0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views31 pages

NDT/Bobath Approach for Stroke Recovery

Uploaded by

komal khanna
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views31 pages

NDT/Bobath Approach for Stroke Recovery

Uploaded by

komal khanna
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

NDT (Neurodevelopmental

Therapy)/
BOBATH APPROACH
 NDT/ Bobath approach is a “living concept”. It is a
problem solving approach that involves the treatment
and management of movement dysfunction in
individuals with CNS pathophysiology.
 The person is addressed as a whole and the
intervention is individualized to meet his/her specific
goals
 NDT is an interactive process among the individuals,
care givers and members of the interdisciplinary team
 The overall goal of treatment and management is the
enhancement of the individual’s capacity to function
 To achieve this goal, the practitioner addresses
quality of movement utilizing principles of movement
science
 Treatment involves active participation of the
individual, direct handling to optimize function
with gradual withdrawal of direct input by the
therapist
 The NDT approach contributes to a person’s
independence and quality of life
 Bobath assumed that the abnormal patterns of
muscle tone and motor control were major
impairments interfering with normal motor
control of the trunk, arm and leg
 Bobath found that when spasticity decreased,
her patients could acquire improved control of
posture and movement on their affected side
and could use these new patterns for function
 Her approach involved the use of manual
techniques to eliminate abnormal tone and
movement and retrain normal patterns of
coordination in the affected trunk, arm and leg
 Because her goal was to restore movement
and function, she rejected both traditional
compensatory approaches that neglected the
potential for function in the hemiplegic side
and other neurophysiological approaches that
encouraged abnormal movement and reflex
activity
 Writings of K. Bobath rely on models of
nervous system function that are now out-of-
date, the Bobath approach has been the
target of criticism.

 Since the deaths of Bobaths in 1990, the


Neurodevelopmental Treatment Association
in United States have been working to update
the theoretical basis of NDT/Bobath
treatment
Movement control problems
after stroke
 Bobath described the loss of normal movement
responses as the first type of motor impairment
associated with hemiplegia

 Patients with hemiplegia may demonstrate loss


of postural control or inability to activate muscles
automatically to maintain the body in balance at
rest and during movement

 There is also loss of selective motor control of


the muscles controlling movement of the
hemiplegic arm and leg

 Bobath identified abnormal tone as the second


motor problem interfering with the movement
control and function in hemiplegia
 Patients may demonstrate flaccidity or spasticity

 Bobaths believed that these two categories of


motor impairment results in stereotyped
nonfunctional movement patterns and functional
limitations associated with hemiplegia

 They hypothesized that patients with hemiplegia


have forgotten how to move in normal patterns
of coordination
 This sensorimotor disturbance results in loss of
normal movement responses, even when the
muscles are sufficiently strong enough to
support the movement
Neurodevelopmental treatment
of patients with stroke
 DT/Bobath uses specific set of techniques to address
the problems of tone and movement control and to
provide sensory messages about how movement is
organized and executed
 The techniques have the goals of preventing abnormal
patterns of coordination, retraining normal movement
responses and increasing functional use of the
hemiplegic side
 [Link] used her hands on the patient’s body to
produce therapeutic changes in tone and movement.
She called this treatment “handling” to reflect the
manual hands-on quality of her treatment
 Handling is a dynamic process and it activates
movement patterns in the patient that both decrease
abnormal tone and coordination and reeducate normal
movements.
 The NDT therapist uses handling to provide specific
tactile, proprioceptive and kinesthetic messages that
help organize the quality of patient’s movement and
influence the status of relative impairments, such as,
spasticity and flaccidity
 B. Bobath found that certain hand placements, which
she called “Key points of control” are most effective
for controlling the patient’s movement. During the
treatment the therapist selects the key points that give
maximal control over the patient’s problems and the
movement pattern the therapist wishes to influence
 Proximal key points are used to influence posture and
movement of the trunk, shoulder girdle and hip
 Distal key points are used to control the position of
the distal extremities
 Handling is used for two types of techniques:
 Inhibition
 Facilitation

 Inhibition techniques are used to address problems of


abnormal tone and abnormal coordination. Inhibition
techniques often use “Reflex-Inhibiting Patterns (RIPs)”, a
term of patterns that counteract the pull of tight or spastic
muscles

 The NDT therapist uses RIPs to establish a normal tonal


state prior to teaching normal movements. Bobath
believed that therapists should not attempt to retrain
normal movement responses until the spasticity was
minimized, because spasticity prevents normal movement
patterns of reciprocal muscle activation
 When the tone is normalized through inhibition,
the NDT therapist uses facilitation techniques to
train movement patterns

 Facilitation techniques are used to activate


automatic postural responses and trunk control,
and to train weight-bearing and non-weight
bearing movements in the arm and leg
INHIBITION TECHNIQUES
 Inhibition techniques unique to NDT are:
 Passive elongation
 Proximal dissociation
 Reflex Inhibiting Patterns (RIPs)\
 Inhibitory positioning devices and orthotics
 Weight shifting
 Normal limb movements
Passive elongation
 Shortened muscles lose strength because
they are contracting at the end of the joint
range, where muscles are weak
 Slow, even pressure is applied to gradually
elongate a shotened muscle
Proximal dissociation
 It consists of separate movements of
adjacent proximal body parts

 In brain damaged patients, these isolated


movements are often lost and the patient
moves head and shoulder movements en
bloc, as a solid unit
Reflex inhibiting patterns
 RIPs can be facilitated using proximal or
distal key points of control
 Proximal key points include the head, trunk,
pelvis, shoulder, elbow and lower trunk
 Distal key points include the forearm, hand,
knee and foot
Inhibitory positioning and
orthotics
 Passive elongation and RIPs are
supplemented by positioning devices that
maintain the elongation of the shortened
muscles
 Orthotics can also supplement passive
elongation and RIPs. The spasticity reduction
splint, finger abduction splint, inflatable splint,
serial casting, dynamic sling are few
examples of orthotics that can inhibit the
flexion synergy of the arm
Active movement
 Weight shifting in miniature ranges is another
inhibition technique that inhibits rigid fixing.
 Weight shifting includes both axial weight
shifts and limb weight shifts
 Maximum physical support, minimum
resistance, and miniature speed are the keys
to using these inhibition techniques
effectively
NDT evaluation/ treatment
 Identify abilities and functional capabilities
 Identify functional limitations

 Determine what problems interfere with movement


control and functional performance, such as:
 Abnormal tone
 Abnormal coordination
 Loss of postural control
 Loss of selective movement control
 sensation
 Establish functional goals and treatment goals:
 The NDT therapist gathers assessment information
through a variety of procedures
 The therapist observes the patient’s behavior to
gather information about typical posture, preferred
movement patterns and spontaneous use of the
hemiplegic side
 The therapist notes whether the patient
spontaneously uses the affected side or relies on
compensations that reflects asymmetry and neglect
 It is essential to evaluate motor patterns and the
patient’s response to being moved
 The NDT therapist uses handling to identify the
normal movement patterns that are contributing to
the patient’s movement problems and functional
limitations
 To assess movement control, the therapist moves
the patient into postures and movement sequences
example checking postural and equilibrium reactions
by facilitating trunk movements
 Te therapist uses the information gained in the
observational stage to select movement
patterns to be assessed by handling
 Handling provides the therapist with specific
sensory information about the quality and the
strength of the patient’s movements
 When the movement control is present on the
hemiplegic side, the patient actively assists
with the movement. If the therapist stops the
movement briefly and lightens manual support,
the patient will briefly hold the position. Bobath
referred to this as “placing response”. Placing
is possible only when muscle tone is in the
normal range and muscle strength is available
to support the movement
Treatment goals for stages of
recovery
 NDT therapist establishes goals to be
achieved through practice
 NDT therapist establishes goals that relate to
motor problems such as spasticity, that will
be inhibited and movement on the hemiplegic
side to be facilitated
 The exact goal depends upon the patient’s
problems, level of functional independence,
movement control and reasons for seeking
treatment
 In acute stage, the NDT goals focus on
increasing independence in life tasks,
preventing the development of abnormal tone
and abnormal movements and increasing
movement control on the hemiplegic side

 To accomplish this functional goal the NDT


therapist introduces and practices adapted
techniques for ADL, bed mobility, transfers
and wheel chair management, positioning,
ROM exercises, inhibitory treatment
techniques
 NDT treatment goals for the patient with
spasticity include inhibiting abnormal tone
and movement, increasing normal movement
responses, and improving the occupational
performance by incorporating the hemiplegic
side into task performance
Treatment of Hemiplegic arm
 The Bobath approach to treatment of
hemiplegic arm is designed to address
impairments such as abnormal tone, pain,
subluxation, and loss of movement control

 Specific impairments are treated using


inhibition techniques such as RIPs, scapula
mobilization, trunk rotation and weight
bearing
Bobath’s Approach vs. NDT
Bobath NDT
[Link] solving based on [Link] on system model
reflex and hierarchical
theory
2. Hierarchical model of 2. Distributed model of
CNS structure and function CNS

[Link]- controller- [Link] CNS determines the


automatic postural control pattern of neural activity
mechanisms simplified the based on the input from the
responsibility of the CNS in multiple systems and
the control extrinsic variables that
establish in context for the
movt. Initiation and
execution
[Link] [Link] [Link] by specific
by maturation and reflexive functional goal
movt.

[Link] & postural tone  [Link] goal, experience,


quality of patterns of indiv. learning, strategies,
posture and movt. used in synergies, energy, and
the functional activities interest  quality of the
final action

[Link] feedback  error Sensory feed-forward and


correction feedback for movt control

7. “+ve signs” : spasticity & 7. “–ve signs” : weakness,


abnormal coordination of impaired postural control,
movt. paucity of movt.
[Link] not hard wired, [Link] possible
spasticity and abnormal functional changes limited
coordination are by the structural damage to
changeable but the CNS, secondary changes
limitations occur if in the body systems and
abnormal movt. are inability to adapt to the
practiced or repeated environment

[Link] an dev. [Link] of the body


aspects of CNS pathology systems and the
– Ex and M/M environmental context are
all part of Ex and planning
[Link] of peripheral [Link] of body systems
sensory system to and environment to
influence movt. influence the movt
[Link] and facilitation [Link] learning
by hands-on control concepts, including change
environment, verbal
reinforcement, self initiated
movt. trial and error
[Link] movt from 12. Practice of function is
automatic components of important in facilitating
movt. component of movt.

[Link] an others [Link] teaching of the


ensure carry over in life functional activities in
settings community setting of movt.

You might also like