0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views22 pages

Systematic Risk in Diversified Portfolios

The document discusses the arbitrage pricing theory (APT) model of asset pricing. It explains that total risk can be broken down into systematic and unsystematic risk. For well-diversified portfolios, unsystematic risk is negligible so total risk equals systematic risk. The APT uses multiple factors to measure systematic risk rather than just the market factor as in the CAPM. Betas measure the sensitivity of asset returns to changes in these systematic factors. When assets are combined into a portfolio, their unsystematic risks cancel out through diversification, so the portfolio's return depends on its weighted average betas and the returns on the systematic factors.

Uploaded by

ammad uddin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views22 pages

Systematic Risk in Diversified Portfolios

The document discusses the arbitrage pricing theory (APT) model of asset pricing. It explains that total risk can be broken down into systematic and unsystematic risk. For well-diversified portfolios, unsystematic risk is negligible so total risk equals systematic risk. The APT uses multiple factors to measure systematic risk rather than just the market factor as in the CAPM. Betas measure the sensitivity of asset returns to changes in these systematic factors. When assets are combined into a portfolio, their unsystematic risks cancel out through diversification, so the portfolio's return depends on its weighted average betas and the returns on the systematic factors.

Uploaded by

ammad uddin
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 12

An Alternative View of Risk and Return: The


Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Total Risk
 Total risk = systematic risk + unsystematic risk
 The standard deviation of returns is a measure
of total risk.
 For well-diversified portfolios, unsystematic
risk is very small.
 Consequently, the total risk for a diversified
portfolio is essentially equivalent to the
systematic risk.
12-2
Risk: Systematic and Unsystematic
We can break down the total risk of holding a stock into
two components: systematic risk and unsystematic risk:
2
R  R U
Total risk
becomes
 R  Rmε
where
Nonsystematic Risk: 
m is the systematic risk
Systematic Risk: m ε is the unsystemat ic risk

n 12-3
Systematic Risk and Betas
 The beta coefficient, , tells us the response of the stock’s return
to a systematic risk.
 In the CAPM,  measures the responsiveness of a security’s
return to a specific risk factor, the return on the market portfolio.

Cov( Ri , RM )
i 
 ( RM )
2

• We shall now consider other types of systematic risk.


12-4
Systematic Risk and Betas
 For example, suppose we have identified three
systematic risks: inflation, GNP growth, and the
dollar-euro spot exchange rate, S($,€).
 Our model is:
R  Rmε
R  R  β I FI  βGNP FGNP  βS FS  ε
β I is the inflation beta
βGNP is the GNP beta
βS is the spot exchange rate beta
ε is the unsystemat ic risk 12-5
Systematic Risk and Betas: Example
R  R  β I F I  β G NP FG NP  β S FS  ε
 Suppose we have made the following estimates:
1. I = -2.30
2. GNP = 1.50
3. S = 0.50
 Finally, the firm was able to attract a “superstar” CEO,
and this unanticipated development contributes 1% to
the return.
ε  1%
R  R  2 . 30  F I  1 . 50  FG NP  0 .50  FS  1 %
12-6
Systematic Risk and Betas: Example
R  R  2 . 30  F I  1 . 50  FG NP  0 . 50  FS  1 %
We must decide what surprises took place in the
systematic factors.
If it were the case that the inflation rate was expected
to be 3%, but in fact was 8% during the time
period, then:
FI = Surprise in the inflation rate = actual – expected
= 8% – 3% = 5%

R  R  2 . 30  5 %  1 . 50  FG NP  0 . 50  FS  1 %
12-7
Systematic Risk and Betas: Example
R  R  2 . 30  5 %  1 . 50  FG NP  0 . 50  FS  1 %
If it were the case that the rate of GNP growth
was expected to be 4%, but in fact was 1%,
then:
FGNP = Surprise in the rate of GNP growth
= actual – expected = 1% – 4% = – 3%
R  R  2 . 30  5 %  1 . 50  (  3 %)  0 . 50  FS  1 %

12-8
Systematic Risk and Betas: Example
R  R  2 . 30  5 %  1 . 50  (  3 %)  0 . 50  FS  1 %
If it were the case that the dollar-euro spot
exchange rate, S($,€), was expected to
increase by 10%, but in fact remained stable
during the time period, then:
FS = Surprise in the exchange rate
= actual – expected = 0% – 10% = – 10%
R  R  2 . 30  5 %  1 . 50  (  3 % )  0 . 50  (  10 % )  1 %
12-9
Systematic Risk and Betas: Example
R  R  2 . 30  5 %  1 . 50  (  3 % )  0 . 50  (  10 % )  1 %
Finally, if it were the case that the expected return on
the stock was 8%, then:

R  8%

R  8 %  2 .30  5 %  1 .50  (  3 %)  0 .50  (  10 %)  1 %


R   12 %

12-10
Portfolios and Factor Models
 Now let us consider what happens to portfolios of stocks when each of
the stocks follows a one-factor model.
 We will create portfolios from a list of N stocks and will capture the
systematic risk with a 1-factor model.
 The ith stock in the list has return:

Ri  R i  β i F  ε i
12-11
Relationship Between the Return on
the Common Factor & Excess Return
Excess Ri  R i  β i F  ε i
return
If we assume
that there is no
unsystematic
i risk, then i = 0.

The return on the factor F

12-12
Relationship Between the Return on
the Common Factor & Excess Return
Excess
return
If we assume
Ri  R i  β i F that there is no
unsystematic
risk, then i = 0.

The return on the factor F

12-13
Relationship Between the Return on
the Common Factor & Excess Return
Excess
return β A  1 .5 β B  1 .0
Different
securities will
β C  0 . 50 have different
betas.

The return on the factor F

12-14
Portfolios and Diversification
 We know that the portfolio return is the weighted
average of the returns on the individual assets in the
portfolio:
R P  X 1 R1  X 2 R 2    X i R i    X N R N
Ri  R i  β i F  ε i
R P  X 1 ( R 1  β1 F  ε1 )  X 2 ( R 2  β 2 F  ε 2 ) 
  X N (R N  βN F  εN )

R P  X 1 R 1  X 1 β1 F  X 1ε1  X 2 R 2  X 2 β 2 F  X 2 ε 2 
  X N R N  X N βN F  X N εN 12-15
Portfolios and Diversification
The return on any portfolio is determined by three sets
of parameters:
1. The weighted average of expected returns.
2. The weighted average of the betas times the factor.
3. The weighted average of the unsystematic risks.
RP  X 1 R1  X 2 R 2    X N R N
 ( X 1 β1  X 2 β 2    X N β N ) F
 X 1 ε1  X 2 ε 2    X N ε N
In a large portfolio, the third row of this equation
disappears as the unsystematic risk is diversified away. 12-16
Portfolios and Diversification
So the return on a diversified portfolio is
determined by two sets of parameters:
1. The weighted average of expected returns.
2. The weighted average of the betas times the factor
F.
RP  X 1 R1  X 2 R 2    X N R N
 ( X 1 β1  X 2 β 2    X N β N ) F
In a large portfolio, the only source of uncertainty is the
portfolio’s sensitivity to the factor.

12-17
Betas and Expected Returns
R P  X 1 R 1    X N R N  ( X 1 β1    X N β N ) F

RP βP
Recall that and
R P  X 1 R1    X N R N β P  X 1 β1    X N β N
The return on a diversified portfolio is the sum of the expected
return plus the sensitivity of the portfolio to the factor.

RP  R P  βP F 12-18
Relationship Between  & Expected
Return
 If shareholders are ignoring unsystematic
risk, only the systematic risk of a stock
can be related to its expected return.
RP  R P  βP F

12-19
Relationship Between  & Expected
Return
Expected return
SML

D
A B

RF
C

R  RF  β (R P  RF )
12-20
Practice Questions

12-21
Practice Questions

12-22

You might also like