0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views49 pages

Understanding Operating System Processes

The document discusses the concept of processes in operating systems, detailing their states, control blocks, and scheduling mechanisms. It covers process creation, termination, and inter-process communication, including shared memory and message passing models. Additionally, it addresses the producer-consumer problem as a paradigm for cooperating processes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views49 pages

Understanding Operating System Processes

The document discusses the concept of processes in operating systems, detailing their states, control blocks, and scheduling mechanisms. It covers process creation, termination, and inter-process communication, including shared memory and message passing models. Additionally, it addresses the producer-consumer problem as a paradigm for cooperating processes.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Processes

Processes

 Process Concept
 Process Scheduling
 Operations on Processes
 Cooperating Processes
 Inter process Communication
 Communication in Client-Server Systems

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Concept
 Process – a program in execution; process execution must progress in

sequential fashion

 “Program” is a passive entity which resides in secondary memory, “process” is

Active entity which resides in Primary memory.

 A process includes:

 program counter

 stack

 data section

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process in Memory

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process State

 As a process executes, it changes state

 new: The process is being created

 running: Instructions are being executed

 waiting: The process is waiting for some event to occur

 ready: The process is waiting to be assigned to a processor

 terminated: The process has finished execution

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Diagram of Process State

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Control Block (PCB)

Information associated with each process

 Process state

 Program counter

 CPU registers

 CPU scheduling information

 Memory-management information

 Accounting information

 I/O status information

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Control Block (PCB)

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
CPU Switch From Process to Process

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Scheduling Queues

 Job queue – set of all processes in the system

 Ready queue – set of all processes residing in main memory, ready and

waiting to execute

 Device queues – set of processes waiting for an I/O device

 Processes migrate among the various queues

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Representation of Process Scheduling
Queuing Diagram

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Schedulers

 Long-term scheduler (or job scheduler) – selects which processes

should be brought into the ready queue

 Short-term scheduler (or CPU scheduler) – selects which process

should be executed next and allocates CPU

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Addition of Medium Term Scheduling

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Schedulers (Cont.)

 Short-term scheduler is invoked very frequently (milliseconds) 


(must be fast)
 Long-term scheduler is invoked very infrequently (seconds,
minutes)  (may be slow)
 The long-term scheduler controls the degree of
multiprogramming
 Processes can be described as either:
 I/O-bound process – spends more time doing I/O than
computations, many short CPU bursts
 CPU-bound process – spends more time doing computations;
few very long CPU bursts

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Context Switch
 When CPU switches to another process, the system must save the
state of the old process and load the saved state for the new
process
 Context-switch time is overhead; the system does no useful work
while switching
 Time dependent on hardware support

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operations on Processes

 A process may create several new processes, via a create-process

system call, during its course of execution.

 The creating process is called the parent process, and the new

processes that are being created are called the child process.

 Parent process create child processes, which, in turn create other

processes, forming a tree of processes

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Operations on Processes
Takes care of all user
created processes

Responsible for
Processes taking care of
Networking Functions
memory and File
management

X-window for login

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Creation

 Resource sharing
 Parent and children share all resources
 Children share subset of parent’s resources
 Parent and child share no resources
 Execution
 Parent and children execute concurrently
 Parent waits until children terminate

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Creation

 Address space
 Child duplicate of parent (Same program and data
as parent)
 Child has a program loaded into it
 UNIX examples
 fork system call creates new process
 exec system call used after a fork to replace the
process’ memory space with a new program

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Creation

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
C Program Forking Separate Process
int main()
{
pid_t pid;
/* fork another process */
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) { /* error occurred */
fprintf(stderr, "Fork Failed");
exit(-1);
}
else if (pid == 0) { /* child process */
execlp("/bin/ls", "ls", NULL);
}
else { /* parent process */
/* parent will wait for the child to
complete */
wait (NULL);
printf ("Child Complete");
exit(0);
}
}

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Process Termination
 A process terminates when it executes the last statement and asks the operating
system to delete it (exit), only by the parent process
 Output data from child to parent (via wait)
 Process resources are de-allocated by operating system(Physical/Virtual, Open
files and I/O buffers)
 Parent may terminate execution of children processes (abort)
 Child has exceeded allocated resources (Parent should have a mechanism to
inspect the state of the child)
 Task assigned to child is no longer required
 If parent is exiting
 Some operating system do not allow child to continue if its parent terminates
– All children terminated - cascading termination

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Inter-process Communication
 Processes executing concurrently may be either Independent or
Cooperating processes.
 Independent process cannot affect or be affected by the execution of
another process
 Cooperating process can affect or be affected by the execution of
another process (Any process that shares data with another process)
 Advantages of process cooperation
 Information sharing
 Computation speed-up
 Modularity
 Convenience

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Inter-process Communication (IPC)
 Cooperating processes require an IPC mechanism that will allow them to

exchange data and information among the processes.

 There are 2 fundamental models of IPC

 Shared Memory

 Message Passing

 In Shared Memory model, a region of memory that is shared by

cooperating process is established. Processes can then exchange


information's by reading and writing data to the shared region.

 In message passing model, communication takes place by means of

messages exchanged between the cooperating processes.


Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Communications Models

(Message Passing) (Shared Memory)


Process Level User Thread Level
Parallelism(Distributed) Parallelism – Tightly
Loosely coupled system coupled system
Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Share Memory Model
 IPC using shared memory requires communicating processes to establish a region of

shared region.

 Typically, a shared region resides in the address space of the process creating the

shared-memory segment.

 The other processes that wish to communicate using this shared-memory segment must

attach it to their address space.

 Usually the OS tries to prevent one process from accessing the memory of another

process.

 Shared memory requires that two or more processes agrees to remove this restriction.

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Producer-Consumer Problem

 A producer process produces information that is consumed by


the consumer process
 Solution to producer consumer problem is to use share memory
concept
 To allow producer and consumer process run concurrently, we
must have a buffer of items that can be filled by the producer
and emptied by the consumer
 This buffer will reside in a region of memory that is shared
between Producer and Consumer.
 A Producer can produce one item while the consumer
consumes another Item

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Producer-Consumer Problem

 The Producer and Consumer must be synchronized, so that the

consumer does not try to consume an item that is not yet been
produced.

 Uses buffer

 Bounded

 Un-Bounded

 For example:

 Client – Server Model

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Producer-Consumer Problem

 Paradigm for cooperating processes, producer process

produces information that is consumed by a consumer


process

 unbounded-buffer places no practical limit on the size of


the buffer

 bounded-buffer assumes that there is a fixed buffer size

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.29 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Bounded-Buffer – Shared-Memory Solution

 Shared data

#define BUFFER_SIZE 10
typedef struct {
...
} item;

item buffer[BUFFER_SIZE];
int in = 0;
int out = 0;
 Solution is correct, but can only use BUFFER_SIZE-1 elements

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.30 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Bounded-Buffer – Insert() Method

while (true)
{
/* Produce an item */
while (((in + 1) % BUFFER SIZE count) == out)
; /* do nothing -- no free buffers */
buffer[in] = item;
in = (in + 1) % BUFFER SIZE;
}

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.31 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Bounded Buffer – Remove() Method

while (true)
{
while (in == out)
; // do nothing -- nothing to consume

// remove an item from the buffer


item = buffer[out];
out = (out + 1) % BUFFER SIZE;
return item;
}

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.32 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Message Passing Model
 Mechanism for processes to communicate and to synchronize their

actions with each other without resorting to shared variables

 Useful in a distributed environment where the communicating

process might be residing in different computer in a network.

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.33 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Message Passing Model
 IPC facility provides two operations under message passing:
 send(message) – message size fixed or variable
 receive(message)
 Fixed Size – System level implementations are easier but makes the task of
programming more difficult
 Variable size – Requires a more complex system level implementation but the
task of programming becomes simpler
 If P and Q wish to communicate, they need to:
 establish a communication link between them
 exchange messages via send/receive Q
 Implementation of communication link
 physical (e.g., shared memory, hardware bus)
 logical (e.g., logical properties) P

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.34 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Message Passing Model
 There are several methods for logically implementing a link and the primitive

send() and receive() operations


 Direct and Indirect communication

 Synchronous and Asynchronous

 Automatic and Explicit Buffering

 There are several issues related with features like:

 Naming

 Synchronization

 Buffering

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.35 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Direct Communication
 Processes that wants to communicate must have a way to refer each other. They can
either use direct or indirect communications.
 Processes must name each other explicitly: Symmetric
 send (P, message) – send a message to process P
 receive(Q, message) – receive a message from process Q
 Only the sender knows the receiver explicitly: Asymmetric
 send (P, message) – send a message to process P
 Receive(id, message) – receive a message from any process the variable “id” is
set to the name of the process with which communication has taken place
 Properties of communication link
 Links are established automatically
 A link is associated with exactly one pair of communicating processes
 Between each pair there exists exactly one link
 The link may be unidirectional, but is usually bi-directional

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.36 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Indirect Communication
 Messages are directed and received from mailboxes (also referred to as ports)
 Each mailbox has a unique id
 Processes can communicate only if they share a mailbox
 A mailbox can be viewed as an abstract object into which messages can be
placed and removed.
 Properties of communication link
 Link established only if processes share a common mailbox
 A link may be associated with many processes
 Each pair of processes may share several communication links
 Link may be unidirectional or bi-directional

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.37 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Indirect Communication

 Operations
 create a new mailbox
 send and receive messages through mailbox
 destroy a mailbox
 Primitives are defined as:

send(A, message) – send a message to mailbox A


receive(A, message) – receive a message from
mailbox A

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.38 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Indirect Communication

 Mailbox sharing
 P1, P2, and P3 share mailbox A
 P1, sends; P2 and P3 receive
 Who gets the message?
 Solutions
 Allow a link to be associated with at most two processes
 Allow only one process at a time to execute a receive operation
 Allow the system to select arbitrarily the receiver. Sender is
notified who the receiver was.

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.39 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Synchronization
 Message passing may be either blocking or non-blocking
 Blocking is considered synchronous
 Blocking send has the sender block until the message is received
 Blocking receive has the receiver block until a message is
available
 Non-blocking is considered asynchronous
 Non-blocking send has the sender send the message and continue
 Non-blocking receive has the receiver receive a valid message or
null

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.40 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Buffering
 Queue of messages attached to the link; implemented in one of
three ways
1. Zero capacity – 0 messages
Sender must wait for receiver (rendezvous)
2. Bounded capacity – finite length of n messages
Sender must wait if link full
3. Unbounded capacity – infinite length
Sender never waits

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.41 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Client-Server Communication
 Sockets
 Remote Procedure Calls
 Remote Method Invocation (Java)

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.42 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Sockets
 A socket is defined as an endpoint for communication
 Concatenation of IP address and port
 The socket [Link]:1625 refers to port 1625 on host
[Link]
 Communication consists between a pair of sockets

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.43 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Socket Communication

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.44 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Remote Procedure Calls
 Remote procedure call (RPC) abstracts procedure calls between
processes on networked systems.
 Stubs – client-side proxy for the actual procedure on the server.
 The client-side stub locates the server and marshalls the
parameters.
 The server-side stub receives this message, unpacks the
marshalled parameters, and peforms the procedure on the server.

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.45 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Execution of RPC

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.46 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Remote Method Invocation
 Remote Method Invocation (RMI) is a Java mechanism similar to
RPCs.
 RMI allows a Java program on one machine to invoke a method on
a remote object.

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.47 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
Marshalling Parameters

Operating System Concepts - 7th Edition, Feb 7, 2006 3.48 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2005
End of Chapter 3

You might also like