Scribd
Upload
5 views4 pages

Split Half

The document presents a Split-Half Reliability analysis with data from 20 participants, showing mean scores of 12.20 for Half 1 and 11.30 for Half 2. The Pearson correlation coefficient is calculated as 0.691, indicating strong reliability, while the Spearman-Brown formula yields a reliability estimate of 0.817. Overall, the test demonstrates excellent reliability and is deemed suitable for classroom use.

Uploaded by

lvrzmyra
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views4 pages

Split Half

The document presents a Split-Half Reliability analysis with data from 20 participants, showing mean scores of 12.20 for Half 1 and 11.30 for Half 2. The Pearson correlation coefficient is calculated as 0.691, indicating strong reliability, while the Spearman-Brown formula yields a reliability estimate of 0.817. Overall, the test demonstrates excellent reliability and is deemed suitable for classroom use.

Uploaded by

lvrzmyra
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Aguirre, Anthony,

Alvarez, Myra Rose Q.

Fernin, Trisha Cassandra A.

Nalangan, Allysa Shane P.

Split-Half Reliability Worksheet


Participant X (Half 1) Y (Half 2)

Participant 1 13 12

Participant 2 12 11

Participant 3 13 11

Participant 4 12 12

Participant 5 13 12

Participant 6 12 11

Participant 7 12 11

Participant 8 13 12

Participant 9 13 12

Participant 10 12 11

Participant 11 11 11

Participant 12 11 11

Participant 13 12 11

Participant 14 12 11

Participant 15 12 11

Participant 16 12 11

Participant 17 12 11

Participant 18 12 11
Participant 19 12 11

Participant 20 13 12

Mean of X: 12.20 Mean of Y: 11.30

Deviations and Products Table

Participant X deviation Y deviation Product

Participant 1 0.80 0.70 0.56

Participant 2 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 3 0.80 -0.30 -0.24

Participant 4 -0.20 0.70 -0.14

Participant 5 0.80 0.70 0.56

Participant 6 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 7 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 8 0.80 0.70 0.56

Participant 9 0.80 0.70 0.56

Participant 10 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 11 -1.20 -0.30 0.36

Participant 12 -1.20 -0.30 0.36

Participant 13 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 14 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 15 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 16 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 17 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 18 -0.20 -0.30 0.06

Participant 19 -0.20 -0.30 0.06


Participant 20 0.80 0.70 0.56

Σ Products: 3.80

Participant X (Half 1) (X − X̄ )² Y (Half 2) (Y − Ȳ)²

Participant 1 13 0.64 12 0.49

Participant 2 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 3 13 0.64 11 0.09

Participant 4 12 0.04 12 0.49

Participant 5 13 0.64 12 0.49

Participant 6 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 7 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 8 13 0.64 12 0.49

Participant 9 13 0.64 12 0.49

Participant 10 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 11 11 1.44 11 0.09

Participant 12 11 1.44 11 0.09

Participant 13 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 14 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 15 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 16 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 17 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 18 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 19 12 0.04 11 0.09

Participant 20 13 0.64 12 0.49

Σ(X − X̄ )²: 7.20 Σ(Y − Ȳ)²: 4.20


Pearson r = 0.691

STRONG=GOOD RELIABILITY

Spearman-Brown Formula:
rₓₓ = (2 × r) / (1 + r)
rₓₓ = 0.817

Interpretation and Recommended Action:

indicates a good level of reliability or internal consistency for a test or scale.


The test shows excellent reliability and is suitable for classroom use. The whole test is highly
reliable.

You might also like