0% found this document useful (0 votes)
159 views41 pages

Chapter 3 Incentive Pay

Uploaded by

Sandra Chan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
159 views41 pages

Chapter 3 Incentive Pay

Uploaded by

Sandra Chan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Strategic Compensation: A Human Resource

Management Approach
Tenth Edition

Chapter 3
Incentive Pay

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives
4.1 Explore the incentive pay approach.
4.2 Describe the differences between incentive pay
methods and traditional pay methods.
4.3 Explain the practice of individual incentive pay plans.
4.4 Summarize the practice of group incentive plans.
4.5 Describe the practice of company-wide incentive plans.
4.6 Summarize considerations when designing incentive
pay programs.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 4.1
• Explore the incentive pay approach.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentive Pay
• Compensation fluctuates according to:
– A preestablished formula
– Individual or group goals
– Company earnings
• Adds to base pay on a nonrecurring basis
• Controls costs
• Motivates employees through explicit goal setting

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentive Pay Assumptions
• Effective incentive pay systems are based on three
assumptions:
– Individual employees and work teams differ in how
much they contribute to the company, both in what they
do as well as in how well they do it
– The company’s overall performance depends to a large
degree on the performance of individuals and groups
within the company
– To attract, retain, and motivate high performers and to
be fair to all employees, a company needs to reward
employees on the basis of their relative performance

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 4.2
• Describe the differences between incentive pay methods
and traditional pay methods.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Contrasting Incentive Pay with Traditional
Pay
• Traditional pay generally includes an annual salary or
hourly wage
– Increased periodically on a seniority or merit basis with
permanent increase to base pay
• Incentive pay generally
– Increases base pay on goal attainment with pay
increase nonrecurring
– Companies use incentive pay to reward individual
employees, teams of employees, or whole companies
based on their performance

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Cost Comparison: Merit Pay v s er us

Incentive Pay
Table 4-1 Permanent Annual Merit Increases versus Incentive Awards: A
Comparison (At the end of 2018, John Smith earned an annual salary of
$35,000.)
Cost of Cost of Cost of Cost of
Increase Increase Increase Increase
(Total Current (Total Current (Total Current (Total Current
Salary—2012 Salary—2012 Salary—2012 Salary—2012
Annual Annual Annual Annual Total Salary
Salary) Salary) Salary) Salary) under Total Salary under
Permanent Merit
Increase Incentive Award
Permanent (Percent Increase Annual (Percent
Increase Merit Incentive × Previous Increase × 2012
Year Amount (%) Increase ($) Award ($) Annual Salary) ($) Salary) ($)
2019 3 1,050 1,050 36,050 36,050
2020 5 1,802 1,750 37,853 36,750
2021 4 1,514 1,400 39,367 36,400
2022 7 2,755 2,450 42,122 37,450
2023 6 2,527 2,100 44,649 37,100

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentive Pay Categories
• Individual: these plans reward employees whose work is
performed independently
• Group: these plans promote supportive, collaborative
behavior among employees
• Company-wide: these plans tie employee compensation
to a company’s performance over a short time frame

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 4.3
• Explain the practice of individual incentive pay plans.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentive Pay Measures (1 of 2)
Table 4-2 Typical Performance Measures for Individual, Group, and Company-
wide Incentive Plans

Individual Incentive Plans


Quantity of work output
Quality of work output
Monthly sales
Work safety record
Work attendance

Group Incentive Plans


Customer satisfaction
Labor cost savings (through gain sharing plans)
Materials cost savings
Services cost savings (e.g., utilities)

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentive Pay Measures (2 of 2)
Table 4-2 [continued]

Company-wide Incentive Plans


Operational Measures:
Customer satisfaction
Operational efficiency
Service/quality
Safety/occupational injury

Financial Measures:
Revenue
Earnings per company stock share
Operating income
Revenue growth
Note: Measures such as safety records and customer satisfaction can be measured on an
individual, group, or company-wide basis according to a company’s objectives.
Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Types of Individual Incentive Plans (1 of 2)
• Piecework plans: reward workers for every item produced
over a designated production standard
• Management incentive plans: award bonuses to
managers when they meet or exceed objectives based on
sales, profit, production, or other measures for their division

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Types of Individual Incentive Plans (2 of 2)
• Behavioral encouragement plans: employees receive
payments for specific behavioral accomplishments
• Referral plans: employees receive bonuses for
recruitment of highly qualified employees
• Spot bonuses: employees receive small monetary gifts
for outstanding work or effort during a reasonably short
time period
• Signing bonuses: monetary awards given to promote
recruitment and job offer acceptance

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Piecework Plans
• Awards based on individual production v s objective er us

standards
• Awards based on individual performance standards using
objective and subjective criteria
• Quantity and/or quality goals

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Calculation of a Piecework Award for a
Garment Worker
Piecework standard: 15 stitched garments per hour Hourly base rate
awarded to employees when the standard is not met: $4.50 per hour
That is, workers receive $4.50 per hour worked regardless of whether
they meet the piecework standard of 15 stitched garments per hour.
Piecework incentive award: $0.75 per garment stitched per hour above
the piecework standard

Table 4-3 Calculation of a Piecework Award for a Garment Worker


Piecework Award
Guaranteed (No. of Garments Stitched
Hourly Above the Piecework Total Hourly
Blank Base Pay ($) Standard × Piecework Incentive Award) Earnings ($)
First hour 4.50 10 garments × $0.75 per garment = $7.50 12.00
Fewer than 15 stitched garments, thus
Second hour 4.50 4.50
piecework award equals $0

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Individual Incentive Pay Program
Advantages
• Helps relate pay to performance
• Promotes equitable distribution of compensation
• Instills an ownership mentality
• Compatible with America’s individualistic culture

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Individual Incentive Pay Program
Disadvantages
• May promote inflexibility
• Measurement problems
• May promote undesirable behaviors

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 4.4
• Summarize the practice of group incentive plans.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Group Incentive Plans
• Reward employees for their collective performance
• Two types:
– Team based or small group
– Gain sharing

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Types of Teams
• Work (process) teams: refer to organizational units that
perform the work of the organization on an ongoing basis
– Ex: Customer service teams, assembly teams on
production lines.
• Project teams: consist of a group of people assigned to
complete a one-time project
– Ex: Engineers working on the construction of a bridge.
• Parallel teams (task forces): include employees assigned
to work on a specific task in addition to normal work duties

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Rewards Allocation Methods
• Equal incentive payments
• Differential payments based on contribution to goals
• Differential payments according to base pay

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Gain Sharing
• Incentives based on company performance in
– Increased productivity
– Increased customer satisfaction
– Lower costs
– Better safety records

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Gain Sharing Programs
• Most gain sharing programs have three components
1. Leadership philosophy
2. Employee involvement systems
3. Bonuses

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Gain Sharing Plans
• Three common forms:
– Scanlon plan
– Rucker plan
– Improshare

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Scanlon Plan
• Emphasis on teamwork
• Two-tiered cost savings suggestion system
• Production-level committees
• Screening committees
labor costs
• , Rewards =
SVOP
• Smaller Scanlon ratios show that labor costs are lower
relative to SVOP

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Rucker Plan
• Emphasizes employee involvement
• Uses a value-added formula to measure productivity (value
added/total employment costs)
• Larger ratios show that value added is greater than total
employment costs

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Improshare
• Measure productivity physically rather than in terms of
dollar savings
• Incentive to finish products
• Based on a labor hour ratio formula

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Comparison of Key Features
Feature Scanlon Rucker Improshare
Program goal Productivity Productivity Productivity
improvement improvement improvement
Basis for savings Labor costs Labor costs/raw Completing work
materials at or sooner than
costs/services costs production
standard
Employee Required Required NA
involvement
Type of Screening and Screening and NA
employee production production
involvement committees committees
Bonus payout Monthly Monthly Weekly
frequency

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Advantages of Group Incentives
• Companies can more easily develop performance
measures for group incentive plans than for individual
incentive plans
• Greater group cohesion

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Disadvantages of Group Incentives
• May lead to higher employee turnover because of the
free-rider effect
• Members may feel uncomfortable with the fact that other
members’ performance influences their compensation
level

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 4.5
• Describe the practice of company-wide incentive plans.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Company-Wide Incentive Plans
• Rewards employees when company exceeds minimum
acceptable performance standards
• Two types
– Profit sharing plans
– Employee stock options

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Profit-Sharing Plans
• Current profit-sharing plans
– Award cash to employees typically on a quarterly or
annual basis
• Deferred profit-sharing plans
– Place cash awards in trust accounts for employees

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Profit-Sharing Formulas
• Fixed first-dollar-of profits formula
– Ex: 7% of corporate profits
• Graduated first-dollar-of profits formula
– Ex: 3% of the first $8 million of profits and 6% of the
profits in excess of that level
• Profitability threshold formula

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Distribution Methods
• Equal payments
• Proportional payments based on annual base earnings

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Profit-Sharing Plans
• Advantages
– Enable employees to share in companies’ profits
– Allow companies greater financial flexibility
• Disadvantages
– Can undermine the economic security of employees
– May fail to motivate employees if they do not see a
direct link between their efforts and profits

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Employee Stock Option Plans
• Companies grant employees right to purchase share of
company
– Company stock
– Company stock shares
– Stock options

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objective 4.6
• Summarize considerations when designing incentive pay
programs.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Incentive Pay Considerations
• Based on individual or group performance
• Acceptable level of risk
• Replace or complement traditional pay
• Performance criteria evaluated
• Appropriate time horizon for goals

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright

This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is


provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their
courses and assessing student learning. Dissemination or sale of
any part of this work (including on the World Wide Web) will
destroy the integrity of the work and is not permitted. The work
and materials from it should never be made available to students
except by instructors using the accompanying text in their
classes. All recipients of this work are expected to abide by these
restrictions and to honor the intended pedagogical purposes and
the needs of other instructors who rely on these materials.

Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved

You might also like