Problem Solving
Problem Solving
MODULE CONTENT
The Creative Problem‐Solving Model
Looking for problems
Gathering data
Defining the problem
Generating solutions
Evaluating and selecting solutions
Planning for implementation
Gaining acceptance
Implementation
1
OBJECTIVES
2
CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING MODEL
3
CPS DEFINITION
4
CPS MODEL
• Deferring judgment
• Active divergence
• Active convergence
5
CPS MODEL
CONVERGENT DIVERGENT
FOCUSES GENERATES
6
CPS MODEL
CONVERGENT OR DIVERGENT?
7
CPS MODEL
8
BASADUR CPS MODEL
[Link]
Finding Phase 1
Problem Formulation
[Link] [Link] Finding Steps 1, 2,3
Phase 2
Solution Formulation
[Link] 4, 5
[Link]
Definition
Phase 3
Solution
Implementation
[Link] [Link] Finding Steps 6, 7, 8
[Link] &
Select
9
ACTIVITY
Your Profile
• You will identify your problem‐
Implementer Generator
solving preference
• Follow the instructions in
Problem
Handout to complete the Your Solving
Problem‐Solving Profile Style
assessment
Optimizer Conceptualizer
10
PHASE 1 – PROBLEM FORMULATION
BASADUR CPS MODEL
[Link]
Finding Phase 1
Problem Formulation
[Link] Steps 1, 2, 3
[Link]
Finding
Phase 2
Solution Formulation
Steps 4, 5
[Link]
[Link]
Definition
Phase 3
Solution
Implementation
[Link] Steps 6, 7, 8
[Link]
Finding
[Link] &
Select
12
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
13
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
2. Fact Finding
• Challenge assumptions
• View facts from several viewpoints
• Types of information (facts, opinions,
assumptions, concepts, procedures)
• Methods to gather information
(interviews, surveys, research,
observation, focus groups)
• Identify what approaches we have tried
• Identify what approaches others have
tried
• Determine internal/external constraints
to implementing solutions
14
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
2. Fact Finding
15
ACTIVITY
Case Study
• Read the case study about the
presenting problem
• Discuss the case study
questions with a partner
16
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
2. Fact Finding
17
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
Common forms of resistance
• Presses for details
• Floods with details
• Claims a timing mismatch / busyness
• Emphasizes practicality
• Lack of surprise
• Attacks
• Claims confusion
• Lack of response (silence)
• Intellectualizing
• Moralizing
• Compliance
• Pushs too early for solutions
18
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
Reasons for resistance
• Maintaining control
• Perceived vulnerability
19
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
Dealing with resistance
20
ACTIVITY
Comfort Zones
• Stand up and cross your arms
the way you normally would
• Now cross your arms the
opposite way
21
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
3. Problem Definition
22
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
3. Problem Definition ‐ Benefits
23
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
3. Problem Definition ‐ Tips
24
PHASE 1: PROBLEM
FORMULATION
3. Problem Statement ‐ Example
25
PHASE 1: TOOLS
Tool Description
Rich pictures Provides an initial overview of the problem. Can provide
understanding from different points of view.
26
PHASE 1: TOOLS
RICH PICTURES
Source: Checkland, P.B. & Poulter, J. (2006) Learning for Action: A short definitive account of
Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, teachers and Students
27
ACTIVITY
28
PHASE 1: TOOLS
6 UNIVERSAL QUESTIONS
Who
Why When
Where
29
PHASE 1: TOOLS
30
PHASE 1: TOOLS
GOAL ORIENTATION
General outline
• As a group, discuss of the problem
the desired goal and statement
what stands in the
way
• At the end of the What are the What are the What are the
activity, write the needs? obstacles? constraints
revised problem
statement
Redefine
original problem
statement
31
PHASE 1: TOOLS
WEB OF ABSTRACTION
32
ACTIVITY
33
PHASE 2 – SOLUTION FORMULATION
BASADUR CPS MODEL
[Link]
Finding Phase 1
Problem Formulation
[Link] [Link] Finding Steps 1, 2,3
Phase 2
Solution Formulation
[Link] Steps 4, 5
[Link]
Definition
Phase 3
Solution
Implementation
[Link] [Link] Finding Steps 6, 7, 8
[Link] &
Select
35
PHASE 2: SOLUTION
FORMULATION
4. Idea Finding
36
PHASE 2: SOLUTION
FORMULATION
37
PHASE 2: SOLUTION
FORMULATION
38
PHASE 2: SOLUTION
FORMULATION
39
PHASE 2: TOOLS‐CREATING
Tool Description
Brain‐writing Generates many ideas and useful to encourage
Pool participation from everyone. (Fluency & flexibility)
Reversal Used to generate different types of ideas and can
lighten the tone. (Unique & flexibility)
Super Uses other viewpoints to shift paradigms and can
Heroes lighten the tone, taking people out of their typical roles
(Flexibility)
Picture Use to get unstuck or to create connections that at first
Prompts don’t appear to be connected (Unique & flexibility)
Excursion Use to get unstuck or create insights to create
connections that at first don’t appear to be connected.
(Unique)
40
PHASE 2: TOOLS
BRAIN-WRITING POOL
• Each team member individually writes 3 ideas on a sheet
of paper and puts it in the middle of the table
41
PHASE 2: TOOLS
42
ACTIVITY
Practice Clustering
• Using the previous issue you
identified, write a word or
phrase related to it as a
nucleus.
• As fast as you can, write all
words or phrases that come to
mind and circle each one.
• We will time this for 3 minutes
43
PHASE 2: TOOLS
REVERSAL
• Each team member individually writes 3 ideas on a sheet
of paper and puts it in the middle of the table
44
PHASE 2: TOOLS
SUPER HEROES
• Each team member thinks of a superhero (living, dead,
imaginary, human, animal, inanimate)
• The first team member describes the superhero’s
qualities and attributes. The team tries to guess who the
superhero is (if not done quickly, reveal the identity)
• All team members add superhero qualities and attributes
• Ask “How would the superhero tackle this problem?”
• Document and elaborate on ideas generated
• Repeat for the next team member and so on
45
PHASE 2: TOOLS
PICTURE PROMPTS
• Facilitator provides 3‐5 pictures for team members to view
and individually write down their impressions,
observations and thoughts related to them. Do not share
with others yet
46
PHASE 2: TOOLS
EXCURSION
• Physical – Take a walk in nearby nature, museum, park, local
street. Team members note their impressions privately. May
explore individually and regroup.
• When return to work team members write down impressions
and reflections
• Ask people to share their strongest impressions
• Ask what connection team members can make between the
impressions and the original problem
Excursion
• The facilitator will guide you
through a journey
• Afterward, write down your
impressions and reflections
• With a partner, share your
strongest impressions
• Discuss with your partner what
connection you can make
between the impressions and
your original problem
48
PHASE 2: SOLUTION
FORMULATION
5. Evaluate and Select
• Narrow down ideas
• Create criteria to measure the
ideas
• Apply the selected criteria to
possible solutions
• Primary objective of this step is to
identify the ideas’ strengths and
weaknesses and select at least
one solution
• If none of the solutions seem
strong enough, go back to the
previous step(s)
49
PHASE 2: TOOLS‐NARROWING
Tool Description
Voting A structured approach for groups to narrow down
many ideas into fewer
Flat Sort Places an even number of ideas into each sorting pile
or category. Can be used individually or in groups
Time Frame Sorts ideas based on short, medium, and long term
time frames. Can be used individually or in groups
Hold How Categorizes ideas based on originality and feasibility.
Now Wow Can be used individually or in groups
50
PHASE 2: TOOLS
VOTING
• Each team member has the same number of votes (often 3‐8
but may depend on the number of ideas)
• Prompt team members to vote based on a prompt such as
“select which ideas seem most on target” or “select which
ideas have the most potential”
• Team members can vote for their own ideas
• Ideas can be posted for open voting with dots or check marks
or anonymously where each team member writes down the
ideas that have their votes on a sheet of paper
• Further consider the ideas with the most votes
51
PHASE 2: TOOLS
FLAT SORT
• Determine categories (e.g. high, moderate, low)
• Count the total number of ideas and divide by the number of
categories (e.g. three). The numbers should be equal (if not,
assign the “extras” to moderate and low)
• Each team member assigns each idea to one of the categories.
The number of ideas should be equal according to the total
number
• Further consider the ideas in the high category
52
PHASE 2: TOOLS
TIME FRAME
• Prepare a time scale of short‐term, medium‐term, and long‐
term on a flip chart (or paper if individually)
• Identify the duration of each time scale (e.g. weeks, months,
years)
• Use the prompt “When could this idea begin to deliver value?”
• Allow for discussion
• Further consider the ideas whose timeframe meet the aim of
the problem defined
53
PHASE 2: TOOLS
feasible
Not yet
HOLD HOW
• Top ideas are placed in one of the
categories based on feasibility and
originality
Feasible
• Discuss themes or commonalities NOW WOW
• Further consider the Wow ideas
(original and feasible) Common Original
54
ACTIVITY
55
PHASE 2: SOLUTION
FORMULATION
Create evaluation criteria
56
PHASE 2: TOOLS‐EVALUATION
Tool Description
PPCO Similar to SWOT analysis, looks at the pluses,
potentials, concerns, and overcomes
Criteria and Evaluates each idea and rates it against each discrete
Evaluation criterion established
Grid
Paired Compares pairs of ideas to consider which of the two is
Comparison best or most important
57
PHASE 2: TOOLS
PPCO
• Pluses – What are the good or positive
things about the idea
• Potentials – What are the possibilities if PLUSES POTENTIALS
58
PHASE 2: TOOLS
PAIRED COMPARISON
• Determine a scale to use (e.g. slight = 1,
moderate =2, great = 3) Idea 1 Idea 2 Idea 3 Idea 4 Idea 5
Idea 3
• Which of these two options is the best Idea 4
PPCO
• Identify the pluses, potentials,
concerns, and overcomes for
your top 2‐3 ideas PLUSES POTENTIALS
CONCERNS OVERCOMES
61
STAGE 3 ‐ SOLUTION IMPLEMENTATION
BASADUR CPS MODEL
[Link]
Finding Phase 1
Problem Formulation
[Link]
[Link] Steps 1, 2,3
Finding
Phase 2
Solution Formulation
Steps 4, 5
[Link]
[Link]
Definition
Phase 3
Solution
Implementation
Steps 6, 7, 8
[Link]
[Link]
Finding
[Link] &
Select
63
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
6. Plan
64
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
• Create a grid that includes
headings such as
• What will be done
• How will it be done
• Responsible person/role
• Timeframe
• Select and list the most
important tasks
65
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
Consider the following:
• What new issues might this
idea create?
• Where might we have some
barriers?
• Who will this idea impact?
• How should we introduce the
idea?
• When should we introduce the
idea?
66
ACTIVITY
Plan
• Identify 3 tasks important to
implement the idea.
• Write down:
• What will be done
• How will it be done
• Responsible person/role
• Timeframe
67
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
7. Acceptance
68
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
Tips to Increase Acceptance
Tool Description
Supporters Helps to identify the people who might support or
and Resisters resist the idea implementation
Changing Used to anticipate objections by stakeholders
Shoes
Stakeholder Anticipates potential stakeholder impact and level of
Analysis support
Stakeholder Anticipates potential stakeholder benefits and concerns
Benefits and
Concerns
70
PHASE 3: TOOLS
Supporter Resister
Exploration ‐ who, what
Gain Support/Overcome Concerns
71
PHASE 3: TOOLS
CHANGING SHOES
• Identify three of the best reasons in support of the
solution
• For each supporting reason, determine the best way you
can oppose it
• For each opposing reason, identify arguments to
overcome the opposing reasons
• Return to the original solution(s), and write a solution
that is completely opposite (e.g. if the solution is to
reduce turnover, write a solution to increase turnover)
• Follow the steps above for reasons in support, opposing,
and agreements to overcome
• Discuss any fresh insights or potential weaknesses in the
original proposed solution 72
PHASE 3: TOOLS
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
• Populate an 8 column table with the name (or role) of each key
stakeholder in column 1 (see below)
• Identify the level of impact on the stakeholder in column 2
• Determine the level of support and put an X in the appropriate
column (3 through 7)
• Decide how far you could realistically shift a stakeholder for
more support and where you would need him/her to be
• Decide the actions you can take to make high and medium
impact stakeholders more supportive
Completely Fairly Fairly Completely
Stakeholders Impact Against Unsupportive Neutral Supportive in Favor Action
Name1 High X Leverage Stakeholder Name4
Name2 Low X
Name3 Medium X
Name4 High X 73
PHASE 3: TOOLS
74
ACTIVITY
Supporter Resister
Exploration ‐ who, what
Gain Support/Overcome Concerns
75
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
8. Action
76
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
Common Fears
• The unknown
• Failure
• An imperfect result
77
PHASE 3: SOLUTION
IMPLEMENTATION
Tips to Address Common Fears
Feedforward
• Think of 1 concern you
have about
implementation
• Ask a colleague for his/her
suggestion
• Thank the person for
his/her suggestion (do not
judge it)
• Let your colleague ask you
for a suggestion
79
Handout 1: Your Creative Problem‐Solving Style1
Instructions: Identify which words most (4) and least (1) describe your problem‐ solving style. For
each row of words, use a forced scale. This means that the rating for words in each column will
differ in the same row. For example:
1
Source: Basadur, Min. “The Basadur Simplex Creative Problem‐Solving Profile Inventory: Development, Reliability,
and Validity,” McMasterUniversity. (1998).
Scoring: Sum the numbers (1, 2, 3, 4) in each column (A, B, C, D). Exclude the ratings for rows 1, 2,
5, 10, 14, and 17. These are distractor words, and their ratings should not be included in the sum.
Preference Summary
Interpretation
Whichever dimension has a greater percentage (out of 100%) of the four styles is your preferred
problem‐solving style. If you use all four styles equally, each will represent 25%.
Different problem‐solving styles don’t indicate differences of ability. All have value. The key is to
have awareness of your style as a leader, what your team preferences are, and how that impacts
your team dynamics.
Request: Leadership has asked you to design a strategy to reduce overall voluntary staff turnover.
The organization’s strategic plan has identified that voluntary staff turnover should be reduced
from 5% to 1% over 5 years.
Context: As a state‐owned enterprise (SoE), some staff naturally transfer from one SoE to another.
However, the service sector in Ethiopia is growing, and leadership is concerned about new private
competitors poaching staff.
Data Analysis: The organization has provided you data gathered from their HRIS, staff surveys, and
staff interviews. Your analysis of the data indicates the two primary reasons for separation are
resignation (55%) and pensioned (24%). Nearly half of all staff resigning have more than 20 years
of service. Half of the employees who leave do so within one year of receiving a transfer assignment
initiated by the organization.
The organization’s voluntary staff turnover rate is 5% overall, but when you analyze by job group,
you discover that 80% of job groups had no staff resign in the last year. On the other hand, 20% of
Directors resigned in the last year.
External benchmark data shows an average voluntary staff turnover rate of 8% within private
Ethiopian organizations for the sector.
The most recent employee satisfaction survey conducted last year surveyed 1,500 of the 5,000
staff. Of those surveyed, 50% are dissatisfied in their current roles. On the positive side, staff are
proud to work for the organization, the induction process for new hires is favorable, staff connect
to the vision/mission, and generally trust their co‐workers. However, staff complain about lack of
training and development opportunities, lack of empowerment to make decisions, lack of
recognition, and dissatisfaction in their roles.
You have personally observed a few staff sleeping at their desks. One staff member told you in
confidence that when she was transferred, she was not informed until after she arrived one day to
find her replacement sitting at her desk.
Employees are required to travel to Addis for an exit interview. Of those who were interviewed,
the top four reasons for resigning were personal (not job related), job dissatisfaction, salary, and
to join private organizations.
QUESTIONS
With a partner, discuss the following:
1. What were some sources of information used for the data analysis?
2. Do you think the presenting problem is still the underlying problem to be solved? If so, why?
If not, why not and what appears to be the underlying problem?
Problem Solving Skills Set ‐ PEHA 1
Handout 3: Brainstorming with Creativity Clustering1
This is a brainstorming technique using circles to help you break
through normal linear thinking. Often, when we think of ideas, we
make bullet lists. That approach works fine when you don’t have any
blockages. However, if you find brainstorming a challenge, lack ideas,
or need clarity in writing, prioritizing, or preparing for a presentation,
this method can help.
1
Adapted from Rico, Gabriel L. 2000. Writing the Natural Way: Using Right‐Brain Techniques to Release Your Expressive Powers.
Tarcher/Putnam.
አመሰግናለሁ!