Government Influence on Firm Behavior
Government Influence on Firm Behavior
SMN580S
STRATEGY
AFI FRAMEWORK
External Analysis: Industry Structure, Competitive Forces, and
Strategic Groups
A firm’s external environment consists of all the factors that can affect its potential to gain and sustain a competitive
advantage.
By analyzing the factors in the external environment, strategic leaders can mitigate threats and leverage
opportunities.
For example, external factors in the firm’s general environment are ones that managers have little direct influence
over, such as macroeconomic factors (e.g., interest or currency exchange rates).
Technological factors capture the application of knowledge to create new processes and products.
Major innovations in process technology include lean manufacturing, Six Sigma quality, and biotechnology.
technological progress is relentless and seems to be picking up speed.
Technological environment bring both opportunities and threats for companies (AI)
Ecological factors involve broad environmental issues such as the natural environment, global warming, and
sustainable economic growth.
Organizations and the natural environment coexist in an interdependent relationship.
Managing these relationships in a responsible and sustainable way directly influences the continued existence of
human socithe organizations we create.
Managers can no longer separate the natural and the business worlds; they are inextricably linked.
Ecological factors can also provide business opportunities.
External Analysis: Industry Structure, Competitive Forces, and
Strategic Groups
Legal factors include the official outcomes of political processes as manifested in laws, mandates, regulations,
and court decisions—all of which can have a direct bearing on a firm’s profit potential.
As noted earlier, legal factors often coexist with or result from political will.
Governments especially can directly affect firm performance by exerting both political pressure and legal
sanctions, including court rulings and industry regulations
External Analysis: Industry Structure, Competitive Forces, and
Strategic Groups
Industry Structure and Firm Strategy: The Five Forces Model
Firm performance is determined primarily by two factors: industry and firm effects. Industry effects describe the
underlying economic structure of the industry.
They attribute firm performance to the industry in which the firm competes
Firm effects attribute firm performance to the actions strategic leaders take.
Michael Porter developed the highly influential five forces model to help managers understand the profit
potential of different industries and how they can position their respective firms to gain and sustain competitive
advantage.
The five forces model allows strategic leaders to analyze all players using a wider industry lens, which in turn
enables a deeper understanding of an industry’s profit potential.
Moreover, a five forces analysis provides the basis for how a firm should position itself to gain and sustain a
competitive advantage.
Industry Structure
and Firm Strategy:
The Five Forces
Model
Industry Structure and Firm Strategy: The Five Forces Model
The threat of entry describes the risk that potential competitors will enter the industry.
There are, however, a number of important barriers to entry that raise the costs for potential competitors and
reduce the threat of entry.
Entry barriers, which are advantageous for incumbent firms, are obstacles that determine how easily a firm can
enter an industry.
Incumbent firms can benefit from several important sources of entry barriers:
• Economies of scale.
• Network effects.
• Customer switching costs.
• Capital requirements.
• Advantages independent of size.
• Government policy.
• Credible threat of retaliation.
Industry Structure and Firm Strategy: The Five Forces Model
Power of Suppliers
The bargaining power of suppliers captures pressures that industry suppliers can exert on an industry’s profit
potential.
This force reduces a firm’s ability to obtain superior performance for two reasons:
Powerful suppliers can raise the cost of production by demanding higher prices for their inputs or by reducing the
quality of the input factor or service level delivered.
Powerful suppliers are a threat to firms because they reduce the industry’s profit potential by capturing part of the
economic value created.
To compete effectively, companies generally need a wide variety of inputs into the production process, including
raw materials and components, labor (via individuals or labor unions, when the industry faces collective
bargaining), and services.
The relative bargaining power of suppliers is high when
■ The supplier’s industry is more concentrated than the industry it sells to.
■ Suppliers do not depend heavily on the industry for a large portion of their revenues.
■ Incumbent firms face significant switching costs when changing suppliers.
■ Suppliers offer products that are differentiated.
■ There are no readily available substitutes for the products or services that the suppliers offer.
■ Suppliers can credibly threaten to forward-integrate into the industry
Industry Structure and Firm Strategy: The Five Forces Model
Power of Buyers
The bargaining power of buyers is the flip side of the bargaining power of suppliers.
The power of buyers concerns the pressure an industry’s customers can put on the producers’ margins in the
industry by demanding a lower price or higher product quality.
When buyers successfully obtain price discounts, it reduces a firm’s top line (revenue).
When buyers demand higher quality and more service, it generally raises production costs.
Strong buyers can therefore reduce industry profit potential and a firm’s profitability.
Powerful buyers are a threat to the producing firms because they reduce the industry’s profit potential by
capturing part of the economic value created.