0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Research Process

The document outlines the process of formulating research objectives, distinguishing between program and research objectives, and the characteristics of a good research question. It emphasizes the importance of a clear, measurable, and ethical approach to defining research problems and objectives, as well as the stages of conducting a literature review and data analysis. Additionally, it covers the design of data collection tools, data processing, and the dissemination of research findings.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views3 pages

Research Process

The document outlines the process of formulating research objectives, distinguishing between program and research objectives, and the characteristics of a good research question. It emphasizes the importance of a clear, measurable, and ethical approach to defining research problems and objectives, as well as the stages of conducting a literature review and data analysis. Additionally, it covers the design of data collection tools, data processing, and the dissemination of research findings.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Notes 3rd year

B. Formulate research objectives


“A question well-phrased is a question
half-answered”
o indicates the direction of the research
o clearly reflects the question that the
researcher wants to answer
o can be expressed in the form of a statement
or a question
✔ To determine the relationship of smoking
and Lung Cancer.
✔ What is the relationship of smoking and
Lung Cancer?

PROGRAM vs. RESEARCH Objective


o A Program objective reflects the
Identify the Research Problem and Objectives purpose or desired output of the
A. Select topics for research intervention being considered.
Criteria for selection o A Research objective reflects
1. Researcher characteristics questions which need to be
o personal interest and inclination answered in order to know if the
o training program objective was attained.
o previous experience ❖ PO: To decrease the prevalence of severe
2. Nature of topic malnutrition among preschoolers by 80%
o timeliness: internet, literature within a 2 year period
o relevance ❖ RO: To determine and compare the baseline
o replicable level of the prevalence of severe malnutrition
o applicability/utizability among preschoolers with corresponding value
o cost-effectiveness 2 years after program implementation
3. Feasibility Formulating objectives
o availability of subjects o use action verbs specific enough to be
o availability of specific equipment measured
o necessity for special working conditions ▪ to determine
o availability of research fund - degree of ▪ to compare
sponsorship / administrative cooperation ▪ to calculate
o hazards to be encountered ▪ to describe
o time requirements / duration o Do not use vague non-action verbs
4. Ethical considerations ▪ To appreciate
o risks involved to investigator and subjects ▪ To understand
5. Significance/ Social Value of the study ▪ To explore
Sources of research problems Objectives
▪ own experiences, communication with o General objective
other people ▪ identifies in general terms what is to be
▪ assessment of needs and practices accomplished by the study
▪ patterns and trends o Specific objective
▪ somebody else’s completed research ▪ identifies in specific details on how to
▪ investigator’s intellectual and scientific accomplish the research by using
interests measurable parameters
▪ critical reading of literature Examples
▪ intellectual curiosity, intuitive hunch General objective
Characteristics of a good research question ▪ To determine the effectiveness of a nutrition
o Feasible –number of subjects, technical education program for schoolchildren
expertise, resources, manageable ​Specific objective
o Interesting ▪ To determine and compare the prevalence of
o Novel -confirms and refutes previous malnutrition among schoolchildren before
findings, extends previous research, and after the nutrition program
provides new findings ▪ To determine and compare the level of
o Ethical nutrition knowledge among schoolchildren
o Relevant -to scientific knowledge, clinical before and after the nutrition program
and health policies, future research
direction
Notes 3rd year
Characteristic of Research Objectives the capabilities of the participants to plan,
o Phrased clearly, unambiguously and specifically implement and evaluate training programs
o Stated in measurable and operational terms they conduct in the field
o S.M.A.R.T.(specific, measurable, attainable, Formulate the Hypothesis and Define the Study
relevance, time-bound) Variables
Example Formulate the hypothesis
o To study diarrhea o Hypothesis–a proposition or statement
o To determine the role of infant feeding in about the relationship of variables being
diarrhea investigated
o To compare the incidence of diarrhea among o Variables–a characteristic or
bottle, breast and mixed-fed infants measurement whose value differs from
Conduct literature review one individual to another or from one
o Cannot be done overnight period to another in the same individual
o Not a patchwork ​Type of variables:
o Critical assessment 1. Independent Variable: Presumed to cause,
▪ What is known? influence or stimulate the outcome, can be
▪ What is not known? manipulated by the investigator
▪ How strong is the evidence? 2. Dependent Variable: the output, outcome or
o Be systematic in writing your literature response variable
review. 3. Confounding Variable: differences between
STAGES IN WRITING LITERATURE REVIEW groups that cannot be attributed to the IV ;
1. Literature search sometimes referred to as extraneous or
2. Evaluation and analysis of work intervening variables
3. Drafting ​CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
o Outline your literature properly. ▪ shows the relationship of the variables being
Structure of a Literature Review studied
I. Conceptual Literature
▪ Present concept 1.
▪ Present concept 2.
▪ Present concept 3.
II. Related Studies
▪ Present study 1.
▪ Present study 2.
▪ Present study 3.
III. Synthesis
IV. Theoretical Framework
o Minimize the use of direct quotation in your
paper.
o Use recent references from ISI/Scopus-indexed
journals. Symbols used in Research Frameworks
Sources of Literature
o Unpublished completed thesis,
dissertation
o Medical and public health journals
o Statistical reports (Phil Health Stat,
Demographic Yearbook)
o Indexes (Index Medicus)
o Publications of Abstracts (Excerpta
Medica)
o Databases (Medline, Ovid, Herdin)
o Academic search engines
Define the actual problem and objectives in clear
specific terms
o Make them more specific or limit the
scope!!
o To determine the impact of continuing
education for health workers
o To determine the effect of continuing
education activities conducted by the DOH for
its staff on their performance
o To determine the effect of the Master
Trainer’s Course conducted by the DOH on
Notes 3rd year

DESIGN THE PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS


o should be done before data collection
o construct dummy tables to help you
conceptualize how data is going to be
organized and presented after collection
Collect data
o Use of tools earlier developed
o Permission to collect data(Administrative
concerns)- Meeting with community leaders
o Social preparation: proper orientation of
population to the study prior to data collection
o Training of data collectors
Construct research design Data processing
o “Plan of attack” Phases of Data Processing
o Includes subject selection, sample size, 1. Editing of data collection forms
control and manipulation of variables, o for completeness
outcome evaluation, instrumentation, plan o legibility of entries
of analysis o consistency of responses
o Consider the objectives, feasibility, economy 2. Coding and encoding of responses
and efficiency, ethics o precoding of difficult information
o Important to achieve internal and external o coding the data in analyzable form
validity o encoding the data in the computer
o INTERNAL validity ​Analyze the data
▪ -extent to which the investigator is able to o Involves quantification, description and
control the different biases that may determination of relationships of variables
affect the study to be able to measure o Statistics play an important role
what he really intends to measure Two methods of statistical data analysis:
o EXTERNAL validity 1. Descriptive statistics
▪ -extent to which the investigator is able ▪ Frequency distributions
to generalize the results of the study ▪ Mean, median, std deviation, range
▪ graphical presentations
2. Inferential statistics
A. estimation of parameters
B. hypothesis testing
▪ tests for means (t-test, ANOVA)
▪ tests for proportions (chi-square)
▪ tests for associations (Prevalence
ratios, Odds Ratios, Relative Risks)
▪ Regression (linear, logistic, Cox
survival, poisson)

Mixed Method Write the research report


o organized presentation of activities and
findings
o make conclusions: answer the research
question and objectives
o follow basic principles of technical report
writing (form and style)
DESIGN DATA COLLECTION TOOLS Disseminate and utilize the results
o Dissemination
▪ publication in scientific journals
▪ news releases
▪ presentation in scientific meetings
o Utilization
▪ basis for determining changes as a
result of intervention
▪ information-based decision-making
▪ clinical trial –therapeutic intervention

You might also like