0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views12 pages

Food Grain Disposal: Issuable vs Non-Issuable

The document discusses the Food Corporation of India's (FCI) system for disposing of food grains. It outlines the classification of stocks as issuable or non-issuable and the criteria for each. Issuable stocks can be distributed under public distribution systems and welfare schemes if they meet specifications. Non-issuable stocks that exceed limits may be used for industrial purposes, manure, or dumping. The document compares FCI's standards to those of major nations and concludes that while the current system works fairly well, adopting stricter disposal policies could impact farmers' and consumers' rights.

Uploaded by

Madhur Dixit
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views12 pages

Food Grain Disposal: Issuable vs Non-Issuable

The document discusses the Food Corporation of India's (FCI) system for disposing of food grains. It outlines the classification of stocks as issuable or non-issuable and the criteria for each. Issuable stocks can be distributed under public distribution systems and welfare schemes if they meet specifications. Non-issuable stocks that exceed limits may be used for industrial purposes, manure, or dumping. The document compares FCI's standards to those of major nations and concludes that while the current system works fairly well, adopting stricter disposal policies could impact farmers' and consumers' rights.

Uploaded by

Madhur Dixit
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

WHETHER THE PRESENT SYSTEM OF DISPOSAL OF FOOD GRAINS FOLLOWED BY FCI IS SUFFICIENT OR DOES IT NEED IMPROVEMENT.

By : Vyomesh-03 Rajdeep-04 Puneet-05

CLASSIFICATION OF STOCKS

Issuable stocks Within PFA limits Includes Ready stocks & Upgradable

Non Issuable stocks Beyond PFA limit Unfit for human consumption

ISSUABLE STOCKS

Ready stocks
Wheat:

Stock of Category A (upto 1% weevilled) Stock of Category B (upto 4% weevilled)


Issuable provided free from insect infestation having foreign matter upto 1% including inorganic foreign matter upto 0.5%

Note- stock of Category C (upto 7% weevilled)


stock of Category D (upto 10% weevilled)

Cont
Rice:

Stock of A (damaged upto3%, discolored upto3%) Stock of B (damaged upto4%, discolored upto5%) Stock of C (damaged upto5%, discolored upto7%) Stock of Category D (if broken is more then .5%)
Issuable under PDS & other welfare schemes provided refractions are upto 20% in excess of uniform specifications for rice

UPGRADEBLE STOCK-RICE

This cover the stock of rice which can be issued as per the PFA, but can not be issued as per the FCI specifications

Non issuable stocks

The stock which is beyond PFA limit is Non Issuable stock Note-if except foreign matters, moisture can be upgraded

Non issuable stocks


Sr. No. 1 Particulars Wheat / Rice Feed I % of sound grains other than foreign & damaged food grains i) Sound grain 85% < 95% (Rice) & 94% (wheat) ii) Weevilled grain >10% by count Uric acid alone > 100mg / kg.

2
3 4 5 6

Feed II
Feed III Industrial use Manure use Dumping

Sound grains > 70% less than 85%


Sound grains > 55% less than 70% i) Sound grains > 30% less than 55% ii) Contaminated with poisonous chemical & fertilizers Sound grains > 10% less than 30% Sound grains less than 10%

Minimum prices for the tender


Category Feed-1 Feed-2 75% of CIP for the APL family 60% of CIP for the APL family

Feed-3
Industrial use Manure use

45% of CIP for the APL family


25% of CIP for the APL family 10% of CIP for the APL family

Comparison of disposable standards with major nations


Refractions (Wheat)
Protein Moisture Damaged Foreign matter Weevilled Other grains

India (figures in %)
11 12 3 2 2 2

Major Nations (figures in %)


11 13 minimum 12 0.5 max 0.5 0.5 nil

Conclusion

We can say that the Food Disposal System prevailing in FCI is doing fairly well. If we adopt more strict disposable policy then it may be difficult to safeguard the rights of farmers and consumers.

References..

Sercular No. 8 -10/2004 PV IV Notes from Gogia sir,

THANK YOU

You might also like