Velammal Engineering College,
Surapet, Chennai-66
FEEDBACK ANALYSIS –PROJECT EXPO
[Link] Description Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Expectations
good doesn’t met
1. Was the event content relevant and
49 3 2 3 2
useful to your field of study?
2. How effective were the speakers or
presenters in delivering their 51 2 2 2 2
topics?
3. Did the event meet your
47 6 2 2 2
expectations?
4. Did you find the session or activity
did you find most engaging and 46 4 3 4 2
beneficial?
[Link] Description Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Expectations
good doesn’t met
5. Was the duration of the event
47 2 5 2 2
appropriate?
6. Did participating in the expo
improve your teamwork and 44 3 5 6 1
collaboration skills?
7. New insights or skills did you
42 5 3 6 3
gained from this event?
8. How well did the event address
current trends and challenges in 45 5 3 4 2
Computer Science?
9. How likely are you to recommend
43 3 5 6 2
this event to your peers?
[Link] Description Excellent Very Good Satisfactory Expectations
good doesn’t met
10. Did you find the event helpful in
enhancing your technical 47 3 3 4 2
knowledge or skills?
Event Feedback Survey Charts:
FEEDBACK ANALYSIS:
1. Was the event content relevant and useful to your field of study?
49students rated the content Excellent, showing strong relevance.
Very few students (only 2) felt it didn’t meet expectations.
The majority found the content useful for their studies.
2. How effective were the speakers or presenters in delivering their topics?
51 participants rated the speakers as Excellent.
Only a handful rated Good/Satisfactory/Doesn’t meet (2 each).
The delivery of topics was highly effective overall.
3. Did the event meet your expectations?
47 students agreed the event fully met expectations.
A small group (6) rated it Very Good while 2 each rated it lower.
The event was broadly successful in fulfilling participant expectations
4. Did you find the session or activity most engaging and beneficial?
46 students found the sessions highly engaging.
A few (4) marked Satisfactory and 2 said expectations were not met.
Overall engagement levels were strong with minor gaps.
5. Was the duration of the event appropriate?
48 participants rated the timing as Excellent.
Only 2 felt it didn’t meet expectations.
The duration was suitable for most attendees.
6. Were the event materials (slides, handouts, etc.) clear and informative?
44 students felt the materials were excellent in clarity.
6 rated them Satisfactory and 1 said expectations weren’t met.
While mostly effective, a few participants wanted clearer or more
detailed materials.
7. New insights or skills did you gain from this event?
42 participants gained significant new knowledge/skills.
A few (6) marked Satisfactory and 3 felt expectations weren’t met.
The majority benefited, though some desired deeper insights.
8. How well did the event address current trends and challenges in Computer
Science?
45 rated it as Excellent in addressing CS trends.
5 marked Very Good and 4 Satisfactory.
The event successfully addressed trends, with scope for more in-depth coverage
9. How likely are you to recommend this event to your peers?
43 students said they would strongly recommend it.
6 marked Satisfactory, and only 2 felt it didn’t meet expectations.
Recommendation levels are high, indicating strong peer value.
10. Did you find the event helpful in enhancing your technical knowledge or skills?
47 participants found it very helpful.
A few (4) rated Satisfactory and 2 said it didn’t meet expectations.
Overall, the event successfully enhanced technical knowledge.