0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views58 pages

Understanding XML and JSON Structures

The document discusses the structure and usage of XML and JSON as semi-structured data formats. It covers XML's extensibility, self-documenting nature, and its role in data interchange, along with the importance of schemas like DTD and XML Schema for validating XML documents. Additionally, it addresses querying and transformation of XML data using languages like XPath, XSLT, and XQuery.

Uploaded by

lpg pekapontren
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views58 pages

Understanding XML and JSON Structures

The document discusses the structure and usage of XML and JSON as semi-structured data formats. It covers XML's extensibility, self-documenting nature, and its role in data interchange, along with the importance of schemas like DTD and XML Schema for validating XML documents. Additionally, it addresses querying and transformation of XML data using languages like XPath, XSLT, and XQuery.

Uploaded by

lpg pekapontren
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The Shades of Semi-structured Data

• XML - Chapter 30
• JSON
Outline
 Structure of XML Data
 XML Document Schema
 Querying and Transformation
 Application Program Interfaces to XML
 JSON
Introduction

 XML: Extensible Markup Language


 Defined by the WWW Consortium (W3C)
 Derived from SGML (Standard Generalized Markup
Language), but simpler to use than SGML
 Documents have tags giving extra information about
sections of the document
 E.g., <title> XML </title> <slide> Introduction …
</slide>
 Extensible, unlike HTML
 Users can add new tags, and separately specify
how the tag should be handled for display
XML Introduction (Cont.)

 The ability to specify new tags, and to create nested tag structures
make XML a great way to exchange data, not just documents.
 Much of the use of XML has been in data exchange applications,
not as a replacement for HTML
 Tags make data (relatively) self-documenting
 E.g.,
<university>
<department>
<dept_name> Comp. Sci. </dept_name>
<building> Taylor </building>
<budget> 100000 </budget>
</department>
<course>
<course_id> CS-101 </course_id>
<title> Intro. to Computer Science </title>
<dept_name> Comp. Sci </dept_name>
<credits> 4 </credits>
</course>
</university>
XML: Motivation

 Data interchange is critical in today’s networked world


 Examples:
 Banking: funds transfer
 Order processing (especially inter-company orders)
 Scientific data
– Chemistry: ChemML, …
– Genetics: BSML (Bio-Sequence Markup Language),

 Paper flow of information between organizations is being
replaced by electronic flow of information
 Each application area has its own set of standards for
representing information
 XML has become the basis for all new generation data
interchange formats
XML Motivation (Cont.)

 Earlier generation formats were based on plain text with line headers
indicating the meaning of fields
 Similar in concept to email headers
 Does not allow for nested structures, no standard “type” language
 Tied too closely to low level document structure (lines, spaces, etc)
 Each XML based standard defines what are valid elements, using
 XML type specification languages to specify the syntax
 DTD (Document Type Descriptors)
 XML Schema
 Plus textual descriptions of the semantics
 XML allows new tags to be defined as required
 However, this may be constrained by DTDs
 A wide variety of tools is available for parsing, browsing and querying
XML documents/data
Comparison with Relational Data

 Inefficient: tags, which in effect represent schema


information, are repeated
 Better than relational tuples as a data-exchange
format
 Unlike relational tuples, XML data is self-
documenting due to presence of tags
 Non-rigid format: tags can be added
 Allows nested structures
 Wide acceptance, not only in database systems,
but also in browsers, tools, and applications
Structure of XML Data

 Tag: label for a section of data


 Element: section of data beginning with <tagname>
and ending with matching </tagname>
 Elements must be properly nested
 Proper nesting
 <course> … <title> …. </title> </course>
 Improper nesting
 <course> … <title> …. </course> </title>
 Formally: every start tag must have a unique
matching end tag, that is in the context of the same
parent element.
 Every document must have a single top-level element
Example of Nested Elements
<purchase_order>
<identifier> P-101 </identifier>
<purchaser> …. </purchaser>
<itemlist>
<item>
<identifier> RS1 </identifier>
<description> Atom powered rocket sled </description>
<quantity> 2 </quantity>
<price> 199.95 </price>
</item>
<item>
<identifier> SG2 </identifier>
<description> Superb glue </description>
<quantity> 1 </quantity>
<unit-of-measure> liter </unit-of-measure>
<price> 29.95 </price>
</item>
</itemlist>
</purchase_order>
Motivation for Nesting

 Nesting of data is useful in data transfer


 Example: elements representing item nested within an
itemlist element
 Nesting is not supported, or discouraged, in relational
databases
 With multiple orders, customer name and address are
stored redundantly
 Normalization replaces nested structures in each order by
foreign key into table storing customer name and address
information
 But nesting is appropriate when transferring data
 External application does not have direct access to data
referenced by a foreign key
Structure of XML Data (Cont.)

 Mixture of text with sub-elements is legal in XML.


• Example:
<course>
This course is being offered for the first time in 2009.
<course id> BIO-399 </course id>
<title> Computational Biology </title>
<dept name> Biology </dept name>
<credits> 3 </credits>
</course>
• Useful for document markup, but discouraged for data
representation
Attributes

 Elements can have attributes


<course course_id= “CS-101”>
<title> Intro. to Computer Science</title>
<dept name> Comp. Sci. </dept name>
<credits> 4 </credits>
</course>
 Attributes are specified by name=value pairs inside the
starting tag of an element
 An element may have several attributes, but each attribute
name can only occur once
<course course_id = “CS-101” credits=“4”>
Attributes vs. Subelements

 Distinction between subelement and attribute


 In the context of documents, attributes are part of markup,
while subelement contents are part of the basic document
contents
 In the context of data representation, the difference is
unclear and may be confusing
 Same information can be represented in two ways
– <course course_id= “CS-101”> … </course>
– <course>
<course_id>CS-101</course_id> …
</course>
 Suggestion: use attributes for identifiers of elements, and
use subelements for contents
More on XML Syntax

 Elements without subelements or text content can be


abbreviated by ending the start tag with a /> and deleting
the end tag
 <course course_id=“CS-101” Title=“Intro. To Computer
Science”
dept_name = “Comp. Sci.” credits=“4” />
 To store string data that may contain tags, without the
tags being interpreted as subelements, use CDATA as
below
 <![CDATA[<course> … </course>]]>
Here, <course> and </course> are treated as just strings
CDATA stands for “character data”
XML Document Schema

 Database schemas constrain what information can be stored,


and the data types of stored values
 XML documents are not required to have an associated
schema
 However, schemas are very important for XML data exchange
 Otherwise, a site cannot automatically interpret data
received from another site
 Two mechanisms for specifying XML schema
 Document Type Definition (DTD)
 Widely used
 XML Schema
 Newer, increasing use
Document Type Definition (DTD)

 The type of an XML document can be specified using a DTD


 DTD constraints structure of XML data
 What elements can occur
 What attributes can/must an element have
 What subelements can/must occur inside each element,
and how many times.
 DTD does not constrain data types
 All values represented as strings in XML
 DTD syntax
 <!ELEMENT element (subelements-specification) >
 <!ATTLIST element (attributes) >
Element Specification in DTD

 Subelements can be specified as


 names of elements, or
 #PCDATA (parsed character data), i.e., character strings
 EMPTY (no subelements) or ANY (anything can be a subelement)
 Example
<! ELEMENT department (dept_name building, budget)>
<! ELEMENT dept_name (#PCDATA)>
<! ELEMENT budget (#PCDATA)>
 Subelement specification may have regular expressions
<!ELEMENT university ( ( department | course | instructor | teaches )
+)>
 Notation:
– “|” - alternatives
– “+” - 1 or more occurrences
– “*” - 0 or more occurrences
University DTD

<!DOCTYPE university [
<!ELEMENT university ( (department|course|instructor|teaches)+)>
<!ELEMENT department ( dept name, building, budget)>
<!ELEMENT course ( course id, title, dept name, credits)>
<!ELEMENT instructor (IID, name, dept name, salary)>
<!ELEMENT teaches (IID, course id)>
<!ELEMENT dept name( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT building( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT budget( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT course id ( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT title ( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT credits( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT IID( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT name( #PCDATA )>
<!ELEMENT salary( #PCDATA )>
]>
Attribute Specification in DTD
 Attribute specification : for each attribute
• Name
• Type of attribute
 CDATA
 ID (identifier) or IDREF (ID reference) or IDREFS (multiple
IDREFs)
– more on this later
• Whether
 mandatory (#REQUIRED)
 has a default value (value),
 or neither (#IMPLIED)
 Examples
• <!ATTLIST course course_id CDATA #REQUIRED>, or
• <!ATTLIST course
course_id ID #REQUIRED
dept_name IDREF #REQUIRED
instructors IDREFS #IMPLIED >
IDs and IDREFs

 An element can have at most one attribute of type ID


 The ID attribute value of each element in an XML
document must be distinct
 Thus the ID attribute value is an object identifier
 An attribute of type IDREF must contain the ID value
of an element in the same document
 An attribute of type IDREFS contains a set of (0 or
more) ID values. Each ID value must contain the ID
value of an element in the same document
University DTD with Attributes

 University DTD with ID and IDREF attribute types.


<!DOCTYPE university-3 [
<!ELEMENT university ( (department|course|instructor)+)>
<!ELEMENT department ( building, budget )>
<!ATTLIST department
dept_name ID #REQUIRED >
<!ELEMENT course (title, credits )>
<!ATTLIST course
course_id ID #REQUIRED
dept_name IDREF #REQUIRED
instructors IDREFS #IMPLIED >
<!ELEMENT instructor ( name, salary )>
<!ATTLIST instructor
IID ID #REQUIRED
dept_name IDREF #REQUIRED >
· · · declarations for title, credits, building,
budget, name and salary · · ·
]>
XML data with ID and IDREF attributes
<university-3>
<department dept name=“Comp. Sci.”>
<building> Taylor </building>
<budget> 100000 </budget>
</department>
<department dept name=“Biology”>
<building> Watson </building>
<budget> 90000 </budget>
</department>
<course course id=“CS-101” dept name=“Comp. Sci”
instructors=“10101 83821”>
<title> Intro. to Computer Science </title>
<credits> 4 </credits>
</course>
….
<instructor IID=“10101” dept name=“Comp. Sci.”>
<name> Srinivasan </name>
<salary> 65000 </salary>
</instructor>
….
</university-3>
Limitations of DTDs

 No typing of text elements and attributes


 All values are strings, no integers, reals, etc.
 Difficult to specify unordered sets of subelements
 Order is usually irrelevant in databases (unlike in the
document-layout environment from which XML evolved)
 (A | B)* allows specification of an unordered set, but
 Cannot ensure that each of A and B occurs only once
 IDs and IDREFs are untyped
 The instructors attribute of an course may contain a
reference to another course, which is meaningless
 instructors attribute should ideally be constrained to refer
to instructor elements
XML Schema
 XML Schema is a more sophisticated schema language which addresses
the drawbacks of DTDs. Supports
 Typing of values
 E.g., integer, string, etc
 Also, constraints on min/max values
 User-defined, comlex types
 Many more features, including
 uniqueness and foreign key constraints, inheritance
 XML Schema is itself specified in XML syntax, unlike DTDs
 More-standard representation, but verbose
 XML Scheme is integrated with namespaces
 BUT: XML Schema is significantly more complicated than DTDs.
Querying and Transforming XML Data

 Translation of information from one XML schema to another


 Querying on XML data
 Above two are closely related, and handled by the same tools
 Standard XML querying/translation languages
 XPath
 Simple language consisting of path expressions
 XSLT
 Simple language designed for translation from XML to
XML and XML to HTML
 XQuery
 An XML query language with a rich set of features
Tree Model of XML Data

 Query and transformation languages are based on a tree


model of XML data
 An XML document is modeled as a tree, with nodes
corresponding to elements and attributes
 Element nodes have child nodes, which can be attributes or
subelements
 Text in an element is modeled as a text node child of the
element
 Children of a node are ordered according to their order in
the XML document
 Element and attribute nodes (except for the root node) have
a single parent, which is an element node
 The root node has a single child, which is the root element
of the document
XQuery

 XQuery is a general purpose query language for XML data


 Currently being standardized by the World Wide Web
Consortium (W3C)
 XQuery is derived from the Quilt query language, which itself
borrows from SQL, XQL and XML-QL
 XQuery uses a
for … let … where … order by …result …
syntax
for  SQL from
where  SQL where
order by  SQL order by
result  SQL select
let allows temporary variables, and has no equivalent in
SQL
FLWOR Syntax in XQuery

 For clause uses XPath expressions, and variable in for clause ranges over
values in the set returned by XPath
 Simple FLWOR expression in XQuery
• find all courses with credits > 3, with each result enclosed in an
<course_id> .. </course_id> tag
for $x in /university-3/course
let $courseId := $x/@course_id
where $x/credits > 3
return <course_id> { $courseId } </course id>
• Items in the return clause are XML text unless enclosed in {}, in which
case they are evaluated
 Let clause not really needed in this query. Query can be written as:
for $x in /university-3/course[credits > 3]
return <course_id> { $x/@course_id } </course_id>
 Alternative notation for constructing elements:
return element course_id { element $x/@course_id }
Joins

 Joins are specified in a manner very similar to SQL


for $c in /university/course,
$i in /university/instructor,
$t in /university/teaches
where $c/course_id= $t/course id and $t/IID = $i/IID
return <course_instructor> { $c $i } </course_instructor>
XSLT
 A stylesheet stores formatting options for a document, usually separately
from document
 E.g. an HTML style sheet may specify font colors and sizes for
headings, etc.
 The XML Stylesheet Language (XSL) was originally designed for
generating HTML from XML
 XSLT is a general-purpose transformation language
 Can translate XML to XML, and XML to HTML
 XSLT transformations are expressed using rules called templates
 Templates combine selection using XPath with construction of results
Application Program Interface

 There are two standard application program interfaces to XML data:


 SAX (Simple API for XML)
 Based on parser model, user provides event handlers for parsing
events
– E.g., start of element, end of element
 DOM (Document Object Model)
 XML data is parsed into a tree representation
 Variety of functions provided for traversing the DOM tree
 E.g.: Java DOM API provides Node class with methods
getParentNode( ), getFirstChild( ), getNextSibling( )
getAttribute( ), getData( ) (for text node)
getElementsByTagName( ), …
 Also provides functions for updating DOM tree
Storage of XML in Relational Databases
 Alternatives:
 String Representation
 Tree Representation
 Map to relations
JSON
Data Interchange

 The key idea in Ajax.

 An alternative to page replacement.

 Applications delivered as pages.

 How should the data be delivered?


JSON

 A Subset of ECMA-262 Third Edition.

 Language Independent.

 Text-based.

 Light-weight.

 Easy to parse.
JSON Is Not...

 JSON is not a document format.


 JSON is not a markup language.
 JSON is not a general serialization format.
 No cyclical/recurring structures.
 No invisible structures.
 No functions.
Values

 Strings
 Numbers
 Booleans

 Objects
 Arrays

 null
Value

value

string

number

objec t

array

true

false

null
Strings

 Sequence of 0 or more Unicode characters


 No separate character type
 A character is represented as a string with a
length of 1
 Wrapped in "double quotes"
 Backslash escapement
String

string
Any UNICODE c harac ter exc ept
" "
" or \ or c ontrol c harac ter

quotation mark
\ "
reverse solidus
\
solidus
/
bac kspac e
b
formfeed
f
new line
n
c arriage return
r
horizontal tab
t

u 4 hexadec imal digits


Numbers

 Integer
 Real
 Scientific

 No octal or hex
 No NaN or Infinity
 Use null instead
Number

number

0 . digit

-
digit
e
1 - 9
digit E
+
digit
-
Booleans

 true
 false
null

 A value that isn't anything


Object

 Objects are unordered containers of key/value pairs


 Objects are wrapped in { }
 , separates key/value pairs
 : separates keys and values
 Keys are strings
 Values are JSON values

 struct, record, hashtable, object


Object

objec t

{ string : value }

,
Object

{"name":"Jack B. Nimble","at large":


true,"grade":"A","level":3, "format":
{"type":"rect","width":1920,
"height":1080,"interlace":false,
"framerate":24}}
Object

{
"name": "Jack B. Nimble",
"at large": true,
"grade": "A",
"format": {
"type": "rect",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080,
"interlace": false,
"framerate": 24
}
}
Array

 Arrays are ordered sequences of values


 Arrays are wrapped in []
 , separates values
 JSON does not talk about indexing.
 An implementation can start array indexing at 0 or
1.
Array

array

[ value ]

,
Array

["Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday",


"Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday",
"Saturday"]

[
 [0, -1, 0],
 [1, 0, 0],
 [0, 0, 1]
]
Arrays vs Objects

 Use objects when the key names are arbitrary


strings.

 Use arrays when the key names are sequential


integers.

 Don't get confused by the term Associative Array.


JSON in Ajax

 HTML Delivery.

 JSON data is built into the page.


 <html>...
 <script>
 var data = { ... JSONdata ... };
 </script>...
 </html>
JSON in Ajax

 XMLHttpRequest
 Obtain responseText
 Parse the responseText

 responseData = eval(
 '(' + responseText + ')');

 responseData =
 [Link]();
Arguments against JSON

 JSON Doesn't Have Namespaces.

 JSON Has No Validator.

 JSON Is Not Extensible.

 JSON Is Not XML.


JSON Is Not XML

 objects • element
 arrays
• attribute
 strings
• attribute string
 numbers
 booleans • content
 null • <![CDATA[ ]]>
• entities
• declarations
• schema
• stylesheets
• comments
• version
• namespace
Data Interchange

 JSON is a simple, common representation of data.

 Communication between servers and browser


clients.

 Communication between peers.

 Language independent data interchange.


End of Chapter 30

You might also like