0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views56 pages

Keystone Species and Community Dynamics

Chapter 17 discusses species interactions and community structure, focusing on community webs, keystone species, exotic predators, and mutualistic keystones. It highlights the importance of keystone species in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem stability, as well as the negative impacts of exotic predators on local communities. The chapter emphasizes the complexity of food webs and the indirect interactions that influence community dynamics.

Uploaded by

bodurr571
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views56 pages

Keystone Species and Community Dynamics

Chapter 17 discusses species interactions and community structure, focusing on community webs, keystone species, exotic predators, and mutualistic keystones. It highlights the importance of keystone species in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem stability, as well as the negative impacts of exotic predators on local communities. The chapter emphasizes the complexity of food webs and the indirect interactions that influence community dynamics.

Uploaded by

bodurr571
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Species Interactions &

Community Structure
Chapter 17

KM2XJSJGR

1
Outline
• Community Webs
 Complexity and Structure

• Keystone Species
 Effects on Diversity

• Exotic Predators
• Mutualistic Keystones

2
How do you envisage the
community structure?

3
• One of the earliest approach to
community structure was to
describe who eats whom?

• Food web, a summary of feeding


interactions within a community. It
reflects the community potraits

4
5
Community Webs
• Summerhayes and Elton studied feeding
relations on Bear Island in High Arctic.

 Primary producers were terrestrial plants


and aquatic algae.
 Fed by several kinds of terrestrial and

aquatic invertebrates.
 Consumed by birds.

– Attacked by arctic foxes.

6
Arctic Food Web: Simple food
web

7
Detailed Food Web Reveal Great
Complexity
• Winemiller described feeding relations
among tropical freshwater fish.
 Represented food webs in various ways:

 Only included common species.

 Top-predator sink.

 Excluded weakest trophic links.

8
Only 10 fish feeding
Complex Interactions

9
Strong Interactions and Food Web Structure
• R. Paine suggested feeding activities of a
few species may have a dominant influence
on community structure.

Dominant or foundation species- b/c of its


huge biomass it has a strong impact on
community structure
 Reeds in wetlands- will not cover

10
Concept 2: Indirect Interactions
Indirect interactions between species are
fundamental to communities

13
• Direct interactions include: competition,
predation, commensalisms, herbivory and
mutualisms

• Indirect interactions between species are


also fundamental to communities
 One species affect another through a

third, intermediary species such as trophic


cascade
14
Indirect commesalism
• Commesalisms: one+, other is indifferent

• Indirect commensalisms: occurs when the


activity of one species indirectly- that is
through an intermediatary species- benefit
another species without it self being helped
or harmed

15
Concept 3 Keystone Species
If keystone species reduce likelihood of
competitive exclusion, their activities
would increase the number of species that
could coexist in communities.

17
What Is a Keystone Species?
• A keystone species is a species whose very
presence contributes to a diversity of life

• Whose extinction would consequently lead


to the extinction of other forms of life.

• Keystone species help to support the


ecosystem (entire community of life) of
which they are a part.

18
19
Keystone...

20
Keystone Species Concept
• Since 1969, non-predator
keystone species have been
identified and studied, such as
beavers (Castor canadensis),
bison (Bison bison), kangaroo
rats (Dipodymys spp.), and plant
species such as the quaking
aspen (Populus tremuloides).
• The two keystone species we
will be identifying later are
salmon and wolves.

21
Salmon as a Keystone Species
-Salmon play a vital role inecosystems
-They help support approximately 137 different
species
-41 mammals
-89 birds
-5 reptiles
-2 different amphibians

Without salmon as a keystone species, we could see


a tremendous decrease in dependent creatures.

22
Northwest species now struggling because of depleted
salmon runs include the following:

Black Grizzly Bear


Bear

Bald Eagle

Osprey

Caspian tern
Harlequin duck 23
BEES

24

Bees
Bees are central to the systems that support
food production for human beings.

• An international study of 115 food crops


grown in over 200 countries showed that
75% of the crops were pollinated by animals,
especially by BEES.

• Bees pollinate 80% of the food grown

25
Initial Keystone Species

Concept
The idea was developed in 1969
by Dr. Robert Paine
• The idea also originated from
his work with the Makah Indian
Tribe and lands along
Washington’s Pacific coastline.

26
FOOD WEB STRUCTURE & SPECIES
DIVERSITY
• Pain began studying the relationship between
overall species diversity within food webs and
proportion of the community represented by
predator
 Atlantic Ocean: 81 species and 16% predator
 Sargasso Sea: 268 species, 39% predator

• Pain described intertidal zone at Mukkaw Bay,


Washington figure 17.6
• Paine also described subtropical food web from
California fig.17.6
27
28
Food web

• Pisaster feeds
on acorn
barnacles and
mussels in rocky @
intertidal

29
30
31
Food Web Structure and Species
Diversity
• Paine found as number of species in
intertidal food webs increased, proportion
of the web represented by predators also
increased.
 According to his hypothesis, higher

proportion of predators produces higher


predation pressure on prey populations,
in turn promoting higher diversity
through reducing the chance of
“competitive exclusion”.
 Removal of starfish (top predator) caused

decline in diversity from 15 to 8 species.


32
33
34
Can Herbivore be a Keystone?
See intertidal algal species

35
Consumers’ Effects on Local Diversity:
Herbivore can be a Keystone species
• Effect of herbivores on plant diversity:
 Herbivore food preference.

 Competitive relationships between plant


species.

 Variance in feeding preferences and


competitive relationships across
environments.
36
Fish as River Keystone Species

Power investigated whether


California roach Hsperoleucas
symmetricus and steelhead trout
Oncorhhyncus mykiss
significantly influence food web
structure.

42
Fish as River Keystone Species
Predatory fish
decrease algal
densities.

Low predator
density increased
midge production.

Increased feeding
pressure on algal
populations.

Thus, fish act as


Keystone Species.
43
44
45
Effects of Predation by Birds on
Herbivory
• Atlegrim studied influence of birds on
herbivorous insects and insect-induced plant
damage.
 Insectivorous birds may act as keystone

species via effects on herbivorous insects.


 Larval insect densities peak when many

insectivorous birds are feeding their


young.

46
Keystone Species: Summation
• Power : Keystone species exert strong
effects on their community structure, despite
low biomass.

50
CONSERVATION POINT of VIEW

Concept review.
Keystone species have a
disproportionately large influence on
ecosystem structure and function.
Remove the species, the whole
ecosystem can change

Management/Restoration of keystone
species (particularly predators) is often
an important goal of restoration.

51
Exotic Predators
• Exotic predators can collapse and simplify
the structure of food webs

• Exotic species have dramatic impacts on


communities because they were outside the
evolutionary experience of local prey
populations.
 Nile Perch (Lates nilotica) exotic fish

predator in Lake Victoria.


 Fish fauna dramatically reduced.

55
Exotic Predators

56
Exotic Predators

57
Exotic Predators
• Kaufman pointed out changes in Lake
Victoria fish community coincide with other
ecosystem changes.
 Dissolved oxygen concentrations

significantly decreased.
 Cultural eutrophication.

58
İstılacı Tür Aşılanması
Eğridir Gölü'nde Balık Üretimi

700

600 Levrek

500
Sazan
400

300
Diğer
200 Balıklar

100

0
1958 1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991

59
Concept 4: MUTUALISTIC
KEYSTONE
Mutualistic species can act as keystone
species

•Predators can act as a keystone


•Herbivore Can act as a Keystone

•Mutualistic species as a keystone

60
A Cleaner Fısh as a Keystone
Species
• Many fish in tropics clean the
ectoparasities of other fish
 Cleaner wasser remove

about 1200 parasites/day


• What effect might cleaning
activity by the cleaner wasser
have on diversity
 Experiment carried out to

test this showed that


cleaner fish had strong
effect on diversity
61
62
Seed Dispersal Mutualists as Keystone
Species
• Christian observed native ants
disperse 30% of shrubland seeds in
fynbos of South Africa.
 Seed-dispersing ants bury seeds

in sites safe from predators and


fire.
 Large seeds

 Introduced Argentine ants have

displaced many native ant


species that disperse large
seeds.
 Substantial reductions in

seedling recruitment by plants


producing large seeds. 63
64
65
Ants and Agriculture Keystone predators
for pest control

• 17 centuries ago, Chinese farmers used citrus ant to control


herbivorous insect
• US department of Agriculture sent workers to Chine to inquiry
about pest control
•They came across with some villages where main occupation is

growing ants for orange garden for 17 century

Read the rest..

66
Review
• Community Webs
 Complexity and Structure

• Keystone Species
 Effects on Diversity

• Exotic Predators
• Mutualistic Keystones

67
68
69
70

You might also like