Science, Faith & Knowledge
1) All scientists hold to at least ten scientifically unverifiable
presuppositions, that is, things that are assumed before
collecting any data and before using any logic. These are
things that cannot be proven scientifically, yet they are
necessary to carry on science.
2) So all scientists, whether they are aware of it or not, and
whether they will even admit to it or not, have faith in at least
these ten presuppositions.
3) Those scientists who are working in a field outside the
optimal domain of science, in the historic and prehistoric past,
must make even more assumptions which cannot, by their
nature, be scientifically verified.
4) How can we know something? The technical term for
assessing and addressing this question is epistemology.
Science, it is said, is able to bring us to a knowledge of things
in the physical realm. But what kind of knowledge is it?
And how certain is that knowledge? And what are its limits?
Science, Faith & Knowledge
1) All scientists hold to at least ten scientifically unverifiable
presuppositions, that is, things that are assumed before
collecting any data and before using any logic. These are
things that cannot be proven scientifically, yet they are
necessary to carry on science.
2) So all scientists, whether they are aware of it or not, and
whether they will even admit to it or not, have faith in at least
these ten presuppositions.
3) Those scientists who are working in a field outside the
optimal domain of science, in the historic and prehistoric past,
must make even more assumptions which cannot, by their
nature, be scientifically verified.
4) How can we know something? The technical term for
assessing and addressing this question is epistemology.
Science, it is said, is able to bring us to a knowledge of things
in the physical realm. But what kind of knowledge is it?
And how certain is that knowledge? And what are its limits?
Faith in the ten scientifically unverifiable presuppositions
(1 & 2 of the 4 above)
(1) the existence of an external world
(2) the orderly nature of the external world
(3) the knowability of the external world
(4) the existence of truth
(5) the laws of logic
(6) the reliability of our memory, thinking & sensory faculties to
serve as truth gatherers & as a source of justified true beliefs
(7) the adequacy of language to describe the world
(8) the existence of values in science (e.g., "test theories fairly
& report results honestly")
(9) the uniformity of nature & the continuity of laws inherent in
nature into the future
(10) the existence of numbers corresponding to nature in order
to measure & model using mathematics
Science, Faith & Knowledge
1) All scientists hold to at least ten scientifically unverifiable
presuppositions, that is, things that are assumed before
collecting any data and before using any logic. These are
things that cannot be proven scientifically, yet they are
necessary to carry on science.
2) So all scientists, whether they are aware of it or not, and
whether they will even admit to it or not, have faith in at least
these ten presuppositions.
3) Those scientists who are working in a field outside the
optimal domain of science, in the historic and prehistoric past,
must make even more assumptions which cannot, by their
nature, be scientifically verified.
4) How can we know something? The technical term for
assessing and addressing this question is epistemology.
Science, it is said, is able to bring us to a knowledge of things
in the physical realm. But what kind of knowledge is it?
And how certain is that knowledge? And what are its limits?
Gradations in quality of subject
matter for scientific study purposes
(gray area is the optimal domain of science)
Present / Past Present Processes
& Events
Scope, Scale
& Access
Smaller In Scope, Presently observable
Scale, Total
Repeatable
Access
Controlled inputs
Measured outputs
Larger In Scope,
Scale, Partial
Access
Presently observable
Sampled inputs &
outputs
Past Historical
Processes &
Events
Past NonHistorical
Processes
& Events
Presently Observe Presently
Past Human
Observe
Written Observation Evidence
& Other Evidence
From The Past
From The
Past
Presently Observe Presently
Past Human
Observe
Written Observation Evidence
& Other Evidence
On page 174 of
The Greatest
Show on Earth,
atheist scientist
Richard
Dawkins writes,
"As the giraffe's
neck slowly
lengthened over
evolutionary
time...".
On page 174 of
The Greatest
Show on Earth,
atheist scientist
Richard
Dawkins writes,
"As the giraffe's
neck slowly
lengthened over
evolutionary
time...".
There are no clear &
undisputed fossils to support
this supposed lengthening
over evolutionary time.
In Climbing Mount
Improbable Richard
Dawkins gave these
illustrations of a giraffe &
an okapi, saying that the
giraffe evolved from a
creature much like the
okapi.
In Climbing Mount
Improbable Richard
Dawkins gave these
illustrations of a giraffe &
an okapi, saying that the
giraffe evolved from a
creature much like the
okapi.
And Richard Dawkins neglected
to mention that there are no
clear undisputed transitional
fossils between the okapi-like
predecessor & the giraffe.
Problem: This is the size
of an okapi to scale.
Gradations in quality of subject
matter for scientific study purposes
(gray area is the optimal domain of science)
Present / Past Present Processes
& Events
Scope, Scale
& Access
Past Historical
Processes &
Events
Past NonHistorical
Processes
& Events
Smaller In Scope, Presently observable
Scale, Total
Repeatable
Access
Controlled inputs
Measured outputs
Presently Observe
Past Human
Written Observation
& Other Evidence
From The Past
Presently
Observe
Evidence
From The
Past
Larger In Scope,
Scale, Partial
Access
Presently observable
Sampled inputs &
outputs
Presently Observe Presently
Past Human
Observe
Written Observation Evidence1
& Other Evidence
On page 174 of
The Greatest
Show on Earth,
atheist scientist
Richard
Dawkins writes,
"As the giraffe's
neck slowly
lengthened over
evolutionary
time...".
On page 174 of
The Greatest
Show on Earth,
atheist scientist
Richard
Dawkins writes,
"As the giraffe's
neck slowly
lengthened over
evolutionary
time...".
There are no clear &
undisputed fossils to support
this supposed lengthening
over evolutionary time.
Giraffe fossil head & jawbone
Okapi fossil
head & jawbone
Photo by Skulls Unlimited
In Climbing Mount
Improbable Richard
Dawkins gave these
illustrations of a giraffe &
an okapi, saying that the
giraffe evolved from a
creature much like the
okapi.
In Climbing Mount
Improbable Richard
Dawkins gave these
illustrations of a giraffe &
an okapi, saying that the
giraffe evolved from a
creature much like the
okapi.
The giraffe has 62 pairs of chromosomes
And Richard Dawkins neglected
to mention that there are no
clear undisputed transitional
fossils between the okapi-like
predecessor & the giraffe.
The okapi has 46 pairs of chromosomes
Problem: This is the size
of an okapi to scale.
In The Greatest
Show On Earth
Richard Dawkins
wrote, This book
is my personal
summary of the
evidence that the
'theory' of evolution
is actually a
fact as
incontrovertible a fact
as any in science.
Gradations in quality of subject
matter for scientific study purposes
(gray area is the optimal domain of science)
Present / Past Present Processes
& Events
Scope, Scale
& Access
Past Historical
Processes &
Events
Past NonHistorical
Processes
& Events
Smaller In Scope, Presently observable
Scale, Total
Repeatable
Access
Controlled inputs
Measured outputs
Presently Observe
Past Human
Written Observation
& Other Evidence
From The Past
Presently
Observe
Evidence
From The
Past
Larger In Scope,
Scale, Partial
Access
Presently observable
Sampled inputs &
outputs
Presently Observe Presently
Past Human
Observe
Written Observation Evidence1
& Other Evidence
Science, Faith & Knowledge
1) All scientists hold to at least ten scientifically unverifiable
presuppositions, that is, things that are assumed before
collecting any data and before using any logic. These are
things that cannot be proven scientifically, yet they are
necessary to carry on science.
2) So all scientists, whether they are aware of it or not, and
whether they will even admit to it or not, have faith in at least
these ten presuppositions.
3) Those scientists who are working in a field outside the
optimal domain of science, in the historic and prehistoric past,
must make even more assumptions which cannot, by their
nature, be scientifically verified.
4) How can we know something? The technical term for
assessing and addressing this question is epistemology.
Science, it is said, is able to bring us to a knowledge of things
in the physical realm. But what kind of knowledge is it?
And how certain is that knowledge? And what are its limits?
The Four Truth Questions & Knowing:
1) Is there absolute Truth?
Yes__ No__
Proverbs 22:20, 21; Hebrews 13:8
2) Is that Truth singular?
Yes__ No__
John 14:6; 18:37
3) Has the Truth been given?
Yes__ No__
Psalms 119:160; John 17:17; Revelation 1:1, 2
4) Is the (absolute, singular, given) Truth knowable?
Yes__ No__
John 8:31, 32; I John 5:13, 20