0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views12 pages

Marxist Critique by George Banis

This document provides an overview of Marxist literary criticism and its key concepts. It discusses Marx's philosophy and how he viewed history and society through concepts like dialectical materialism, historical materialism, and the labor theory of value. It then gives examples of how Marxist critics have analyzed works like Hamlet and The Fountainhead by viewing them through the lens of class struggle and how they represent or critique the social structures of their time.

Uploaded by

GreekPride
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views12 pages

Marxist Critique by George Banis

This document provides an overview of Marxist literary criticism and its key concepts. It discusses Marx's philosophy and how he viewed history and society through concepts like dialectical materialism, historical materialism, and the labor theory of value. It then gives examples of how Marxist critics have analyzed works like Hamlet and The Fountainhead by viewing them through the lens of class struggle and how they represent or critique the social structures of their time.

Uploaded by

GreekPride
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MARXIST LITERARY

CRITICISM
GEORGE BANIS
MARX
1818-1883
•Born in Trier, Prussia (now
Germany)
•German philosopher and
social activist
•Along with Friedrich Engels,
led a political movement that
inspired progression towards
Communism
HISTORY OF THE
IDEALS
• Georg W. Hegel (1770-1831) --->Ludwig Feuerbach (1804-1872)---->Karl
Marx

• Hegel: “Man is God, and history is the process by which man alienates
himself (thus alienating God).

• Feuerbach: “History is process by which man realizes himself when he stops


projecting himself in God”----->God is man alienated from himself.

• Marx led this to a political view, the alienation of social institutions------>


Marx Philosophy
• Focus on the social being

• Critique of Hegel’s philosophy: “The political


system is the political system of private property.”--
>

• For man to be reunited with man (mixing of


classes), systems of private ownership must
be abolished.

• “It is not the consciousness of men that


determines their being, but their social being
that determines their consciousness.”
Dialectic
• The method of philosophizing by means of question and answer--->Ancient
Philosophers (Socrates, Plato)

• Aims to understand things concretely in all their movement, change and


interconnection, with their opposite and contradictory sides in unity.

• Plato-->applied this to logical method and reducing multiple


experiences to an organized system.

• Hegel-->the ideal and the real are opposed and unified in a


world spirit.

• Marx and Friedrich Engels- Dialectical Materialism:the


opposing forces are human and the conflict is primarily a clash
of classes---->Marxism----->Communism

• Bourgeoisie- social class that owns the means of production in


a Capitalist society.
Dialectical Materialism
• Foundation of whole Marxist doctrine

• All phenomena originate from a physical cause and can be understood and
explained through natural science.

• Matter--->total explanation for any aspect of existence (space, nature,


man society, history, etc.)

• Hegel- History is the product of class struggles.

• Matter precedes thought.

• Overall: Material contradictions are the primary cause of motion, change,


and development in the world.
Historical Materialism
• Materialist conception of History- Marx

• Looks for causes of developments and changes in society by humans


producing the necessities of life.

• Mode of production of material life--->process of social, political,


and intellectual life.----> Main Points:

• The basis of human society is how humans work on nature to produce the means of
subsistence.

• There is a division of labour into social classes based on property ownership where
some people live from the labour of others.

• The system of class division is dependent on the mode of production.

• The mode of production is based on the level of the productive forces.

• Society moves from stage to stage when the dominant class is displaced by a new
emerging class, by overthrowing the "political shell" that enforces the old relations
of production no longer corresponding to the new productive forces.
Marxist Economics
• Labour Theory of Value: the value of a commodity is the socially necessary
labor time invested in it. (Commodity- item of practical use, ex. food)

• Capitalism--->does not pay workers full value for the commodities


they produce.

• Marx believed Capitalists worked with the idea of surplus value.

• Markets use Commodity Fetishism->social relationships are


transformed into objective relationships between commodities or
money--->People become unaware of the relationships between the
commodities and the labor they represent.

• All Commodities are produced by human labor---->materialism


Marxist Art History
• Art interacts with power structures in society.

• Art is tied to specific classes

• Images contain information about the economy

• Images can make the status quo seem natural

• Clement Greenberg- Marxist Art Critic

• Avant-Garde (innovative) vs. Kitsch (low, tasteless art).

• Meyer Schapiro- Marxist Art Historian

• Commented on sculpture

• “From Mozarabic to Romanesque in Silos”--> Commented how the


concurrent existence of two historical styles in a monastery showed
economic upheaval and class conflict.
The Fountainhead
• Ellsworth Toohey tries to cause class
equality with all mediocrity instead of
exceptionalism---->like Roark
• Class struggle---> Mediocre and weak vs.
Exceptional.
• Keating vs. Roark
HAMLET
• Hamlet--->Strong oppositions to basic social values.

• Carnival: a class of social occasions held together by broad family


resemblance---->used to represent and criticize important beliefs and
practices in the official culture of his own time.

• Carnival - intense, vivid, and dramatic, makes complex social


dialogue more audible.

• Many violations to social order-->masking and disguises allow for


this ---------->the players

• Carnival uses misrule (Claudius), inversion, and travesty.

• Carnivalesque: literary mode---subverts and liberates dominant style or


atmosphere with humor and chaos.

• Likened to common carnival activity-->social hierarchies profaned.


Shakespeare’s Purpose
from Marxist View
• Shakespeare----> Carnival- represents and
criticizes important beliefs and practices in the
official culture of his own time (Historical
Criticism)-------> illegitimacy of royalty and rulers
of his time/corruption.

• Marxists use idea of Carnival--->analyze the social


struggle and conflict (Shakespeare’s purpose in
writing).

You might also like