0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views38 pages

Understanding Insulators: Types and History

The document discusses insulators, including what they are, where they came from, their history, types used for distribution lines, transmission lines and substations, comparisons between ceramic and non-ceramic insulators, and design criteria focusing on mechanical strength requirements.

Uploaded by

krishnandrk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views38 pages

Understanding Insulators: Types and History

The document discusses insulators, including what they are, where they came from, their history, types used for distribution lines, transmission lines and substations, comparisons between ceramic and non-ceramic insulators, and design criteria focusing on mechanical strength requirements.

Uploaded by

krishnandrk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

“Insulators”

Introduction

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


What Is an Insulator?

 An insulator is a “dam***” poor conductor!

And more, technically speaking!

 An insulator is a mechanical support!


 Primary function - support the “line” mechanically
 Secondary function– electrical
Air is the insulator
Outer shells/surfaces are designed to increase
leakage distance and strike distance

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


What Does an Insulator Do?

Maintains an Air Gap


 Separates Line from Ground
length of air gap depends primarily on system voltage,
modified by desired safety margin, contamination, etc.
 Resists Mechanical Stresses
“everyday” loads, extreme loads
 Resists Electrical Stresses
system voltage/fields, overvoltages
 Resists Environmental Stresses
heat, cold, UV, contamination, etc.

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Where Did Insulators Come From?

Basically grew out of the needs of the telegraph


industry – starting in the late 1700s, early 1800s

Early history centers around what today we would


consider very low DC voltages

Gradually technical needs increased as AC


voltages grew with the development of the electric
power industry

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


History

Glass plates used to insulate telegraph line DC to


Baltimore

Glass insulators became the ”norm” soon


thereafter – typical collector’s items today

Many, many trials with different materials – wood –


cement – porcelain - beeswax soaked rag wrapped
around the wire, etc.

Ultimately porcelain and glass prevailed

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


History

 Wet process porcelain developed for high voltage


applications
 Porcelain insulator industry started

 Application voltages increased


 Insulator designs became larger, more complex
Ceramics (porcelain, glass) still only choices at
high voltages

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


History

 US trials of first “NCIs” – cycloaliphatic based


 Not successful, but others soon became interested
and a new industry started up

 Europeans develop “modern” style NCI – fiberglass


rod with various polymeric sheds
 Now considered “First generation”

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


History

 NCI insulator industry really begins in US with field


trials of insulators
 Since that time - new manufacturers, new designs,
new materials
NCIs at “generation X” – there have been so many
improvements in materials, end fitting designs, etc.
Change in materials have meant changes in line
design practices, maintenance practices, etc.
Ceramic manufacturers have not been idle either
with development of higher strength porcelains, RG
glazes, etc.

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


History

 Domestic manufacturing of insulators decreases,


shift to offshore (all types)

 Engineers need to develop knowledge and skills


necessary to evaluate and compare suppliers and
products from many different countries

An understanding of the basics of insulator


manufacturing, design and application is more
essential than ever before

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Types

 For simplicity will discuss in terms of three broad


applications:

 Distribution lines (thru 69 kV)

 Transmission lines (69 kV and up)

 Substations (all voltages)

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Types

 Distribution lines

 Pin type insulators -mainly porcelain, growing use


of polymeric (HDPE – high density polyethylene),
limited use of glass (in US at least)
 Line post insulators – porcelain, polymeric
 Dead end insulators – polymeric, porcelain, glass
 Spool insulators – porcelain, polymeric
 Strain insulators, polymeric, porcelain

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Types of Insulators – Distribution

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Types

 Transmission lines

 Suspension insulators - new installations mainly


NCIs, porcelain and glass now used less frequently

 Line post insulators – mainly NCIs for new lines and


installations, porcelain much less frequent now

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Types of Insulators – Transmission

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Types

 Substations

 Post insulators – porcelain primarily, NCIs growing


in use at lower voltages (~161 kV and below)

 Suspension insulators –NCIs (primarily), ceramic

 Cap and Pin insulators – “legacy” type

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Types of Insulators – Substation

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Types - Comparisons

Ceramic Non Ceramic


• Porcelain or toughened glass • Typically fiberglass rod with
• Metal components fixed with rubber (EPDM or Silicone)
cement sheath and weather sheds
• ANSI Standards C29.1 • HDPE line insulator
through C29.10 applications
• Cycloaliphatic (epoxies)
station applications, some
line applications
• Metal components normally
crimped
• ANSI Standards C29.11 –
C29.19

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Types - Comparisons

Ceramic Non Ceramic


• Materials very resistant to • Hydrophobic materials
UV, contaminant degradation, improve contamination
electric field degradation performance
• Strong in tension, weaker in
• Materials strong in
compression
compression, weaker in
• Deflection under load can be
tension an issue
• High modulus of elasticity - • Lighter – easier to handle
stiff • Electric field stresses must
• Brittle, require more careful be considered
handling
• Heavier than NCIs

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Types - Comparisons

Ceramic Non Ceramic


• Generally designs are • “Material properties have
“mature” been improved – UV
resistance much improved for
• Limited flexibility of example
dimensions • Standardized product lines
• Process limitations on sizes now exist
and shapes • Balancing act - leakage
• Applications/handling distance/field stress – take
methods generally well advantage of hydrophobicity
understood • Application parameters still
being developed
• Line design implications
(lighter weight, improved
shock resistance)

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Mechanical

An insulator is a mechanical support!

• Its primary function is to support the line


mechanically

• Electrical Characteristics are an afterthought.

• Will the insulator support your line?

• Determine The Maximum Load the Insulator Will


Ever See Including NESC Overload Factors.

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Mechanical
Suspension Insulators

• Porcelain
- M&E (Mechanical & Electrical) Rating
Represents a mechanical test of the unit while energized.
When the porcelain begins to crack, it electrically punctures.
Average ultimate strength will exceed the M&E Rating when new.
- Never Exceed 50% of the M&E Rating

• NCIs (Polymer Insulators)


- S.M.L. – Specified Mechanical Load
Guaranteed minimum ultimate strength when new.
R.T.L. – Routine Test Load – Proof test applied to each NCI.
- Never Load beyond the R.T.L.

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Mechanical
Line Post insulators

• Porcelain
- Cantilever Rating
Represents the Average Ultimate Strength in Cantilever – when new.
 Minimum Ultimate Cantilever of a single unit may be as low as 85%.
- Never Exceed 40% of the Cantilever Rating – Proof Test Load

• NCIs (Polymer Insulators)


- S.C.L. (Specified Cantilever Load)
 Not based upon lot testing
 Based upon manufacturer testing
- R.C.L. (Rated Cantilever Load) or MDC or MDCL (Maximum Design
Cantilever Load) or MCWL or WCL (Working Cantilever Load)
- Never Exceed RCL or MDC or MDCL or MCWL or WCL
- S.T.L. (Specified Tensile Load)
- Tensile Proof Test=(STL/2)

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Mechanical

Other Considerations

• Suspensions and Deadends – Only apply tension loads

• Line Posts –
- Cantilever is only one load
- Transverse (tension or compression) on line post – loading
transverse to the direction of the line.
- Longitudinal – in the direction of travel of the line
- Combined Loading Curve –
Contour curves representing various Longitudinal loads
Available Vertical load as a function of Transverse loading
Manufacturers have different safety factors!!!

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Electrical

An Insulator is a mechanical support!


Air imparts Electrical Characteristics
Strike Distance (Dry Arcing Distance) is the
principal constituent to electrical values.
• Dry 60 Hz F/O and Impulse F/O – based on strike distance.
• Wet 60 Hz F/O
- Some would argue leakage distance as a principal factor.
- At the extremes that argument fails – although it does play a role.
- Leakage distance helps to maintain the surface resistance of the
strike distance.
Leakage Requirements do play a role!!!

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Electrical

Dry Arcing Distance –


(Strike Distance) – “The
shortest distance through
the surrounding medium
between terminal
electrodes….” 1

1 – IEEE Std 100 - 1992

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria – Leakage Distance

What is Leakage Distance?


“The sum of the shortest
distances measured along
the insulating surfaces
between the conductive
parts, as arranged for dry
flashover test.” 1

 1 – IEEE Std 100 - 1992

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Electrical

What’s an appropriate Leakage Distance?

• Empirical Determination
- What’s been used successfully?
- If Flashovers occur – add more leak?

• ESDD (Equivalent Salt Deposit Density) Determination


- Measure ESDD
Pollution Monitors
Dummy Insulators
Remove in-service insulators
- Evaluate ESDD and select appropriate Leakage Distance

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Electrical
“Application Guide for Insulators in a Contaminated Environment”
by K. C. Holte et al – F77 639-8
Leakage Distance
ESDD (mg/cm2) Site Severity I-string/V-string
(“/kV l-g)

0 – 0.03 Very Light 0.94/0.8

0.03 – 0.06 Light 1.18/0.97

0.06 – 0.1 Moderate 1.34/1.05

>0.1 Heavy 1.59/1.19

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Electrical

IEC 60815 Standards

Leakage Distance
ESDD (mg/cm2) Site Severity
(“/kV l-g)

<0.01 Very Light 0.87

0.01 – 0.04 Light 1.09

0.04 – 0.15 Medium 1.37

0.15 – 0.40 Heavy 1.70

>0.40 Very Heavy 2.11

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Design Criteria - Electrical

Leakage Distance Recommendations

2.5

2
IEEE V
Leak ("/kV l-g)

1.5 IEEE I
IEC
Poly. (IEC)
1
Poly. (IEEE V)
Poly. (IEEE I)
0.5

0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
ESDD (mg/cm^2)

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Improved Contamination Performance
Flashover Vs ESDD

300

250

200
Flashover Voltage

Porcelain
New EPDM
150 Aged EPDM
New SR
Aged SR

100
CEA 280 T 621
SR units - leakage equal to porcelain
EPDM Units - leakage 1.3 X Porcelain

50

0
0.01 0.1

ESDD (mg/cm^2)
GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI
Improved Contamination Performance

Polymer insulators offer better contamination


flashover performance than porcelain?

Smaller core and weathershed diameter increase


leakage current density.

Higher leakage current density means more Ohmic


Heating.

Ohmic Heating helps to dry the contaminant layer


and reduce leakage currents.

In addition, hydrophobicity helps to minimize


filming
GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI
Improved Contamination Performance

“the contamination performance of composite


insulators exceeds that of their porcelain counterparts”

“the contamination flashover performance of silicone


insulators exceeds that of EPDM units”

“the V50 of polymer insulators increases in proportion


to the leakage distance”

CEA 280 T 621, “Leakage Distance Requirements for Composite Insulators Designed for Transmission Lines”

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Selection
Where do I get these values?

Leakage Distance or Creepage Distance


• Manufacturer’s Catalog

Switching Surge
• Wet W/S
• ((Wet Switching Surge W/S)/√2) ≥ 60 Hz Wet Flashover (r.m.s.)
• Peak Wet 60 Hz value will be lower than Switching Surge Wet W/S

Impulse Withstand
• Take Positive or Negative Polarity, whichever is lower
• If only Critical Impulse Flashover is available – assume 90%
(safe estimate for withstand)

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Selection
PICKING A SUITABLE INSULATOR

Select the 69 kV Insulator ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS

A. NOMINAL SYSTEM LINE-TO-LINE VOLTAGE 69 kV (rms)

shown at right. B. MAXIMUM SYSTEM LINE-TO-GROUND VOLTAGE


(line A/1.732)*1.05
41.8 kV (rms)

C. MAXIMUM PEAK LINE-TO-GROUND VOLTAGE (e) 59.1 kV (peak)


e=(line B * 1.414)

LEAKAGE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS

I-string – Mechanical CONTAMINATION LEVEL

D. ZERO
(typical values)
SUGGESTED LEAKAGE
(inches/(kV line-to-ground))
UP TO 1.00

• Worst Case – 6,000 lbs


E. LIGHT 1.00 - 1.25
F. MODERATE 1.50 - 1.75
G. HEAVY 2.00 - 2.50
Enter inches/kV - 1

• Suspension: ≥ 12k min ultimate H. INSULATOR LEAKAGE (MIN.)


(line B)*(inches/kV) = 41.8 inches

SWITCHING OVERVOLTAGE REQUIREMENTS

Leakage Distance ≥ 42” I. SSV = (line B) * 3.0 125 kV (peak)

IMPULSE OVERVOLTAGE REQUIREMENTS

J. PEAK IMPULSE WITHSTAND = (I(t) * R(f))+e


I(t) = 20 kA (typical value = 50 kA)
R(f) = 15 ohm (typical value = 10 - 20 ohm)

Switching Surge ≥ 125 kV e=

K. IMPULSE WITHSTAND =
59.1 (line C)

359 kV

SELECT INSULATOR BASED ON REQUIREMENTS:

SYSTEM VALUE FROM NUMBER OF

Impulse Withstand ≥359 kV


REQUIREMENT PAGE 1 POLYMER VALUES PORCELAIN BELLS
H. LEAKAGE
DISTANCE 41.8
I. SWITCHING
SURGE VOLTAGE 125
K. IMPULSE
WITHSTAND 359
T. SELECT
INSULATOR

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Insulator Selection
Porcelain – 5-3/4 X 10” bells X 4 units

Characteristic Required Available

Leakage
42” 46”
Distance

Wet Switching
125 kV 240 kV
Surge W/S

Impulse W/S 359 kV 374 kV

M&E 12,000 lbs 15,000 lbs

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI


Grading Rings
Simulate a larger, more spherical object

Reduce the gradients associated with the shielded object

Reduction in gradients helps to minimize RIV & TVI


Porcelain or Glass –

• Inorganic – breaks down very slowly

NCIs
• Polymers are more susceptible to scissioning due to corona
• UV – short wavelength range – attacks polymer bonds.
• Most short wavelength UV is filtered by the environment
• UV due to corona is not filtered
GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI
NCIs and Rings

Grading (Corona) Rings

• Due to “corona cutting” and water droplet corona – NCIs may


require the application of rings to grade the field on the
polymer material of the weathershed housing.

• Rings must be:


- Properly positioned relative to the end fitting on which they are
mounted.
- Oriented to provide grading to the polymer material.

• Consult the manufacturer for appropriate instructions.

• As a general rule – rings should be over the polymer –


brackets should be on the hardware.

GWCET, NAGPUR– A V WANJARI

You might also like