0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views32 pages

Data Collection Methods and Tools

Community dentistry data collection lecture daly book

Uploaded by

kasmazamir18
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views32 pages

Data Collection Methods and Tools

Community dentistry data collection lecture daly book

Uploaded by

kasmazamir18
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

By:

Dr. Sohail Saadat


Assistant Professor, Incharge
DIKIOHS-DUHS
 Understand and appreciate data and
data collection methods
 Have knowledge of different data
collection tools
 Construct a questionnaire
 Execute data collection
 Data is existing information
/knowledge represented or coded
in some form suitable for better
usage or processing.

 Data is a set of values of qualitative


or quantitative variables.
 The task of data collection begins
after a research problem has been
defined and research design/plan
chalked out (Protocol).

 The aims, study design and selected


population or sample will provide
information on both the type of data
and the frequency with which they
need to be collected
 What is to be measured?

 The principle aim of data collection is


to ensure data should be Valid ,
Reliable and unbiased.
 Valid means that the
data measure
something that truly
exists accurately

 Reliable means if
measurements are
taken at different
occasion the same
answer is obtained
Training and calibration of examiners
and recorders in the measures and
criteria is necessary:

 assessments of the same observer at


different times - INTRA-OBSERVER
RELIABILITY
 assessments of different observers
at the same time - INTER-OBSERVER
RELIABILITY
 Unbiased: neither the
subject nor the examiner
influences the finding
 Single blind Study:
subjects do not know
whether they are in the
treatment group or not.
 Double blind study:
Neither the subject nor
the Researcher are
aware.
 Systematically collect data from files,
documents, or real life (observation in the
field)
 A form that specifies exactly what data you
want to collect
 Example : WHO oral examination form
 An instrument (form) to
 collect answers to questions
 collect factual data
 gathers information or measures
 A series of written questions/items in a
fixed, rational order
A well designed questionnaire:
 Provides accurate and relevant information to your
research question
 Minimises potential sources of bias
 Will more likely be completed

It should be as simple and focused as possible


 Can reach a large number of people relatively
easily and economically
 Provide quantifiable answers
 Relatively easy to analyse
 Provides only limited insight into
problem
 Limitedresponse allowed by questions
 May be not the right questions are asked
 Varying response
 Misunderstanding/misinterpretation
 Need to get it right first time
 Hard to chase after missing data
Face to face By post
Telephone E-mail/Internet
Interviewer Self
-administrated -administrated
Postal Personal Phone Internet
questionnaire interview interview questionnair
e
Cost Low High Moderate Low
Data quality:
Response rate Low High Moderate Low
Respondent Low High High Low
motivation
Interviewer bias None Moderate Low None
Sample quality: Low, unless High Moderate Moderate,
high response to high, but
rate especially improving as
with internet
random access
digit dialling widens

Possible Short Very long Long Short


interview length:
Postal Personal Phone Internet
questionnair Interview interview questionnair
e e
Ability to None High High None
clarify and
probe
Anonymity High Low Low Low
Dependence High None None High
on
respondent’s
literacy:
Control of None High High Depends
context
depends
and question
order:
 Advantages:
 Cheap and easy to administer
 Preserves confidentiality
 Completed at respondent's convenience
 No influence by interviewer/researcher
 Disadvantages:
 Low response rate
 Questions can be misunderstood
 No control by interviewer
 Time and resouces loss
 Advantages:
 Participation by illiterate people
 Clarification of ambiguity
 Quick answers
 Disadvantages:
 Interviewer bias
 Needs more resources
 Only short questionnaires possible
 Especially on telephone
 Difficult for sensitive issues
Design questions:
 Content of the questions

 Format of the questions

 Presentation and layout

 Pilot and refine questionnaire


 On first page
 Return address
 Study title in bold
 On all pages
 Numbered items
 Page numbers
 Directions in bold
 Self-addressed envelope!!
 Decide on order of items/questions
 Easy  difficult
 General  particular

 Where to place sensitive questions?


 Group questions by topic/ response options
 Starting questions
 Simple
 Relevant to main subject
 Non-offending
 Neither demographic nor personal questions

 Don’t put most important item last


 Covering letter/ interview introduction
 Who you are/ you work for
 Why you are investigating
 Where you obtained the respondent’s name
 How and where you can be contacted
 Guarantee of confidentiality
 Length of interview (be honest)

Uusefulness of study should be clear


to all respondents
 Ask for one information at a time
Do you own a dog or have frequent contacts
with dogs?
Yes 
No 
Do you often touch dogs?
Yes 
No 

vs.

How often did you touch a dog during the


past 3 months?
Once 
Twice 
Three times or more 
Not at all 
Don´t know 
Are you a drunk?
Yes 
No 

vs.

How often have you consumed alcoholic


beverages during the past 6 months?
Daily 
2-6 times/week 
Once a week 
Less than once a week 
Don´t know 
Did you smoke not less than a mean
amount
of 7 cigarettes/2 days from 2003 onwards?
Yes 
No 

vs.

Did you smoke an average of 2 pack of


cigarettes/week for the last 5 years?
Yes 
No 
Don´t know 
 The data must be relevant to the
research problem.
 It should be collected through formal or
standardized research tools.
 The data should be such as these can
be subjected to statistical treatment
easily.
 The data should be accurate and
precise.
 The data should be reliable and valid
 The data should be complete in itself
and also comprehensive in nature.
THANK YOU

You might also like