0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views21 pages

Speech and Censorship in Cyberspace

Chapter 3 discusses various aspects of speech in cyberspace, including communication paradigms, internet censorship laws, and the implications of anonymity. It highlights the balance between regulating offensive content and protecting free speech, as well as the challenges posed by spam and the debate over net neutrality. The chapter also addresses the responsibilities of web operators regarding sensitive material and the ethical considerations of search engine results.

Uploaded by

bugs20065
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views21 pages

Speech and Censorship in Cyberspace

Chapter 3 discusses various aspects of speech in cyberspace, including communication paradigms, internet censorship laws, and the implications of anonymity. It highlights the balance between regulating offensive content and protecting free speech, as well as the challenges posed by spam and the debate over net neutrality. The chapter also addresses the responsibilities of web operators regarding sensitive material and the ethical considerations of search engine results.

Uploaded by

bugs20065
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 3:

Speech in Cyberspace
1. Communication Paradigms
2. Speech In the Cyberspace
3. Posting, Selling, Leaking Sensitive Materials
4. Anonymity
5. Net Neutrality Regulations or the Market?
3.1 Communication Paradigms

 Internet Speech Principles


 It can be written for offensive and/or controversial speech and ideas
 Moreover, speech covers spoken and written words, pictures, art, and other
forms of expression of ideas and opinions
 Speech can be limited for the following examples:
 Publishers do not have to publish material they consider offensive, poorly
written, or unlikely to appeal to their customers for any reason.
 Rejection or editing by a publisher is not a violation of the writer’s First
Amendment rights. Web sites, search engine companies, and magazines
may decline specific advertisements if they so choose. That does not violate
the advertiser’s freedom of speech.

Corresponding page number: 137-138


3.1 Communication Paradigms

• Protection and government regulation in KSA


• Governments place regulation to govern all types of media
• In Saudi Arabia, there is the General Commission For
Audiovisual Media
• The aim of the system is to regulate audiovisual media
activity within the Kingdom, to develop it, to provide an
appropriate investment environment for it, and to ensure
that its content is consistent with the Kingdom's media
policy.
• Link: [Link]
3
Communication Paradigms

Communications Decency Act of 1996


 First major Internet censorship law

Corresponding page number: 137


Controlling Speech

Offensive speech: What is it? What is illegal?


 Answers depend on who you are.
 Most efforts to censor the Internet focus on pornographic and
other sexually explicit material

Corresponding page number: 139


Controlling Speech

Internet Censorship Laws & Alternatives


 Child Online Protection Act of 1998 (COPA)
 More limited than CDA
 Federal crime for commercial Web sites to make
available to minors material “harmful to minors”
as judged by community standards

Corresponding page number: 142


Controlling Speech

Internet Censorship Laws & Alternatives


 Children's Internet Protection Act of 2000 (CIPA)
 Requires schools and libraries that participate in certain
federal programs to install filtering software

Corresponding page number: 142-143


3.2 Speech in Cyberspace
 Video Games
A California law banned sale or rental of
violent video games to minors but in 2011, it
ruled out.
What are the regulations of video games in
Saudi Arabia?

Corresponding page number: 143-144


3.2 Speech in Cyberspace

 Alternatives to censorship
 Filters
 Blocks sites with specific words, phrases or images
 Parental control for violence
 Updated frequently but may still screen out too much or too
little
 Not possible to eliminate all errors

Corresponding page number: 145


3.2 Speech in Cyberspace

 Alternatives to censorship
 Policies
 Commercial services, online communities, and social
networking sites develop policies to protect members.
 Video game industry developed rating system that
provides an indication for parents.

Corresponding page number: 145


3.2 Speech in Cyberspace

• Spam
• Defined as the “unsolicited bulk email” (Baase, 2012).
• Now applies to text messages, tweets, and phone calls as
well.
• Spam has infuriated users of the Internet since the 1990s.
Most, but not all, spam is commercial advertising.
• Some businesses and organizations compile or buy huge lists
of email addresses and send their unsolicited messages.
11
3.2 Speech in Cyberspace
 Spam
 What’s the problem?
 Loosely described as unsolicited bulk email
 Mostly commercial advertisement
 Angers people because of content and the way
it’s sent
 Should they be banned legally?
 Spam imposes a cost on recipients
 Spam filters do not violate the sender rights

Corresponding page number: 148-149


3.2 Speech in Cyberspace

 Anti-spam Laws
• Businesses and programmers created a variety of filtering
products to screen out spam at the recipient’s site, by
blocking email from specified addresses, by blocking
messages with particular words, and by more sophisticated
methods.
• The impact of antispam laws and decisions about their
constitutionality can be quite significant. A man convicted for
spamming in Virginia was sentenced to nine years in jail.
Virginia’s law prohibited anonymous, unsolicited, bulk email.
13
Controlling Speech

 Anti-spam Laws
 Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and
Marketing Act (CAN-SPAM Act)
 Targets commercial spam
 Criticized for not banning all spam

Corresponding page number: 151


3.3 Posting, Selling, and Leaking Sensitive Material

• A Web site with risks


• Do search engine providers have a social or ethical
obligation to provide complete search results to all
queries, or do they have a social or ethical obligation to
omit very dangerous sites from search results?

15
3.3 Posting, Selling, and Leaking Sensitive Material

• Leaks
• Type of material
• Value to society
• Risks to society and individuals
• Responsibilities of operators of Web sites for leaks

16
3.4 Anonymity

• Negative uses of anonymity


• Protects criminal and antisocial activities
• Aids fraud, harassment, extortion, theft, and copyright
infringement

17
3.6 Net Neutrality Regulations or the Market?

• Refers to a variety of proposals on how telephone


and cable companies interact with their broadband
customers and set fees for services.
1. Whether the companies that provide the communications
networks should be permitted to exclude or give different
treatment to content based on the content itself.
2. Whether the companies that provide the communications
networks should be permitted to offer content providers
and individual subscribers different levels of speed and
priority at different price levels, this is known as “tiered” 18
service.
3.6 Net Neutrality Regulations or the Market?

A. Net Neutrality
• Argue for equal treatment of all customers.
• Equal treatment includes charging all customers the same rate for
sending information over the Internet and not giving priority to any
particular content or customer.
• Many Internet content providers and large companies such as eBay,
Microsoft, Amazon, Netflix, and Google, argue for net-neutrality rules.
B. Market
• Flexibility and market incentives will benefit customers.
• Charging different rates for products and services is not unusual and
makes economic sense in many areas.
19
Net Neutrality Regulations or the
Market?
Discussion Questions
 Should companies be permitted to exclude or give
special treatment to content transmitted based on
the content itself or on the company that provides it?
 Should companies be permitted to provide different
levels of speed at different prices?

Corresponding page number: 169-171


Reference List

• Sara Baase. A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical


Issues for Computing and the Internet, 4th Edition,
2012, Pearson.
• Sara Baase and Timothy M. Henry. A Gift of Fire:
Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing and
the Internet, 5th Edition, 2018, Pearson.

21

You might also like