Chapter 6: Structure and Control
Structure Follows Strategy (Chandler)
However, it’s not that simple…strategy and
structure are highly integrated
Organizational Design = structure + control
systems
Coordinate activities of ee’s to promote cooperation
motivate ee’s to achieve superior building block
performance (E, I, Q, CR)
Bureaucracies
Businesses operate as bureaucracies (Weber):
Relational –Legal Authority – belief in legality of rules
and authority of those in command
Specialization – division of labor
Hierarchical structure – chain of command
Coordination and control – rules and SOP’s
Standardized employment rules and norms
Separation of management and ownership (agency)
Separation of jobs and people – no ownership of the
position by an individual
Formalization – explicit (written) acts, decisions, rules
Organizational Structure
Building blocks of organizational structure are:
Differentiation - allocation of people to tasks
vertical - distribution of decision-making (levels)
horizontal - distribution of functions
Integration - coordination between people or
functions or divisions or companies.
Differentiation + Integration = Bureaucratic Costs
(time spent in meetings, # of managers)
Organizational Structure
Vertical differentiation:
Reporting relationships that link people, tasks and functions
appropriate # of levels
appropriate span of control
determines if a structure is flat or tall
Tall structures
impede communication & coordination
raise bureaucratic costs
distort information (intentional & non-intentional)
decreases motivation
too many middle managers (structure begets structure)
Organizational Structure
Vertical differentiation:
Centralization:
easier coordination of activities
decisions fit organizational strategy
speedy decision making
Decentralization:
reduces overload for TMT (can focus on strategy)
ee motivation & accountability increase
fewer managers are needed - flatter structure
Organizational Structure
Horizontal differentiation
The degree to which you separate tasks or skills in
the organization (specialization or functionalization).
Many organizational forms:
Functional Multi-Divisional Matrix Team Network ?
Mechanistic Organic
Mechanistic vs. Organic
Feature Mechanistic Organic
Task Definition Rigid and highly specialized Flexible and less narrowly
defined
Coordination Rules and directives vertically Mutual adjustment, common
and Control imposed culture
Communication Vertical Vertical and horizontal
Knowledge Centralized Dispersed
Commitment To immediate supervisor To the organization and its
and Loyalty goals
Environmental Stable with low technological Unstable with significant
Context uncertainty technological uncertainty
and ambiguity
Organizational Structure
Functional structure - groups people on the
basis of common expertise & resources
Adv: learning (transfer of knowledge within function)
monitoring is easier
processes become more efficient
greater managerial control
Dis: control becomes a problem as company grows
communication and coordination (between functions)
measurement (contribution of function)
loss of strategic focus by TMT
Multi-Divisional Structure
Product lines or business unit is self-contained -
corporate HQ established for support & control
Divisional unit = operating authority
HQ = strategic authority
Adv: Financial control - easier to monitor
Strategic control - time for TMT to focus on strategy
Growth - add businesses or products
Internal efficiency - allows clearer variance
identification
Multi-Divisional Structure
Disadvantages:
Division/Corporate relationship
Distortion of information - pressure to present favorable
results
Interdivisional competition - resources, parent attention
Transfer pricing - VI
Short-term focus - ROI emphasis
Bureaucratic costs
Multi-Divisional Structures
Matrix Organization
Based on two forms of horizontal
differentiation: functional and project/product
Advantages:
ee’s tend to be highly qualified, professional, & perform
best in autonomous, flexible working conditions
ee’s can be moved from project to project
leaves TMT to focus on strategy
Disadvantages:
high bureaucratic costs
constant movement of ee’s means $
two boss role can create conflict
Matrix Structure
Team Structure
Many companies use permanent cross-
functional teams
formed at the beginning of product development process
and continued throughout implementation
speeds innovation and customer responsiveness
stronger in highly dynamic industries
Gore is a good example of a team-based organization
Team Structure
Network Organizations
Core group of experts manages the
outsourcing process closely
This forms a hub & spoke type of
organization consisting of many contracts
Could create a control problem with contract
organizations
Nike - Esprit
Network Structure
.
Organizational Structure
Integration
extent to which the organization wants to coordinate
value creation activities (interdependence)
more differentiation requires more integration
increasing integration = $
Some structures are naturally more integrating
Interdepartmental liaison
Task forces – x-functional ad hoc teams
Integrating roles/departments - full time job of
creating coordination between functions, etc.
Strategic Control Systems
Strategic Control
means of motivating ee’s to work at organizational goals
Statement of goals
Set of assumptions or forecasts (environmental)
Qualitative statement of how business will change
Specific action steps for implementation
Set of financial projections
provide information and feedback (information technology)
Why strategic controls?
Efficiency - efficient use of resources/productivity
Quality - defect free goods, customer complaints, returns, sampling
Innovation - encourage risk taking
CR - evaluate ee’s with customer contact
Strategic Controls
Types of controls
Financial - stock price, ROI, profitability, etc.
Output - efficiency, quality, innovation, CR
Behavioral - rules and procedures, budgets,
standardization
Balanced scorecard approach (Kaplan)
A way to look out the rear view mirror (financial) as well
as down the road (strategic building blocks)
Financial
Customer
Process
Employee Development
Strategic Controls
Organizational culture
values and norms that are shared by people/groups that
control the way they act internally and externally.
Values = beliefs about goals and appropriate standards for
achievement (behaviors).
Norms = expectations about behavior in specific situations
and toward one another.
Organizational culture is about behaviors, which are
very difficult to change. But the good news is that they
can be changed.
Organizational Culture
Levels of culture:
Artifacts
visible organization structures and processes
what one sees and hears and feels when encountering a
new group with unfamiliar culture (language, technology,
products, clothing, semiotics, etc.)
easy to observe but difficult to decipher - only interpretable
through experience
Org Culture
Levels
Espoused Values
individual values (CEO, managers) that the group adopts
through validation (cognitive transformation to shared
value)
conscious and explicit - serve a normative or moral
function to guide members in certain situations and in
socializing members.
Strategies - goals - philosophies
Org Culture
Levels
Basic underlying assumptions:
a solution to a problem that works repeatedly &
becomes taken for granted
cannot be confronted or debated and are difficult (if not
impossible) to change.
can only be changed through re-examination and re-
evaluation of the cognitive structure.
this destabilizes our cognitive and interpersonal world
individuals will distort or deny rather than adopt - thus
culture at this level is a defense mechanism
so…major change means managing at this level.
Org Culture
Org socialization - how people learn the culture
Consists of stories, myths, legends, etc.
influence of the founder
organizational structure
composition of TMT
Adaptive cultures - encourage and reward
initiative/innovativeness - easiest to change…
Inert cultures - cautious and conservative, does
not value initiative & may discourage
Org Culture
Strong Adaptive Cultures characterized by:
Bias for action - autonomy, risk-taking,
entrepreneurship (intra)
Coherent mission - sticks to knitting, close to
customers
Structured for flexibility
Reward Systems
Individual
Piecework – Commission – Bonuses - Promotion
Group
group-based bonus - profit sharing – ESOP – gainsharing
if system induces too much stress, internal competitiveness,
or job insecurity, results will be counterproductive…
positive reinforcement > negative reinforcement
but some pressure/anxiety can be productive
meaningful incentives and career consequences =
successful implementation
Reward Systems
Reward systems:
in designing reward systems, jobs need to be defined in
terms of the results to be accomplished, not duties and
responsibilities.
System should track actual achievement vs. targeted
performance using strategic/financial objectives.
Measures usually are made up of both quantitative and
qualitative measures.
MBO – PMP – etc.
Reward Systems
Reward systems;
Generously reward those who reach objectives and
deny reward to those who don’t.
payoff should be a major piece of total comp. and…
should extend to everyone.
administration is paramount (timely, consistent, fair, kiss)
tightly linked to strategic objectives
line-of-sight
Every comp/promo decision will be carefully scrutinized
by all employees.