Chapter 8
Fundamentals of Respiratory
Care Research
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
Explain why research activities are important
in healthcare.
Describe several sources of information that
are commonly used during a literature
search.
Review the various roles of those involved in
conducting research
Argue the importance of evidence-based
medicine and note its limitations
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
Compare and contrast the types of research
design
Describe strategies for getting started in
research
Describe and give examples of how to
develop a study idea and write a research
protocol.
Describe the three basic formats for
publishing a research study.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Overview of Respiratory Care
Research
Research
A scientific and systematic exploration of new
knowledge
Scholarship
Sharing the methods and findings of existing
research and knowledge through presentations at
professional events, as well as publishing
textbooks and journal articles
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The Importance of Research
in Health Care
Academic medicine has three basic missions:
To heal
To teach
To discover
Several stakeholders involved:
Clinicians (who need the ability to assess the usefulness of
new equipment and treatments)
Educators (who need the ability to find, summarize, and
present evidence for clinical activities)
Administrators (who need to evaluate the quality of services
and the validity of policies/procedures)
Researchers (who need to be able to generate new ideas
that inform the other stakeholders)
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Review the Literature
(1 of 4)
Bibliographic databases
Contain books, book chapters, reports, citations, abstracts,
and either the full text of the articles indexed or links to the
full text
Most popular is PubMed
A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine that
includes over 18 million citations from MEDLINE and other
life science journals for biomedical articles back to 1948
Provides search filters, automatic e-mailing of search
updates, the ability to save records, and filters for search
results using "My NCBI”
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Review the Literature
(2 of 4)
Synthesized databases
Prefiltered records for particular topics
Usually subscription based with relatively
large fees
May provide the “best” evidence without
extensive searches of standard bibliographic
databases
The leading database in this category is the
Cochrane Collaboration
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Review the Literature
(3 of 4)
Portals
Web pages that act as a starting point for using
the Web or web-based services
Examples:
ClinicalKey
• Provides links to books, journals, Clinics in Medicine,
patient education resources, and images
Ovid
• Provides links to books, journals, evidence-based
medicine databases, and the Cumulative Index to
Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Review the Literature
(4 of 4)
Electronic journals and books
We are rapidly reaching the point where all medical
journals are available only online
Respiratory Care journal
Electronic versions of textbooks available on the
Internet
Subscription services are also available
General Internet resources
General search engine
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Suggestions for Conducting
Searches
Talk to a professional librarian!
Use bibliographic software such as:
EndNote
RefWorks
Zotero
Mendeley
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluating the Quality
of Research (1 of 2)
Peer reviewed
Evidence-based medicine (EBM)
A rigorous and systematic review of available
evidence
A critical analysis of available evidence to
determine which conclusions are most sound and
applicable
A disciplined approach to incorporating the
literature with personal practice and experience
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Evaluating the Quality
of Research (2 of 2)
Case report
The simplest and least rigorous design is a single
case report, in which a new clinical issue or
problem is described in a single patient
Cohort studies
Compare the clinical outcomes of two groups
Generally have greater scientific rigor than case
studies or case series
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Cohort Studies
Observational cohort study
Compares the outcomes between two groups of
patients, with the treatment allocated to one group
but not the other
Key idea is that the groups are selected by an
intervention of the investigator
Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Mitigates confounding factors by randomly
assigning study participants into either a treatment
group
Usually considered the strongest study design
because it has the least risk of bias
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Research Design
The major purpose of a research design
Control of potential nuisance variables
Four methods of control
Random selection
Matching of subjects between groups or grouping
of subjects based on a nuisance variable to
achieve homogeneity
Including a nuisance variable as a treatment
variable
Statistical removal of a nuisance variable through
analysis of co-variance.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Experimental Design
Pre-experimental
There is little or no control of extraneous nuisance
variables
Useful for a pilot study
Quasi-experimental
Designs lack full control of all variables, but there
is an effort to compensate with other controls.
True experimental
Designs provide full control of variables by one or
more of the methods previously described
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Types of RCTs
Parallel-control study
Compare two groups: one receives the treatment
being studied, and the other receives the control
treatment
Crossover study
The study treatment is first administered to one
group of study subjects while the other group
receives the control or comparison treatment
After measuring outcomes and a subsequent
“washout period”, the group initially given the
study treatment receives the control treatment and
the group initially given the control treatment
receives the study treatment
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Begin Doing Research
How to develop a study idea
Formulate a problem statement
Generate a hypothesis
Define rejection criteria
Make a prediction
Perform the experiment
Test the hypothesis
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Key Roles in Research
Principal investigator
The one who is ultimately responsible for
completing the study in compliance with all
applicable rules and regulations and for adhering
to the protocol approved by the IRB
Co-investigators
Consultants
Study subjects
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Write the Abstract
A condensed version of a research paper that
appears at the beginning of the publication
Most journals restrict the length of the
abstract
Should include an introduction, background,
study purpose, methods, results, discussion
Start with a longer abstract and then edit
The idea is to decrease word count while
increasing clarity
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Make a Poster
A poster allows a bit more freedom in terms of
space as compared to an abstract
Generally 4 feet tall by 6 feet long
Make sure the graphics are at least 300 dots
per inch (dpi)
Posters are usually presented in a group of
maybe 10-15 in small rooms
The posters are hung on stands and visitors
walk around reading them and discussing
them with the authors
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Write a Paper (1 of 2)
Takes anywhere from 20 to 100 hours
Has the same basic outline as an abstract or
poster but goes into much greater detail
Has a references section
No word limit for the Introduction (within
reason)
Most journals have a maximum word count
for the full text of the paper (usually in the
range of 2000-3000 words, depending on the
journal)
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Write a Paper (2 of 2)
Introduction
Provide a brief background explaining why the study was conducted and
why it is of interest
Research problem or hypothesis should be included
Methods
Explains to the reader exactly what was done to answer the research
question and/or test the hypotheses described in the Introduction
Results
Presents the data gathered from the experiments
Discussion
Show how the results answered the research question that was first
described in the Introduction
Should interpret the results in the face of earlier studies’ conclusions
Conclusion
Conclusions made should be briefly explained, including reasons for
rejecting alternate interpretations
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Respond to Reviewers
Usually reviewed by two or three “peer reviewers”
Reviewers will read and critique any and everything
about your paper, from what words you use, to what
measurements you made, to what statistical
procedures you used
Recommend to the journal editor one of three
outcomes
That your paper should not be considered for publication
Rejected with an opportunity to revise and resubmit
That the paper should be accepted as is
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.