0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views40 pages

Survey Methods and Observations Analysis

The document discusses various survey and observation methods used in research. It provides details on telephone interviews, personal interviews, mail interviews, electronic interviews, and compares them based on flexibility, type of questions used, ability to use physical stimuli, sample control, and other factors. It also discusses personal observation, mechanical observation, audits, content analysis, trace analysis and compares the observation methods based on degree of structure, ability to observe in a natural setting, and analysis bias. The document provides an overview of commonly used research methods for collecting data through surveys and observation.

Uploaded by

Nishtha Sharma
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views40 pages

Survey Methods and Observations Analysis

The document discusses various survey and observation methods used in research. It provides details on telephone interviews, personal interviews, mail interviews, electronic interviews, and compares them based on flexibility, type of questions used, ability to use physical stimuli, sample control, and other factors. It also discusses personal observation, mechanical observation, audits, content analysis, trace analysis and compares the observation methods based on degree of structure, ability to observe in a natural setting, and analysis bias. The document provides an overview of commonly used research methods for collecting data through surveys and observation.

Uploaded by

Nishtha Sharma
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Survey and observation

Made by-
Aditi Mishra
MBA(II SEM)
Survey methods
 Telephone interviewing

 Personal interviewing

 Mail interviewing

 Electronic interviewing
Telephone interviewing
• Traditional • Computer assisted

1. Involve phoning a 1. Computerized


sample of respondents. questionnaire
2. Paper questionnaire and administered to
records the responses respondents over the
phone.
with a pencil.
2. One question at a time
3. use of local telephone appears on time.
interviewing has
decreased 3. Responses are directly
entered in the reports.
Personal interviewing
 In-home

 Mail intercept

 Computer intercept
In-home interviewing
 Respondents are interviewed face-to-face
in their home.

 Interviewer’s task is to contact the


interviewer.

 Use of personal interview has declined.


Mall-intercept
 Respondents are intercepted while they
are shopping in malls.

 interviewer then administers a


questionnaire as in the in-home personal
survey.
Computer-assisted
 Respondent sits in front of computer
terminal and answer a questionnaire.

 Colorful screens and on-and-off screen


stimuli adds to respondents interest.

 It Is administered through use of kiosks.


Mail interviewing
• Mail • Mail panel
1. questionnaire are 1. Consists of a large,
mailed to preselected nationally representative
potential respondents. sample of households.
2. Package consists of 2. They are compensated
outgoing envelope, with various incentives.
cover letter, 3. Used to implement a
questionnaire, return longitudinal design
envelope
Electronic methods
• Email interviews • Internet interviews
1. List of email 1. They use HTML as
addresses is the language .
obtained and survey 2. Respondents are
is written within the asked to go to a
body of email. particular web
2. It has many location and
limitations. complete the survey.
Comparative evaluation of
survey methods
Flexibility of data collection
• Telephone interview – Frequency is
moderate to high.
• In-home interview- Frequency is high.
• Mail intercept- Frequency is high.
• CAPI- Frequency is moderate to high.
• Mail surveys- Frequency is moderate.
• Mail panels- Frequency is low.
• Internet- Frequency is low
Diversity of questions
• Telephone interview – low
• In-home interview – high
• Mall intercept interview – high
• Capi-high
• Mail surveys –moderate
• Mail panels – moderate
• Intenet –moderate to high
Use of physical stimuli
• Telephone interview- low
• In-home interview – moderate to high
• Mall intercept interview – high
• Capi – high
• Mail surveys – moderate
• Mail panels – moderate
• Internet – moderate
Sample control
• Telephone interview – moderate to high
• In-home interview – potentially high
• Mall intercept interview – moderate
• Capi- moderate
• Mail surveys - low
• Mail panels – moderate to high
• Intenet –low to moderate
Control of data collection
• Telephone interview – moderate
• In-home interview – moderate to high
• Mall intercept interview – high
• Capi- high
• Mail surveys - low
• Mail panels – low
• Internet –low
Control of field force
• Telephone interview – moderate
• In-home interview – low
• Mall intercept interview – moderate
• Capi- moderate
• Mail surveys – high
• Mail panels –high
• Intenet –high
Quantity of data
• Telephone interview – low
• In-home interview –high
• Mall intercept interview – moderate
• Capi- moderate
• Mail surveys - moderate
• Mail panels –high
• Internet –moderate
Response rate
• Telephone interview – moderate
• In-home interview –high
• Mall intercept interview – high
• Capi- high
• Mail surveys - low
• Mail panels – moderate
• Internet – very low
Perceived anonymity of the
respondent
• Telephone interview – moderate
• In-home interview – low
• Mall intercept interview – low
• Capi- low
• Mail surveys - high
• Mail panels –high
• Intenet –high
Social desirability
• Telephone interview – moderate
• In-home interview – high
• Mall intercept interview – high
• Capi- moderate to high
• Mail surveys - low
• Mail panels – low
• Intenet –low
Obtaining sensitive information
• Telephone interview –high
• In-home interview – low
• Mall intercept interview – low
• Capi- low to moderate
• Mail surveys – high
• Mail panels – moderate to high
• Intenet –high
Potential for interviewer bias
• Telephone interview – moderate
• In-home interview –high
• Mall intercept interview – high
• Capi- low
• Mail surveys - none
• Mail panels – none
• Intenet –none
Speed
• Telephone interview –high
• In-home interview – moderate
• Mall intercept interview – moderate to
high
• Capi- moderate to high
• Mail surveys - low
• Mail panels – low to moderate
• Intenet –very high
Cost
• Telephone interview – moderate
• In-home interview –high
• Mall intercept interview – moderate to
high
• Capi- moderate to high
• Mail surveys - low
• Mail panels – low to moderate
• Intenet –very high
Observation methods
 Personal observation
 Mechanical observation
 Audit
 Content analysis
 Trace analysis
Personal observation
• Researcher observes actual behavior as it
occurs.
• Observer does not attempt to control the
phenomenon being observed.
• information could aid in designing store
layout and determining location of
individual departments.
Mechanical observation
• Mechanical devices observes the
phenomenon.
• They are used for recording ongoing
behavior.
• Devices like ACNielsen,people meters are
used.
Audit
• Researcher collects data by examining the
physical records.
• Pantry audit, the researcher takes an
inventory of brands,quantites and package
sizes in a consumer’s home.
• The brands in the pantry may not reflect
the most preferred brand.
Content analysis
• This is an appropriate method when the
phenomenon to be observed is
communication, rather than behavior or
physical outputs.
• The unit of analysis may be words,
characters,themes,space and time
measures.
Trace analysis
• Data collection is based on physical
traces, or evidence, of past behavior.

• These traces may be left immediately or


unintentionally by the respondents.
Comparative evaluation of
observation method
Degree of structure
• Personal observation – low
• Mechanical observation – low to high
• Audit – high
• Content analysis – high
• Trace analysis – medium
Degree of disguise
• Personal observation – medium
• Mechanical observation – low to high
• Audit – low
• Content analysis – high
• Trace analysis – high
Ability to observe
in natural setting
• Personal observation – high
• Mechanical observation – low to high
• Audit – high
• Content analysis – medium
• Trace analysis – low
Observation bias
• Personal observation – high
• Mechanical observation – low
• Audit – low
• Content analysis – medium
• Trace analysis – medium
Analysis bias
• Personal observation – high
• Mechanical observation – low to medium
• Audit – high
• Content analysis – medium
• Trace analysis – medium
General remarks
• Personal observation – most flexible
• Mechanical observation – can be
intrusive
• Audit – expensive
• Content analysis – limited to
communication
• Trace analysis – method of last resort
observation
• Advantages • Disadvantages
1. They permit 1. Reasons for the
measurement of observed behavior
actual behavior . may not be
2. There is no reporting determined.
bias, and potential 2. Selective perception
bias. can bias the data.
3. It include the 3. Observation is time
behavior pattern consuming.
Ethnographic research
• It is the study of the human behavior in its
natural context.
• It involves the observation of the behavior
and setting along with dept interview.
• Audio and video recordings are also
obtained.
Thank you

You might also like