0% found this document useful (0 votes)
208 views37 pages

Strategic Leadership in Management

This document summarizes key concepts about strategic leadership and the strategic management process. It discusses the roles of strategic leaders and how they can positively or negatively impact organizational performance. It also outlines different approaches to strategic planning, including top-down strategic planning, scenario planning, and strategy as planned emergence. Finally, it assesses the relationship between stakeholder strategy and competitive advantage.

Uploaded by

gabi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
208 views37 pages

Strategic Leadership in Management

This document summarizes key concepts about strategic leadership and the strategic management process. It discusses the roles of strategic leaders and how they can positively or negatively impact organizational performance. It also outlines different approaches to strategic planning, including top-down strategic planning, scenario planning, and strategy as planned emergence. Finally, it assesses the relationship between stakeholder strategy and competitive advantage.

Uploaded by

gabi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 2:

Strategic Leadership
Managing the Strategy Process
-Strategic Leadership
-The Strategic Management Process
-Stakeholders and CA
Objective
LO 2-1 Explain the role of strategic leaders and what they do.
LO 2-2 Outline how you can become a strategic leader.
LO 2-3 Describe the roles of corporate, business, and
functional managers in strategy formulation and
implementation.
LO 2-4 Evaluate top-down strategic planning, scenario
planning, and strategy as planned emergence.
LO 2-5 Assess the relationship between stakeholder strategy
and sustainable competitive advantage.
LO 2-6 Conduct a stakeholder impact analysis.
What Is Strategic Leadership?

• Successful use of power and influence


• Directing the activities of others
• Pursuing an organization’s goals
• Enabling organizational competitive advantage
Leaders Can Positively Impact Performance

• Mark Zuckerberg – Facebook


• Elon Musk – Tesla and SpaceX
• Jeff Bezos – Amazon
• Oprah Winfrey – HARPO
• Sheryl Sandberg – Facebook
• Angela Ahrendts – Apple
• Mary Barra – General Motors
• Howard Schultz - Starbucks
Leaders Can Destroy Shareholder Value

• Ken Lay – Enron


• John Sculley – Apple
• Bernard Ebbers – WorldCom
• Richard Fuld – Lehman Brothers
• Richard Wagoner – General Motors
• Robert Nardelli – The Home Depot and Chrysler
• Ron Johnson – JC Penney
How Do You Become a Strategic Leader?

• Leadership actions reflect:


• Age, education, and career experiences
• Personal interpretations of situations

• Strong leadership: innate abilities and learning


Upper Echelon’s Theory

• Organizational outcomes reflect the values of the top


management team.

• Outcomes include:
• Strategic choices
• Performance levels
Great Companies

• Based on the bestseller Good to Great


• Written by Jim Collins
• Over 1,000 companies were analyzed.

• Great companies had things in common:


• Sustained competitive advantage
• Stock returns of almost 7x the general market
• Consistent patterns of leadership
• Summarized in the Level 5 Leadership Pyramid
Level-5 Leadership Pyramid

• Exhibit 2.2

• (Adapted to compare corporations and entrepreneurs) SOURCE: Adapted from J. Collins (2001), Good to Great: Why Some
Companies Make the Leap . . . And Others Don’t (New York: HarperCollins), 20.

Jump to Appendix 3 long image description


Progression of Leaders Through the Pyramid

• Each level builds upon the previous one.


• Prior levels must be mastered before moving on.
• Each level helps individuals develop the capacity for
greater success.

• A Level-5 executive:
• Works to help the organization succeed
• Helps others reach their full potential
The Strategy Process

• Strategy Formulation:
• The choice of strategy
• Where and how to compete

• Strategy Implementation:
• Organization, coordination, integration
• How work gets done
• The execution of strategy
The Strategy Process Across Levels

• Corporate Strategy
• Where to compete?
• Industry, markets, and geography

• Business Strategy
• How to compete?
• Cost leadership, differentiation, or value innovation

• Functional Strategy
• How to implement a chosen business strategy?
Formulation and Implementation Across Levels

• Exhibit 2.3
Jump to Appendix 4 long image description
Corporate Strategy

• Decide in which industries, markets, and geographies


their companies should compete.
• Corporate executives:
• Create synergies across SBUs.
• Decide whether to enter or exit industries and markets.
• Set strategic objectives.
• Allocate scarce resources among SBU.
• Monitor performance.
• Make adjustments to the portfolio as needed.
Business Strategy

• Standalone division of corporate


• Profit and loss responsibility
• Work with corporate to determine business strategy
• Cost leadership
• Differentiation
• Value innovation
Functional Strategy

• Within each strategic business unit:


• Accounting
• Finance
• Human resources
• Product development
• Operations
• Manufacturing
• Marketing
• Customer service
• Functional managers are responsible for decisions and
actions within the function.
Three Approaches to Organizational Strategy

• Strategic planning
• A formal, top-down planning approach

• Scenario planning
• A formal, top-down planning approach

• Strategy as planned emergence


• Begins with a strategic plan, but is less formal
Top Down Strategic Planning (1 of 2)

• Data-driven strategy process


• Top management attempts to program future success
through
• Analysis of:
• Prices
• Costs
• Margins
• Market demand
• Head count
• Production runs
• Five year plans and correlated budgets
• Performance monitoring
Top-Down Strategic Planning (2 of 2)

• Exhibit 2.4
Jump to Appendix 5 long image description
Shortcomings of the Top-Down Approach

• May not adapt well to change


• Formulation separate from implementation
• Information flows one-way
• Leaders’ future vision can be wrong

• Example: Apple
• Steve Jobs predicted customers needs
• Apple didn’t engage in market research
• Since Cook took over, their planning process has evolved
Scenario Planning (1 of 2)

• Asks “what if” questions:


• Top management envisions different scenarios
• Then they derive strategic responses

• Optimistic and pessimistic futures planned

• Considerations can include:


• New laws
• Demographic shifts
• Changing economic conditions
• Technological advances
Scenario Planning (2 of 2)

• Exhibit 2.5
Jump to Appendix 6 long image description
Approaches to Scenario Planning

• Obtain input from different levels and functions


• R&D, manufacturing, and marketing and sales

• Determine how to compete situationally


• Example: UPS
• What if the price of a barrel of oil was $35, or $100, or even
$200?

• Attach probabilities to different future states:


• Highly likely vs. unlikely
• 85% vs. 2% likely
Black Swan Events

• The high impact of a highly improbable event.


• In the past, most people assumed that all swans were
white.
• When they first encountered swans that were black, they were
surprised.
• Examples:
• Security breach of an IT system
• Accounting Scandals: Enron
• Real Estate Bubble: 2008 financial crisis
Questions to Ask in Scenario Planning

• What resources and capabilities do we need to compete


successfully in each scenario?

• What strategic initiatives should we put in place to


respond to each scenario?

• How can we shape our expected future environment?


Strategy as Planned Emergence

• Top Down and Bottom Up


• Bottom-up strategic initiatives emerge
• Evaluated & coordinated by management

• Relies on data, plus:


• Personal experience
• Deep domain expertise
• Front line employee insights
Key Points About Strategy

• Intended strategy
• The outcome of a rational and structured top-down strategic
plan

• Realized strategy
• Combination of intended and emergent strategy

• Emergent strategy
• Any unplanned strategic initiative
• Bubbles up from the bottom of the organization
• Can influence and shape a firm’s overall strategy
Intended vs. Realized Strategy

Jump to Appendix 7 for long description.


Strategic Initiatives

• Any activity a firm pursues to explore and develop


• New products and processes
• New markets
• New ventures

• Can bubble up from deep within a firm through:


• Autonomous actions
• Serendipity
• Resource-allocation process (RAP)
Autonomous Actions, Serendipity, and the Resource Allocation Process (RAP)

• Autonomous Actions
• Strategic initiatives undertaken by employees
• In response to unexpected situations

• Serendipity
• Random events, surprises, coincidences
• Has an effect on strategic initiatives

• Resource-Allocation Process (RAP)


• How a firm allocates resources based on policy
• Helps shape realized strategy
Companies with Good Strategy Are Valuable

• Companies with a good strategy:


• Provide products or services to consumers at an affordable
price
• Make a profit
• Can provide benefits such as:
• Education, infrastructure, public safety, health care, clean water
and air

• Strategic failure is expensive


Stakeholders

• Organizations, groups, and individuals


• Can affect or are affected by a firm’s actions
• Have an interest in the performance and survival of the
firm

• Internal stakeholders:
• Stockholders, employees (including executives, managers, and
workers), and board members

• External stakeholders:
• Customers, suppliers, alliance partners, creditors, unions,
communities, media, and governments at various levels
Internal and External Stakeholders in an Exchange Relationship with the Firm

• Exhibit 2.8
Jump to Appendix 8 long image description
Stakeholder Strategy

• An integrative approach to managing a diverse set of


stakeholders to gain and sustain competitive advantage

• Stakeholder management benefits firm performance


• Stakeholders more cooperative
• Lower business transaction cost
• Greater adaptability and flexibility
• More predictable returns
• Stronger reputation
Stakeholder Impact Analysis (1 of 2)

• A decision tool
• Helps strategic leaders can recognize, prioritize, and
address the needs of different stakeholders.

• Important stakeholder attributes:


• Power: control over actions
• Legitimacy: valid concerns
• Urgency: require immediate attention
Stakeholder Impact Analysis (2 of 2)

• Exhibit 2.9 Jump to Appendix 9 long image description


The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility

• Exhibit 2.10

• SOURCE: Adapted from A. B. Carroll (1991), “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational
stakeholders,” Business Horizons, July-August: 42.

Jump to Appendix 10 long image description

You might also like