Reorganization for Revitalization
Group 5 Akash Deep Gowtham Srinivas Kanika Jain Kanika Singhania Rudra Radhakrishnan Sohini Bera Tajeshwar Singh 127 142 147 148 173 185 188
Case Background
1913 : Andersen auditing firm was founded by Prof. Arthur Andersen
1952: The firm started getting involved in consulting business too
1980s: The consulting business outpaced the auditing business
1989: Firm was divided into two, Arthur Andersen(audit, tax and related services) and Andersen Consulting
1994: Andersen Consulting became world s largest consulting business
CRU Computer Rentals
Group 5, Section C
Governance Structure
Managing Partner Arthur Andersen Board Of Partners
Managing Partner Andersen Consulting
Managing Partner Arthur Andersen
Area Managing Partner (Asia Pacific)
Area Managing Partner (Europe)
Area Managing Partner (Americas)
Global Services Line Practice Support
Country Managers
Service Lines
Practice Support
Recruitment and Training
System Integration Recruits: o Mostly young university graduates
o 3 week rigorous training program ; Exposed to METHOD/1 training o Training stressed on standardization and formalization of tasks o Strict guidelines for project management and common language for questioning clients
System Integration Consultants:
o As associate, programming and methodology training o As engagement manager, project management skills o As partner, refine client management skills
Strategic Services Division:
o Recruited from business schools o Not put through programming courses o Also recruited from competitors directly to senior level positions
Performance Evaluation, Compensation, Promotion
Consultants and Engagement Managers:
Consultants o Assessed every three months by their project managers o Collected at end of year; ranked against others in their cohort o Detailed review at end of five years 15% counseled to leave; others promoted to engagement managers; required ability to lead and manage project teams Election to associate manager came five to seven years after becoming manager After 2-4 years, reviewed for promotion to partner; Required two-thirds majority by the partnership community
Partners:
Partners held shares in their national practices; profits were shared globally on a per unit basis Eligible to be awarded additional number of units based on performance o Committee including Country Managers, industry, service heads evaluates performance oAssessed on four category scale: Exceptional, Outstanding, Standard, Needs improvement Negative voices against this system: o Allocations made first on a country basis; Not helpful in encouraging collaboration o Partner Units are not taken away even if they are underperforming
Performance Evaluation, Compensation, Promotion
Consultants and Engagement Managers:
xxxx
Partners:
xxxx
Performance Evaluation, Compensation, Promotion
Consultants and Engagement Managers:
xxxx
Partners:
xxxx
Performance Evaluation, Compensation, Promotion
Consultants and Engagement Managers:
xxxx
Partners:
xxxx