You Exec provides business resources that move your career

forward. Access our full library of presentations, spreadsheet

models, and business book summaries. We do the work, you take
the credit.

Errors & Omissions Liability (E&O): You Exec makes no

guarantee that the statements, analysis, projections, estimates,
graphs, reports, numbers, and any derivatives sourced from this
presentation are free of errors and omissions. You Exec assumes
no liability for erroneous outcomes derived from this
Watch explainer
presentation.
This 9-min video will walk you through the
Please do not resell this presentation. For a commercial or group benefits of this framework.
license, please visit Unlimited and schedule a demo. Paid members, please log in for a better
viewing experience.
 Access to Services

Processes
Governance People

Business Interruption
Strategic Planning Financial

Emergency Response
Ethics & Values Technology

OPERATIONAL
Stakeholder Relations Infrastructure

STRATEGIC ENABLERS

Internal Risks

External Risks

Demand Socio-political

Regulatory Economical Environment

 Risk Categories

Project
Product Design System / Software Manufacturing Quality All Others
Management

Product Performance Data Accuracy Assembly Quality system Team work Consumer service

Design System/ Software Tools Sigma Levels Product cost Environment

Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here

Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here

Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here Your text here
 Risk Appetite Table
Obtain an estimate of the risk appetite of the shareholders with the help of the below bar
graph. This will help in assessing the acceptable risk level

High

Exceed Risk Appetite

Impact

Medium

Within Risk Appetite

Low

Low Medium High

Likelihood
 Risk Impact & Probability Analysis

Cost Time Quality

Manageable by exchange against Internal Slight reduction in quality/scope, no overall

Very Low Slight slippage against internal targets
budgets impact

Require some additional funding from Slight slippage against key milestones or
Low Failure to include certain ‘nice to have’ elements
Institution published targets

Requires Significant additional funding from Delay affects key stakeholders – loss of Significant elements of scope for functionality
Medium
Institution confidence in the project will be unavailable.

Requires Significant reallocation of Institutional Failure to meet key deadlines in relation to Failure to meet the needs of a large proportion
High
funds (or borrowing) academic year or strategic plan of stakeholders

Very High Increases threaten viability of project Delay jeopardizes viability of project Project outcomes effectively unusable
 Risk Assessment

Probability Impact Risk Map

› Major uncertainties remain › Performance, quality, cost or safety

High (5) › No or little prior experience or data impacts resulting in major redesign and
Low Med High Critical
› Infrastructure and/or resources not in place program delay

No concern 1 2 3 4
› Some uncertainties remain › Performance, quality, cost and/or safety
Medium (3) › Some experience and data exist impacts resulting in minor redesign and Proceed w/ 2 4 6 8
caution
› Infrastructure in place but under-resourced schedule adjustment
Significant risk 3 6 9 12

› Few uncertainties remain

› Performance, quality, cost and safety Show stopper 4 8 12 16
Low (1) › Significant experience and data exist
requirements met within planned schedule
› Infrastructure in place and fully

RISK SCORING SYSTEM

Consequences Likelihood of Occurrence Likelihood of Detection

1. No. direct effect on operating service level E. Probability of once in many years A. Detectability is very high
2. Minor deterioration in operating service level D. Probability of once in many operating months B. Considerable warning of failure before occurrence
3. Definite reduction in operating service level C. Probability of once in some operating weeks C. Some warning of failure before occurrence
4. Source deterioration in operating service level B. Probability of weekly occurrence D. Little warning of failure before occurrence
5. Operating service level approaches zero A. Probability of daily occurrence E. Detectability is effectively zero
 Risk Assessment (Cont.)

CONSEQUENCES

Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic

LIKELIHOOD 1 2 3 4 5

A. Almost Certain - - - - -
B. Likely - - - - -
C. Possible - - - - -
D. Unlikely - - - - -
E. Rare - - - - -

Low Risk Moderate Risk High Risk Extreme Risk

Managed by Managed by specific Management responsibility Immediate Action where senior management
routine process responsible person Should be specified get involved
 Risk Mitigation Plan

TECHNICAL
CLIENT MANAGEMENT SERVER
IDENTIFIED
IDENTIFIED RISK IDENTIFIED RISK
Popular web RISK
browsers may get an
Miscommunication with sponsor or Server is down which causes project to
update that will discontinue support for
client regarding project requirement be slightly delayed due to application not
features used in our development as we
and expectations able to load
using responsive bootstrap.

Monitor any updates on popular web

Update client more frequently browser and / or bootstrap and make sure
Perform periodical check on
along the way with project all UI design works as intended on
server status
progress updated web browsers or responsive
bootstrap
Related resources:

Get the full version of this resource and

access our library of hundreds of business
resources

Join You Exec Plus today and take your career to new
heights. Receive premium business resources in your
inbox every week.

Start today