Understanding Process Variation and Control Charts
Understanding Process Variation and Control Charts
Types of Variation
X X
30
X
Quality characteristic value
X X
25
X X
X Average value[center line(CL)]
20
X X
15
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sample(or Sub group) number
Examples of Quality characteristics include:
•Average length
•Average diameter
•Average tensile strength
•Average Resistance
•Average Service time
The primary use of control chart is to detect assignable cause of variation in the
process.
Process variation are traceable to two kinds of causes:
(i) Assignable causes (i.e) due to specific “findable causes” (Special).
(ii) Random or common or chance causes.
Before introducing the control charts to any organisations, some preliminary decisions
have to be made:
(1) What characteristics are to be investigated?
Quality characteristics
e.g:- Size, Dimension and finish
Percentage of Rejection/Rework
Destructive testing is involved
(2) What type of control chart will serve the purpose is to be decided?
Measurement cost
Loss due to failures to detect changes in the process.
(3) No. of sub-groups
25 sub-groups are needed for good results.
Subgroup 1 X X X X X X X X̄ 1 =
2 X X X X X X X X̄ 2 X=µ=E( X̄ )
3 X X X X X X X X̄ 3
σx̄ =σx/√n
=
C.L. =X +/- 3(σx/√n)
=
C.L. =X +/- Aσx ; A=3/√n
X̄ Chart
=
C.L. =X +/- 3σx̄
σx̄ =σx/√n
=
C.L. =X +/- 3(σx/√n)
=
C.L. =X +/- 3(s̄ /c2√n) ; σx=s̄ /c2
=
C.L. =X +/- A1s̄ ; A1=3/c2√n
X̄ Chart
=
C.L. =X +/- 3(σx/√n)
=
C.L. =X +/- 3(R ̄/d2√n); A2= 3/d2√n
=
C.L. =X +/- A2R ̄
R [Range- Chart]
3 Critical decisions need to be made before any control chart technique can be
initiated.
No. of initial samples in the base period should be enough to yield a satisfactory estimate
of the distribution.
(i) If any of the X̄ or R values during the base period were outside the control limits, it would
indicate probable lack of stability of the process.
(ii) When the process is not stable in the base period, the validity of using control limits for the
monitoring period would be questionable.
(iii) If the instability during base period is inherent in the process itself (worn out equipment,
Poor quality of materials), it is best to abandon the base – period results and reinitiate after
the inherent causes have been corrected.
(iv) If the instability is due to newness of the product or process and/or the operators not being
familiar with the product, the control limits can be derived as follows:
(a) If time permits and the observations are not very expensive, a new base period can be
started the process would probably have stabilised by this time.
(b) Check if the process is stable if the “out-of control limits” observations are eliminated.
In order to be able to adopt option 2, the following procedure is used :
(iii) Check the R chart. If all the observations are within the control limits goto step 4. if some
observations are outside the UCL, remove the corresponding samples from the base period
and goto step 2.
(iv) Check the X̄ chart. If all observations are within control limits goto step – 5. If some
observations are outside the UCL, remove the corresponding samples from the base period.
If the base period has 15 or fewere samples left, abandon the base period. Otherwise goto
Step – 2.
Process is estimated from the MOVING RANGE found from two successive observations.
Conduct an initial analysis using Frequency histograms to identify the shape of the
distribution.
(I) NO GIVEN STANDARDS
__
An estimate of the process standard deviation, σ^ = MR/d2
__
MR is the average of the moving ranges of successive observations
__
CLMR = MR
__
UCLMR = D4MR
__
LCLMR = D3MR
X-Chart
_
CLX = X
_ ___
UCLX = X + 3 MR /d2
_ ___
LCLX = X - 3 MR /d2
(II) GIVEN STANDARDS
_
CLX = X0
_
UCLX = X0 + 3σ0
_
LCLX = X - 3σ0
CLMR = d2 σ0
UCLMR = D4d2σ0
LCLMR = D3d2σ0
Moving Average Control Chart
• These are effective for detecting shifts of small magnitude in the process mean.
Mt = [X̄ t+ Xt-1
̄ +…+ Xt-w+1
̄ ]/W
Var(X̄ t) = σ2/n
= 1/w^2[Σvar(σ^2/n)] ; i=(t-w+1) to t
= σ^2/nw
_
C.L= X̄
_
U.C.L= X̄ + 3σ/√nw
_ For the remaining values
LCL = X̄ - 3σ/√nw
_
U.C.L= X̄ + 3σ/√nt
_
LCL = X̄ - 3σ/√nt
t = 1,2,…,w-1
Control chart Patterns and Corrective actions
A non random identifiable pattern in the plot of control chart might provide sufficient reason
to look for special causes in the system
Special causes are due to periodic and persistent disturbances that affect the process
intermittently. The objective is to identify the special cause and take appropriate remedial
action. Totally nine patterns exists
(i) Natural Pattern
* Natural pattern is one in which no identifiable arrangement of the plotted points exists.
No points fall outside the control limits.
Majority of the points are near the center line.
Few are close to the control limits.
Demonstrate the presence of a stable system of common causes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
Sample X X XX X X
Average X
CL
X X X X X X X X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
(ii) Sudden Shifts in the level
Many causes can bring about a sudden change (or jump) in pattern level on an X̄ or R chart.
Change in customer waiting time in a bank because the No. of tellers changed.
A new method or process, new measuring instrument, new vendors, new operator, new
equipment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
X X X
Sample X X X X
Average X X X CL
X X
X X
X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
(iii) Gradual shifts in the level
It occurs when a process parameter changes gradually over a period of time, after the
process stabilizes.
An X̄ chart might exhibit such a shift because the incoming quality of raw materials or
components changed over time, Maintenance program changed or the style of supervision
changed.
An R chart might exhibit such a shift because of new operator, a decrease in worker skill due
to fatigue or monotony.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
Sample
Average X X X X CL
X X X X
X X X X X
X X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
(iv) Trending Pattern
An X̄ chart may exhibit a trend because of tool wear, gradual deterioration of equipment,
build up of debris in jigs and fixtures or gradual change in temperature.
An R-chart may exhibit a trend because of a gradual improvement in operator skill resulting
from on- the job training, or a decrease in operator skill due to fatigue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
X X X X
Sample X X X
X X CL
Average X X X X X X X
X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
(V) Cyclic Patterns:
Cycles of low and high points will appear on the control chart.
X̄ - chart may exhibit cyclic behaviour because of rotation of operators, periodic changes in
temperature and humidity, seasonal variation of incoming components.
An R-chart may exhibit cyclic pattern because of operator fatigue or periodic maintenance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
X X
Sample X X X X X X
Average X
X X X X
X
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
(vi)Wild patterns
(i) Freaks
(iii) Freaks:
Plotted points too small or too large with respect to control limits.
Points usually fall outside the control limits and are easily distinguishable from the other
patterns on the chart.
Failure of a component.
FREAKS
X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
XX X X X
Sample X X X
X X CL
Average XX X X X X X
X X X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Bunches:
Bunches are clusters of several observations that are different from other points on the
plot.
Possible special causes of such behavior Use of a new vendor for a short period of time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
X X
Sample X X
Average X X X X CL
X X X X
X X X X X
X X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
(vii) MIXTURE PATTERNS (or the effect of two or more populations)
Caused by the presence of 2 or more populations in the sample and characterized by points
that fall near the control limits.
One set of values is too high and another set of values too low because of differences in the
incoming quality of material from two vendors.
A remedial action would be to have a Separate control chart for each vendor.
Other example include two or more operators being represented on the same chart,
differences in two or more pieces of testing or measuring equipment and differences in
production methods of two or more lines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
Sample X X X XX X X
Average X
CL
X X X X X X X X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
(viiii) STRATIFICATION FACTORS
When two or more population distribution of the same quality characteristic are present.
Output is combined or mixed and samples are selected from mixed output.
Majority of the points are very close to the center line, with very few points near the control
limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
Sample
Average X X X
X X CL
X X X X
X X X X X X
X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
(ix) INTERACTION PATTERMS
Occurs when the level of one variable affects the behavior of other variables associated with
the quality characteristics of interest.
TEMP LEVEL A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
Sample
Average X X X
X X CL
X X X X
X X X X X X
X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Temp level B
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCL
Sample X
Average X X X X CL
X X X X
X X X X X
X
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
ERRORS IN MAKING INFERENCES FROM CONTROL CHARTS
Type I error:
Since the control limits are a finite distance from the mean, there is a small chance
(about 0.026) of a sample statistics falling outside the control limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------ UCL X̄
X̄ Center line
------------------------------------------------------------------------ LCL X̄
P(type I error) = α (It is a sum of two tail areas outside the control limits)
Type II errors
If no observations fall outside the control limits, we conclude that the process is in control.
(Process is actually out of control)
A process going out of control due to a change in process mean from A to B. For this
situation , the current conclusion is that the process is out of control.
There is a strong possibility of the sample statistic falling within the control limits, in which
case we would conclude that the process is in control and thus make a type II error.
Type II error in control charts
B ------------------------------------------------------------------------ UCL X̄
X̄ A Center line
------------------------------------------------------------------------ LCL X̄
OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE (O.C. CURVE)
The ability of a control chart to detect changes quickly is indicated by the steepness of the
OC curve.
OC curve for a control chart
X
X
X
X
Probability of non-detection
X
X
X
X X
Process mean
AVERAGE RUN LENGTH
Denotes the No. of samples, on average, required to detect a out of control signal.
ARL = Σj(1-Pd)(j-1)Pd
= Pd Σj(1-Pd)(j-1)
= Pd/[1-(1-Pd)]2
= 1/Pd
j = 1 to ∞
Pd = α Type I
Pd = 1-β Type II
WARNING LIMITS ON CONTROL CHARTS
The inner limits usually at 2 sigma are usually called warning limits.
If one or more points fall between the warning limits or very close to the warning limit, we
should be suspicious that the process may not be operating properly.
Use additional data in conjunction with the suspicious points to investigate the state of
control of the process.
They do not have a precise interpretation and may be confusing to operating personnel.
An X̄ chart with Z-σ Warning limits
UCL
UWL
3 σx
Quality characteristics
2 σx
Center line
LWL
LCL
Sample number
Effect of sample size on Control limits
Sample size usually has influence on the σ of the sample statistics being plotted on the
control chart.
An increase in the Sample size cause the control limits to be drawn closer.
Increasing the sample size provides more information, causes the sample statistics to have
less variability.
ANALYSIS OF PATTERNS IN CONTROL CHARTS
(i) A process is assumed to be out of control if a single point plots outside the control limits.
(ii) A process is assumed to be out of control if 2 out of 3 consecutive points fall outside the 2σ
warning limits on the same side of center line.
(iii) A process is assumed to be out of control if 4 out of the consecutive points fall beyond the
1σ limit on the same side of the center line.
(iv) A process is assumed to be out of control if 9 or more consecutive points fall to one side of
the center line.
(v) A process is assumed to be out of control if there is a run of 6 or more consecutive points
steadily increasing or decreasing.
X
--------------------------------------------------- UCL
X
X X
X
X CL
Quality characteristic X X
value X
X
--------------------------------------------------- LCL
Sample (1)
--------------------------------------------------- UCL
X X
--------------------------------------------------- WL
X X
X
X X CL
Quality characteristic
X X X
value
--------------------------------------------------- WCL
--------------------------------------------------- LCL
Sample (2)
--------------------------------------------------- UCL
X X
X
--------------------------------------------------- 1σ limit
X
X CL
Quality characteristic X
value
---------------------------------------------------
X X X 1σ limit
X
--------------------------------------------------- LCL
Sample (3)
--------------------------------------------------- UCL
X X
X X
X X
X X CL
Quality characteristic
value X
--------------------------------------------------- LCL
Sample (4)
TREND CHART (Regression control chart)
Tool wear or die wear – the characteristic of interest is expected to gradually increase or
decrease.
C= a + bi
a is the interaction point of the fitted center line with vertical axis
2 Quality characteristics that must both be in control for the process to be in control.
If control charts for the averages of these 2 characteristics are kept independently, the result
is a rectangular control region.
Mean Characteristic 2(X̄ 2)
UCL X̄ 2 x-----------------------------------------
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
B C
LCL X̄ 1 UCL X̄ 1
Mean Characteristic 1 (X̄ 1)
Elliptical Control Region
-----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Region E
Mean Characteristic 2(X̄ 2)
UCL X̄ 2 x Region F
Region G Ellipse C
- Ellipse A
X̄ 2 A D
Ellipse B
LCL X̄ 2 x-------------------------------------------------------
- UCL X̄ 1
LCL X̄ 1
X̄ 1
Mean Characteristic 1 (X̄ 1)
Elliptical Control Region
_ _
Target mean value of the characteristics = X̄ 1 & X̄ 2
Sample size= n
_ _ _ _
T^2 = {n/(S1^2S2^2-S12^2)}{S2^2(X̄ 1 - X1
̄ )^2 + S1^2(X̄ 2- X̄ 2)^2 – 2S12(X̄ 1- X̄ 1)(X̄ 2- X̄ 2)}
If calculated value T^2 exceeds T^2 α,n-1 = Atleast one of the characteristic is out of control.
Disadvantages
(i) Time sequence of plotted points (X̄ 1 , X̄ 2) is lost (Cannot check runs in the plotted pattern
as with control chart).
(ii) Construction of control ellipse becomes quite difficult for more than 2 characteristics.
Values of Hotelling T^2 percentile points can be obtained from the percentile points
of the F – distribution
X̄ 1j
X̄ j = j = 1,….m
X̄ 2j
.
.
X̄ pj
Where, X̄ ij is the sample mean of i^th character of j ^th sample
Xijk is the value of K^th observation of the i^th character in the j^th sample
S=
_ _
Vector X̄ = Elements {X̄ i} and matrix is
If the probability of type I error for a joint control process is α, then for sample j, the
individual control interval for the i^th quality characteristics,
_
X̄ ± tα/2p , m(n-1) Si√[(m-1)/mn] ; i= 1,2,…p
CONTROL CHARTS FOR MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION
A standard deviation chart (S-chart) is preferable for longer sample sizes (> 10, usually).
S = √[Σ(Xi- X̄ )^2/((n-1)]
= √[{Σxi^2 - (ΣXi)^2/n}/(n-1)] ; i= 1 to n
σ s = σ √(1-C4^2)
C4 = [2/(n-1)]^(1/2)[{(n-2)/2}!/{(n-3)/2}!]
Assume σ s is unknown
σˆ =S̄ /C4
Therefore,
UCLs = S̄ B4
LCLs = S̄ B3
_
Center line of X̄ chart = C.L X̄ = X̄ = ΣX̄ i/g
_ _
Control limits = X̄ ± 3σX̄ = X̄ ±3σ/√n
_ _
UCL X̄ = X̄ + 3S̄ /C4√n = X̄ + A3S̄
_ _
LCL X̄ = X̄ - 3S̄ /C4√n = X̄ - A3S̄
Only f its is in control should the X̄ - chart be developed because the the standard deviation
of X̄ is dependent of S̄ .
Assume σx is known,
where, B6 = C4 + 3√(1-C4^2)
LCLs = B5σo
UCLX̄ = X̄ o + Aσo
LCLX̄ = X̄ o - Aσo
where, A = 3/√n
CONTROL CHARTS FOR INDIVIDUAL UNITS
CLMR = MR̄̄
UCLMR = D4MR̄̄
LCLMR = D3MR̄̄
Assume σo is known,
X – Chart
CLX =X̄ o
UCLX = X̄ o + 3σo
LCLX = X̄ o - 3σo
MR – Chart
CLMR = d2σo
UCLMR = D4d2σo
LCLMR = D3d2σo
CUMULATIVE SUM CONTROL CHART FOR THE PROCESS MEAN (cumsum)
CUMSUM chart uses information from all of the prior samples by displaying the
cumulative sum of the deviation of the sample values from a specified target value.
Disadvantages:
Not an effective tool in analysing the historical performance of a process to see whether it is
in control.
To train workers to use and maintain cumsum charts may be more costly.