0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views22 pages

Lossy Transmission Lines Explained

1) Dielectric loss occurs when polar molecules in insulating materials rotate to align with oscillating electric fields, dissipating energy as heat. 2) Dielectric loss can be modeled by treating the dielectric constant as a complex number with real and imaginary parts. 3) Dielectric loss causes frequency-dependent attenuation in transmission lines and can be expressed as a risetime penalty per unit length of line.

Uploaded by

Kashif Hassan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views22 pages

Lossy Transmission Lines Explained

1) Dielectric loss occurs when polar molecules in insulating materials rotate to align with oscillating electric fields, dissipating energy as heat. 2) Dielectric loss can be modeled by treating the dielectric constant as a complex number with real and imaginary parts. 3) Dielectric loss causes frequency-dependent attenuation in transmission lines and can be expressed as a risetime penalty per unit length of line.

Uploaded by

Kashif Hassan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Signal Integrity:

Applied Electromagnetics and Professional Practice

CHAPTER 7
LOSSY TRANSMISSION LINES
LECTURE SLIDES BY DR. SAMUEL H. RUSS
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA
CHAPTER 7 OBJECTIVES

• Understand units of attenuation


• Contrast frequency-dependent and –independent
attenuation and identify sources
• Explain dielectric loss, its physical origins, and its
effects on ε
• Read dielectric loss off of a datasheet
• Explain how it affects signal propagation
WHAT IS ATTENUATION?

• Signals get weaker over distance


• Like radio signals traveling away from an
antenna…

• How is it measured?
• Attenuation is exponential, so the units are dB per
distance (e.g. dB/m)
EXAMPLE: CABLE WITH 0.1 dB/m
OF ATTENUATION
• What is amplitude of 5V signal after traveling 6m?
• Attenuation = 0.1 x 6 = 0.6dB
• 0.6 dB of loss = 10-(0.6/20) = 0.933
• Output = 5 x 0.933 = 4.665V
• At what distance does signal have amplitude of 4V?
• Output = 4/5 = 0.8; 10-(x/20) = 0.8
• x/20 = -0.9691; x = 1.9382 dB
• Distance = 1.9382/0.1 = 19.4 m
TYPES OF ATTENUATION

• Frequency-independent
• Like radio waves over distance
• Signal arrives smaller, but completely intact – scale
model of original signal

• Frequency-dependent (higher at high frequency)


• Signal is low-pass filtered; rise-time degradation (e.g.)
ILLUSTRATION OF ATTENUATION

Frequency-Independent
Attenuation

Original Signal
Frequency-Dependent
Attenuation
SOURCES OF FREQUENCY-
DEPENDENT ATTENUATION
• First source: Skin effect
• Resistance goes up with square root of frequency
• … so higher frequencies are more attenuated
• Next source: Let’s back up…
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PUT A
GLASS BOWL IN A MICROWAVE?
• It eventually gets hot
• But how!!??
• Getting hot is significant – it means that the glass is
absorbing and dissipating RF energy

• Answer: Polar molecules rotate to line up with the


applied RF energy
• This rotation creates heat and dissipates the RF energy
• This is called dielectric loss
• Remember – it is occurring in the dielectric, the insulator
CAPACITOR: APPLY HIGH
FREQUENCY AND OBSERVE
CURRENT
• First current: 90° out of phase with voltage, goes up
with frequency
• This is the I = C dV/dt behavior of a capacitor
• Second current: In phase with voltage, goes up with
frequency
• This is due to dielectric loss
• Turns out to be much smaller than the other, which is why it
is rarely noticeable…
NOW SOME MATH….

•  Start with conductance, I = VG…


• Express the two currents we just observed:
I  jCV  Cˆ V

• Again, second current is real, and express its ratio


as
CAN FACTOR C…

•  Can define a new version of C, call it εr C0


• Doing this to separate the dielectric constant from
everything else

• Can then factor out εr from C and from


I  j r C 0V  ˆr C 0V  C 0V ( j r  ˆr )
WHAT HAPPENED TO ε? COMPLEX!

••The
  jεr term is ordinary capacitance and the term is
dielectric loss
• This gets very confusing, so read carefully…
• The convention is to express as a fraction of εr
• The way this is done is to treat εr as real and as imaginary
• Even though εr is associated with imaginary current and with
real
PLOT IT ON AN ARGAND PLANE…

• The phase angle of εr


is δ
εr
δ tan    r
ˆ
r
εr • So…

I  C 0V ( j r  ˆr )   r C oV ( j  tan  )  CV ( j  tan  )


• And…
REVIEW…

• Imaginary part of I/V is the familiar ωC


• Real part of I/V is ωC tan δ
• This is due to dielectric loss, a property of non-ideal dielectrics
that cause them to absorb real energy at high frequency

• Example: The tan δ of FR-4 is 0.02


• Note the scale: 1/50th the “ordinary” capacitive current…
• Normal to find tan δ on datasheets or on reputable
online sources
SO HOW IS DIELECTRIC LOSS
MANIFESTED?
• Basic assumption of transmission lines was that
series resistance of conductor was 0 and shunt
conductance of dielectric was 0
• Turns out not to be true, so we have to go back
to the lumped model of a transmission line
R R R

LM G LM G LM G
CM CM CM
R R R
MODELING IT

• The voltage coming out of one piece of line is


the voltage divider between 1/GL and Z0/2
1
GL 1
Vout  Vin ( )  Vin ( )
1 Z0 1
 1  GL Z 0
GL 2 2

• Attenuation: analyze it exponentially…


Vout 1 1
 e x
ln( )  x 1
Vin 1 1 ln(1  G L Z 0 )  x
1  GL Z 0 1  GL Z 0 2
2 2
WHAT NEXT?

• Since ln(1+a) ≈ a… • Since log10(e) = 0.434…


Vout 1
 GL Z 0 b  •4.34G L Z 0 where b is loss in dB
 e x  e 2
Vin
• Now convert to dB… • Recall that r
Z0 
1
 GL Z 0 G L  C L tan  cC L
e 2
 10 ( b / 20)
1
• So…
 G L Z 0 log 10 (e)   b C L tan   r 4.34 tan   r
2 20 b  4.34G L Z 0  4.34 
cC L c
EXAMPLE

• FR-4
  has εr = 4.2 and tanδ = 0.02
• Find loss in dB/cm due to dielectric loss at f = 10GHz
• c = 3x1010 cm/s
• b = (4.34 * 2 * π * 10 GHz * 0.02 * )/3x1010 cm/s = 0.372
dB/cm

• Over what length will there be 3 dB of loss?


• 3 dB / 0.372 dB/cm = 8.05 cm
AN ASIDE ABOUT FR-4…

• FR-4 shows significant attenuation even at low GHz


• This shows that the era of FR-4 is coming to an end

• Is there an easier way to express dielectric loss?


• Express it as a risetime adder…
FIND 3DB LOSS POINT…

• Multiply loss equation by length d and solve


for 4.34 tan   r
loss=3dB 4.34  2f 3dB tan  r 27.26 f 3dB tan   r
3 d d d
c c c

3c
f 3dB 
• So… 27.26 tan   r d

• Since tr t≈ 00.35/f


.35
r
27.26 tan 
 0.353dB
r d

3.18 tan   r d
f 3dB 3c c
REDO THE FR-4 EXAMPLE…

•  Risetime adder of 1 cm of conductor:


• tr = 3.18 * 0.02 * * 1 cm / 3x1010 cm/s = 0.434 ps
• FR-4 has a risetime adder of 0.434 ps/cm due
to dielectric loss
TWO EXAMPLES

• 1 Gbps SATA: tr = 130 ps. Routed over 10 cm of FR-4.


• Risetime = 0.434 x 10 = 4.34 ps. 130 2  4.34 2  130.1 ps
• Not a significant issue.
• 6 Gbps SATA: tr = 20 ps. Routed over 30 cm of FR-4
• Risetime = 0.434 x 30 = 13.02 ps. 20 2  13.022  23.9 ps
• 20% increase risetime: significant problem.

You might also like