PMS IN DENA BANK
BY
MOHIT YADAV
ROLL NO 22
MHROD
HISTORY OF DENA BANK
D E N A B A N K W A S F O U N D ED O N 26 T H
M A Y , 1 9 3 8 B Y T H E F A M I L Y O F D EV KA RA N
N A N J E E U N D E R T H E N A M E D EV KA R A N
N A N J E E B A N KI N G C O M P A N Y L T D .
I T BE C A M E A P U BL I C L T D . C O M P A N Y I N
D E C EM B E R 1 9 3 9 A N D L A T E R T H E N A M E
W A S C H A N G ED T O D E N A BA N K L T D .
Mission & Vision
Mission
DENA BANK will provide its
Customers - premier financial services of great value,
Staff - positive work environment and opportunity for
growth and achievement,
Shareholders - superior financial returns,
Community - economic growth
Vision
DENA BANK will emerge as the
most preferred Bank of customer choice
in its area of operations, by its
reputation and performance
SERVICES
Core banking solutions
Delivery Channels
Verified by Visa Services
Dena Alert Services
Dena ATM Services
Dena IndiaRemit
Dena BillPay
Inbound Remittances
Direct Tax Collection
Bancassurance
Indirect Tax
Dena e-Tax Pay
Distribution of Mutual Funds
Demat Services
Performance Management System(PMS)
Performance appraisal is the process of obtaining,
analyzing and recording information about the
relative worth of an employee. The focus of the
performance appraisal is measuring and improving
the actual performance of the employee and also the
future potential of the employee. Its aim is to
measure what an employee does.
Purpose of Performance Appraisal
To review the performance of the employees over a
given period of time.
To judge the gap between the actual and the desired
performance.
To help the management in exercising
organizational control.
To diagnose the training and development needs of
the future
Challenges of Performance Appraisal
Determining the evaluation criteria
Create a Rating instruments
Errors in Rating and Evaluation
Resistance
Lack of competence
Pre-requisites for Effective &
Successful Performance Appraisal
Documentation
Standards / Goals
Practical and simple format
Evaluation technique
Communication
Feedback
Personal Bias
Methods of Performance Appraisal
Traditional method Modern method
Confidential method Assessment centre
Graphics scales Human resource accounting
Straight ranking Behaviorally anchored rating scales
Paired comparison Management by objectives
Grading system 360 degree performance appraisal
Forced distribution
Check list method
Critical incident method
Free essay method
Field review
Nominations
Work sample tests
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES
The concept of ‘Management by Objectives’ (MBO)
was first given by Peter Drucker in 1954. It can be
defined as a process whereby the employees and the
superiors come together to identify common goals
The essence of MBO is participative goal setting,
choosing course of actions and decision making
BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING
SCALES
combines the graphic rating scale and critical incidents
method
an employee’s actual job behavior is judged against the desired
behavior by recording and comparing the behavior with BARS
HUMAN RESOURCE ACCOUNTING
METHOD
. Human resource accounting method tries to find the relative
worth of these assets in the terms of money
ASSESSMENT CENTRES
The trained evaluators observe and evaluate employees as they
perform the assigned jobs and are evaluated on job related
characteristics.
PMS IN DENA BANK
Its an Annual Process , done once a year
Done for officer level and above employees
Reporting Authority should be minimum one Scale
higher than the Appraisee
Reviewing Authority should be minimum one Scale
higher than the Reporting Authority
Maximum marks – 100
Marks assigned to Key Responsibility Areas – 50marks
Outstanding Performance 10 marks
2 marks for each Achievements
Self Appraisal includes Questions like
Highlights of my performance during the
Areas in which I feel I have not done well
What according to me would enable me to perform better
Any outstanding performance outside the Bank
Contribution in implementation of Official Language Policy, i.e.,
Hindi
Managerial Dimensions 40 marks
Job Knowledge 5 marks
Leadership 5 marks
Decision Making 5 marks
Administrative Skills 5 marks
Public relation and marketing 5 marks
Willingness to assume 5 marks
responsibilities
Communication Skills 5 marks
Responsiveness to Corporate 5 marks
concerns
Max marks By Appraiser By Reviewing
Authority
KEY 50
RESPONSIBILITY
AREAS
MANAGERIAL 40
DIMENSIONS
OUTSTANDING 10
PERFORMANCE
TOTAL MARKS 100
FINAL RATING
OUTSTANDING (80 - 100)
GOOD (60 - 79)
AVERAGE (40 - 59)
BELOW AVERAGE (BELOW 40)
PMS Questionnaire
Included 20 objective Questions
Every question carries marks from -12 to +12
Level wise score Effectiveness
Between -12 & -6 Poor
Between -6 & 0 Less Effective
Between 0 & 6 Good
Between 6 & 12 Very Good
Differentiation of respondents
In total there were 20 respondents , all from
Regional Office of Dena Bank ,Delhi
scale Designation number
L1 Officer 8
L2 Manager 6
L3 Sr Manger 4
L4 Chief manager 2
Results of Questionnaire
Training needs identification
Training need identification
8
7 7.5
7.2
6
5
5.25
4 Training need identification
3
3
2
0
1 2 3 4
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ePMS
12 ePMS Effectiveness
10
9.6
8
66.75 ePMS Effectiveness
2 3
0
1 2 3 0
4
Problem of Biasness
Biasness
0
1 2 3 4
-1
-2
-2.25
-3 Biasness
-4 -3.6
-5
-6
-7
-7.12
-8 -7.5
Performance planning
Appraiser and Appraise Organisation & Employees
8
9
7 7.5
8
6
7.8
7
5 5.25 7.12
4 6
Appraiser and Appraise
Organisation &
3 5 Employees
2 4 4.5
1 3
3
0.75
0 2
1 2 3 4
-1 1
-2 -1.5 0
1 2 3 4
Communication between Appraiser and
Appraisee
communication
2.5
2
2
1.5
1
communication
0.5
0
1 2 0
3 4
-0.5
-1
-1.5 -1.2
-1.5
-2
TRANSPARENCY
Transparency
3
2.5
2.45
2
Transparency
1.5
1.34
1 1.2
1
0.5
0
1 2 3 4
After Appraisal
After Appraisal
6
4 3.6
3.6
2 3
0 feedback
1 2 3 4 Reward
-2
-3
-4
-6-5.25
-6 -6
-8
-10 -9
Appraiser Training
Appraiser's training
0
1 2 3 4
-1
-1.2
-2
-3 Appraiser's training
-4
-5 -4.7
-6
-6
-7
-8-7.5
Individual Employee’s Commitment
Individual Employee's Commitment
6
4 4.5 4.7
3 Individual Employee's Commitment
2
2
1
0
1 2 3 4
-1
-1.13
-2
Overall Effectiveness
overall effectiveness
4
3
3
2 2.4
1 overall effectiveness
0
1 2 3 4
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
Recommendations and Suggestions
In most of the responses 360 Degree Feedback implementation is strongly
recommended to avoid the problem of biasness.
The process should be more on the quarterly basis which they think that will
bring more relevance of the PMS in the Dena Bank. Quarterly system is
thought to be more effective than the yearly which is said to formality.
Free and frank communication between the appraiser and appraise also there
should be a mutual consent between these two while deciding the goals.
Counseling and feedback handling can be conducted timely if there is a
planning of these two besides the planning the goals.
As far as performance parameters are concerned it should be more on the role
and function based.
Reporting authority’s recommendations should have maximum weightage.
Stepwise rating should be conveyed to appraise with a reason if ratings are
downgraded by reporting /accepting officer.
Some employees feel that the organization should try to balance
between organizational requirements with individual aspirations.
Even a need for the discussion between appraise and the
appraiser over the way appraise has been appraised and the
reasons for the same. This will lead to the greater transparency.
In order to identifying the various performance parameters and
their targets balance card approach should be initiated.
Timely communication should be there because if every body
knows what needs to be done then there will be no difference over
the ratings the appraise will already know it.
The PMS mechanism in the Dena Bank should regularly analyze
not only for its effectiveness but also for its efficiency.
Suggestion and recommendations by Dena bank employees when
they are playing a role of an appraiser
Most of the employees think that there should be a mutual consent among
team members for grading of an individual performance.
After counseling an appraiser is supposed to send the feedback and various
recommendations to the people who are associated with the PMS program.
As an appraiser one should keep track of the subordinates’ achievements as
well as shortcomings throughout the year, not only during the evaluation
period.
Counseling is the core component of the PMS. This should be done in an
unbiased way. Also the appraiser should take it his moral responsibility to
counsel his appraise properly.
Appraiser should be more conscious about the PMS throughout the year as
his dedication can bring more accurate appraisal ratings.
If an appraiser is facing a difficulty in the process then he should tell it to the
authority concerned within time and ask to arrange for an appraisal training.
Things to look in Future
360 degree Feedback
Quarterly Review
Continuous Counseling