Solar-Fed High-Gain Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Integrated

Electric Vehicle System with ANFIS-Based Speed Regulation

ABSTRACT: This research explores the integration of many components into a solar- powered electric car
system, including a high-gain bidirectional DC-DC converter, an Adapted Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System-
controlled DC motor drive, and an EV battery unit. The proposed high-gain converter eliminates the need for
hybrid switched-capacitor networks and voltage multiplier cells by using a dual-current-path design for effective
step-up and step-down. This improves the reliability of charging and discharging while decreasing the number
of components and increasing conversion efficiency. A constant voltage control and smooth power transfer are
guaranteed under diverse irradiation scenarios by the converter, which promptly charges the EV batteries with
solar energy. While you're on the road, the DC motor—powered by the battery—generates torque & mechanical
output. Reducing transient overshoot, improving disturbance rejection, and settling faster than conventional
controllers are all ways in which ANFIS-based speed control enhances dynamic motor performance. The
integrated system's renewable energy efficiency, enhanced driving performance, and robust adaptability in the
face of dynamic load changes make it a good fit for environmentally friendly electric cars.

INDEX TERMS: electric car, regenerative braking, battery charging, bidirectional dc-dc converter, high
voltage gain.

1. INTRODUCTION

Electric vehicle (EV) power trains aren't complete without bidirectional DC-DC converters, which regulate the
flow of electricity from the battery pack to the engine. For modern electric vehicles, which rely on efficient
battery charging and energy recovery, a bidirectional converter is the way to go. Converters that are compact in
size, have a high voltage gain, are more reliable, and allow for smooth bidirectional power transmission have
been created in response to the need for high-performance electric vehicles. With the converter's help, the
electric motor can run smoothly in driving mode, ensuring quick acceleration and responsiveness. In order to
recharge the battery and reduce the voltage produced by the motor, the converter inverts the current during
regenerative braking. Reduced grid-dependent charging cycles improve system efficiency, extend driving range,
and prolong battery life. Electric vehicle drive trains that need a voltage much greater than that supplied by the
battery often use topologies of high-gain bidirectional converters. In order to convert high voltages with less
component stress, modern converters employ hybrid designs, connected inductors, or switching capacitors.
Reduced loss, improved efficiency, and thermal performance are the results of this. We test these converters
under braking conditions to see how they handle voltage gain, switch stress, efficiency, transient response, and
battery charge. Stable functioning under varying load conditions, seamless power reversibility, and efficient
regenerative energy management are all provided by intelligent control algorithms.
Because of the need to be able to switch between charging the battery pack and transferring power to the load in
both normal and transient conditions, a bidirectional DC-DC converter is required. Using a battery-to-inverter
converter (BDC) has many benefits [4, 5]: inverter stress is reduced by a DC stage. a) Increased motor power is
achieved by adjusting the inverter supply voltage; b) The size and cost of the battery are reduced due to a lower
cell count; and d) The system voltage & battery may be designed by the manufacturer. Vehicles with varying
outputs may be accommodated by this architecture's adaptable system designs. The dc bus voltage is raised to
650 V via the DC-DC converter, even though the battery default voltage is 200 V in the 2010 Prius made by
Toyota [2]. An isolated structure is typical of BDCs [2, 6, 11]. Losses and volume are increased when these
independent converters are used with a high-frequency transformer. Transformer core saturation is another issue
that has to be addressed with this converter [25]. Most isolated BDCs, including LLC conversions, CLLC
conversions, and dual-activebridge (DAB) conversions, need several active switches to operate [10], [11].
Therefore, when separation is not necessary, nonisolated BDCs are selected. Researchers are intrigued by its
straightforward structure and minimal number of components. Because of their compact size and light weight,
they are ideal for use in electric vehicle drive trains. Achieving large conversion ratios is possible with non-
isolated BDCs by using SEPIC/Cuk/Zeta, voltage multipliers cells, switching capacitors, and linked inductors.
Reduced efficiency and increased voltage stress are consequences of the cascaded architecture of
SEPIC/Cuk/Zeta converters. One way to make BDCs is using voltage multiplier cells, however the switch
voltage are too high. Switched capacitors are used by BDCs [12] to [14] to simplify design, increase
performance, and make operation easier. Adding extra switches and capacitors makes the circuit more complex
and susceptible to losses, making it less suitable for high-gain applications. Even while hybrid topologies
increase system efficiency, they often suffer from insufficient voltage gain and increased ripple current [15]. On
the other hand, SEPIC/quasi-Z sources with switched capacitors are hybrid systems that have the potential to
attain significant conversion ratios [16], [17]. Conversion efficiency is limited, nevertheless, by a high
component count and a lack of simple switching. The performance and battery life associated with high gain
mixed BDC circuitry are negatively impacted by large LV circuit ripple current. Large capacitors are not
recommended for controlling input ripple current due to their added bulk and expense [18]. Although
interleaved DC-DC converters have a lower voltage gain along with additional components, they are better at
minimising input current ripple [19]. With just four active power switches required for the proposed high gain
bidirectional converter (HGBDC), construction is a breeze. A high voltage gain is achieved by using the correct
values of the inductor, capacitor, and duty cycle. Saturation of the inductor core is minimised during operation
of a lower duty ratio converter. Inductors are used to disperse the input current, which reduces their size and gets
rid of the need for a clamp circuit for powering the load. The performance of the converter supplied drive was
examined using the MATLAB/Simulink & OPAL-RT SIL systems to determine its viability in linking devices
that store energy to electric car dc connections. Whether you're cranking out the miles or recharging your
battery, the converter will keep the electricity flowing smoothly. The high-gain bidirectional DC to DC
converter improves the efficiency of energy conversion and the performance of electric vehicle drives,
according to the simulations. Capturing and storing regenerative braking energy reduces grid costs and increases
usage of renewable energy. The vehicle's autonomy in energy and environmental effect are both enhanced by
solar power. This study demonstrates the potential of renewable energy sources and state-of-the-art power
electronics for use in EVs. Greener and more affordable transportation options may become available if the
proposed method improves EV performance and sustainability.
 2. DC-DC CONVERTERS

A high-step-up DC-DC converter is used in automotive lighting, systems that convert energy from fuel cells,
systems that convert energy from solar cells, and systems that backup batteries from UPS systems. DC-DC
boost converters have the ability to achieve high duty ratios and step-up voltages. The ESR of capacitors,
inductors, and power switches all work together to cap the step-up voltage gain. Standard boost converters
encourage voltage step-up by using high duty ratios. Reduced efficiency and voltage gain are the results of
power switch or diode losses, equivalent series resistance of inductors and capacitors, and diode reverse
recovery. Transformer leakage inductance strains voltage and wastes power via the active switch of these
converters. Active switches have less voltage spikes when snubbed resistors, capacitors, and diodes are used. Its
effectiveness is reduced. Converters with reduced input ripple are made possible by linked inductors. These
converters have input current ripple reduced by an extra LC component with an inductor.
2.1 ELECTRIC VEHICLE: The propulsion system of an electric vehicle (EV) is an electric motor or a
traction motor. A variety of energy sources, including batteries, solar panels, electric generators, and fuel, may
be used to power electric cars, or they can be connected to a larger [Link] types of watercraft—surface,
submerged, and otherwise—as well as electric planes and spacecraft are considered electric vehicles [1]. When
electricity became an increasingly common motor vehicle propulsion method in the mid-19th century, a new era
began for electric vehicles (EVs), which offered advantages over gasoline-powered vehicles in terms of user
comfort and convenience. For the last century or so, electric power has propelled trains and smaller vehicles, but
modern engines with internal combustion continue to dominate motor vehicle propulsion. Innovations in
technology and a focus on renewable energy sources brought EVs back in the modern era. As the need for EVs
grew, a small number of do-it-yourself engineers began disseminating electric car conversion guides. The US
and EU governments instituted incentives to increase adoption rates.

3. PROPOSED HIGH GAIN BIDIRECTIONAL DC-DC CONVERTER (HGBDC)

Presented in Figure 1 is a proposed HGBDC that incorporates four operational switch (S1, S2, S3, & S4), two
similar inductive elements (L1 & L2), a semiconductor diode (D1), & a high-voltage capacitor (CH). In boost
mode, diode D1 changes the current via S1 and S2, while blocking the reverse voltages VL across the
MOSFET. All four of the switches—S1, S2, S3, and S4—turn on at fs. When in boost mode, S1 as well as S2
have duty ratios of d1, but S3 has d2. When the converter is in boost mode, the duty ratio set by switching S4 is
(1- d1-d2), and when it is in buck mode, it is db.
3.1 OPERATION OF THE HGBDC IN BOOST MODE

There are three distinct stages to the boost functioning of the converter, and they are labelled Mode I, Mode II,
and Mode III. Figure 2 shows the present flow route of the planned HGBDC in boost mode. In this mode,
regulated switches S1, S2, S3, and S4 move energy from the converter's low-voltage to high-voltage side. You
may control the first three switches (S1, S2, and S3) with the PW control. For continuous conduction, the figure
shows typical wave shapes of the suggested HGBDC in boosting mode.
 Fig: The suggested bidirectional DC-DC converter has a large gain.(HGBDC).

3.1 MODE I

During this state (t0, t1), switches S1, and S2, respectively, are activated, whereas switches S3 as well as S4 are
deactivated for the period of d1Ts. Figure 2(a) shows the energy transfer from the power source to the inductive
elements L1, L2, which are linked in parallel. The charge that has been stored in the capacitor, CH, is discharged
to the load. Formulas (4.19) through (4.21) represent the voltage that exists across the inductors.

(4.19)

(4.20)

(4.21)

When the currents across the inductors L1 and L2, respectively, are denoted by vL1 and vL2,

3.2 MODE II

Mode II (t1, t2) involves turning off switches S1 and S2, respectively, and turning on switch S3, which remains
active for the length of d2Ts. Figure 2(b) shows that the current is passing via L2, S3, D1, and L1. The inductors
receive energy from the source. What is transferred from the capacitor to the load is its stored energy. In this
mode, the source is connected in parallel with the inductors. The currents passing by and the voltages that exist
across the inductors are represented by Equations (4.20) and (4.21).
 (a)

(b)

(c)

Fig: Models I, II, and III of the HGBDC in boost operation.

3.3 MODE III

During (1-d1-d2)TS, the body diode of MOSFET S4 conducts current, whereas MOSFET switches S1, S2, and
S3 are disabled in this mode (t2, t3). Inverse bias is present in diode D1. Both the source plus the inductors
provide the load, as seen in figure 2(c). Charge is being applied to the capacitor CH.

Fig: Boost mode (CCM) operational waveforms of the HGBDC battery.

An innovative non-isolated high gain bidirectional DC-to-DC converter, battery energy storage, and solar
photovoltaics are all part of this study's high-performance renewable energy aided electric vehicle drive system.
Under varying operating circumstances, the suggested converter topology keeps electricity flowing steadily and
flexibly while connecting the electric vehicle's propulsion system to the solar panel or batteries. The converter's
design achieves a large voltage gain with a small number of components by using two separate duty cycle
procedures. This makes the system more efficient, simplifies the circuits, and allows for a smaller design that is
good for electric mobility. The use of dual power path inductor components is a crucial innovation in this
architecture. These routes do away with the need for extra clamping circuits to transmit load power, greatly
decrease inductor size, and enhance current ripple performance. The suggested topology achieves high step-up
and step-down voltage conversion without putting additional strain on the switching devices, in contrast to
traditional high gain converter that use voltage multiplication cells or hybrids switched capacitor networks.
Consequently, the system's dependability, conduction losses, and electromagnetic interference are all enhanced.
The converter can switch between driving and regenerative brake modes with ease since it functions in both
directions. The electric vehicle's propulsion is powered by a combination of solar energy and the energy stored
in the battery. Regenerative braking involves using the same converter to transform the mechanical energy that
the motor recovers into electrical energy that can be stored in the battery. As a result, the vehicle's total energy
utilisation, driving range, and sustainability are all improved. The electric car is driven by an independently
stimulated DC shunt motor to show how the suggested method may be employed in real-world applications.
Evaluating the converter's and control strategy's dynamic performance is facilitated by this motor's smooth
torque characteristics, great speed manoeuvrability, and efficient operation. In any weather, the solar panel,
battery, and unidirectional converter will work in tandem to provide steady DC link control and dependable
power management.
4 SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The results of the proposed system's MATLAB Simulink simulation of the model are presented in this chapter.
Various operational circumstances are evaluated to verify the design of the converter, controller, or power
management method. Examining dynamic reaction, subsystem interaction, and steady state behaviour in a
simulated environment does not need any hardware. The model incorporates the driving system for the motor,
control algorithms, a bidirectional DC-to-DC converter, and a mechanism for storing energy in batteries. Testing
the system's robustness include driving, regenerative braking, voltage fluctuations, load adjustments, and
charging the batteries. The following parameters are tracked: efficiency, charging capacity, current
responsiveness, voltage gain, and switching behaviour. According to the results obtained in MATLAB
Simulink, the proposed design has a good chance of achieving high voltage gain, stable operation under fast
changes in load and speed, and smooth bidirectional power flow. Results from comparisons, graphs, and
waveforms demonstrate how the system's performance has improved. A clear data analysis confirming the
design's suitability for EVs concludes this chapter.
 Fig: Proposed system Configuration.

4.1 Mode: 1 Linking Solar Energy with Electric Vehicle Battery Charging

It is easy to see from the simulation results how well the solar PV array charges the electric vehicle battery.
Through the regulated charging interface, the PV panel provides steady DC power for the EV battery when solar
irradiation is present. The charging current is constantly regulated to keep the battery charging smoothly, and the
PV voltage stays constant regardless of the ambient circumstances. Throughout the simulation time, the voltage
of the EV battery steadily rises as the charge condition improves, indicating a charging profile that is both
continuous and uninterrupted. Safe functioning and prevention of overcharging are ensured by a steady
reduction in the charging current as the battery approaches its maximum charging limit. There are no oscillations
in the system, and the energy transfer from PV to battery is quite stable, therefore it seems that independent
electric vehicle charging using direct solar power is a viable and dependable option.

Fig: Findings from Solar-to-EV Battery Charging Simulation

In Mode-2, an ANFIS controller controls the motor speed and electricity comes straight from the EV battery to
the independently stimulated DC motor. In comparison to traditional control, the ANFIS-based speed sensor
offers a much more rapid and smooth response, as seen in the simulation results. To minimise overshoot and
achieve steady speed tracking, the controller swiftly modifies the armature current and voltage during
acceleration. Displaying remarkable resilience in the face of dynamic disturbances, the ANFIS controller keeps
the motor speed relatively constant, regardless of changes in load circumstances. Throughout its entire working
range, the motor displays a consistent electromagnetic torque profile and a marked reduction in torque ripple.
By stabilising itself without oscillations and reacting instantaneously to changes in its benchmark speed, the
system verifies that the ANFIS algorithm successfully improves dynamic behaviour. The simulation confirms
that the Mode-2 individually excited DC motor transmission is very steady, economical, and responsive when
powered by an electric vehicle's battery with ANFIS speed control.

Fig: Mode 2: Electric Vehicle Battery Infeed DC Motor with Automatic Nozzle Position Control (ANFIS)
Simulation Outcomes.

5 CONCLUSION

Combining solar energy, a high-gain unidirectional DC-DC converter that powers an EV battery, and an
independently triggered DC shunt motor drive creates a unified and efficient electric vehicle power management
architecture. The high-gain non-isolated unidirectional converters stabilises step-up & step-down voltage for EV
battery solar power generation and regulates energy flow during driving and regeneration. Using dual-current-
path architecture minimises component stress and increases conversion efficiency without voltage multiplier cell
or expensive switched-capacitor arrangements. The solar source adjusts the EV battery's recharging pattern to
guarantee secure energy transfer and reduce power fluctuations even with changing irradiation. The converter
gives consistent power to the electric motor drive from the battery, increasing torque and mechanical output.
ANFIS controller speed modification of the independently stimulated DC motor enhances driving performance.
The controller reduces transient overshoot, dynamic fluctuations, and settling time compared to linear control. It
measures reference speed correctly under load changes via adaptive learning, ensuring accuracy and longevity.
The integrated system delivers reliable renewable-based EV charging of the batteries, efficient bidirectional
power transfer, and great motor driving performance. The high-gain converters and ANFIS-based control
technique improve stability, dynamic adaptive design, and energy use, making the design suited for electric cars
and clean-energy applications.
6 REFERENCES
[1] Aharon, I. and Kuperman, A. 2010. Design of semi-active battery-ultracapacitor hybrids. In : Proceeding of
IEEE 26th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers held at Israel, Eliat, 17-20 Nov. 2010, pp.
000593-000597.
[2] Antúnez, S.C., Franco, J.F., Rider, M.J. and Romero, R. 2016. A New Methodology for the Optimal
Charging Coordination of Electric Vehicles Considering Vehicle-to-Grid Technology. IEEE Transactions on
Sustainable Energy 7: 596-607.
[3] Awami, A.T., Sortomme, E., Akhtar, A.G.M. and Faddel, S. 2016. A Voltage-Based Controller for an
Electric-Vehicle Charger. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 65: 4185-4196.
[4] Azib, T., Bethoux, O., Remy, G. and Marchand, C. 2011. Saturation Management of a Controlled Fuel-
Cell/Ultracapacitor Hybrid Vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 60: 4127-4138.
[5] Azlan, H.M., Ahmed, N., Abdalla, Ishak, R., Abdullah, R., Ali, Z.M. 2011. Study on Improving Electric
Vehicle drive range using Solar Energy. In: proceedings of International Conference on Electrical Control
and Computer Engineering held at Pahang Malaysia, 21-22 June 2011, pp. 21-22.
[6] Butler, K.L., Ehsani, M. and Kamath, P. 1999. A Matlab-based modeling and simulation package for
electric and hybrid electric vehicle design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 48: 1770-1778.
[7] Cao, J. and Emadi, A. 2009. A New Battery/Ultra-Capacitor Hybrid Energy Storage System for Electric,
Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Dearborn,
MI, USA, 7-10 Sept. 2009, pp. 941-946
[8] Chen, X., Jian, Y., Yu, F. 2010. Model and Simulation of a Super-capacitor Braking Energy Recovery
System for Urban Railway Vehicles WASE. In: proceedings of International Conference on Information
Engineering held at Beidaihe, Hebei, china 14-15 Aug. 2010, pp. 295-300.
[9] Chen, Y., Zhao, S., Li, Z., Wei, X. and Kang, Y. 2017. Modeling and Control of the Isolated DC–DC
Modular Multilevel Converter for Electric Ship Medium Voltage Direct Current Power System. IEEE
Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics 5: 124-139.
[10] Cho J.H. and Hong W.P. 2010. Power control and modeling of a solar-ultra capacitor hybrid energy system
for stand-alone applications. In: proceeding of ICCAS held at Gyeonggi-do, South Korea 27-30 Oct. 2010.
pp. 811-814.
[11] Choudhury, A., Pillay, P. and Williamson, S.S. 2016. Modified DC-Bus Voltage- Balancing Algorithm
Based Three-Level Neutral-Point-Clamped IPMSM Drive for Electric Vehicle Applications. IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics 63: 761-772.
[12] Corno, M., Roselli, F. and Savaresi, S.M. 2017. Bilateral Control of SeNZA- A Series Hybrid Electric
Bicycle. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 25: 864-874.
[13] Devi, K.P., Kamdar, P., Mittal, A., Rohit, A.K. and Rangnekar, S. 2014. Performance Analysis of Various
Ultracapacitor And Its Hybrid with Batteries. International Journal of Advanced Technology Engineering
and Science 2. pp. 327-333.
[14] Divakar, B. 2009. Battery management system and control strategy for hybrid and Electric vehicle. In:
Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications (PESA) held
at Hong Kong, 20-22 May 2009, pp. 1-6.
[15] Dixon, J., Nakashima, I., Arcos, E.F. and Ortuzar, M. 2010. Electric Vehicle Using a Combination of
Ultracapacitors and ZEBRA Battery. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 57: 943-949.
[16] Dokuyucu, H. I. and Cakmakci, M. 2016. Concurrent Design of Energy Management and Vehicle Traction
Supervisory Control Algorithms for Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
Technology 65: 555-565.
[17] Durastanti, J. F., Camara, M. A., Djellad, A. P., Logerais,O. and Riou,O. 2013. Modeling of a hybrid energy
storage system supplied by a photovoltaic source to feed a DC motor. International Journal of Renewable
and Sustainable Energy. pp. 222-228.
[18] P. Rodriguez, A. Luna, I. Etxeberria, J. R. Hermoso, and R. Teodorescu, “Multiple second order generalized
integrators for harmonic synchronization of power converters,” in Proc. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr.
Expo., 2009, pp. 2239–2246.
[19] Y. Liu,W. Xu, T. Long GAE, and F. Blaabjerg, “An improved rotor speed observer for standalone brushless
doubly-fed induction generator under unbalanced and nonlinear loads,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol.
35, no. 1, pp. 775–788, Jan. 2020.
[20] X. Quan, X. Dou, [Link],M. Hu, and A. Q. Huang, “Complex-Coefficient complex-variable filter for grid
synchronization based on linear quadratic regulation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1824–
1834,May 2018.
[21] V. Jain and B. Singh, “Power quality improvement in PV system tied to weak grid,” in Proc. Int. Conf.
Comput., Power Commun. Technol., 2019, pp. 936–941.
[22] “IEEE draft guide for applying harmonic limits on power systems,” IEEE P519.1/D12, Jul. 2012, pp. 1–
124, 26 Feb. 2015.
[23] IEEE Recommended Practice forMonitoring Electric PowerQuality IEEE Std 1159-2019 (Revision of IEEE
Std 1159-2009), pp. 1–98, 13Aug. 2019.
[24] V. Jain and B. Singh, “A multiple improved notch filter-based control for a single-stage PV system tied to a
weak grid,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 238–247, Jan. 2019.
[25] S. Devassy and B. Singh, ``Design and performance analysis of three- phase solar PV integrated DPFC,''
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 73_81, Jan. 2018.