Group System
Group System
I. DEFINITION OF GROUPS
Reporter; James Eldon
• A social group consists of two or more people who regularly interact on the basis of mutual
expectations and who share a common identity.
•Group can also comprises formal social organizations, which have specific and varied impact
on the society and culture.
Other Definitions
According to Maclver:
“By group, we mean any collection of human beings who are brought into social relationship
with one another”.
According to Bogardus:
“Ä social group is a number of persons, two or more, who have common objects of attention,
who are stimulating to each other, who have common loyalty and participate in similar activities”.
According to Williams:
“Social group is a given aggregate of people playing interrelated roles and recognized by
themselves or others as a unity of interaction”.
In Group
An ingroup is a group comprised of things, people, or other entities that are similar to one
another. Particularly in the case of humans, ingroups are defined by beliefs, values, and
identities. Within ingroups, there is a shared understanding that there is an element of
commonality amongst group members.
Out Group
An outgroup is a group defined by its dissimilarity to an in-group. Where an in-group is unified
by a shared element of identity, be it a belief or a trait, and out-group is defined by its lack of that
shared element.
Formal Group
This is the most common form of a group. Individuals work together as they are assigned
various roles inside the organization. The management decides upon the set of goals, and the
entire group works towards achieving the set of organizational goals.
2. Permanent Group: These groups are permanent and stay for a long time.
3. Command Group: These groups are permanent and exist in every organization. They can
be called sections or departments.
4. Functional Group: These groups are defined according to group members’ position in an
organization, such as engineers, clerks, supervisors, etc.
5. Task Group: This group is temporary and created to achieve a specific task. Usually, these
groups consist of influential stakeholders.
6. Committees: Members of this group are appointed by organizations to resolve issues. This
group is permanent and consists of stakeholders with high positions.
Informal Group
Inside a formal structure, there exists an informal structure. These informal structures are borne
out of the social needs of the employees. The informal groups consist of personal relationships,
and there is no set role for any individuals.
•Interest Group
The group of people that don’t belong to the same chain of command or interrelated task
groups. They work towards achieving their specific set of goals. For instance, a group of people
coming together in favor of improving their work conditions.
Task Roles
Task roles are roles that focus on completing group’s goal. The different task roles of a group
are stated below;
Coordinator
Energizer
Elaborator
Information-giver
Information-seeker
Norms
Norms are the acceptable standards of behavior within a group that are shared by the group
members. Every group develops its own customs, values, habits and expectations for how
things need to be done.
TYPES OF NORMS
Performance Norms
—These are centered on how hard a person should work in a given group. They are informal
clues that help a person understand how hard they should work and what type of output they
should give.
Appearance Norms
—Appearance norms updates or guides us as to how we should look or what our physical
appearance should be, like what fashion we should wear or how we should style our hair or any
number of areas related to how we should look.
Social Arrangement Norms
—This norm is basically centered on how we should behave in social settings. Again here, there
are clues we need to pick up on when we are out with friends or at social events that help us fit
in and get a closer connection to the group.
Resource Allocation Norms
—This norm focusses on the allocation of resources in a business surrounding. This may
include raw materials as well as working overtime or any other resource found or needed within
an organization.
Conformity
Conformity can be stated as “accommodating to group pressures”. It is also called as the
majority influence or we can say the group pressure.
♠Normative Conformity
Yielding to group pressure because an individual wants to fit in with the group. Conforming
usually takes place because the individual is scared of being rejected or neglected by the group.
♠Informational Conformity
This usually happens when a person lacks knowledge and looks to the group for guidance. Or
when a person is not clear about a situation and socially compares one’s behavior with the
group.
♠Ingratiational Conformity
Where a person conforms to gain a favor or acceptance from other people. It is relative to
normative influence but is encouraged by the need for social rewards rather than the threat of
being rejected.
Reference Groups
It is a group to which a person or another group is compared. Reference groups are used in
order to examine and determine the nature of a person or other group's features and
sociological attributes.
Status
Status is a socially defined position or rank given to groups or group members by others. A
group structure status includes group norms, culture, status equity. All these factors when
combined presents the status of members of the group.
Social Loafing
It is the phenomenon of people exerting less effort to achieve a goal when they work as a group
than when they work alone.
Cohesiveness
Extent to which group members are attracted towards each other, and are encouraged to stay in
the group. Group cohesion is the aggregate of all the factors causing members of a group to
stay in the group or be attracted to the group. Group cohesion acts as the social glue that binds
a group together. Some people think that work teams illustrating strong group cohesion will
function and perform better in achieving work goals.
Workplace Behavior
Workplace deviance can take the form of bitterness towards co-workers. Organizations usually
strive to create an atmosphere of conformity and teamwork to achieve maximum productivity
and create a healthy corporate culture.
In organizations of any size, deviant behavior can occur, which can sabotage the work. There
are usually two types of deviant behavior −
Aggressive Behavior
Unproductive Behavior
Aggressive Behavior
—Workplace deviance can sometimes take the form of aggressive behavior. In diverse work
environments, deviance may occur when workers display intolerance of co-workers of different
nationalities or cultures.
Unproductive Behavior
—Actions that disrupt or minimize productivity are also a form of workplace deviance. Common
examples of this type of deviant behavior include: Workers who waste their time by standing
around the water cooler, taking the "scenic route" while making sales calls or extending the time
it takes to complete a task that slows down productivity.
V. GROUP DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE
Reporter; Lyca and Nelyn
The majority of group development research aims to figure out why and how small groups
change over time. The quality of a group’s output, the type and frequency of its activities, its
cohesiveness, and the presence of group conflict are all factors to consider.
To explain how certain groups change over time, a number of theoretical models have been
developed. Some of the most common models are listed below. In some cases, such as therapy
groups, the type of group being considered influenced the model of group development
proposed. In general, some of these models see group change as a regular progression through
a series of “stages,” while others see it as a series of “phases” that groups may or may not go
through at various points in their history
Group Development
Refers to the process by which members of newly formed work teams learn about their
teammates, establish their roles and Responsibilities, and acquire the task work and teamwork
Capabilities required to coordinate their effort to perform effectively as a team.
Pertains to the team as a whole (i.e., all members are new to the Team), distinguishing this
process from group socialization, which Refers to the assimilation of new members into an
existing team with an ongoing history.
The amount of time It takes for a team to develop is variable and, although precise time frames
are not established, the process is presumed to take longer when the team task entails greater
complexity, interdependence, and coordination and less time when there is less demand for the
integration of team members’ knowledge, skill, and effort. The process is important because
team development is assumed to be a necessary, but insufficient, precondition for team
effectiveness.
Group Development Models
• Tuckman’s Group Development Model
1. Forming
- commonly called orientation
- At this stage, the group isn’t very productive, as they’re still getting acclimated
and figuring out the role that each person will play on the team.
2. Storming
- Also called the power struggle phase.
- All that polite, deferential behavior that dominated the Forming stage starts to fall
by the wayside in the storming Stage. As team members begin collaborating,
conflicts may arise, whether that’s from clashing personalities or opinions On how
a project should progress.
3. Norming
- Once the role of every member is cleared along with the authority and
responsibility of each, the team members start Settling in a group. Here,
everybody works cohesively towards the target and appreciate each other’s
experience and skills.
- Each person begins to recognize how their fellow team members contribute to
the group, and that perspective
4. Performing
- Also known as synergy
- There’s a high level of cohesion and trust between team members. Teams are
functioning at peak efficiency with less oversight from team leaders.
5. Adjourning
- Also called the mourning phase.
- In this stage typically team members are ready to leave (course Termination)
causing significant change to the team structure, MEMBERSHIP, or purpose and
the team during the last week of class.
- While the group continues to perform productively they also Need time to
manage their feelings of termination and transition.
- In this model “early” stages of group development are associated with specific
issues and patterns of talk such as those related to dependency,
counterdependency and trust which precede the actual work conducted During
the “more mature” stages of a group’s life.
- Wheelan (2003) examined the relationship between the length of time a group
has been meeting and the verbal behaviour patterns of its members, as well as
the members’ perceptions of the group’s state of development, in order to
empirically validate the model. Her findings appear to show that there is a link
between the length of time a group has been meeting and the verbal behaviour
patterns of its members. Members of older groups also tended to perceive their
groups as having more Stage-3 and Stage-4 characteristics and as being more
productive. Wheelan’s position is based on these findings, which support
traditional linear models of group development while casting doubt on cyclic
models and Gersick’s punctuated equilibrium model.
SUSAN WHEELAN
- Wheelan was born in Providence, Rhode Island and she was a graduate of Bay
View Academy, Stonehill College and the University of Wisconsin/Madison with a
Ph.D in Psychology. She was a professor of Psychological Studies and Faculty
Director of the Center for the Study of Psychoeducational Processes at Temple
University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for 28 years.
- She is the author of many books, including Group Processes: A
Developmental Perspective and Creating Effective Teams: A Guide for
Members and Leaders.
- Beside the Integrated Model of Group Development, Wheelan also created and
validated both the Group Development Observation System (GDOS) and the
Group Development Questionnaire (GDQ).
- Is used to survey group members and assess their individual perception oftheir
group’s developmental state
- In this stage, members rely on the leader and powerful group members to
provide direction. Team members may engage in what has been called “pseudo-
work,” such as exchanging stories about outside activities or other topics that are
not relevant to group goals.
Stage 02: Counterdependency and Flight
- The group’s task at Stage 2 is to develop a unified set of goals, values and
operational procedures and this task inevitably generates some conflict.
- Conflict also is necessary for the establishment of trust and a climate in which
members feel free to disagree with each other.
Stage 03: Trust / Structure
- If the group manages to work through the inevitable conflicts of Stage 2, member
trust, commitment to the group and willingness to cooperate increase.
Communication becomes more open and task-oriented.
- This third stage of group development, referred to as the trust and structure
stage, is characterized by more mature negotiations about roles, organization
and procedures.
- Communication becomes more open and focused on the task at hand. The trust
and structure stage, also known as the mature stage of group development, is
marked by more mature negotiations about roles, organisation, and procedures.
It's also a time when team members work to strengthen positive working
relationships
Stage 04: Work or Productivity
- As its name implies, the fourth stage of group development is a time of intense
team productivity and effectiveness.
- Having resolved many of the issues of the previous stages, the group can focus
most of its energy on goal achievement and task accomplishment
Stage 05: Final
- Groups that have a distinct ending point experience a fifth stage. Impending
termination may cause disruption and conflict in some groups. In other groups,
separation issues are addressed and members’ appreciation of each other and
the group experience may be expressed.
- A fifth stage is experienced by groups that have a distinct ending point. Some
groups may experience disruption and conflict as a result of the impending
termination. Separation issues are addressed in other groups, and members’
appreciation for one another and the group experience is expressed.
• Connie Gersick’s Punctuated Equilibrium Model
- This model describes the processes by which such frameworks are created and
revised, as well as the timing of progress and when and how groups are likely to
be influenced by their environments at various stages of development. Because
groups’ historical paths are expected to vary, the model leaves the specific issues
and activities that dominate their work unspecified.
- This model argues that groups often move forward during bursts of change after
long periods without change.
- Groups that are similar, stable, small, supportive, and satisfied tend to be more
cohesive than groups that are not.
Connie Gersick
Stage 03:
-is characterized by changes in the group which facilitate the accomplishment of the task.
-At the beginning of stage three, the group chooses to drop old unsuccessful patterns of
behavior and adopts new perspectives; the group sets a new direction for their goals.
-These new goals lead the group into a high level of performance.
- Refers to the tendency of individuals to put in less effort when working in a group
context.
3. Collective Efficacy
- Refers to a group’s perception of its ability to successfully perform well (Bandura,
1997)
This is to be realized through a social process that is guided by the below objectives:
1. Train the individual ways of living and working together as well as getting involved in group
activities to foster their emotional, intellectual, and physical growth.
2. Help the individual enjoy a good life within their group and family. This entails teaching the
individual how to work together with others through participation in various activities.
3. Help develop the behavior and personality of individuals participating in the groups through
the use of group work process.
4. Prepare individuals participating in the group process how to assume responsibility within a
democratic working environment.
5. Learn how to divide labor as well as understand role specialization and how to perform
individual roles within the group.
6. Establish tasks suitable for individuals based on their knowledge, skills, and interest.
7. Accord individuals the opportunity characteristic of potential the chance to exercise leadership
characterized by dignity.
8. Prepare individuals for positive social change.
9. Help individuals widen their horizons about life.
10. Enable people optimize their leisure time.
When studying the social connections of group members, you can introduce specific changes
to:
•Promote teamwork
•Boost morale
•Increase productivity
Perceptual or personal sociograms - where you create a visual map of your emotional
geography as a member of a particular social environment, for example, the office.
Role diagram sociograms - where you identify the hidden roles of different members
within a group
Sociograms of the moment - these diagrams display the relationship between group
members at a point in time. When this time elapses, the results obtained become obsolete
because the social dynamics in the group under analysis change.
However, all the sociograms mentioned above fall under two main categories:
network sociograms
egocentric sociograms
1. Network Sociogram
A network sociogram displays the relationships between a group of cases or individuals.
2. Egocentric Sociogram
Egocentric sociometry reveals how different group members relate to one specific person within
the group
Vertex
Also commonly referred to as nodes, the vertex represents the cases under analysis. It may be
an individual or a group. They take different shapes, such as circles, triangles, stars, etc.
When selecting a template, consider the shapes of the vertices to ensure you
pick one whose nodes reflect your group’s entities.
But this is not compulsory. Often, any form can do unless creating an
egocentric sociogram.
For egocentric sociograms, use a star to represent the ego or focus of the analysis.
Edge
Edges or vectors are lines that connect vertices in a sociogram. They reveal the relationship
several participants or members of a group share.
Usually, the lines will have arrows pointing towards or away from specific cases or
individuals.
Different types of edges or lines indicate the nature of various social relationships.
Here is a summary of what each line symbol means.
On a sociogram, numbers denote something different depending on where
they appear. If they are in the vertex, they represent a count of the
participants.
Stars – individuals with several lines pointing towards them. It means other members of the
group chose them several times.
Isolates – these members might not have a single line pointing toward them or might have one
line from other isolates. It shows that not many group members picked them as their preferred
choice to engage in any activity.
Cliques – you will notice groups of individuals, usually three or more, who pick each other. The
presence of cliques or sub-groups within a group may mean they exclude other group members.
Example of sociogram:
Sociogram Examples
Let us look at a few examples of sociograms to see how they work.
Figure 1. A network sociogram of a group of 7 individuals (Hollander, 1978).
In this sociogram example, it is easy to see that Joel is the star, i.e., the favorite of most team
members. They have chosen him several times, and all his interactions are positive.
Figure 2: Advice network created by the auditing team of a company (Huang, Hong & Eades,
2006)
The diagram shows ellipses (managers), diamonds (staff auditors), and boxes (secretaries). An
arrow from one person to the other shows that the said person takes advice from the one the
arrowhead is facing.
In this case, it appears that Nancy is an essential asset to the company. Everyone seeks advice
from her either directly or indirectly.
Figure 3: An egocentric sociogram showing a dialogue between the ego (Carlos) and five other
participants (Wagner & González-Howard, 2018).
The left shows the outgoing conversation or responses, whereas the right indicates the
incoming dialogue. The numbers represent the average number of exchanges or ties per
minute.
From this diagram, it is easy to tell that Ms. Brennan and Jessica are the most active
participants in the dialogue with Carlos. They have more exchanges per minute with him than
the rest of the team.