0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views23 pages

Chapter 008

Chapter 8 covers the fundamentals of respiratory care research, emphasizing the importance of research in healthcare, various research designs, and the roles of stakeholders involved in research activities. It outlines strategies for literature review, evaluating research quality, and provides guidance on developing study ideas and writing research papers. The chapter also discusses the process of responding to peer reviewers and the significance of evidence-based medicine.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views23 pages

Chapter 008

Chapter 8 covers the fundamentals of respiratory care research, emphasizing the importance of research in healthcare, various research designs, and the roles of stakeholders involved in research activities. It outlines strategies for literature review, evaluating research quality, and provides guidance on developing study ideas and writing research papers. The chapter also discusses the process of responding to peer reviewers and the significance of evidence-based medicine.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 8

Fundamentals of Respiratory
Care Research
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
 Explain why research activities are important
in healthcare.
 Describe several sources of information that
are commonly used during a literature
search.
 Review the various roles of those involved in
conducting research
 Argue the importance of evidence-based
medicine and note its limitations

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
 Compare and contrast the types of research
design
 Describe strategies for getting started in
research
 Describe and give examples of how to
develop a study idea and write a research
protocol.
 Describe the three basic formats for
publishing a research study.

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Overview of Respiratory Care
Research
 Research
 A scientific and systematic exploration of new
knowledge
 Scholarship
 Sharing the methods and findings of existing
research and knowledge through presentations at
professional events, as well as publishing
textbooks and journal articles

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


The Importance of Research
in Health Care
 Academic medicine has three basic missions:
 To heal
 To teach
 To discover
 Several stakeholders involved:
 Clinicians (who need the ability to assess the usefulness of
new equipment and treatments)
 Educators (who need the ability to find, summarize, and
present evidence for clinical activities)
 Administrators (who need to evaluate the quality of services
and the validity of policies/procedures)
 Researchers (who need to be able to generate new ideas
that inform the other stakeholders)
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Review the Literature
(1 of 4)
 Bibliographic databases
 Contain books, book chapters, reports, citations, abstracts,
and either the full text of the articles indexed or links to the
full text
 Most popular is PubMed
 A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine that
includes over 18 million citations from MEDLINE and other
life science journals for biomedical articles back to 1948
 Provides search filters, automatic e-mailing of search
updates, the ability to save records, and filters for search
results using "My NCBI”

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


How to Review the Literature
(2 of 4)
Synthesized databases
 Prefiltered records for particular topics

 Usually subscription based with relatively

large fees
 May provide the “best” evidence without

extensive searches of standard bibliographic


databases
 The leading database in this category is the

Cochrane Collaboration

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


How to Review the Literature
(3 of 4)
 Portals
 Web pages that act as a starting point for using
the Web or web-based services
 Examples:
 ClinicalKey
• Provides links to books, journals, Clinics in Medicine,
patient education resources, and images
 Ovid
• Provides links to books, journals, evidence-based
medicine databases, and the Cumulative Index to
Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


How to Review the Literature
(4 of 4)
Electronic journals and books
 We are rapidly reaching the point where all medical

journals are available only online


 Respiratory Care journal

 Electronic versions of textbooks available on the

Internet
 Subscription services are also available

General Internet resources


 General search engine

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Suggestions for Conducting
Searches
 Talk to a professional librarian!
 Use bibliographic software such as:
 EndNote
 RefWorks
 Zotero
 Mendeley

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Evaluating the Quality
of Research (1 of 2)
 Peer reviewed
 Evidence-based medicine (EBM)
 A rigorous and systematic review of available
evidence
 A critical analysis of available evidence to
determine which conclusions are most sound and
applicable
 A disciplined approach to incorporating the
literature with personal practice and experience

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Evaluating the Quality
of Research (2 of 2)
 Case report
 The simplest and least rigorous design is a single
case report, in which a new clinical issue or
problem is described in a single patient
 Cohort studies
 Compare the clinical outcomes of two groups
 Generally have greater scientific rigor than case
studies or case series

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Cohort Studies
 Observational cohort study
 Compares the outcomes between two groups of
patients, with the treatment allocated to one group
but not the other
 Key idea is that the groups are selected by an
intervention of the investigator
 Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
 Mitigates confounding factors by randomly
assigning study participants into either a treatment
group
 Usually considered the strongest study design
because it has the least risk of bias
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Research Design
 The major purpose of a research design
 Control of potential nuisance variables
 Four methods of control
 Random selection
 Matching of subjects between groups or grouping
of subjects based on a nuisance variable to
achieve homogeneity
 Including a nuisance variable as a treatment
variable
 Statistical removal of a nuisance variable through
analysis of co-variance.

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Experimental Design
 Pre-experimental
 There is little or no control of extraneous nuisance
variables
 Useful for a pilot study
 Quasi-experimental
 Designs lack full control of all variables, but there
is an effort to compensate with other controls.
 True experimental
 Designs provide full control of variables by one or
more of the methods previously described

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Types of RCTs
 Parallel-control study
 Compare two groups: one receives the treatment
being studied, and the other receives the control
treatment
 Crossover study
 The study treatment is first administered to one
group of study subjects while the other group
receives the control or comparison treatment
 After measuring outcomes and a subsequent
“washout period”, the group initially given the
study treatment receives the control treatment and
the group initially given the control treatment
receives the study treatment
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Begin Doing Research
 How to develop a study idea
 Formulate a problem statement
 Generate a hypothesis
 Define rejection criteria
 Make a prediction
 Perform the experiment
 Test the hypothesis

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Key Roles in Research
 Principal investigator
 The one who is ultimately responsible for
completing the study in compliance with all
applicable rules and regulations and for adhering
to the protocol approved by the IRB
 Co-investigators
 Consultants
 Study subjects

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


How to Write the Abstract

 A condensed version of a research paper that


appears at the beginning of the publication
 Most journals restrict the length of the
abstract
 Should include an introduction, background,
study purpose, methods, results, discussion
 Start with a longer abstract and then edit
 The idea is to decrease word count while
increasing clarity

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


How to Make a Poster
 A poster allows a bit more freedom in terms of
space as compared to an abstract
 Generally 4 feet tall by 6 feet long
 Make sure the graphics are at least 300 dots
per inch (dpi)
 Posters are usually presented in a group of
maybe 10-15 in small rooms
 The posters are hung on stands and visitors
walk around reading them and discussing
them with the authors
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Write a Paper (1 of 2)
 Takes anywhere from 20 to 100 hours
 Has the same basic outline as an abstract or
poster but goes into much greater detail
 Has a references section
 No word limit for the Introduction (within
reason)
 Most journals have a maximum word count
for the full text of the paper (usually in the
range of 2000-3000 words, depending on the
journal)
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
How to Write a Paper (2 of 2)
 Introduction
 Provide a brief background explaining why the study was conducted and
why it is of interest
 Research problem or hypothesis should be included
 Methods
 Explains to the reader exactly what was done to answer the research
question and/or test the hypotheses described in the Introduction
 Results
 Presents the data gathered from the experiments
 Discussion
 Show how the results answered the research question that was first
described in the Introduction
 Should interpret the results in the face of earlier studies’ conclusions
 Conclusion
 Conclusions made should be briefly explained, including reasons for
rejecting alternate interpretations

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


How to Respond to Reviewers
 Usually reviewed by two or three “peer reviewers”
 Reviewers will read and critique any and everything
about your paper, from what words you use, to what
measurements you made, to what statistical
procedures you used
 Recommend to the journal editor one of three
outcomes
 That your paper should not be considered for publication
 Rejected with an opportunity to revise and resubmit
 That the paper should be accepted as is

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

You might also like