combination of SC-FDE with MIMO is not as natural
combination for performance improvement in fading because detection cannot be done in the frequency domain.
channel. Not possible to use maximum likelihood detection for MIMO
with SC-FDE
SC-FDE less popular than OFDM.
On the whole, OFDM continues to be much more popular On the whole, OFDM continues to be much more popular
Design Considerations for SC-FDE and OFDM
• Since the performance difference between SC-FDE and OFDM is not that significant,
other considerations are more important in determining which is the appropriate
method to use for a given application. An obvious difference is that SC-FDE has a lower
complexity transmitter but a higher-complexity receiver, compared to OFDM.
• Since the receiver was already considerably more complex than the transmitter in a
typical OFDM system due to channel estimation, synchronization, and the error
correction decoder, this further skews the symmetry:
• In a cellular system like LTE, this asymmetry can be a favorable feature, since the
uplink could utilize SC-FDE & downlink could utilize OFDM.
• In such a situation, the base station would perform 3 IFFT, FFT operations & mobile,
which is more power- and cost-sensitive, would perform only a single FFT operation
(to receive its OFDM waveform from the base station).
Design Considerations for SC-FDE and OFDM
• Adding in SC-FDE's benefits of reduced PAR & commensurate cost & power savings,
• it appears that the cause for using SC-FDE in the uplink of a wideband data system is
favorable indeed.
• Channel estimation and synchronization are a bit different in practice for an SC FDE
System VS. OFDM system.
• In a typical wireless OFDM System—including LTE, WiMAX, und 802.11a/b/’n
• channel estimation & synchronization are accomplished via a preamble of known data
symbols, & then pilot tones, which are inserted at known positions in all subsequent
OFDM symbols.
• Although SC-FDE systems would include 1 preamble, this perusable is in the time
domain so it is not as straightforward to estimate the frequency domain values H.
• Similarly, it is not possible to insert pilot tones on a per-frame basis.
• As we will see, SC-FDMA Overcomes these potential problems for LTE by using both a
DFT & an IFFT at the transmitter.
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
OFDM - Basics
The subchannel/subcarrier
frequency
fk = kΔf ,
where Δf is the subcarrier
spacing.
Δf = 15 kHz
Each subcarrier is modulated by
a data symbol and an OFDM
symbol is formed by simply
adding the modulated subcarrier
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing ( OFDM )
OFDM - Basics
Multicarrier modulation divides the high rate transit bit stream into L lower rate substreams
Where L is chosen such that each of the subcarrier has effective symbol time
TS L >> TM
TS = symbol time
TM = delay spread ( see slide no-38 of module one)
Schematic - 1 Schematic- 2