Portfolio Models
(Product/Market Evolution Matrix, Directional Policy Matrix, Strategic Position and Action Evaluation)
Abhishek Jhanwar Roll No. 51
Portfolio Analysis
In a business, there may be many products with varying prospects. Portfolio analysis (also referred to as corporate portfolio, business portfolio, or product portfolio analysis), is a set of techniques that helps an organisation in making strategic decisions with regard to what to do with different businesses/products. Prominent portfolio analysis models are BCG growth-share matrix, GE nine-cell planning grid, Product/market evolution matrix, directional policy matrix, and strategic position and action evaluation.
Product/Market Evolution Matrix
This model was given by Hofer and Schendel to overcome the weakness identified by them in GE approach. GE approach does not depict the positions of businesses that are about to emerge as winners because the product is entering the take off stage. In order to overcome this problem, they constructed a fifteencell matrix taking competitive position and stages of product/market evolution dimensions.
Competitive Position Stage of Product/Market Evolution
Strong Average Weak Development Growth
Shakeout
Maturation, Saturation
Decline
Business falling in strong competitive position and in development and growth market may be future winners. Business falling in average competitive position and in development and growth market may be converted into future winners by increasing their competitive position. Business falling in weak competitive position in any market, particularly more so in mature and declining market are potential losers. Therefore can be considered for disinvestment. Business falling in strong competitive position and in mature shakeout market may be termed as cash cows because of their ample cash generating capacity. Business falling in average competitive position and in saturated and declining market can also be candidate for future disinvestment
Competitive Position Stage of Product/Market Evolution
Strong A Development B Growth D Shakeout C Average Weak
Maturation, Saturation
F Decline
Directional Policy Matrix
DPM, developed by shell chemicals, UK. It uses two dimensions- business sector prospects and companys competitive capabilities- to choose strategies. Each dimension is further divided into three degrees- business sector prospects into unattractive, average, and attractive and companys competitive capabilities into weak, average, and strong. The combination of two dimensions with three degrees of each gives nine cells as shown in figure:
Business Sector Prospects Competitive Capabilities
Unattractive Average Attractive
Divestment
Phased withdrawal
Double or quit
Weak Phased withdrawal Average Custodian Try harder
Cash generation
Strong
Growth
Market leadership
Type of Strategy
Divestment Phased withdrawal Double or quit Custodian Try harder Cash generation Growth Market leadership
Strategic Position and Action Evaluation
SPACE is an extension of two dimensional portfolio analysis. SPACE involves a consideration of four dimensions: organisations competitive advantage, organisational financial strength, industry strength, and environmental stability.
Factors
Competitive advantage: Market share Product quality Product life cycle Product replacement cycle Customer loyalty Capacity utilization Technical know-how Vertical integration
Cont..
Financial Strength Return on investment Leverage Capital required and available Cash flow Ease of exit from market Risk involved in the business
Cont..
Industry Strength Profit potential Growth potential Financial stability Resource utilization Capital intensity Ease of entry into market Productivity
Cont..
Environmental Stability Technological changes Rate of inflation Demand variability Price range of competing products Competitive pressure Price elasticity of demand Entry barriers
Types of Strategy
Aggressive Posture Competitive Posture Conservative Posture Defensive Posture
Thank You