0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views4 pages

Draft Resolution

The draft resolution by the United Nations Security Council addresses the implementation of AI in the defense sector, emphasizing the need for international cooperation, ethical standards, and oversight to mitigate risks associated with AI technologies. It outlines various recommendations, including the establishment of regulatory bodies, training programs, and initiatives to combat misinformation and biases in AI. The resolution also calls for transparency, accountability, and support for affected civilians while ensuring that AI enhances military effectiveness without compromising global stability.

Uploaded by

adhnan musthafa
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views4 pages

Draft Resolution

The draft resolution by the United Nations Security Council addresses the implementation of AI in the defense sector, emphasizing the need for international cooperation, ethical standards, and oversight to mitigate risks associated with AI technologies. It outlines various recommendations, including the establishment of regulatory bodies, training programs, and initiatives to combat misinformation and biases in AI. The resolution also calls for transparency, accountability, and support for affected civilians while ensuring that AI enhances military effectiveness without compromising global stability.

Uploaded by

adhnan musthafa
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DRAFT RESOLUTION AI ACCORD - ALLIANCE

Committee: United Nations Security Council (UNSC)


Agenda: Implementation of AI in Defense Sector
Sponsors: United States of America, South Korea
Signatories: India, United Kingdom, Mexico, Japan, France, Vietnam, Republic of Nigeria

The UNSC,

Recalling its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security as
enshrined in the United Nations Charter,
Concerned about the risks associated with the unregulated use of AI in military applications,
including the potential for escalation of conflicts, ethical dilemmas, and loss of human
control,
Highlighting the necessity of a international cooperation and comprehensive understanding
of AI technologies among member states to foster informed decision-making regarding their
use in defence,
Affirming the principles of international humanitarian law and human rights as essential
frameworks guiding the application of AI in military contexts,
Recognizing the potential for AI technologies to enhance military effectiveness while
simultaneously posing risks to global stability if mismanaged,
Further Recognizing the potential of the usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) under human
supervision body,
Realising the need for separate policies regarding compensation and support for civilians
affected by AI types of machinery,
Recognizing the dreadful impacts of AI on the environment and its drastic effects on life and
resources,
Expecting the need for transparency, accountability, and trust-building measures among
nations as AI systems are integrated into defence strategies,
Recognizing decreased internet surveillance and noting with deep concern, the issue of
hacking by criminal groups into government systems to cause mishap and damage,
Further Expect international unity for the creation of AI and advanced technological
implementation of defence resources, ideologies and projects,
Noting with great concern the powers and limitations of the usage of Artificial Intelligence
(AI) in several fields,
Alarmed at the notion of an AI-based Cold War, driven by radical, vehement approaches to
integration obligating observing countries to resort to unforeseen and accelerated
advancement, further causing global unrest & instability,
Desiring to recognize and mitigate the ubiquitous regional tensions and ensuring the concord
of member states on de-escalation,
1. Expresses its hope for cooperation among law enforcement agencies worldwide to
monitor, detect, and respond to AI-driven cyber threats and prevent nefarious
actors from exploiting AI tools;
2. Supports the creation of diverse and inclusive datasets used in AI training, along
with regular audits to ensure fairness and eliminate discriminatory outcomes;
3. Endorses the revision and regulation of inputs to an AI model during training and
evaluation phases, keeping in mind the concept of GIGO - Garbage In,
Garbage Out, to further ensure unbiased results;
4. Encourages governments to invest in reskilling and upskilling programs for
workers, ensuring that the labour force can adapt to changing technological
demands;
5. Further invites scholarships and grants by colleges and universities on courses related
to AI development such as Data Science for the creation and sustenance of AI
models, and provide jobs to youth, reducing rates of unemployment and fostering
economic growth;
6. Proposes mandatory training programs for military personnel and AI developers
focused on ethical considerations and implications of AI in warfare;
7. Emphasises AI as a complement to human labour and recommends establishing a
GAWRF- Global AI Workforce Resilience Fund, to fund worker reskilling;
8. Further recommends the establishment of policies that prioritise human oversight
in sectors at risk of automation, creating safeguards for employment;
9. Emphasises the importance of the formation of independent regulatory bodies
tasked with monitoring and testing AI algorithms for biases, making their findings
transparent to the public;
10. Supports the implementation of the AI the Guardian Program which is a global
initiative aimed at tracking and controlling the use of artificial intelligence systems by
countries, particularly in military applications, The goal of this initiative is enforcing
governing principles, preventing abuse and encouraging countries to turn towards safe
development and use of artificial intelligence technologies, (note the the guardian Is a
read only program other countries won’t be able to change any of the codes
whatsoever);
11. Draws attention to the need for establishment of a new authority referred to as
JARVIS: Joint Authority for Regulation and Verification of International AI
Standards, which will be established to ensure ethical standards are maintained in the
use of AI in the military and ensure adherence to the laws of war, The Council will
ensure the cooperation and interaction of its members for the purposes of
knowledge integration and development, Also, deployment of AI systems will be
made publicly accessible, and there will be a colloquium each year to address
progress and revise
strategies in the implementation plans;
12. Confirms the establishment of the DMU - The Deepfake and Misinformation
Unit, focusing on research and tools to combat the spread of AI-generated
misinformation and protect information integrity;I
13. Further Assists the Bias program by introducing EDGING AI - Engagement
Directorate For Growth And International Norm Governance of AI which is
dedicated to identifying, assessing, and mitigating biases in artificial intelligence
systems to ensure fairness and equity in their applications;
14. Recommends to Create a task force that can be activated in case of AI-related
incidents or crises, providing expertise and resources to member states;
15. Considers regulation of weaponry created by member states of UN through
JARVIS in order to identify bias and error, and maximise precision of AI system by
feeding even larger datasets to models;
16. Emphasises the environmental concerns of AI, endorses the use of non conventional
sources of energy to power large servers, innovative designs of efficient AI model,
the creation of energy efficient GPUs and accelerators, and further recommends
members of UNEP, join JARVIS, creating regulatory policies and clauses on the
same;
17. Seeks the active seizing of AEGIS and other confidential AI entities to encourage
unity and joint transnational concurrence and cooperation, further recommends
members to report their missions prior, to the neutral body, to prevent such future
occurrences from happening, integrate kill switches or emergency shutdown
mechanisms into AI systems, allowing human operators to halt operations if
necessary;
18. Deplores the casualties and repercussions of the 2028 “Dragon’s Shadow” tragedy
and putting forth an international fund package for all the, accepts to pay half of total
compensation regarding AEGIS tragedy, while splitting it amongst US, UK and Japan
Takes note of the causation of the of the 2028 “Dragon’s Shadow” tragedy and seeks
to maintain transparency in the future;
19. Calls upon the member nations, relying on obligatory, unanimous participation and
mutual transparency, while ensuring ethical accountability and responsible utilisation;
20. Endorses securing the AI system and preventing it from being hacked or intercepted
by other unofficial sources or malicious agents through one accorded measures and
cybersecurity exercises;
21. Recommends validation and scrutiny of AI powered arms and weapons, by
conducting periodic checks to limit and certify the arsenal of member nations;
22. Further requests to have a committee which is independent of the government to
monitor the decisions regarding the development of AI in different provisions of the
defence sector;
23. Emphasises that the training of the candidates should strictly be conducted by the
committee itself without the involvement of any external institution, As this would be
helpful to culture a trustworthy, reliable and trained professionals to handle AI;
24. Confirms a public apology from the delegates of United Kingdom on behalf of the
government, for peace and betterment of the world;
25. Strongly commends stricter surveillance measures will take place along with required
compensation to developing and affected countries of war crimes and drone launches,
illustrated by the AEGIS organisation;
26. Solemnly affirms Suspension of corrupt politicians at fault along with increased
compensation from the nations involved have been provided.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The UNSC recommends the formation of independent regulatory bodies to monitor and test AI algorithms for biases, with findings made transparent to the public. Additionally, there is the 'EDGING AI' initiative dedicated to identifying, assessing, and mitigating biases to ensure fairness and equity in AI applications. Regular audits and diverse datasets are also supported to eliminate discriminatory outcomes .

The UNSC recommends mandatory training programs for military personnel and AI developers focused on ethical considerations and implications of AI in warfare. There is also a recommendation for creating independent committees to monitor AI development decisions and ensure candidate training is conducted internally for reliability. JARVIS is tasked with maintaining ethical standards and transparency in AI deployment .

The resolution highlights concerns about AI's environmental impact and proposes the use of non-conventional energy sources to power large servers. It advocates for the development of energy-efficient AI models, GPUs, and accelerators. Additionally, the involvement of UNEP members in JARVIS aims to create regulatory policies focusing on environmental sustainability in AI technology .

The unregulated use of AI in military applications poses risks such as escalation of conflicts, ethical dilemmas, loss of human control, and potential global instability if mismanaged. There is also concern about the impact on international peace and security, as well as ethical considerations in warfare as reflected in the need for human oversight and accountability .

The 'AI the Guardian Program' is a global initiative aimed at tracking and controlling the use of AI systems by countries, particularly in military applications. It enforces governing principles, prevents abuse, and encourages countries to develop and use AI technologies safely. The program is a read-only platform, meaning other countries cannot alter its code .

Diverse and inclusive datasets in AI training are crucial to achieving fairness and eliminating discriminatory outcomes. The UNSC supports dataset diversity and regular audits as measures to ensure AI models do not produce biased results. This approach reflects an understanding that biased inputs (GIGO - Garbage In, Garbage Out) lead to biased outputs, emphasizing the need for vigilant oversight during AI model development .

JARVIS, or the Joint Authority for Regulation and Verification of International AI Standards, is proposed to ensure ethical standards in AI use within the military context. This body will oversee the adherence to international laws of war, coordinate knowledge integration among member states, and manage public access to AI deployment information. JARVIS is also tasked with hosting an annual colloquium to review implementation strategies .

The draft resolution emphasizes international cooperation as essential for informed decision-making regarding AI use in the defense sector. It underscores the necessity of transparency, accountability, and trust-building measures among nations, as well as the establishment of bodies like JARVIS to regulate AI use and ensure ethical standards. This cooperative approach seeks to prevent regional tensions and maintain global stability .

The DMU focuses on research and tool development to combat the spread of AI-generated misinformation, thus protecting information integrity. Its creation acknowledges the need to address the dangers of AI used in misinformation and emphasizes accountability and responsible utilization of AI technologies in information dissemination .

The resolution highlights concerns about an AI-based Cold War driven by radical approaches to AI integration, potentially causing global unrest and instability. To mitigate such a scenario, the resolution calls for international unity in AI technological implementation, transparency, and cooperative governance to prevent divisive AI arms races. Establishing regulatory bodies like JARVIS can ensure adherence to ethical standards and promote peaceful AI advancements .

You might also like