• Introduction
• System Description & Problem Statement
• Unified Distributed Control Strategy
• Simulation Analysis
• Experimental Analysis
• Conclusions
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 1
Introduction
• Microgrids are undoubtedly the indispensable components of the future
distribution networks.
• DC Microgrid, in particular is of great research interest due to its unique features
like
efficient inclusion of direct DC sources and storage devices
Minimal effort in control and energy management
increasing DC driven electronic loads
Primary impediments in microgrid control are
• Stringent communication requirements for real-time control of the microgrid
• Need for proper power sharing
• Demand side management
Distributed Control of DC microgrid
Fig. 1. Typical structure of a microgrid
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 2
System Description
Table. I. DC microgrid: technical specifications
Device Specifications
PV array 430V, 24.5A, 10kW, Ns=14, Np=3
Battery bank 220V, 400Ah, 5kW, Ns=110, Np=1
Supercapacitor bank 56V, 2600F, 5kW, Ns=21, Np=20
Fuel cell stack 48V, 105A, 5kW, Np=2
Load 1 48V, 105A, 5kW
Load 2 380V, 13.16A, 5kW
Fig. 2. Schematic of the DC microgrid
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 3
DC Bus Signalling Method
(a) (b) (c)
Fig. 3. Equivalent circuits of different modes of operation (a) mode-I (b) mode-II and III (c) mode-IV
Table. II. Control of power converters during different modes
Mode
I II III IV
Vdc,ref 375 V 380 V 380 V 385 V
DC bus forming Fuel cell CES (discharge) CES(charging) Solar PV
Solar PV (MPPT) and
DC bus feeding Solar PV (MPPT) Solar PV (MPPT) --
CES (discharge)
CES (charging) and/or
DC bus loading DC loads DC loads DC loads
DC loads
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 4
Unified Distributed Control
Impediments with DC bus signaling method are
• false activation due to line voltage drop
• Inability to support transient power sharing among components
Fig. 4. Detailed equivalent circuit of mode-II
Fig. 6. Control of CES converters
Demand Side Management
• The status of microgrid is always available in the form of DC bus voltage (Vdc).
• In the event of N-1 operation, the drop in Vdc will be utilized as an information for
load shedding.
Fig. 5. Control of interfacing converter using virtual resistance
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 5
Simulation Analysis
Case-I: Normal Operating Condition
Fig. 7. Power flow from/to different microgrid components
Fig. 8. DC bus voltage
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 6
Simulation Analysis
Case-II: N-1 operation (absence of CES device)
CES Failure
Fig. 9. Power flow from/to different microgrid components
Fig. 10. DC bus voltage
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 7
Conclusions
• A distributed control strategy for the DC microgrid is presented and different
operating modes are discussed in detail with the help of equivalent circuits for
each mode of operation.
• The potency of the control strategy is evaluated using both simulation and
experimental analysis.
• The system is observed to seamlessly transit between different operating modes
autonomously and is thus able to display
increased reliability
robustness to N-1 operation,
and
negligible communication requirements
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 8
Thank You
NPSC 2018, 14-16, December 2018 at NIT-Tiruchirappalli 9