0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views20 pages

Object-Oriented Testing Strategies in Java

Chapter 11 of 'Object-Oriented Software Engineering' discusses various aspects of software testing, including types of testing such as unit, integration, system, and acceptance testing. It emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive test plan and the distinction between quality assurance and testing. The chapter also covers fault handling techniques and the differences between black-box and white-box testing methodologies.

Uploaded by

ellen deus
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views20 pages

Object-Oriented Testing Strategies in Java

Chapter 11 of 'Object-Oriented Software Engineering' discusses various aspects of software testing, including types of testing such as unit, integration, system, and acceptance testing. It emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive test plan and the distinction between quality assurance and testing. The chapter also covers fault handling techniques and the differences between black-box and white-box testing methodologies.

Uploaded by

ellen deus
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Object-Oriented Software Engineering

Using UML, Patterns, and Java

Chapter 11, Testing


Outline

¨ Terminology ¨ System testing


¨ Types of errors  Function testing
¨  Structure Testing
Dealing with errors
 Performance testing
¨ Quality assurance vs Testing  Acceptance testing
¨ Component Testing  Installation testing
 Unit testing
 Integration testing
¨ Testing Strategy
¨ Design Patterns & Testing

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 2
Some Observations
¨ It is impossible to completely test any nontrivial module or any
system
 Theoretical limitations: Halting problem ??
 Practial limitations: Prohibitive in time and cost
¨ Testing can only show the presence of bugs, not their absence
(Dijkstra)

total number of execution paths?

loop 200 times

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 3
Testing Activities
Subsystem Requirements
Unit System
Code Test Analysis
Design Document
Tested Document User
Subsystem
Subsystem Manual
Unit
Code Test
Tested Integration Functional
Subsystem
Test Test
Integrated Functioning
Subsystems System

Tested Subsystem

Subsystem Unit
Code Test
All
Alltests
testsby
bydeveloper
developer
Cf. levels of testing

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 4
Testing Activities continued
Client’s
Global Understanding User
Requirements of Requirements Environment

Functioning Validated Accepted


System PerformanceSystem System
Acceptance Installation
Test Test Test

Usable
Tests
Testsby
byclient
client System
Tests
Testsby
bydeveloper
developer
User’s understanding
System in
Use
Tests
Tests(?)
(?) by
byuser
user
nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 5
Level of abstraction
Levels of Testing in V Model

system system
requireme integration
nts
software
requireme acceptance
nts test

preliminar software

te
y integratio
an

t s
design n
aly

and
componen
z

detailed
ea

i
t

nt
design
nd

test

eg
r
de

at
code & unit
sig

e
debug test
n

Time

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit


N.B.: component test vs. unit test; acceptance test vs. system integration
Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 6
Test Planning [Pressman]

¨ A Test Plan: ¨ A test plan includes:


 covers all types and phases of  test objectives
testing  schedule and logistics
 guides the entire testing process  test strategies
 who, why, when, what  test cases
 developed as requirements,  procedure
functional specification, and high-  data
level design are developed  expected result
 should be done before  procedures for handling
implementation starts problems

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 7
Fault Handling Techniques
Fault Handling

Fault Tolerance
Fault Avoidance Fault Detection

Design Atomic Modular


Reviews
Methodology Transactions Redundancy

Configuration
Verification
Management

Testing Debugging

Unit Integration System Correctness Performance


Testing Testing Testing Debugging Debugging

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 8
Quality Assurance encompasses Testing
Quality Assurance

Usability Testing

Scenario Prototype Product


Testing Testing Testing

Fault Avoidance Fault Tolerance

Atomic Modular
Configuration Transactions Redundancy
Verification
Management
Fault Detection

Reviews

Debugging
Walkthrough Inspection
Testing

Correctness Performance
Unit Integration System Debugging Debugging
Testing Testing Testing
nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 9
Types of Testing
¨ Unit Testing:
 Individual subsystem
 Carried out by developers
 Goal: Confirm that subsystems is correctly coded and carries out
the intended functionality
¨ Integration Testing:
 Groups of subsystems (collection of classes) and eventually the
entire system
 Carried out by developers
 Goal: Test the interface among the subsystem

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 10
System Testing
Terminology:
¨ System Testing: system testing here = validation testing
 The entire system
 Carried out by developers
 Goal: Determine if the system meets the requirements (functional
and global)
¨ Acceptance Testing: 2 kinds of Acceptance testing
 Evaluates the system delivered by developers
 Carried out by the client. May involve executing typical
transactions on site on a trial basis
 Goal: Demonstrate that the system meets customer requirements
and is ready to use

¨ Implementation (Coding) and testing go hand in hand

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 11
Unit Testing
¨ Informal:
 Incremental coding Write a little, test a little
¨ Static Analysis:
 Hand execution: Reading the source code
 Walk-Through (informal presentation to others)
 Code Inspection (formal presentation to others)
 Automated Tools checking for
 syntactic and semantic errors

 departure from coding standards

¨ Dynamic Analysis:
 Black-box testing (Test the input/output behavior)
 White-box testing (Test the internal logic of the subsystem or object)
 Data-structure based testing (Data types determine test cases)

Which is more effective, static or dynamic analysis?


nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 12
Black-box Testing

¨ Focus: I/O behavior. If for any given input, we can predict the
output, then the module passes the test.
 Almost always impossible to generate all possible inputs ("test
cases") why?
¨ Goal: Reduce number of test cases by equivalence partitioning:
 Divide input conditions into equivalence classes
 Choose test cases for each equivalence class. (Example: If an object
is supposed to accept a negative number, testing one negative
number is enough)

 If x = 3 then …

 If x > -5 and x < 5 then …

What would be the equivalence classes?


nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 13
Black-box Testing (Continued)
¨ Selection of equivalence classes (No rules, only guidelines):
 Input is valid across range of values. Select test cases from 3
equivalence classes:
 Below the range
 Within the range Are these complete?
 Above the range
 Input is valid if it is from a discrete set. Select test cases from 2
equivalence classes:
 Valid discrete value
 Invalid discrete value
¨ Another solution to select only a limited amount of test cases:
 Get knowledge about the inner workings of the unit being tested =>
white-box testing

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 14
White-box Testing
¨ Focus: Thoroughness (Coverage). Every statement in the component is
executed at least once.
¨ Four types of white-box testing
 Statement Testing
 Loop Testing
 Path Testing
 Branch Testing

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 15
White-box Testing (Continued)
¨ Statement Testing (Algebraic Testing): Test single statements
¨ Loop Testing:
 Cause execution of the loop to be skipped completely. (Exception:
Repeat loops)
 Loop to be executed exactly once
 Loop to be executed more than once
¨ Path testing:
 Make sure all paths in the program are executed
¨ Branch Testing (Conditional Testing): Make sure that each
possible outcome from a condition is tested at least once

if ( i = TRUE) printf("YES\n");else printf("NO\n");


Test cases: 1) i = TRUE; 2) i = FALSE

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 16
White-Box Testing
Loop Testing
[Pressman]

Simple
loop
Nested
Loops

Concatenated
Loops Unstructured
Loops
Why is loop testing important?
nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 17
Self reading
Comparison of White & Black-box Testing 25.1.2002

¨ White-box Testing: ¨ Both types of testing are needed


 Potentially infinite number of ¨ White-box testing and black box
paths have to be tested testing are the extreme ends of a
 White-box testing often tests testing continuum.
what is done, instead of what ¨
should be done
Any choice of test case lies in
between and depends on the
 Cannot detect missing use cases
following:
¨ Black-box Testing:  Number of possible logical paths
 Potential combinatorical  Nature of input data
explosion of test cases (valid & 
invalid data) Amount of computation
 Often not clear whether the  Complexity of algorithms and
selected test cases uncover a data structures
particular error
 Does not discover extraneous
use cases ("features")

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 18
The 4 Testing Steps

1.
[Link]
Selectwhat
whathas
hasto
tobe
be 3.
[Link]
Developtest
testcases
cases
measured
measured AAtest
testcase
caseisisaaset
setof
oftest
test
Analysis: data
dataororsituations
situationsthat
thatwill
Analysis:Completeness
Completenessof of will
requirements be
beused
usedtotoexercise
exercisethetheunit
unit
requirements
Design: (code,
(code,module,
module,system)
system)being
being
Design:tested
testedfor
forcohesion
cohesion tested
Implementation: testedor
orabout
aboutthetheattribute
attribute
Implementation:Code
Codetests
tests being
beingmeasured
measured
2.
[Link]
Decidehow
howthe
thetesting
testingisis 4.
[Link]
Createthe
thetest
testoracle
oracle
done
done An
Anoracle
oraclecontains
containsofofthe
the
Code
Codeinspection
inspection predicted
predictedresults
resultsfor
foraaset
setof
of
Proofs test
testcases
Proofs(Design
(DesignbybyContract)
Contract) cases
Black-box, The
Thetest
testoracle
oraclehas
hasto
tobe
Black-box,white
whitebox,
box, be
Select written
writtendown
downbefore
beforethe
the
Selectintegration
integrationtesting
testing actual
strategy actualtesting
testingtakes
takesplace
place
strategy(big
(bigbang,
bang,bottom
bottom
up,
up,top
topdown,
down,sandwich)
sandwich)
Next module
nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 19
Who Tests the Software?
[Pressman]

developer independent tester


Understands the system Must learn about the system,
but, will test "gently" but, will attempt to break it
and, is driven by "delivery" and, is driven by quality

nd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 20

You might also like