Because learning changes everything.
Chapter 4
Process Costing and
Hybrid Product-Costing
Systems
Twelfth Edition
© 2020 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom.
No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objective 4-1 – List and explain the similarities
and important differences between job-order and
process costing.
© McGraw Hill 2
Comparison of Job-Order Costing and Process Costing 1
Process Job-Order
Costing Costing
Used for production of small,
identical, low-cost items.
Mass produced in automated
continuous production processes.
Costs cannot be directly traced to
each unit of product.
© McGraw Hill 3
Comparison of Job-Order Costing and Process Costing 2
Process Job-Order
Costing Costing
Typical process cost applications:
• Petrochemical refinery
• Paint manufacturer
• Paper mill
© McGraw Hill 4
Job-Order Costing vs. Process Costing
Job-order costing Process costing
• Costs accumulated by the • Costs accumulated by
job. department or process.
• Work in process has a • Work in process has a
job-cost sheet for each production report for each
job. batch of products.
• Many unique, high-cost • A few identical, low-cost
jobs. products.
• Jobs built to customer • Units continuously
order. produced for inventory in
automated process.
© McGraw Hill 5
Differences Between Process and Job-Order Costing 1
The work-in-process
account consists of
individual jobs in a
job-order cost system.
Direct Material
Finished
Direct Labor Jobs
Goods
Manufacturing Cost of
Overhead Goods
Sold
© McGraw Hill 6
Differences Between Process and Job-Order Costing 2
The work-in-process
account consists of
individual products in a
process-cost system.
Direct Material
Direct Labor
& Overhead Finished
Products
(Conversion) Goods
When direct labor is a relatively small amount Cost of
compared to material and overhead, it is often Goods
combined with overhead. Sold
© McGraw Hill 7
Learning Objective 4-2 – Prepare journal entries to
record the flow of costs in a process-costing system
with sequential production departments.
© McGraw Hill 8
Process Cost Flows – Single Department
Access the text alternative for slide images.
© McGraw Hill 9
Journal Entry Direct Material, Direct Labor, and
Overhead Applied
Work-in-Process Inventory: Production Department A ............................. 100,000
Raw-Material Inventory .................................................................... 50,000
Wages Payable ............................................................................... 20,000
Manufacturing Overhead ................................................................. 30,000
© McGraw Hill 10
Process Cost Flows –Two Departments
Access the text alternative for slide images.
© McGraw Hill 11
Journal Entry Dept. B – Transferred In Costs
Work-in-Process Inventory: Production Department B ............................ 80,000
Work-in-Process Inventory: Production Department A …………… 80,000
© McGraw Hill 12
Journal Entry Dept. B – Direct Material, Direct Labor, and
Manufacturing Overhead
Work-in-Process Inventory: Production Department B ............................ 75,000
Raw-Material Inventory .................................................................... 40,000
Wages Payable ............................................................................... 15,000
Manufacturing Overhead ................................................................. 20,000
© McGraw Hill 13
Journal Entry Goods Completed
Finished-Goods Inventory ....................................................................... 130,000
Work-in-Process Inventory: Production Department B .................... 130,000
© McGraw Hill 14
Journal Entry Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of Goods Sold ................................................................................. 125,000
Finished-Goods Inventory ............................................................... 125,000
© McGraw Hill 15
Learning Objective 4-3 – Prepare a table of equivalent
units under weighted-average process costing.
© McGraw Hill 16
Equivalent Units: A Key Concept
By definition, units in work-in-process inventory at both the
beginning and end of the period are only partially complete
(finished units are transferred out).
Equivalent units is a concept expressing these partially
completed units.
Equivalent units refers to the amount of manufacturing
activity that has been applied to a batch of physical units.
© McGraw Hill 17
Equivalent Units Example
Two half completed products are
equivalent to one completed product.
So, 10,000 units that are 70% complete
are equivalent to 7,000 complete units.
© McGraw Hill 18
Equivalent Units Question 1
For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and
completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process
30% complete. How many equivalent units of production
did Jones have for the period?
a. 10,000
b. 11,500
c. 13,500
d. 15,000
© McGraw Hill 19
Equivalent Units Question 1 (Solved)
For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and
completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30
percent complete. How many equivalent units of
production did Jones have for the period?
a. 10,000
10,000 units + (5,000 units × .30)
b. 11,500
c. 13,500 = 11,500 equivalent units
d. 15,000
© McGraw Hill 20
Equivalent Units Question 2
Jones incurred $27,600 in production costs for the
11,500 equivalent units. What was Jones’s cost per
equivalent unit for the period?
a. $1.84
b. $2.76
c. $2.40
d. $2.90
© McGraw Hill 21
Equivalent Units Question 2 (Solved)
Jones incurred $27,600 in production costs for the
11,500 equivalent units. What was Jones’s cost per
equivalent unit for the period?
a. $1.84
b. $2.76
$27,600 ÷ 11,500 equivalent units
c. $2.40
= $2.40 per equivalent unit
d. $2.90
© McGraw Hill 22
Calculating and Using Equivalent Units of Production
To calculate the direct materials and conversion costs per
equivalent unit for the period:
Materials
Materials cost for the period
cost per
equivalent unit Materials equivalent units for the period
Conversion
Conversion cost for the period
cost per
equivalent unit Conversion equivalent units for the period
© McGraw Hill 23
Departmental Production Report 1
Analysis of Calculation
physical flow of equivalent
of units units
Production
Report
Computation Analysis of
of unit costs total costs
© McGraw Hill 24
Equivalent Units of Production – Weighted-Average
Method
The weighted-average method . . .
• Makes no distinction between work done in the prior
period and work done in the current period.
• Blends together units and costs from the prior period and
the current period.
• The FIFO method is a more complex method and is rarely
used in practice.
© McGraw Hill 25
Production Report Example 1
MVP Sports Equipment Company makes baseball gloves in
two departments, Cutting and Stitching.
MVP uses the weighted-average process costing.
Material is added at the beginning of the Cutting Department,
while conversion is incurred uniformly throughout the
process.
Using the following information for the month of March, let’s
prepare a production report for the Cutting Department.
© McGraw Hill 26
Production Report Example 2
Work in process, March 1: 20,000 Units Cost
Materials: 100% complete $ 50,000
Conversion: 10% complete 7,200
Units started into production in March: 30,000 Units
Units completed and transferred out in March: 40,000 Units
Work in process, March 31: 10,000 Units
Materials 100% complete
Conversion 50% complete
Costs incurred during March
Materials cost 90,000
Conversion costs:
Direct labor $ 86,000
Applied manufacturing overhead 107,500
Total conversion costs 193,500
Total costs to account for $ 340,700
© McGraw Hill 27
Production Report Example – Units Accounted For
1) Analysis of Physical Flow of Units
Physical Units
Work in process, March 1 20,000
Units started during March 30,000
Total units to account for 50,000
Units completed and transferred out during March 40,000
Work in process, March 31 10,000
Total units accounted for 50,000
© McGraw Hill 28
Production Report Example – Equivalent Units 1
2) Calculation of Equivalent Units
Equivalent Equivalent
Units Units
Percentage of
Completion
Physical with Respect to Direct
Units Conversion Material Conversion
Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%
Units started during March 30,000
Total units to account for 50,000 50% of 10,000 units
Units completed and transferred 40,000 100% 40,000 40,000
Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000
Total units accounted for 50,000
Total equivalent units 50,000 45,000
Beginning inventory % is not used in weighted-average method.
© McGraw Hill 29
Production Report Example - Equivalent Units 2
Equivalent Equivalent
Units Units
Percentage of
Completion
Physical with Respect to Direct
Units Conversion Material Conversion
Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%
Units started during March 30,000
100% of 10,000 units, all
Total units to account for 50,000
material added at beginning
Units completed and transferred 40,000 100% 40,000 40,000
Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000
Total units accounted for 50,000
Total equivalent units 50,000 45,000
© McGraw Hill 30
Learning Objective 4-4 – Compute the cost per
equivalent unit under the weighted-average method of
process costing.
© McGraw Hill 31
Computation of Unit Costs
Direct Material Conversion Total
Work in Process, March 1 $ 50,000 $ 7,200 $ 57,200
Costs incurred during March 90,000 193,500 283,500
Total costs to account for $140,000 $200,700 $340,700
Equivalent units 50,000 45,000
Costs per equivalent unit $ 2.80 $ 4.46 $ 7.26
$140,000 ÷ 50,000 equivalent units
$2.80 + $4.46
$200,700 ÷ 45,000 equivalent units
© McGraw Hill 32
Learning Objective 4-5 – Analyze the total production
costs for a department under the weighted-average
method of process costing.
© McGraw Hill 33
Production Report Example – Total Costs 1
Analysis of total costs
Cost of goods completed and transferred during March
40,000 units × $7.26 per equivalent unit
$290,400
Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31
Direct Material:
10,000 equivalent units × $2.80 per equivalent unit $ 28,000
Conversion:
5,000 equivalent units × $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300
Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 50,300
Total costs accounted for $ 340,700
© McGraw Hill 34
Production Report Example – Total Costs 2
Analysis of total costs
Cost of goods completed and transferred during March
40,000 units × $7.26 per equivalent unit
$290,400
Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31
Direct Material:
10,000 equivalent units × $2.80 per equivalent unit $ 28,000
Conversion:
5,000 equivalent units × $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300
Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 50,300
Total costs accounted for $ 340,700
© McGraw Hill 35
Production Report Example – Costs Accounted For
Analysis of total costs
Cost of goods completed and transferred during March
40,000 units × $7.26 per equivalent unit
$290,400
Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31
Direct Material:
10,000 equivalent units × $2.80 per equivalent unit $ 28,000
Conversion:
5,000 equivalent units × $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300
Total cost of March 31 work-in-process All costs 50,300
Total costs accounted for accounted for $ 340,700
© McGraw Hill 36
Learning Objective 4-6 – Prepare a departmental
production report under weighted-average process
costing.
© McGraw Hill 37
MVP Sports Equipment Report Example
MVP SPORTS EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Production Report: Cutting Department
Equivalent Units Equivalent Units
Physical Percentage of Completion
Units with Respect to Conversion Direct Material Material
Work in process, March 1 20,000 10%
Units started during March 30,000
Total units to account for 50,000
Units completed and transferred 40,000 100% 40,000 40,000
Work in process, March 31 10,000 50% 10,000 5,000
Total units accounted for 50,000
Total equivalent units 50,000 45,000
Direct Material Conversion Total
Work in Process, March 1 $ 50,000 $ 7,200 $ 57,200
Costs incurred during March 90,000 193,500 283,500
Total costs to account for $ 140,000 $ 200,700 $340,700
Equivalent units 50,000 45,000
Cost per equivalent unit $ 2.80 $ 4.46 $ 7.26
Cost of goods completed and transferred during
March 40,000 units x $7.26 per equivalent unit $290,400
Costs remaining in work-in-process on March 31
Direct Material:
10,000 equivalent units x $2.80 per equivalent unit $ 28,000
Conversion:
5,000 equivalent units x $4.46 per equivalent unit 22,300
Total cost of March 31 work-in-process 50,300
Total costs accounted for $340,700
© McGraw Hill 38
Actual versus Normal Costing
Manufacturing overhead is
Actual costs of applied
manufacturing overhead
are entered in Work-in- to Work-in-Process Inventory
Process Inventory using a predetermined
overhead rate
© McGraw Hill 39
Departmental Production Report 2
Analysis of
physical flow
of units
Calculation
of equivalent
units
Computation
of unit costs
Analysis of
total costs
© McGraw Hill 40
Learning Objective 4-7 – Describe how an operation
costing system accumulates and assigns the costs of
direct-material and conversion activity in a batch
manufacturing process.
© McGraw Hill 41
Operation Costing 1
Operation costing employs some aspects
of both job-order and process costing.
Job-order Operation Costing Process
Costing (Products produced in batches) Costing
© McGraw Hill 42
Operation Costing 2
Operation costing employs some aspects
of both job-order and process costing.
Job-order Operation Costing Process
Costing (Products produced in batches) Costing
Material costs are charged Conversion costs
to batches as in are assigned to batches
job-order costing. as in process costing.
© McGraw Hill 43
End of Main Content
Because learning changes everything. ®
[Link]
© 2020 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom.
No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.