44
Chapter 4
PRESENTATION, DATA ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION
This chapter deals with the presentation, analysis, and interpretation of
the gathered data, result of the evaluation, and responses of the selected
respondents on Development of the Power Bank using Duracell Plus Battery.
Profile of the Respondents
Table 1
Frequency, Percentage and Rank Distribution of Power Bank using
Duracell Plus Battery in terms of Age, Sex and Grade and Section
Students
Age F % R
15-17 5 25 2
18-19 11 55 1
20 and above 4 20 3
TOTAL 20 100
Sex F % R
Female 0 0
Male 20 100 1
TOTAL 20 100
Grade and Section F % R
Determination 5 25 2.5
Justice 5 25 2.5
Claudio 5 25 2.5
Santos 5 25 2.5
TOTAL 20 100
45
In terms of age the overall frequency is 20 with the percentage of 100%.
The majority of them is 18 to 19 having the frequency of 11 and percentage of
55% which got a first rank, while 20 above having the frequency of 4 and
percentage of 20% which got a lowest rank, in terms of sex, the majority of
them of them is male having a frequency of 20 and percentage of 100%, while
female student have a frequency of 0 and percentage of 100%. However in
terms of grade and section, It can be seen in the table above they are
categorized as students from grade 11-Determination, 11-Justice, 12-Claudio
and 12-Santos.
It can be implied that the students populate is mainly younger with a 18
to 19 years old being that must represented, these students age distribution
reflect the different stage of life career that students are respectively shows. In
terms of Sex a higher percentage male pupils respondents to the survey,
students responses are all male focuses only in Electrical Installation and
Maintenance (EIM) Strand. However, in terms of Grade and Section the grade
11 and 12 students from TVL strand can contribute to the study since the
really evaluate the product in their strand so that indicates they can analyze
and provide clearly. The suggest that the students may have strong skill which
could be helpful for the study these students may be motivated.
The results is similar to the study of Alonzo (2015), The new
curriculum, popularly known as the K to 12 program, is a landmark reform that
brings the basic education of the country on a par with international standards.
The history of the reform is revisited and its legal bases, main features,
relevant orders, and implications for higher education are discussed.
46
Table 2
Frequency, Percentage and Rank Distribution of Power Bank using
Duracell Plus Battery in terms of Age, Sex and No. Years in Teaching
Teachers
Age F % R
21-25 0 0
26-30 4 40 1
31-35 1 10 4
36-40 3 30 2
41-45 1 10 4
46 and above 1 10 4
TOTAL 10 100
Sex F % R
Female 8 80 1
Male 2 20 2
TOTAL 10 100
No. Years in F % R
Teaching
1-5 6 60 1
6-10 3 30 2
11-15 1 10 3
TOTAL 10 100
In terms of age, the overall frequency is 10 with a percentages of 100.
the majority of them is 26-36 having the frequency of 4 and percentage of
40% which got the highest rank, while 31-35 36-40 and 46 and above having
the frequency of I and percentage of 0% which got a lowest rank. In terms of
sex the majority of them is Female having the frequency of 8 with a
percentage of 80% which got a highest rank, while Male having a frequency
of 2 with a percentage of 20%. which got a lowest rank. However, in terms of
47
No. years in teaching the majority of them is 1-5 having a frequency of 6 and
percentage of 60%, while 11-15 having a frequency of 1 and percentage of
10% which got a lowest rank.
It can be implied that the teachers population range from 26-30 years
old being that must represented, these age distribution the different reflect the
different stages of life and career that teachers are in respectively. In terms of
Sex the higher percentage of female teachers respondents to the survey,
indicating that for teachers, woman were present the time. However, in terms
of No. Yeas in Teaching it may be inferred that teachers response required
information. This knowledge may have been acquired through personal
development, coursework or years in teaching the same subject
The results is similar to the study of Jan (2017), The quality of
teachers determines the quality of education and linked with nation’s
development. With the emerging technologies, the teaching-learning is
transforming from teacher-centered, lecture based to student-centered
learning environment.
48
Table 3
Computed Weighted Mean, Verbal Interpretation and Rank of
Development of the Power Bank using Duracell Plus Battery in terms of
Durability
Durability Students Teachers Overall
M VI R M VI R M VI R
1 stand for long 3.75 VHA 1.5 3.40 HA 4 3.58 VHA 2
period of time.
2 has over 3.60 VHA 5 3.40 HA 4 3.50 VHA 5
charging
protection to
battery
explosion.
3 has explosive 3.70 VHA 3 3.40 HA 4 3.55 VHA 4
protection.
4 has fire proof 3.50 VHA 6 3.10 HA 6 3.30 HA 6
to prevent fire
damage.
5 is portable and 3.75 VHA 1.5 3.60 VHA 1 3.68 VHA 1
durable.
6 has high 3.65 VHA 4 3.50 VHA 2 3.56 VHA 3
efficiency to
reduce heat
build up.
TOTAL 3.66 VHA 3.40 HA 3.53 VHA
Legend: VHA-Very Highly Acceptable: 3.50-4.00; HA-Highly Acceptable; 2.50-3.49, SA-Acceptable
1.50-2.49; NA-Not Acceptable 1.00-1.49
The overall mean of durability is 3.53 which is verbally interpreted as
“Very Highly Acceptable”. The total average of students is 3.66, while in
teachers is 3.40. Indicator 5, which is both from students and teachers
respondents got a first rank which contains the highest overall mean of 3.68
and verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable”, indicator 4 got a lowest
rank which contains the lowest overall mean of 3.30, verbally interpreted as
“Highly Acceptable”.For students respondents, indicator 5 and 1, got a first
49
rank which contains the highest mean of 3.75 and verbally interpreted as
'Very Highly Acceptable" while statement 4, got a last rank which having a
mean of 3.50 and verbally interpreted as "Very Highly Acceptable". However,
in teachers respondents, statement 5, got a first rank which contains the
highest mean of 3.60 and verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable”,
while statement 4 got a last rank which having a mean of 3,10 and verbally
interpreted as “Highly Acceptable”.
It can be implied that the durability of the product is very highly
acceptable which means that the durability is clearly met. It is long period of
time. It is charging protection. It is explosive protection. It is fire proof. It is
portable and durable. Lastly, it is high efficiency. However, the researchers
must improve the strongness of the power bank using duracell battery since it
has the lowest mean.
According to Danza [Link] (2018). The requirements for building
energy needs reduction and increase of renewable energy sources stimulated
designers to integrate technologies in an efficient way. This ambitious goal
must meet the capacity of the technical solutions to guarantee their
performances over the years. The durability of materials and technologies is a
topic that warrants further analyses in order to assess the proper efficiencies
and the expected lifetime of a ZEB.
50
Table 4
Computed Weighted Mean, Verbal Interpretation and Rank of
Development of the Power Bank using Duracell Plus Battery in terms of
Features
Features Students Teachers Overall
M VI R M VI R M VI R
1 has weight that 3.60 VHA 3 3.60 VHA 2.5 3.60 VHA 3
is convenient for
every use.
2 has portability 3.90 VHA 1 3.70 VHA 1 3.80 VHA 1
that is
sustainable for
travel purpose.
3 offers sufficient 3.55 VHA 4.5 3.30 HA 6 3.43 HA 6
power capacity
to meet daily
charge
requirement.
4 is fast charging 3.55 VHA 4.5 3.40 HA 5 3.48 HA 5
that gives
impressive
quality.
5 is easy to 3.65 VHA 2 3.60 VHA 2.5 3.63 VHA 2
carry, handle,
and store when
not in use.
6 has design 3.50 VHA 6 3.50 VHA 4 3.50 VHA 4
and features are
user-friendly and
intuitive.
TOTAL 3.63 VHA 3.52 VHA 3.57 VHA
Legend: VHA-Very Highly Acceptable: 3.50-4.00; HA-Highly Acceptable; 2.50-3.49, SA-Acceptable
1.50-2.49; NA-Not Acceptable 1.00-1.49
The overall mean of features is 3.57 which is verbally interpreted as
“Very Highly Accepted”. The total average of the students is 3.63, while in
teachers is 3.52. Indicator 2, got a first rank which contain the highest overall
mean of 3.80 and verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable, while
51
indicator 3, got a last rank which contains the lowest overall mean of 3.43
verbally interpreted as “Highly Acceptable”. For students respondents,
indicator 2, got a first rank which contains the highest mean of 3.90 and
verbally interpreted as 'Very Highly Acceptable" while indicator 6, got a last
rank which has the total of 3.50 and verbally interpreted as "Very Highly
Acceptable". While in teacher respondents, indicator 2, got a first rank which
contains the highest mean of 3.70 and verbally interpreted as "Very Highly
Acceptable" while indicator 4, got a last rank which having a mean of 3.40 and
verbally interpreted as "Highly Acceptable”.
It can be implied that the features is very highly acceptable which
means that it is clearly met. It has weight that is convenient for everyday use,
it has portability that is sustainable for travel purposes . Also, it is easy to
carry, handle, and store when not in [Link], the respondents must
improve the physical appearance of the product.
cal appearance of the product.
According to Diao [Link] (2020), Power banks are used to charge
portable electronic devices, including smartphones and tablets. However,
customers' expectations are often not realized in terms of the actual delivered
capacity of the power bank; it is often far less than the value specified on the
product.
52
Table 5
Computed Weighted Mean, Verbal Interpretation and Rank of
Development of the Power Bank using Duracell Plus Battery in terms of
Longevity
Longevity Students Teachers Overall
M VI R M VI R M VI R
1 can be uses 3.65 VHA 3.5 3.30 HA 6 3.48 HA 3
for long lasting
period.
2 has charging 3.70 VHA 2 3.40 HA 4 3.55 VHA 1
protection for the
safety
3 has high- 3.50 VHA 6 3.40 HA 4 3.45 HA 6
quality cells that
enhance
longevity.
4 has a low 3.75 VHA 1 3.70 VHA 1.5 3.73 HA 5
percentage of
over heating
5 has a short 3.55 VHA 5 3.70 VHA 1.5 3.63 VHA 2
circuit protection
to prevent
electricity.
6 can support 3.65 VHA 3.5 3.40 HA 4 3.53 VHA 4
multiple devices
for a long period
of them.
TOTAL 3.63 VHA 3.48 HA 3.56 VHA
Legend: VHA-Very Highly Acceptable: 3.50-4.00; HA-Highly Acceptable; 2.50-3.49, SA-Acceptable
1.50-2.49; NA-Not Acceptable 1.00-1.49
The overall mean of longevity is 3.56 which is verbally interpreted as
“Very Highly Accepted”. The total average of the students is 3.63 and verbally
interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable , while in teachers is 3.48 and verbally
as “Highly Acceptable”. Indicator 4, got a first rank which contain the highest
overall mean of 3.73 and verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable”,
53
while indicator 3, got a last rank which contains the lowest overall mean of
3.45 verbally interpreted as “Highly Acceptable”. For students respondents,
indicator 4, got a first rank which contains the highest mean of 3.75 and
verbally interpreted as 'Very Highly Acceptable" while indicator 3, got a last
rank which has the total of 3.50 and verbally interpreted as "Very Highly
Acceptable". While in teacher respondents, indicator 4 and 5, got a first rank
which contains the highest mean of 3.70 and verbally interpreted as "Very
Highly Acceptable" while indicator 1, got a last rank which have a total of 3.30
and verbally interpreted as "Highly Acceptable”.
It can be implied that the quality of the product is very highly
acceptable which means that the longevity is clearly met. It is long period of
time. It is charging protection. It can be uses for long lasting period, has a low
percentage of over heating. Lastly, can support multiple devices for a long
period of them. However, the researchers must improve the longevity of the
power bank using duracell battery since it has the lowest mean.
According to Sundar (2023), This research offers a comprehensive
literature review on sizing Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) and battery
banks for residential applications. Its objective is to distill current knowledge
and practices, facilitating informed UPS and battery bank selection to ensure
uninterrupted power supply and safeguard electronic devices. Factors
influencing sizing decisions, including load requirements, UPS efficiency,
battery backup duration, voltage, wire loss, battery efficiency, aging, depth of
discharge, and operating temperature, are meticulously assessed.
54
Table 6
Computed Weighted Mean, Verbal Interpretation and Rank of
Development of the Power Bank using Duracell Plus Battery in terms of
Product Performance
Product Students Teachers Overall
Performance
M VI R M VI R M VI R
1 provides 3.85 VHA 2 3.40 VHA 3 3.63 VHA 3
satisfactory
battery life
during regular
use.
2 offers sufficient 3.75 VHA 4.5 3.30 VHA 5 3.53 VHA 5
power capacity
to meet daily
charging
requirements.
3 hold-ups well 3.85 VHA 2 3.80 VHA 1 3.83 VHA 1
under various
condition, such
as travel or
outdoor use.
4 effectively 3.75 VHA 4.5 3.60 VHA 2 3.68 VHA 2
manages heat
while charging.
5 is proven to be 3.60 VHA 6 3.30 HA 5 3.45 HA 6
for long term
usage
6 is fast charging 3.90 VHA 1 3.30 VHA 5 3.60 VHA 4
TOTAL 3.78 VHA 3.45 HA 3.62 VHA
Legend: VHA-Very Highly Acceptable: 3.50-4.00; HA-Highly Acceptable; 2.50-3.49, SA-Acceptable
1.50-2.49; NA-Not Acceptable 1.00-1.49
The overall mean of product performance is 3.62 which is verbally
interpreted as “Very Highly Accepted”. The total average of the students is
55
3.78 and verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable”, while in teachers is
3.45 and verbally as “Highly Acceptable”. Indicator 3, got a first rank which
contain the highest overall mean of 3.83 and verbally interpreted as “Very
Highly Acceptable, while indicator 5, got a last rank which contains the lowest
overall mean of 3.45 verbally interpreted as “Highly Acceptable”. For students
respondents, indicator 6, got a first rank which contains the highest mean of
3.90 and verbally interpreted as 'Very Highly Acceptable" while indicator 5,
got a last rank which has the total of 3.60 and verbally interpreted as "Very
Highly Acceptable". While in teacher respondents, indicator 3, got a first rank
which contains the highest mean of 3.80 and verbally interpreted as "Very
Highly Acceptable" while indicator 2,5 and 6, got a last rank which having a
mean of 3.30 and verbally interpreted as "Highly Acceptable”.
It can be implied that the product performance is very highly acceptable
which means that the product performance is clearly met. It also the
respondents expectation. Provides satisfactory battery life during regular use,
hold-ups well under various condition, such as travel or outdoor use. Lastly, is
fast charging However, the performance of the products give more improved
since it has the lowest mean.
According to Eisend (2016). The authors conduct a meta-analysis on
the combined influence of organizational and national culture on new product
performance. For this purpose, they refer to the effectiveness of value
congruency and develop a conceptual model describing the fit between
organizational culture types as suggested by the competing values framework
and national culture, as described by Hofstede's cultural dimensions.
56
Table 6
Computed Weighted Mean, Verbal Interpretation and Rank of
Development of the Power Bank using Duracell Plus Battery in terms of
Quality
Quality Students Teachers Overall
M VI R M VI R M VI R
1 is convenient 3.90 VHA 1 3.80 VHA 1 3.85 VHA 1
for everyday
usage.
2 is portable and 3.60 VHA 2 3.70 VHA 2.5 3.65 VHA 3.5
suitable for
travel purpose.
3 works well with 3.80 VHA 3 3.50 VHA 6 3.65 VHA 3.5
different devices.
4 has charging 3.70 VHA 4.5 3.40 HA 4.5 3.55 VHA 5.5
speed that is
satisfactory.
5 has size that is 3.70 VHA 4.5 3.40 HA 4.5 3.55 HA 5.5
suitable for
various needs.
6 has material 3.65 VHA 6 3.70 VHA 2.5 3.68 VHA 2
quality that is
reliable.
TOTAL 3.73 VHA 3.58 HA 3.66 VHA
Legend: VHA-Very Highly Acceptable: 3.50-4.00; HA-Highly Acceptable; 2.50-3.49, SA-Acceptable
1.50-2.49; NA-Not Acceptable 1.00-1.49
The overall mean of product performance is 3.66 which is
verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Accepted”. The total average of the
students is 3.73 and verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable”, while in
teachers is 3.58 and verbally as “Very Highly Acceptable”. Indicator 1, got a
first rank which contains the highest overall mean of 3.85 and verbally
interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable, while indicator 3 and 5, got a last
rank which contains the lowest overall mean of 3.55 verbally interpreted as
57
“Very Highly Acceptable”. For students respondents, indicator 1, got a first
rank which contains the highest mean of 3.90 and verbally interpreted as
'Very Highly Acceptable" while indicator 2, got a last rank which has the total
of 3.60 and verbally interpreted as "Very Highly Acceptable". While in teacher
respondents, indicator 1, got a first rank which contains the highest mean of
3.80 and verbally interpreted as "Very Highly Acceptable" while indicator 4
and 5, got a last rank which having a mean of 3.40 and verbally interpreted as
"Highly Acceptable”.
It can be implied that the quality of the product is very highly
acceptable which means that the quality is clearly met. It is convenient for
everyday usage, has charging speed that is satisfactory. Lastly, has size that
is suitable for various needs. However, the product is made from recycled
materials.
According to Nishal (2024). The concept of quality by design (QbD) initially,
who held the view that quality ought to be scheduled and believed that the
majority of quality crises and issues stem from how quality was initially
planned. New processes can be explored by learning about the current
processes, and improve the performance of these processes to be globally
competitive, experimental design is a potent technique and instrument for
QbD. A crucial component of contemporary approach to quality is quality by
design. When it comes to the proper vocabulary and element of quality by
design, professional experts from industries are often confused.
58
Table 7
Composite Table in Power Bank using Duracell Plus Battery in terms
of Quality, Product Performance, Features, Expenses and Durability.
STUDENTS TEACHERS OVERALL
VARIABLES M VI SD R M VI SD R M VI SD R
Durability 3.66 VHA 0.47 2 3.40 HA 0.62 5 3.50 VHA 0.55 5
Features 3.62 VHA 0.45 5 3.51 VHA 0.51 2 3.57 VHA 0.48 3
Longevity 3.63 VHA 0.48 4 3.48 HA 0.52 3 3.56 VHA 0.50 4
Product 3.80 VHA 0.41 1 3.45 HA .0.45 4 3.63 VHA 0.43 2
Performance
Quality 3.64 VHA 0.43 3 3.58 VHA 0.32 1 3.65 VHA 0.48 1
OVERALL 3.67 VHA 0.45 3.49 VHA 0.48 3.58 VHA .0.49
AVERAGE
Legend: VHA-Very Highly Acceptable: 3.50-4.00; HA-Highly Acceptable; 2.50-3.49, SA-Acceptable
1.50-2.49; NA-Not Acceptable 1.00-1.49
The development of the power bank using duracell plus battery in
terms of Durability, Features, Longevity, Product Performance and Quality
very highly acceptable, which indicates that the variables are clearly met. In
students response, the variable “Product Performance” has the highest mean
of 3.80 which has a verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable”. In
teachers response, rank 1 among the variable is “Quality” with the mean of
3.58 is verbally interpreted as “Very Highly Acceptable”.
It can implied on the table that both students and teachers find the
development of the power bank using duracell plus battery is very highly
59
acceptable in terms of durability, features, product performance and quality.
The highest ranking for students and teachers respondents are product
performance for students and quality for teachers.
According to Aamir [Link] (2016). The mobile devices need to be
recharge whenever its charging is competed, that’s why power banks come
into the market to recharge portable devices such as mobile devices.
Table 8
T-test Result Comparing of the Acceptability Based Evaluation of
Students and Teachers in Development of the Power Bank using
Duracell Plus Battery.
Respondent N Mean SD Tc Tt Df P Verbal
Interpretation
Student 20 3.69 0.02 0.08 ±2.048 28 0.05 Accepted
Teacher 10 3.48 0.07
The table shows the number of respondents between teachers and
students which are 20 students and 10 teachers respondents respectively
with a total mean of 3.48 for students and 3.69 for teachers.
Students respondents come from same track which are Determination,
Justice, Claudio and Santos and other respondents are different subject
teachers. The result implies that the standard division computed in students
60
respondents is 0.02 and 0.07 for teachers respondents. Furthermore, the
table depicts that with respects to development of the power bank using
duracell plus battery based on two groups of respondents that when subjected
to T-test it has a computed T-value 0.08 and the T-Critical value of 2.048, it
also has 28 degree of freedom and a statistics p of 0,05 and the overall result
of “accepted” decision.
According to Winter (2019), the present simulation study estimated the
type error rate and statistical power of the various distractions such as
unequal sample sizes, and unequal variance, and a normal population
distribution per-group were varied between 2 and 5.