0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views31 pages

Understanding Organizational Structures

The document provides reminders about upcoming deadlines for case assignments and revisions that are due. It discusses organizational structures, including functional, divisional, hybrid, matrix, horizontal/team, and network/virtual structures. The key characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of these different structures are examined.

Uploaded by

Sagar Tanna
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views31 pages

Understanding Organizational Structures

The document provides reminders about upcoming deadlines for case assignments and revisions that are due. It discusses organizational structures, including functional, divisional, hybrid, matrix, horizontal/team, and network/virtual structures. The key characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of these different structures are examined.

Uploaded by

Sagar Tanna
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Reminders

 C & C Grocery case will be in your mail files by


the end of the week.
 University Art Museum revisions are due by
2:00 PM on Monday.
 Aquarius Advertising case is due by 2:00 PM on
Monday. Think carefully about possible
structural changes. Don’t jump to conclusions
about appropriate structures simply as a
function of what you have read most recently.
Review of last week
 What is structure?
 What influences the structure chosen?
 What are the options for structuring work?
– Functional Structures
– Task forces and task teams for coordination
– Divisional Structures
 What are the characteristics, advantages
and disadvantages of functional/divisional
structures?
 Questions?
Understanding and Managing
Organizational Structure: B

BA 152
From last week’s discussion
 Functional structures work well when the
environment demands efficiency.
 Divisional structures work well when the
environment demands responsiveness.
But what happens if . . .
 The environment demands both
efficiency and responsiveness?
Other approaches to putting
organizations together
 Hybrid Structures
 Matrix Structures
 Horizontal/Team Structures
 Network/Network/Virtual Structures
A Hybrid Organization
President

International
Domestic Sales Sales

Vice-President Vice-President Vice-President Vice-President


Manufacturing Engineering Research & Dev. Finance & Acct.

Director
Manufacturing
Domestic
Manufacturing
International
Manufacturing
Building a Hybrid Organization
President

Finance &
Personnel Accounting

Vice-President Vice-President Vice-President Vice-President


Eastern Region Southern Region Northern Region Western Region

Director Same as East Same as East Same as East


R&D
Director
Manufacturing
Director
Marketing
A Matrix Organization

CEO

Prod. Director MFG ENG MKT F&A

Prod. A

Prod. B

Prod. C
Characteristics of Matrix
Structures
1. Individuals or work units can have a
combination of functional and divisional
assignments.
2. Methods and procedures will change by
assignment.
Characteristics of Matrix
Structures
3. Shared control and decision making
between functional and divisional leaders
4. Dual reporting relationships and balance of
power needed for success
Characteristics of Matrix
Structures
5. Competitive in dynamic environments
requiring responsiveness and efficiency
A Matrix Organization-NASA
CEO

Program Director Propulsion Engineer. Flight Cont. Operations

Shuttle

Mars

Space
Station
A Matrix Organization
CEO

Program Director MFG ENG MKT F&A

Prog. A

Prog. B

Prog. C
A Matrix Organization
CEO

Country Director MFG ENG MKT F&A

USA

Canada

Mexico
Kenan-Flagler Business School
Matrix Structure

DEAN

Management Accounting Finance Marketing Operations


UDG DB
MBA DB
MAC

PhD DB

Exec. Ed. DB
Can you imagine a 3-D
Matrix Organization?

Function

Country

Product
Matrix Structures
Advantages & Disadvantages

 Advantages  Disadvantages
– Can meet dual – Lose some economies
environmental demands of scale
– Flexible use of resources – Difficult to maintain
– Relatively quick reaction balance of power
times – Having two bosses can
– Good training for both be stressful
generalists and specialists – Conflict resolution can be
time-consuming
– Requires talented
management
Matrix Structure
What happens when the economy goes bad?

CEO

MFG ENG MKT F&A


Matrix Structure
What happens when the economy looks good?

CEO

Project. Director

Proj. A

Proj. B

Proj. C
Horizontal/Team Structures

Process Product
Top Management Team

Research Testing
Owner Planning

NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Process Identification Execution Integration


Owner

MERGERS & ACQUISTIONS

Process Material
Purchasing Distribution
Owner Flow

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT


Characteristics of
Horizontal/Team Structures
1. Organized around cross-functional core
processes
2. Self-directed teams are the basis for the
design of the organization.
3. Focus must be on the “customer” of the
process.
4. Requires non-traditional organizational
culture.
Horizontal/Team Structures
Advantages

1. Rapid response to changes in customer demands


2. Focus is on delivering value to the customer.
3. Employees have a broader view of organizational
goals.
4. Promotes focus on teamwork/collaboration
5. Improves quality of work-life for employees
Horizontal/Team Structures
Disadvantages

1. Identifying core processes can be difficult.


2. Requires major changes in most organizational
systems and culture.
3. Requires managers to give up power/authority.
4. Requires significant training for employees.
5. Can limit in-depth skill development
Kenan-Flagler Business School
Horizontal/Team Structure

Process
Admissions Internships Placement
Owner

ADMISSIONS & PLACEMENT


DEAN

Process BSBA MBA PHD


Owner

CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

Process Research Service Teaching


Owner Support Support Support

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
A Modular/Network/Virtual/ Structure

Designers Producers

Corporate Headquarters

Suppliers Distributors
Kenan-Flagler Business School
Modular/Network/Virtual Structure

Placement Admissions

DEAN’S OFFICE

Facilities Faculty
A Modular/Network/Virtual Structure:
Advantages
1. Small organizations can obtain talent and
assistance from anywhere.
2. Organization can “ramp up” without huge
investments in facilities.
3. Increases organization flexibility and
responsiveness.
4. Reduces administrative overhead costs.
A Modular/Network/Virtual/ Structure:
Disadvantages
 Little hands-on control of “partners”
 Expenses of establishing monitoring systems
 Reduced partner-employee loyalty
 Weakened corporate culture, if you can talk
about a corporate culture at all.
Is It the Wrong Structure?
How can you tell?

1) If we replaced the people, would the


problems remain?
2) Is the firm inefficient or inflexible?
3) Are decisions made too late?
4) Are decisions of poor quality?
5) Is there too much conflict between units?
Next Time:

Aquarius Advertising Agency

You might also like