CHAPTER 5
Quality Assurance
and Calibration
Methods
1
Quality assurance
Is what we do to get the
right answer for our
purpose.
The ability to consistently
produce the same product to
meet the same
specifications time after
time
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
Importance of quality assurance
Make sure that results meet the
customers need
Analytical data and results
should be used to determine for
example whether the level of fats
in a food package is 0%.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
Basics of quality
assurance
Important terms
Raw data: Individual
measurements e.g. volumes of a
burette in titration, weight of
precipitate,
Treated data: Concentrations
obtained from raw data.
Results: Quantities reported after
statistical treatment of data, e.g.
mean, standard deviation,
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
3 main factors of QA
1. Use objectives
States purpose for which results
will be used.(ask an unanswered Q)
2. Specifications
How good do the numbers have
to be
3. Assessment
Were specifications achieved
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
Specifications
Sampling requirements.
Quality assurance begins with sampling
How many samples, how samples are
preserved, .
How good the numbers need to be.
Accuracy and precision.
Rate of false results.
Selectivity, sensitivity.
Acceptable blank levels.
Recovery of fortification.
Calibration checks and quality control
samples.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
False positive and false
negative
False positive:
positive= there is a problem
States that the concentration exceeds the
certified limit, BUT in fact the
concentration is below the limit.
False negative:
negative = No problem
Says that the concentration is below the
limit when it is in fact above the limit.
A "false positive" is when a good quality item gets
rejected, and a "false negative" is when a poor quality
item gets accepted
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
Examples
For drinking water; which is more
important:
To have a low rate of false negative or
false positive with respect to contaminants
levels!
Drug testing for athletes is designed to
discover cases of using steroids the
consequences of positive testing for
drugs is the ultimate prohibition of those
athletes from participation in the games
For this case which is more important in
designing those tests to have low rate of
false positive or false negative?
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
Selectivity and sensitivity
Sensitivity
Ability to respond reliably and
measurably to changes in analyte
concentration
Sensitivity = slope of calibration curve
Sensitivity = change in signal / change in
concentration
Selectivity (specificity)
Being able to distinguish analyte from
other species free from interferences.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
Blank
Account for interference by other species
in sample and for traces of analyte in
reagents used for sample preparation,
preservation and analysis.
Method Blank
Sample containing all components except
analyte and is subjected to all steps in the
analytical method.
Reagent Blank
Same as method blank but not subjected to
all steps of analysis.
Field Blank
Similar to the method blank but it has been
exposed to the site of sampling.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
10
Spike - Fortification
Known amount of analyte added to a
sample to test whether the response is
the same as that expected from a
calibration curve.
Matrix = everything in the sample
other than the analyte.
Spike recovery
100
Fotification is to identify interference from
matrix.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
11
Calibration check
Analyze solutions prepared to
contain known concentrations of
analyte
Perform calibration check to make
sure that our instrument continues
to work properly and our
calibration remains valid
Solutions of the calibration check
should be prepared from solutions
different from the ones used to
prepare original calibration curve.
(why?)
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
12
Performance test
samples
Also known as Quality Control
Samples or Blind Samples.
These are samples of known
composition - provided as
unknowns to analysts.
Results are compared with the
known values e.g. by a quality
assurance manager.
Used to eliminate bias introduced
by analyst who knows calibration
standards concentrations.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
13
Assessment
A process of
Collecting data to show that the
analytical procedures are performed
correctly.
Verify that the final results meet
use objectives.
Documentation is essential for
assessment
Standard protocols - how
documentation should be done (e.g.
notebooks).
Quality control charts
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
14
Control Charts
Visual representation of confidence
intervals for a Gaussian distribution.
Used to warn from serious deviations
from a target value.
99.7% of
observations
95.5% of
observations
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
15
Control Charts
The following conditions are considered
unlikely to occur - if they occur the
process should be stopped for
troubleshooting
1 observation outside action lines
2 out of 3 consecutive measurements
between the warning and action lines
7 consecutive measurements all above or
below the center line.
6 consecutive measurements all increasing or
decreasing.
14 consecutive points alternating up and
down.
An obvious non random pattern (by common
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
16
sense)
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
17
Method validation
Is the process of proving that an
analytical method is acceptable for its
intended purpose
When should methods be validated?
1- method just developed.
2-established method adapted to a new
problem.
3-when established method is used in
different laboratories, with different
analyst or with different equipment.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
18
Method validation
Specificity
The ability of an analytical method to
distinguish analyte from everything else.
Linearity
Measures how well a calibration curve
follows a straight line.
Measured by Square of Correlation
Coefficient
R2 can be obtained by LINSET
R2 close to
1 5:indicates
curve
Chapter
Calibration methodsgood linear
19
Method validation
Accuracy
Nearness to the truth
Determined by
Analyze certified reference material
Compare results from two different
methods
Analyze blank spiked with known
addition of analyte
Use standard addition method.
Example of analysis of spiked
sample accuracy is expressed as
100.50.8%
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
20
Method validation
Precision
Show how replicate measurements agree
with one another (usually expressed by s)
Instrument precision
Reproducibility observed
when the same quantity of
one sample is repeatedly
injected in an instrument.
Intra-precision
Evaluated by analyzing
aliquots of a material several
times by one person on one
day using the same
instrument.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
21
Method validation
Intermediate precision
Is the variation observed when an
assay is performed by different people
on different instruments on different
days in the same lab.
Interlaboratory precision
Reproducibility observed when aliquots
of the same sample are analyzed by
different people in different
laboratories.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
22
Method validation
Range
Concentration interval over which linearity,
accuracy, and precision are all acceptable
Example: Spike recovery 10010
Limit of detection
Smallest quantity of the analyte that is
significantly different from the blank.
Limit of quantitation
The smallest amount that can be
determined with reasonable accuracy
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
23
Determination of detection limit
(DL)
Using an estimate of DL prpare a sample
with concentration 1-5 times DL
Measure the signal (ysample) from n
replicates of sample (n>=7)
Obtain s
Measure signal of n blank (yblank)
Determine minimum detectable signal
(ydl)
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
24
Example :
From
previous
measurements
of
a
low
concentration of analyte, the signal detection
limit was estimated to be in the low nanoampare
range. Signals from seven replicate samples with
a concentration about three times the detection
limit were 5.0, 5.0, 5.2, 4.2, 4.6, 6.0 and 4.9 nA.
reagent blanks gave values of 1.4, 2.2, 1.7, 0.9,
0.4, 1.5 and 0.7 nA. the slope of the calibration
curve is m=0.229nA/uM.
a) find the signal detection limit and the minimum
detectable concentration
b) what is the concenyration of analyte in a
sample that gave a signal of 7.0nA
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
25
Another way for DL
From the least square equation of a
calibration curve.
ydl = b + 3Sy
LD = 3Sy/m
Instrument detection limit
is
obtained by replicate measurements of
one sample.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
26
Reporting limit
The concentration below which
regulation say that a given analyte is
reported not detected
This does not mean that it is not
observed.
Reporting limit for trans fat is
0.5 g/serving
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
27
Robustness
Is the ability of an analytical
method to be unaffected by small
deliberate changes in operating
conditions.
Example the method pH is 7.5 to
check for robustness we change it
to 7 and to 8 and evaluate the error
in the obtained concentrations.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
28
Standard addition
Known quantities of analyte are added to
the unknown
From the increase in signal, we deduce
how much analyte was in the original
unknown.
Standard addition must be used
whenever the matrix of a sample changes
the analytical sensitivity of the method
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
29
Standard addition
Matrix effect
Matrix = everything in
the unknown other than
analyte
Matrix effect =The
change in analytical
signal caused by
anything in sample other
than analyte
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
30
5.3 Standard addition
Known amounts of analyte are added to the unknown solution
Ix = k[X]i (Response for unknown sample)
Is+x = k([X]f+ [s]f (Response for unknown sample + standard)
X i
S f X f
Xf
s f
Ix
I s x
Vo
X i
VT
Vs
s i
VT
Example: A 25.0 mL sample of
Ni2+ gave a current of 2.36 A in
an electrochemical analysis.
Upon addition of 0.500 mL of
solution containing 28.7 mM Ni2+
the current increased to 3.79 A.
Find the concentration of nickel
in the sample.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
31
Graphical procedure for standard
addition
Unknown without any
added standard
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
32
5.4 Internal standard
A known amount of a compound different from the analyte
is added to the unknown sample.
Analyte signal
Standard signal
concentration of analyte
concentration of standard
Ax
As
F
X S
Example: A solution containing 3.47 mM X
and 1.72 mM S gave peak areas of 3473 and
10222, respectively. 10.00 mL of 0.146 mM S
when added to 10.00 ml of unknown X and
diluted to 25.0 mL gave peak areas of 5428
and 4431 for X and S respectively. Find the
concentration of X in the original unknown.
Chapter 5: Calibration methods
33