0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views14 pages

Adjusting Selectivity in HPLC Methods

Uploaded by

Kashif Bashir
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views14 pages

Adjusting Selectivity in HPLC Methods

Uploaded by

Kashif Bashir
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

OBTAINING

SEPARATION
ADJUSTING SELECTIVITY
PRESENTED BY :
KASHIF
BASHIR
Selectivity
 Selectivity is the ability of an HPLC method to separate two analytes
from each other. Selectivity usually is abbreviated with the Greek letter
α, and is calculated as:
α = k2 /
k1

 If two compounds interact with the column or mobile phase in a


sufficiently different manner, we can separate them – if they interact
in the same manner, a single peak results
 Some of the more important variables that affect selectivity are
1. The solvent strength and type
2. The temperature of the column
3. The buffer and other additives and
4. The type of column packing
After we obtain a reasonable retention time for
a separation we may need to adjust selectivity

 Retention adjustment alone is insufficient to obtain a


satisfactory separation
 Next step is adjusting the selectivity or relative peak
separation of our sample
 In reverse phase HPLC, we control retention primarily by
adjusting the mobile phase strength.
 Selectivity is a function of chemical interactions between
sample molecules, the mobile phase and stationary phase
 For neutral samples adjusting the mobile phase organic
solvent is usually the best way to change selectivity
HPLC Chromatogram
Most Popular organic solvents used in
HPLC
 Acetonitrile

 Methanol

 Tetrahydrofuran
Change to Methanol

 Can be started with 90%


methanol
 And to determine best
conditions for methanol
 We can generalize
solvent strength
conversion although
specific retention
predictions are inaccurate
 Solvent Nomograph
Rule of Three
This rule states that the retention factor,
k, changes approximately threefold for a
10% change in %B
%B = Change in organic solvent

 45% methanol-water gave good


separation( Rs>1.5)
 But retention time increased
 55% methanol- water
 Retention times are better but
resolution decreased to ~1.3.
 Separation of peak 1& 2 also
decreases (bad)
Solvent Mixtures

1. We can try ternary system i.e., methanol ,


acetonitrile and water or
2. THF
 Blending acetonitrile with methanol will result in
poor (worse) separation because of acetonitrile like
separation.
 A Binary THF+ Water as mobile phase is simpler to
use than Ternary THF+ MeOH+ Water
Tetrahydrofuran
 We need to determine starting
composition of THF-Water mobile
phase
 We use nomograph
 30% THF-Water average of two
conversions for 45 and 55%
Methanol-water system (Rs>1.7)
 Decreasing retention further, the
peaks will become further
crowded
Tetrahydrofuran

 5% decrease in organic solvent will further increase


retention with a run time of 20 min
 Resolution has increased greater than 2 for all
peaks at a run time of approx. 25 min
 Mixing methanol-THF will cause same problems like
acetonitrile-methanol
 Separation using binary Tetrahydrofuran-water
phase is satisfactory
Summary
 Strong acetonitrile + water was first used then diluted until
the best possible resolution was achieved in acetonitrile (35%)
 Separation was unsatisfactory so we used solvent strength
conversion tool
 Water-methanol as mobile phase that would yield approximate
retention with different selectivity
 Retention estimates were inaccurate so we adjusted mobile
phase using Rule of Three as a guideline to produce best
methanol-water separation.
 Much better than acetonitrile-water but still inadequate
 So we switched to THF-Water as mobile phase which gave
satisfactory separation.
Summary

 Rule of three enabled us to adjust the solvent strength in an


intelligent and time saving manner
 Solvent Strength nomograph helped us to transfer from one
solvent to another
 Both only gave us estimate and were inaccurate
 But in spite of inaccuracies time was saved
 Only solvent strength and type was changed, the same
principle applies for the adjusting
 Mobile phase additives
 pH and
 Temperature

You might also like