0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views50 pages

Ethics in Research: Nuremberg Trials Insight

This document discusses the importance of ethics in research, outlining key ethical principles and the consequences of research misconduct, including falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism. It emphasizes the historical context of research ethics, particularly the Nuremberg Trials, and highlights the need for ethical standards to promote trust, accountability, and public support in research. The document concludes with a reminder of the various ethical codes and principles that guide responsible research conduct.

Uploaded by

ssiragumaalex
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views50 pages

Ethics in Research: Nuremberg Trials Insight

This document discusses the importance of ethics in research, outlining key ethical principles and the consequences of research misconduct, including falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism. It emphasizes the historical context of research ethics, particularly the Nuremberg Trials, and highlights the need for ethical standards to promote trust, accountability, and public support in research. The document concludes with a reminder of the various ethical codes and principles that guide responsible research conduct.

Uploaded by

ssiragumaalex
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Research Methodology

Part I

Topic 6

Ethics in Research

1
Learning Objectives
•After completing this topic, you should be able to:
[Link] the terms Ethics and Ethics in research
[Link] the why ethics in research is important
[Link] the different ethical principles
[Link] the cardinal sins of research

07/29/25 BIT 2207 2


Ethics 3

• Ethics is rooted in the ancient Greek philosophical inquiry of


moral life. [1]
• It refers to a system of principles which can critically change
previous considerations about choices and actions. [ cited in
1]
• It is said that ethics is the branch of philosophy which deals
with the dynamics of decision making concerning what is
right and wrong.

3
Ethics in Research
4

• Scientific research work, as all human activities, is governed


by individual, community and social values. Research ethics
involve requirements on daily work, the protection of dignity
of subjects and the publication of the information in the
research.
• Ethics refer to the norms for conduct that distinguish
between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
• Research ethics therefore focus on the disciplines and the
standards of conduct during a research.

4
Ethics in Research
5

• Research ethics therefore focus on the disciplines and the


standards of conduct during a research.
• Different disciplines, institutions and professions have
standards for behavior that suit their particular aims and
goals.
• These standards also help members of the discipline to
coordinate their actions or activities and to establish the
public’s trust of discipline.

5
Video Moment: Ethics in
Research 6

• [Link]

6
Why Ethics in Research

07/29/25 BIT 1205 7


History: Nurembergy Trials

• The birth of modern research ethics began with a desire to protect


human subjects involved in research projects.
• Doctors Trial of 1946-1947.
• “The Doctors Trial was a segment of the Nuremberg Trials for Nazi
war criminals.
• In the Doctors Trial, 23 German Nazi physicians were accused of
conducting abhorrent and torturous “experiments” with
concentration camp inmates.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 8


History: Doctors Trial

• The accused physicians tortured, brutalized, crippled, and murdered


thousands of victims in the name of research.
• Some of their experiments involved gathering scientific information
about the limits of the human body by exposing victims to extreme
temperatures and altitudes.
• Tested how quickly a human could be euthanatized in order to carry
out the Nazi racial purification policies most efficiently”

07/29/25 BIT 1205 9


Why Ethics in Research
10

• First, norms promote the aims of research, such as


knowledge, truth, and avoidance of error. For example,
prohibitions against fabricating, falsifying, or
misrepresenting research data promote the truth and
minimize error.

10
Why: Values for11collaboration
• research often involves a great deal of cooperation and
coordination among many different people in different
disciplines and institutions,
• Ethical standards promote the values that are essential to
collaborative work, such as trust, accountability, mutual
respect, and fairness.

11
Why: Values for12collaboration
• For example, many ethical norms in research, such as
guidelines for authorship, copyright and patenting policies,
data sharing policies, and confidentiality rules in peer
review, are designed to protect intellectual property
interests while encouraging collaboration.
• Most researchers want to receive credit for their
contributions and do not want to have their ideas stolen or
disclosed prematurely.

12
Why: Public Accountability
13

• Ethical norms help to ensure that


researchers can be held accountable to the
public.
• For instance, federal policies on research
misconduct, conflicts of interest, the human
subjects protections, and animal care and
use are necessary in order to make sure that
researchers who are funded by public money
can be held accountable to the public.

13
Why: Public Support
14
• ethical norms in research also help to build
public support for research.
• People are more likely to fund a research
project if they can trust the quality and
integrity of research.

14
Video Moment: Why Ethics in
Research 15

• [Link]

• This video presents the history of research ethics. Find our


details on Belmont code, Numeburg code

15
RESEARCH MISCONDUCT

07/29/25 BIT 1205 16


Video Moment: research
misconduct 17

• Theranos : [Link]

17
The “cardinal” research sins

• The three “cardinal sins” of research conduct:


• Falsification
• Fabrication
• Plagiarism
• (FFP) are the primary concerns in avoiding research misconduct.
• Any divergence from these norms undermines the integrity of
research for that individual, lab, university/corporation, and the field
as a whole.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 18


Data Falsification

• Falsification is the changing or omission of research results (data) to


support claims, hypotheses, other data, etc.
• Falsification can include the manipulation of research
instrumentation, materials, or processes. Manipulation of images or
representations in a manner that distorts the data or “reads too
much between the lines” can also be considered falsification.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 19


Data Fabrication

• Fabrication is the construction and/or addition of data, observations,


or characterizations that never occurred in the gathering of data or
running of experiments.
• Fabrication can occur when “filling out” the rest of experiment runs,
for example. Claims about results need to be made on complete data
sets (as is normally assumed), where claims made based on
incomplete or assumed results is a form of fabrication.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 20


Data Fabrication

• This is a dangerous act as it will give a wrong conclusion about a


given guiding research.
• Examples of data fabrication
• 1. Coming up with experimental results without carrying out the
experiment like when coming up with new medicines..
• 2. Reporting survey results for a survey that was never done.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 21


Case: Data Fabrication

• The research protocol for a study of a drug on hypertension


requires the administration of the drug at different doses to
50 laboratory mice, with chemical and behavioral tests to
determine toxic effects. Tom has almost finished the
experiment for Dr. Q. He has only 5 mice left to test.
However, he really wants to finish his work in time to go to
Florida on spring break with his friends, who are leaving
tonight. He has injected the drug in all 50 mice but has not
completed all of the tests. He therefore decides to
extrapolate from the 45 completed results to produce the 5
additional results.[1]

07/29/25 BIT 1205 22


Video moment:

 Data fabrication and falsification


 [Link]

BIT 1205 03/26/13

07/29/25 IST 2203


Plagiarism

• Plagiarism is, perhaps, the most common form of research


misconduct.
• Researchers must be aware to cite all sources and take careful notes.
• Using or representing the work of others as your own work
constitutes plagiarism, even if committed unintentionally.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 24


Plagiarism

• When reviewing privileged information, such as when reviewing


grants or journal article manuscripts for peer review, researchers
must recognize that what they are reading cannot be used for their
own purposes because it cannot be cited until the work is published
or publicly available.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 25


Types of plagiarism

• Passing off material partially or completely written by someone else


as your own work.
• Summarizing, paraphrasing, or quoting without crediting the source,
accurately citing the information, or fairly representing the author's
intentions.
• Using facts (statistics, research findings) that are not common
knowledge without citing the source you obtain them from.

07/29/25 BIT 1205 26


Examples of plagiarism

• Picture used from a book or website and the source is not cited.
• Using a quote from another person and not putting it in quotes (“ ”).

07/29/25 BIT 1205 27


Ethical Principles

07/29/25 BIT 1205 28


Video Moment: Ethical
principles 29

• [Link]

29
1: Honesty 30

• Strive for honesty in all scientific


communications. Honestly report data,
results, methods and procedures, and
publication status.
• Do not fabricate, falsify, or
misrepresent data. Do not deceive
colleagues, research sponsors, or the
public.

30
2: Objectivity 31
• Strive to avoid bias in experimental
design, data analysis, data
interpretation, peer review, personnel
decisions, grant writing, expert
testimony, and other aspects of research
where objectivity is expected or
required.
• Avoid or minimize bias or self-deception.
• Disclose personal or financial interests
that may affect research

31
4: Carefulness 32

•Avoid careless errors and negligence;


carefully and critically examine your
own work and the work of your peers.
•Keep good records of research
activities, such as data collection,
research design, and correspondence
with agencies or journals

32
5&6: Openess and 33
Transparency
• Openness
• Share data, results, ideas, tools,
resources. Be open to criticism and
new ideas.
• Transparency
• Disclose methods, materials,
assumptions, analyses, and other
information needed to evaluate your
research

33
7: Accountability 34

• Take responsibility for your part in


research and be prepared to give an
account (i.e. an explanation or
justification) of what you did on a
research project and why

34
8: Intellectual Property
35

• Honor patents, copyrights, and other


forms of intellectual property.
• Do not use unpublished data, methods,
or results without permission.
• Give proper acknowledgement or credit
for all contributions to research.
• Never plagiarize.

35
9: Confidentiality
36

• Protect confidential communications,


such as papers or grants submitted for
publication, personnel records, trade or
military secrets, and patient records.

36
10: Responsible37Publication
• Publish in order to advance research
and scholarship, not to advance just
your own career. Avoid wasteful and
duplicative publication.
Publishing the same paper in two different journals without
telling the editors
Submitting the same paper to different journals without
telling the editors
Including a colleague as an author on a paper in return for a
favor even though the colleague did not make a serious
contribution to the paper

37
10&11: Responsible Mentoring and
respect for colleagues
38

• Responsible Mentoring
• Help to educate, mentor, and advise
students. Promote their welfare and
allow them to make their own
decisions.
• Respect for Colleagues
• Respect your colleagues and treat
them fairly.

38
12: Non-Discrimination
39

• Avoid discrimination against colleagues


or students on the basis of sex, race,
ethnicity, or other factors not related to
scientific competence and integrity.

39
13: Social Responsibility
40

• Strive to promote social good and


prevent or mitigate social harms
through research, public education,
and advocacy

40
14: Competence41

• Maintain and improve your own


professional competence and expertise
through lifelong education and
learning; take steps to promote
competence in science as a whole

41
15: Animal Care42

•Show proper respect and care for


animals when using them in research.
•Do not conduct unnecessary or poorly
designed animal experiments.

42
16: Human Subjects
43
protection

•When conducting research on human


subjects, minimize harms and risks and
maximize benefits; respect human
dignity, privacy, and autonomy;
•take special precautions with
vulnerable populations; and strive to
distribute the benefits and burdens of
research fairly.

43
16: Human Subjects
44
protection

•For details on children in research:


•Kirk, S. (2007). Methodological and ethical issues in conducting
qualitative research with children and young people: A literature
review. International journal of nursing studies, 44(7), 1250-1260.
•For details on human subject protection:
•Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major ethical
issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict between the
research ethics and the nature of nursing?. Health science journal,
5(1), 3.

44
17: Legality 45

•Know and obey relevant laws and


institutional and governmental policies.

45
Ethical codes

• The principles mentioned above are just generic principles of


research ethics.
• However, in a particular domain or group of people or country or
organisation, they may have their own ethical list of guidelines to
conduct research.
• An example is the Nuremburg code which was developed to
prosecute the Nazi doctors in Germany. Others include the Helsinki
Declaration and Belmont Report

07/29/25 BIT 1205 46


Topic 6 concluding remarks

• Research ethics protects every one involved in research


• There are principles and guidelines for every aspect

07/29/25 IST 2203


Topic 6 assignment
48

Read the following a articles given


 Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research
ethics. Science and engineering ethics, 8(2), 191-
205.
 Greaney, A. M., Sheehy, A., Heffernan, C., Murphy,
J., Mhaolrúnaigh, S. N., Heffernan, E., & Brown, G.
(2012). Research ethics application: A guide for the
novice researcher. British Journal of Nursing,
21(1), 38-43.
 Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the
major ethical issues in conducting research? Is
there a conflict between the research ethics and
BIT the nature of nursing?. IST
07/29/25
1205 Health
2203 science journal, 5(1),
03/26/13
Topic 6 assignment
49

As part of your proposal include a section on


Ethical considerations. This usually is under
the methodology chapter.

07/29/25
BIT 1205 IST 2203 03/26/13
References of Key Material Used
50

1. Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M. (2011). What are the major


ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict
between the research ethics and the nature of nursing?.
Health science journal, 5(1), 3.
2. [Link]

07/29/25 IST 2203

You might also like