0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views43 pages

Powertrain Systems Engineering Insights

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views43 pages

Powertrain Systems Engineering Insights

Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Powertrain

Matching
John Bucknell
DaimlerChrysler
Powertrain Systems Engineering

September 30, 2006


What is Powertrain
Matching?
 Selecting the right engine and gearing
for a given application
 Not just performance, but giving the driver
the expected response to pedal inputs
 In automotive applications delves
deeper into transmission shift
schedules as fuel economy is heavily
impacted
A little side story
to
get you in the right mindset

which illustrates the difference


between
motorheads and everyone else
The Story of
Power
and the Power Paradigm
(the early life of Electronic Throttle Control at Chrysler)
The Beginning

Driver Pedal

 Driver pushes on Pedal to move vehicle


 Pedal formerly known as Gas Pedal, and before
that, Accelerator Pedal
Driver Intent Relates to Pedal
Position
Speed up
a lot

Speed up
Driver Intent

a little

Maintain
speed Foot off Floored
Pedal

Slow
down Pedal Position
Driver Intent
 Driver Intent is essentially
acceleration rate (+ or -)
 Since pedal position is related to
driver intent, pedal position is related
to desired vehicle acceleration.
Acceleration Relates to Pedal
Position
Vehicle Acceleration

Foot off Floored


Pedal

Pedal Position
Vehicle Acceleration
 Newton’s First Law:
F=ma
 Vehicle mass is constant (ignoring
fuel usage, washer solvent spray, and any
fluid leaks)
 So, Force is proportional to
acceleration
Force Relates to Pedal Position
Force Applied to Vehicle

Foot off Floored


Pedal

Pedal Position
Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Engine produces some torque, at a
speed:
Tengine, engine
 Transmission:

Ttrans Tengine ntrans 


engine
trans 
ntrans
Ignoring Losses, of Course
Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Axle:
Taxle Ttrans naxle  Tenginentrans naxle 
trans engine
axle  
naxle ntrans naxle 

Ignoring Losses, of Course


Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Tire:

Fvehicle 
Taxle  
Tengine ntrans naxle 
 TireDiamet er   TireDiamet er 
   
 2   2 
 TireDiamet er 
Vvehicle axle  
 2 

Ignoring Losses, of Course


Interesting, but not the end of the Story.
Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Note:

Tengine  Ttrans  Taxle


engine  trans  axle
Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Power- the rate at which work is done:
 Power is Force times Velocity (linear)

Power ForceVelocity 
FV 

 Power is Torque times Rotational Speed


(rotary)
Power Torque RotationalSpeed 
T 
Where Does the Force Come
From?

 Engine produces power:

Pengine Tengine engine 


Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Transmission:

Ptrans Ttrans trans 


 engine 
Tengine ntrans  
 ntrans 
Tengine engine 
Ptrans Pengine

Ignoring Losses, of Course


Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Axle:

Paxle Taxle axle 


 trans 
Ttrans naxle  
 naxle 
Ttrans trans 
Paxle Ptrans Pengine

Ignoring Losses, of Course


Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Tire:

Pvehicle FvehicleVvehicle


Taxle   TireDiameter  
axle
 
 TireDiameter    2 
 
 2 
Taxle axle 
Pvehicle Paxle Ptrans Pengine

Ignoring Losses, of Course


Where Does the Force Come
From?
 Power is conserved:

Pengine Ptrans Paxle Pvehicle

POWER IS ABSOLUTE
 Torque is relative (depends on
gear ratio)

Ignoring Losses, of Course


Where Does the Force Come
From?
 The force comes from engine power:

Pengine
Fvehicle 
Vvehicle
 At a given vehicle velocity, force, and
therefore acceleration, depends on
power produced by the engine
Force Relates to Pedal Position
Force Applied to Vehicle

Foot off Floored


Pedal

Pedal Position
Engine Power Relates to Pedal
Position
Engine Power

Foot off Floored


Pedal

Pedal Position
Engine Power Relates to Pedal
Position
100
90
o n
80
t i
Power Demanded (% of max power)

er a
70
el
60
cc ed
50 A
S pe
40
n t
30
st a
o n n
20
C t i o
10
er a
0
el
-10 ec
-20 D 100
-30 75
-40 50
Pedal Position (%)
0 25
25
50 0
75
100
Vehicle Speed (% of max speed)
Implications of the Power
Paradigm
 Powertrain Control
 Vehicle Performance
 Engine Performance Optimization
Criteria
Powertrain Control
 Should provide the power level demanded
by the driver as efficiently as possible
 Efficiency could be based on:
 minimum fuel consumption
 minimum emissions
 best NVH
 some combination of these or other considerations

 Should use the best combination of:

engine speed (gear ratio) cylinder deactivation


throttle position (ETC)
variable valve timing
spark advance active manifold
fuel flow rate external charge
EGR rate motion devices
Powertrain Control Example
 Example: minimize fuel
consumption at a driver
commanded power level
 pedal position indicates driver wants
100 hp delivered (based on power
required vs. pedal position and
vehicle speed)
 need to find engine speed and MAP
(throttle position) for best fuel
consumption
 assume Electronic Throttle Control
Specific Fuel Consumption vs. Speed &
MAP
0.80

0.75

0.70
0.70

0.65
0.65

0.60 0.60

0.55 0.55
0.60

0.50
0.50

0.45

0.45 0.40
20

BSFC (lb/hp-hr)
30
40
)
50 kPa
0.41 (
60 AP
6000 70 M
5000
4000 80
3000
2000 90
Engine Spe 1000
ed (rpm) 0100
Engine Power vs. Speed & MAP

300.00

250.00

350
200.00
300

250
150.00
200

Power (bhp)
150
100.00
100
75.00
25.00 50
100 10.00
90 50.00 0
6000
80
70 25.00
5000
10.00
60 4000
10.00
MA 3000
P ( 50
kP
a) 40 2000 rp
( m)
ed
30 1000 e Spe
in
200 Eng
Specific Fuel Consumption vs. Speed &
100 MAP
90

0.41 0.60
80

70

60
MAP (kPa)

0.45

50
0.50

40 0.55

0.60

0.65
0.70
30

20
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Engine Speed (rpm)
Engine Power vs. Speed & MAP
100

90 25.00
300.00

80
250.00

200.00
70

150.00

60
MAP (kPa)

100.00

75.00
50

50.00

40
25.00
10.00

30
10.00 10.00

20
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Engine Speed (rpm)
100
BSFC vs. Speed & MAP with Constant
Power Lines
90 25.00
300.00

0.41 0.60
80
250.00

200.00
70

150.00

60
MAP (kPa)

0.45 100.00

75.00
50
0.50

50.00

40 0.55

25.00 0.60
10.00 0.65
0.70
30
10.00 10.00

20
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Engine Speed (rpm)
Powertrain Control Example
 Any combination of MAP and rpm
along the 100 hp line will satisfy the
driver’s power requirement
 Low rpm and high MAP gives best
BSFC
 Ideally, efficient CVT sets engine
speed (1900 rpm, set MAP to 90 kPa)
 Conventional transmissions with
discreet gear ratios must pick gear
ratio for combination of rpm and MAP
for lowest BSFC at a vehicle speed
Vehicle Performance
 Best possible vehicle acceleration if
engine runs at peak power (not at peak
torque)
 requires efficient CVT to change
transmission ratio vs. vehicle speed to
maintain peak power engine speed
 Transmission that allows the engine to
provide the highest average power over
an acceleration event will give best
vehicle acceleration
 more transmission gears improves vehicle
acceleration by keeping engine speed in
range that makes more power
Simulated Vehicle Performance with
Different Transmissions
160

140

120
Vehicle Speed (mph)

100

80 100% Efficient CVT


90% Efficient CVT
4 Speed Automatic
60

40

20

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (s)
Engine Performance Optimization
Criteria
 Typically engine program goals are a
peak torque value and a peak power
value
 Assuming different sets of engine
hardware could meet the program
goals, only one set of hardware will
perform the best in a vehicle
 The best performing vehicle will have
the highest average power delivered
to the wheels during an acceleration
event, which is dependent on
transmission capability
Engine Optimization Example:
Which Engine Performs Better in a
Vehicle?
450

400

350
Torque (lb-ft), Power (bhp)

300

engine A
250
engine B
200

150
engine A engine B
100 Peak Torque (lb-ft) 400 400
Average Torque (1200-5600rpm) (lb-ft) 362 351
50 Peak Power (bhp) 350 350
Average Power (1200-5600rpm) (bhp) 234 231
0
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Engine Speed (rpm)
Engine Optimization Example:
Which Engine Performs Better in a
Vehicle?
360
Average Power from x rpm to 5600 rpm (bhp)

340

320

300
engine A
engine B
280

260

240

220

200
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Engine Speed (rpm)
Engine Optimization Example
 Engine A & Engine B both meet
program objectives
 Which one is better?
 It depends on the transmission
 Engine B will perform better if
transmission keeps engine speed above
3200 rpm during an acceleration event
 This is true for any of the typical vehicle
performance metrics:
 5 sec. Distance
 0-60 time

 1/4 mile time


Summary
 The Story of Power
 Pedal Position relates to driver demanded
power output
 The Power Paradigm

Power is Absolute
 Powertrain (engine/transmission)
matching is crucial to maximize
vehicle performance
Closing Remarks
 Powertrain Matching makes best use
of your engine potential
 Torque & Power shaping can give
optimal performance for a given set of
gearing
 Optimal gearing can make your car
faster for no changes in engine
performance
Q&A

You might also like