Breeding Methods for Self-Pollinated Crops
Breeding Methods for Self-Pollinated Crops
CREDIT SEMINAR
RUTU
2020A69M
[Link]. ( 2nd Year )
Dept. of Genetics and Plant breeding
09/25/2025 1
Features of Self Pollinated Crops
Homozygosity
Inbreeding Depression
Heterosis
Development of high yielding varieties- Using Transgressive
segregants.
Development of hybrids- Using Heterosis
09/25/2025 4
Plant breeding and why to do it ?
Domestication Selection
Polyploidy
Migration
Mutation Random
mating
09/25/2025 5
Self pollinated crops vs Cross pollinated crops
• Self pollination(Autogamy) refers to Cross pollination(Allogamy) refers to
transfer of pollens from one flower transfer of pollen grains from on flower
on to the stigma of same flower. of a plant to the stigma of another flower
of different plant
09/25/2025 6
Methods
09/25/2025 8
CONVENTIONAL BREEDING PIPELINE
• .
SEED
INCREASE
CROSSING AND TESTING YEILD, AND
INBREEDING DISEASE, QUALITY RELEASE
09/25/2025 9
PLANT INTRODUCTION
• Plant introduction may involve new varieties of a crop already grown in an area, wild relatives of crop species
or totally new crop species for the area.
• They are of two types :
1. Primary introduction: Wheat variety :Sonora 64, Lerma Rojo
Rice variety : T.N.1 , IR8, IR28, IR36
2. Secondary introduction: Kalyan Sona and Sonalika
09/25/2025 10
Story behind Wheat Introduction
Not tasty
09/25/2025 11
Invasion due to introduction
Argemone mexicana
Water hyacinth Coffee rust
09/25/2025 12
Mass Selection
• It refers to the method in which
individual plants are selected on the
basis of phenotype from mixed
population and their seeds are bulked
and used to grow for next generation.
MIXED POPULATIONS
SECOND GENERATION
AFTER 7-8
• .
GENERATIONS
09/25/2025 14
Mass selection
09/25/2025 15
Pure line selection
• A pure line is a progeny of single homozygous self pollinated plant.
• In Pure line selection, a large number of plants are selected from a self
pollinated crops and harvested individually , individual plant progenies are
then evaluated and the best progeny is released as a pure line variety.
09/25/2025 17
PURELINE THEORY
Phaseolus vulgaris
• .
Line number : 1 13 19
Mean seed weight(mg) 640 450 350
Selection within
lines
09/25/2025 20
Application of Pure line selection Achievements
MS PURELINE SELECTION
Gadag 1
G. hirsutum from U.S.A Dharwar American
09/25/2025 21
09/25/2025 22
PEDIGREE METHOD
• Pedigree method is method of handling
Achievements
segregating generations • Wheat : NP series, KRL1-4( Kharchia
• A detailed description of the present day 65 X WL 711)
pedigree method was outlined by Love(1927)
with a view to handle segregating generations. • Rice: Jaya and Padma ( TN1 X TN141),
Bala , Krishna, Cauveri, Pusa Basmati 1
09/25/2025 23
Selected parents Individual plant progenies planted in multi
1ST Year 6th Year
were crossed F5 row plots
Superior plant selected from superior
progenies
2nd Year 10-30 seeds are space Individual plant progenies planted in multi
F1 planted, harvested in bulk 7th Year
row plots or PYT may be conducted
F6
09/25/2025 24
Modifications of Pedigree method
Bulk pedigree method : The basic tenet of this method is to carry forward F2 plants as
random bulk of each family till later generations where standard pedigree method
can be started. It is also called mass pedigree method of Harrington(1937)
Pureline family method : it is a two step prolonged system in which the first step
involves identification of promising F2 plants from which then extensive selections
are conducted
09/25/2025 25
CR DHAN 307(Maudamani)
Parentage & details of pedigree :
Dandi/Naveen/Dandi
09/25/2025
09/25/2025 26
26
BULK SELECTION
• It was first used by Nilsson-Ehle (1908) to combine winter hardiness and high yield in wheat.
• In this method , F2 and subsequent generations are harvested in mass or as bulk without any artificial
selection till it reaches a certain level of homozygosity. At the end of bulking period individual plant
selection are done and evaluated in same manner as pedigree selection.
09/25/2025 27
Selected parents 8th Year F7 seeds are space planted
1ST Year
were crossed Superior plants selected
F7
Seeds harvested separately
Wheat
Malviya 12
susceptible to stem
rust was
backcrossed with
Sparrow
Sugarcane
Nobilization of
Examples canes
09/25/2025 30
Marker assisted backcross breeding
• Donor parent : Swarna- sub1
• Recipient parent : Maudamani
• Location : NRRI, Cuttack
• QTLs involved : SCM2, GW5
• Duration of experiment : 2014-2019
• Lines constituted :MSS 128-102-
97-117, MSS128-102-97-601,
MSS128-102-97-613, and MSS128-
102-97-617
(Pandit et al.,2021)
Percent plant regenerated in the pyramided lines carrying Sub1 QTL along with the parents
under control screening facility after one week of de-submergence from 14 days of
submergence stress.
09/25/2025 31
GENETIC CONSEQUENCES APPLICATIONS
09/25/2025 32
Transfer of Dominant gene
Variety B is rust resistant , variety 9TH Year Individual plant progenies
1ST Year
A is rust susceptible grown
BC6F2
Selection for rust resistance
A(RR) B(rr) and plant type A
F1 is backcrossed with recurrent
2nd Year F1 Rr X rr parent 10TH Year Individual plant progenies
BC6F3 grown
Selection for
HOMOGENOUS rust
Rust resistance plant similar to
3 Year
rd
BC1 resistance and plant type A
Rr X rr variety A selected.
Selected plants are backcrossed
with recurrent parent A Replicated yield trials
are conducted with
11TH Year recurrent parent as
check
4th -8th Year BC6 Rr X rr As in BC2
12th year
Seed multiplication is done
09/25/2025 33
Modifications of Backcross method
09/25/2025 34
Single Seed Descent
The idea of single seed descent is originally
suggested by Goulden in 1939 and
subsequently modified by Brim in 1966.
Merits
Advances the generation with maximum possible
It is a method of rapid generation advance speed in conventional term.
where the main theme is to carry forward Requires little space, effort and labour
maximum number of F2 plants to a stage of Makes best use of green house and nursery facilities.
Retains the rapid homozygosity
sufficient homozygosity by taking only one
seed from each plant while going from one
Demerits
generation to other .
Plant loss
No selection in segregating generation
09/25/2025 35
Selected parents 6th Year AS in F3
1ST Year
were crossed F5
F6 space planted
2nd Year F1 seeds are space 7
rd
Year 100-500 superior plants with
F1 planted, harvested in bulk F6 desirable characters harvested
separately
F3 seed selected and bulked 10th -12th year Coordinated yield trials
F9-F11 Disease and quality tests
5th Year
As in F3
F4
Seed multiplication is done
09/25/2025
09/25/2025
Comparative analysis between bulk and ssd
Three lentil (Lens culinaris MEDIC.) populations were advanced
from the F2 to the F4 generation by single seed-descent (SSD) and
bulk-population (BP) breeding methods.
Lentil
Genetic variances were significantly higher with SSD for
Haddad, N.I., Muehlbauer, F.J. Comparison of
random bulk population and single-seed-descent plant height, days to maturity and yield in population height
methods for lentil breeding. Euphytica 30, 643– of lowest pod in population and days to blooming, height of
651 (1981) lowest pod and yield in population .
09/25/2025 37
.
SHUTTLE BREEDING : It uses diverse ecological SPEED BREEDING: the technique which involves extending
environments to develop improved varieties with photo period and controlled conditions such as temperature, soil
higher adaptability. media, spacing in glass houses enabling rapid generation advance
by shortening breeding cycle.
09/25/2025 38
MULTILINE VARIETY(Mixture of many pure lines)
Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4
Backcross 1 Backcross 2 Backcross 3 Backcross 4
6-8 years
Gene 1 Gene 2 Gene 3 Gene 4
Line 1 Line 2 Line 3 Line 4 ……………. Line n
09/25/2025 40
DIALLEL SELECTIVE MATING
Parent diallel series (P1) Parent diallel series (P2) First selective Mating series
F2 bulk F1s
Mass selection
F4 F3 F1s
Mass selection
09/25/2025 42
CASE STUDY
09/25/2025 43
09/25/2025 44
Materials and Methods
• CROSSES INVOLVED : 7 crosses ( SL52 X AGS 328, X SL 794, SL 525 Z IC 391477, SL 525 X LSB
23(SL744 X SL682) X AGS 752, SL525 X ( AGS328 X SL682) X AGS 72, SL744 X (SL 525 X AGS
328), SL 783 X SL 871, SL 755 X SL 794, SL 525 X IC 391477, SL 525 X LSB 23)
• LOCATION : PAU, Ludhiana
• DESIGN : RBD
• REPLICATION : 3
• DURATION OF EXPERIMENT : 2009-2016
• ROW TO ROW DISTANCE : 45cm
• PLANT TO PLANT DISTANCE : 5cm
• BREEDING METHODS INVOLVED : Pedigree method, Bulk method, Single pod descent with
selection(SDPS), Single pod descent (SDP)
• CHARACTERS UNDER STUDY : Number of pods per plant, grain yield
Results and Discussion
Selection Year Pods per plant
method
Cross 1 Cross 2 Cross 3 Cross 4 Cross 5 Cross 6 Cross 7
Ranking of breeding (SL 525 x AGS 328) x {(SL 744 x SL 682) x AGS 752} SL 525 x II IV III I
methods based on I III IV II
highest yielding line {(AGS 328 x SL 682) x AGS 752} III I IV II
SL 744 x (SL 525 x AGS 328)
SL 783 x SL 871 II IV III I
SL 755 x SL 794 IV II III I
III IV I II
Ranking of breeding SL 525 x IC 391477
methods based on SL 525 x Lsb 23 I III IV II
mean I IV III I
(SL 525 x AGS 328) x {(SL 744 x SL 682) x AGS 752} SL 525 x
of lines I III IV II
{(AGS 328 x SL 682) x AGS 752}
III IV I
SL 744 x (SL 525 x AGS 328)
IV III II
SL 783 x SL 871 I
III IV II
SL 755 x SL 794 II
IV III II
SL 525 x IC 391477 II
IV III
SL 525 x Lsb 23 II
I
Discussion
• Overall, via PM progenies with highest mean for pods per plant were obtained in crosses 1, 2, 6 and 7
whereas, in crosses 3, 4 and 5, BM had the highest mean. Ahmed et al. (2008) also reported that progenies
derived by PM had higher mean for plant height and pods per plant.
• Juang and Lu (1991) reported that population resulting from the pedigree method had the highest plant
height, branches per plant and pods per plant.
• Comparison of means of the breeding methods for grain yield revealed that the BM was ranked first in four
crosses (SL 525 x AGS 328) x {(SL 744 x SL 682) x AGS 752}, SL 744 x (SL 525 x AGS 328), SL 783 x
SL 871 and SL 755 x SL 794) and second in the remaining three crosses. PM was ranked first in three
crosses (SL 525 x {(AGS 328 x SL 682) x AGS 752}, SL 525 x IC 391477 and SL 525 x Lsb 23) and
second in the remaining four crosses.
• In case of SPDS and SPD yield levels were low compared to check mean.
Conclusion
• The bulk method is widely adopted due to its flexibility and the
possibility of postponing its completion when resources are limited, until
a more appropriate time, without influencing the genetic properties
• Palmer (1952) concluded that the pedigree method is preferable where
only a few genes of importance are segregating or where speed is
essential.
• Losses by sampling on opting SPD and SPDS methods, contribute to the
development of progenies with reduced genetic potential leading to
comparatively poor performance of its derived progenies, especially
compared to progenies derived via bulk method.
09/25/2025 50
Thank you
09/25/2025 51