AI-Powered Code Review System
Enhancing Code Quality and Developer
Productivity using Artificial Intelligence
STUDENT NAME: Dinesh Kumar E(611722104025)
Indhureka A(611722104042)
Iyandurai V(611722104043)
Jeevitha M(611722104304)
DEPARTMENT: COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
COLLEGE: R P SARATHY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
GUID NAME: Mr. I. Anbumuthu AP/CSE
ACADEMIC YEAR: 2025-2026
INTRODUCTION
•Code quality is essential for reliable, secure, and maintainable software.
•Traditional code reviews are:
•Manual
•Time-consuming
•Dependent on reviewer experience
•With advancements in Artificial Intelligence, code can be:
•Analyzed automatically
•Reviewed consistently
•Improved in real time
•This project proposes an AI-Powered Code Review System that assists developers by analyzing
source code and providing intelligent feedback.
Problem Statement
• Manual code reviews require significant human effort.
• Review quality may vary between reviewers.
• Developers may overlook:
• Logical errors
• Code smells
• Security vulnerabilities
• There is a need for an automated and intelligent system that can:
• Analyze code efficiently
• Provide actionable suggestions
• Improve overall code quality
Objectives
•To design and develop an AI-based code review system.
•To detect:
•Syntax errors
•Logical and semantic issues
•Code style violations
•To suggest best-practice improvements.
•To support multiple programming languages (initially Java).
•To enhance developer productivity and learning.
Literature Survey
• AI in Code Review
• Uses NLP and ML to analyze source code.
• Static Code Analysis Tools
• Effective but rule-based and limited.
• AI-Assisted Code Review Systems
• Provide intelligent feedback and bug detection.
• Research Gap
• Limited explainability and usability in existing systems.
• Need for developer-friendly AI feedback.
Proposed System
•An AI-Powered Code Review System integrated with an IDE or web interface.
•Accepts source code from developers.
•Uses AI/NLP and ML models to analyze code.
•Identifies:
•Errors
•Code smells
•Security vulnerabilities
•Provides real-time suggestions and explanations.
System Architecture
Main Components:
1. Code Input Module
2. Preprocessing Module
3. AI Analysis Module
4. Feedback Generation Module
5. Database Module
Methodology / Workflow
1. Developer submits source code.
2. Code is preprocessed and tokenized.
3. AI model analyzes syntax, logic, and structure.
4. Issues and improvements are identified.
5. Feedback and suggestions are generated.
6. Results are stored for future reference.
Workflow:
Code Input → Preprocessing → AI Analysis → Feedback → Database
Technologies Used
•Programming Language: Python / Java
•AI & ML Models: GPT, CodeBERT, BERT
•NLP Techniques: Tokenization, embeddings
•Static Analysis: AST parsing
•Database: MongoDB / MySQL
•Interface: IDE Plugin / Web Application
Expected Outcomes
•Automated and consistent code reviews.
•Early detection of bugs and vulnerabilities.
•Improved coding standards and best practices.
•Reduced dependency on manual reviewers.
•Learning support for beginner developers.
Project Plan / Timeline
Phase Duration
Requirement Analysis 1 Week
Literature Survey 1 Week
System Design 1 Week
Model Selection & Training 2 Weeks
Implementation 2 Weeks
Testing 1 Week
Documentation 1 Week
Base Papers / References
1. Wang, Y. (2025) – AI-assisted code generation and code review
2. AICodeReview (2024) – AI-based IDE plugin for code analysis
3. Alami & Ernst (2025) – Human-AI interaction in code reviews
4. Umut Cihan et al. (2024) – Industrial adoption of automated code review systems