Module - 6 - Specific Process
Module - 6 - Specific Process
PART A. TUTORIAL
Table of Contents
This module comprises three topics which examine the Specific Process of Production ROO that
can be used to determine origin. This type of Product Specific Rule (PSR) can be used as an
alternative to the Regional Value Content (RVC) or Change in Tariff Classification (CTC) Rules of
Origin (ROO) or in some cases as an additional requirement to these ROO.
Specific Process of Production ROO require that the non-originating materialsundergo a specified
manufacturing or production process in an AANZFTA Party prior to being exported and claiming
preferential tariff treatment.
The Specific Process of Production ROO are written to state positively what process is required to
be carried out in the production of the good for it to be considered originating.
Under AANZFTA a relatively small number of products are required to meet a Specific Process of
Production ROO. Specific Process of Production ROO may also be used as an alternative to or in
1
combination with an RVC or CTC ROO. The specific rules are detailed in Annex 2 to Chapter 3
(Rules of Origin) of the AANZFTA text.
Specific Process of Production ROO are simple to administer as manufacturers already have
knowledge of their manufacturing process and are able to establish if these processes meet the
ROO. Furthermore, the verification of Specific Process of Production ROO by Certificate of Origin
Issuing Authorities/Bodies or Customs Authorities is relatively straightforward as the steps of the
production process can be identified.
Specific Process of Production ROO have the benefit of consistency as, provided the same process
is followed, an eligible good will always continue to achieve originating status regardless of the cost
of materials, labour and other inputs.
This is an important reason AANZFTA contains Specific Process of Production ROO for certain
industries.
Specific Process of Production ROO are not affected by shifts in exchange rates and fluctuations in
international prices of materials which can significantly affect an exporter’s final cost structures
which are needed in RVC calculations.
Sensitivity to exchange rates and fluctuations in oil prices are especially the case with regard to
chemical and plastic goods which use derivatives of crude oil as materials. The price of crude oil is
always in fluctuation and thus any rule that uses the price of the crude oil may be difficult to meet
one day and easy to meet another day.
Specific Processes of Production ROO are not affected by changes in the sourcing of materials
which may impact on CTC ROO.
Specific Process of Production ROO aim to produce fairer outcomes across industries and Parties
by basing the determination of substantial transformation on the process of production rather than
on the costs and sourcing of input materials by individual manufacturers. In comparison, using a
single RVC threshold or CTC ROO for all goods does not take into account the different proportions
of materials, labour and capital which are used in production in different industries or the structure of
the Harmonized System (HS). Differences in these factors make it easier for some goods to meet a
single RVC or CTC ROO.
As Specific Process of Production ROO are tailored to a specific good, the ROO may appear
complicated but remember that the ROO has been created in consultation with the specific industry
group who will use the ROO.
The information used to determine origin and the source of that information is similar to other
methodologies. The group exercise below compares the information required to make a decision
based on an RVC, CTC or a Specific Process of Production ROO.
The Product Specific Rules (PSR) are detailed in Annex 2 to Chapter 3 (Rules of Origin) of
the AANZFTA text. The box below illustrates some of the Specific Process of Production
ROO.
Goods produced from mineral fuels, chemicals, plastics and rubber are covered by Chapters 27 -
40. As stated earlier, these goods are highly susceptible to fluctuations in commodity prices and
exchange rates. The PSR for these chapters usually contain ROO for individual tariff lines, but in
addition, there are often alternative rules which apply across the Chapters.
The ROO allow any good which is produced as a result of specified process of production to qualify
as an originating good, regardless of the source of the materials used to produce it.
Within AANZFTA the alternative ROO is called the Chemical Reaction ROO.
AANZFTA includes a Chemical Reaction ROO. Under AANZFTA this ROO can only be applied if a
good does not meet the RVC and CTC ROO.
3
Before the Chemical Reaction ROO can be used, the goods must be first tested to determine
whether they meet the RVC or CTC ROO of the PSR Annex. If the chemicals meet the
requirements of one of these ROO, then the chemicals are originating and the Chemical Reaction
Rule cannot be used. If they fail to meet both the RVC and CTC ROO, then the chemicals can be
tested to see if it is a product of a defined chemical reaction that occurred in a Party.
The following process should be used when considering the use of the Chemical Reaction ROO.
RVC • First test the good against the RVC and CTC.
Or • If it meets either of these requirements then the good is originating.
CTC • If it fails to meet the RVC and CTC then test against the
Chemical Reaction.
For each of these chapters, the alternative ROO allow any good which is produced as a result of a
chemical reaction to qualify as an originating good, regardless of where the materials used to
produce it were sourced from.
The above example of hydrogen and oxygen combining to form water is probably the most
commonly known chemical reaction in the world. Two hydrogen atoms join to one oxygen atom to
form one water molecule. This example is included in this module to remind you what the Chemical
Reaction ROO represents.
Whenever you are trying to decide if a reaction meets the Chemical Reaction ROO, always bring it
back to basics and examine it in comparison to the production of water.
The following are not considered to be chemical reactions for the purposes of determining whether
a product is an originating good:
The Chemical Reaction ROO is located as chapter notes which are found at the beginning of
Chapters 28, 29 and 32 of the PSR Annex.
Chapter Note:
Any good of this chapter that is the product of a chemical reaction shall be
considered to be an originating good if the chemical reaction occurred in a Party.
The “chemical reaction” rule may be applied to any good classified in this
chapter if the product fails to satisfy the regional value content and change in
tariff classification criteria provided for in the Product Specific Rule.
Put simply, when a good does not meet either the RVC ROO or the CTC ROO,
the Chemical Reaction ROO means that if a chemical reaction occurs during
production in an AANZFTA Party for a good of Chapter 28, 29 or 32 the good
produced is an originating good and is eligible for preferential duty rates.
Put simply, when a good does not meet either the RVC ROO or the CTC ROO, the Chemical
Reaction ROO means that if a chemical reaction occurs during production in an AANZFTA Party for
a good of Chapter 28, 29 or 32 the good produced is an originating good and is eligible for
preferential duty rates.
Example
1 Question:
Good C (FOB $15) classified in Chapter 28 is produced in an AANZFTA Party through a chemical
reaction between non-originating materials A (HS 28, value $5) and B (HS 28, value $5).
The PSR for the good is “RVC(40) or CTSH”. The Chemical Reaction ROO applies to Chapter 28 in
cases where the specified PSR have not been met.
Is good C originating?
Answer:
5
Materials A and B are both contained in the same subheading, as good C therefore the CTSH ROO
has not been met.
Due to the high value of the imported non-originating materials the good also fails to meet the
RVC(40) ROO (15 – 10) / 15 x 100 = 33%.
Because neither the RVC(40) nor the CTSH ROO has been met the Chemical Reaction Roo can be
examined.
The Chemical Reaction ROO requires a chemical reaction to take place in the territory of a Party for
the good to be originating.
As the good was produced in the territory through a chemical reaction, the good is an originating
good.
Material A Material B
(value $5) (value $5)
Good C
(HS 28
FOB $15)
2 Question:
Hydrochloric acid (HS 2806.10) with an FOB value of $10 is produced in Thailand by a chemical
reaction when originating hydrogen (HS 2804.10) is mixed with chlorine (HS 2801.10) and dissolved
in water.
The chlorine is imported from China for $7. The PSR for subheading 2803.10 is “RVC(40) or
CTSH”.
The Chemical Reaction ROO applies to Chapter 28 in cases where the other PSR have not been
met. Is the Hydrochloric acid originating?
Answer:
The hydrochloric acid is classified to Chapter 28 and was produced via a chemical reaction, the
manufacturer must first check the RVC(40) and CTSH ROO.
The good fails to meet the RVC(40) ROO (10 – 7) / 10 x 100 = 30%.
Using the CTSH ROO, the hydrochloric acid is originating because the non-originating imported
chlorine (HS 2801.10) comes from a different subheading to the hydrochloric acid (HS 2806.10).
As the hydrochloric acid meets the CTSH ROO the hydrochloric acid is originating.
The Chemical Reaction ROO cannot be used as the hydrochloric acid meets the CTSH ROO.
6
Non-originating
Originating
Chlorine from
Hydrogen
China
(HS 2804.10)
(HS 2801 value $7)
Hydrochloric
Acid (HS
2806.10
FOB %10
3 Question:
Acrylic paint (HS 3209.10) is produced in Cambodia from non-original materials of Chapter 28 and
29 and a small amount of paint made from vinyl polymers (HS 3209.10) imported from Korea.
The Chemical Reaction ROO applies to Chapter 32 in cases where the other PSRs are not met. Is
the paint originating?
Answer:
As the RVC value of the good is 33 per cent (two thirds or 66 per cent of the value is represented by
the non-original imports) the good does not meet the RVC(40) ROO.
The non-originating vinyl polymer paint (HS 3209.10) is classified in the same subheading as the
final good (HS 3209.10); therefore the acrylic paint does not meet the CTSH ROO.
Because the good has failed to meet the RVC and CTC ROO the Chemical Reaction ROO can now
be considered.
The acrylic paint was produced as a result of a chemical reaction so the final good is considered to
be an originating good.
As identified in Module 4 (General Rule - Regional Value Content), Article 7 (Minimal Operations
and Processes) of Chapter 3 (Rules of Origin) contains specific provisions on minimal operations
and processes which are not considered sufficient on their own to confer origin.
7
Minimal operations and process provisions are not used with CTC ROO as the ROO are set at the a
ppropriate chapter (two-digit), heading (four-digit), or subheading (six-digit) level of the HS, or
exceptions are applied, which disqualify certain operations from conferring originating status and
ensure that the good is a product of substantial transformation.
Similarly, the minimal operations and process provisions do not apply to Specific Process of
Production ROO. Like CTC ROO, the Specific Process of Production ROO themselves set out what
activities are not considered substantial.
For example, the Chemical Reaction ROO in AANZFTA states that, “The following are not
considered to be chemical reactions for the purposes of determining whether a product is an
originating good:
8
The PSR Annex contains Specific Process of Production ROO for Chapters 50 – 63. These
chapters relate to textiles, clothing and made-up textile items. Specific Process of Production ROO
are used for some of these chapters as in many cases a CTC or RVC ROO does not achieve the
required substantial transformation.
Fabric Rules
The AANZFTA Parties have agreed that fabric is substantially transformed when greige or raw
fabric is transformed to enable it to be used for the construction of clothing or other made up textile
items.
AANZFTA Parties have agreed that this occurs where the fabric undergoes at least two finishing
operations to render it directly usable.
Greige Fabric
Greige is an unfinished woven or knitted fabric just off the weaving looms or knitting machine that
hasn’t been bleached or dyed. Greige fabric has not been given any finishing at all.
9
cuttling; parchmentizing; water-repellent;
decatizing/decating; plaiting; wet fixation;
delustring; polishing; Wigan finish.
desizing; potting;
dressing (lace) precrêping;
This list is not exhaustive – other finishing operations may be origin conferring provided that at least
two finishing operations have been undertaken in conjunction with printing or dyeing.
‘Rendering the fabric directly usable’ requires that no additional finishing operations are required to
ensure that the fabric can be used in the production of a finished article (e.g. clothing or other made-
up textile items).
Not all fabric chapters of the HS distinguish between greige fabric and finished fabric.
The table below provides the tariff structure for goods of headings 5112 and 5210. You will note that
the term greige in not used. For heading 5210 the fabric is split into groups such as unbleached,
bleached, dyed and printed which indicate the degree of “finishing” the goods may have been
subjected to. These particular groupings cover the fabric from its unfinished state to a state that
includes several finishing processes. For heading 5112 there is no split into such groups.
10
5210.41 --Plain weave
5210.49 --Other fabrics
-Printed:
5210.51 --Plain weave
5210.59 --Other fabrics
Under a CTC ROO for these chapters, fabric is required to be made from yarn. In order to maintain
the principle that non-originating greige fabric can be used in the production of a finished fabric a
second rule for fabric is also applied to certain HS codes.
A change from fabric that is constructed but not further prepared or finished, provided that it is dyed
or printed and undergoes at least two subsequent finishing processes in the territory of one or more
of the Parties to render it directly usable.
Like the Chemical Reaction ROO, the Fabric ROO in the AANZFTA is also designed to prevent
certain activities, undertaken on their own, from conferring origin. In the case of fabric, merely
washing and drying the fabric without printing or dyeing or further finishing operations would not be
considered to be sufficient for origin purposes. Similarly, when the finishing operations have been
completed the good must be directly usable.
For the purposes of this Chapter, if a claim for origin is based on dyeing, printing and at least two
subsequent finishing processes, washing or drying shall not be considered to be finishing
processes. An indicative list of finishing processes is provided in the Appendix to the PSR.
Example
4. Question:
Dyed woven fabric (HS 5514.21) is produced in Thailand from imported non-originating unbleached
fabric (HS 5514.11) from China.
The dyes and pigments (Chapter 32) are imported from Japan and are also non-originating.
The raw material is dyed, washed, dried, brushed, singed and mercerised.
The PSR subheading 5514.21 is “CTH or a change from fabric that is constructed but not further
prepared or finished provided that it is dyed or printed and undergoes at least two subsequent
finishing processes in the territory of one or more of the parties to render it directly usable”.
11
Answer:
The dyed woven fabric (HS 5514.21) is in the same heading (HS 5514) as the non-originating raw
material (HS 5514.11) so the fabric cannot meet the CTH ROO.
Dyes and
Unbleached
pigment
fabric from Cina
from Japan
(HS 5514.11)
(HS 32)
Dyed woven
fabrics
(HS 5514.2)
The specific process of production ROO allows the use of unbleached (raw) fabric that is non-
originating provided at least two other finishing operations occur.
The unbleached fabric is also brushed, singed and mercerised. Brushing and mercerisation are on
the indicative list.
As the fabric is dyed and has undergone at least two finishing operations and is in a state where it
can be used to manufacture clothing, the dyed woven fabric is originating.
Clothing
The AANZFTA sets out Specific Process of Production ROO for clothing.
In these cases the specific process of production is used in combination with the RVC.
Profit may be included in RVC calculations under the AANZFTA. The clothing manufacturing sector
is particularly susceptible to manipulation of profit which would enable goods which have not
undergone a substantial transformation to qualify as originating goods.
The AANZFTA Parties have agreed that in addition to a RVC ROO clothing is required to be cut or
knit to shape and assembled in one or more of the Parties from fabric in order to be deemed
originating.
RVC(40) provided that the good is cut or knit to shape and assembled in the territory of one or more
of the parties.
12
Pattern Cuts Assembled
Example
5. Question:
Cotton tracksuits (FOB $10, HS 6112.11) are made in Cambodia from cotton fabric ($5, HS
5208.31) imported from China.
The factory in Cambodia cuts the fabric and sews the parts together.
The PSR subheading 6112.11 is “RVC(40) provided that the good is cut or knit to shape and
assembled in the territory of one or more of the parties or CC”.
Answer:
The manufacturer has chosen to use the combination RVC and Specific Process of Production
ROO.
Non-originating
Originating
cotton fabric from
cotton thread
China ($5, HS
and elastic
5208.31)
Cotton
tracksuits
(FOB $10,HS
6112.11)
13
Additionally, as the tracksuits were cut and assembled in Cambodia they meet the Specific Process
of Production ROO. The tracksuits are therefore originating goods.
The AANZFTA also has a Specific Process of Production ROO for certain made-up textile articles of
Chapter 63. Some of these goods are flat and their manufacture from fabric may be a simple
process, e.g. bed sheets and table cloths. A CC ROO would allow fabric, which is in a different
chapter of the HS to the finished goods, to be transformed into bed sheets and table cloths by
simple cutting and hemming. In order to better represent the concept of substantial transformation,
an additional requirement is placed on the CTC ROO for these products.
CC provided that where the starting material is fabric, the fabric is raw or unbleached fabric and fully
finished in the territory of one or more of the parties.
Example
6. Question:
Cotton bed sheets (HS 6302.21) are made in Viet Nam from printed cotton fabric (HS 5208.51)
imported from China.
The PSR for subheading 6302.21 is “CC provided that where the starting material is fabric, the
fabric is raw or unbleached fabric and fully finished in the territory of one or more of the Parties”. Are
the bed sheets originating?
Answer:
Printed cotton
Cotton thread
fabrics from China
(originating)
(HS 5208.51)
Bed sheeting
(non-
originating)
As the starting fabric was printed not raw or unbleached fabric that could be fully finished in the
territory of one or more of the Parties, the Made Up Textile Articles ROO has not been met. The bed
sheeting is therefore non-originating.
7. Question:
14
Cotton bed sheets (HS 6302.21) are made in Viet Nam from printed cotton fabric (HS 5208.51)
imported from Singapore.
Unbleached cotton fabric (HS 5208.11) was imported Singapore from China for finishing. The fully
finished fabric was exported from Singapore to Viet Nam. Originating cotton thread are imported
from Thailand.
The PSR subheading 6302.21 is “CC provided that where the starting material is fabric, the fabric is
raw or unbleached fabric and fully finished in the territory of one or more of the Parties”.
Answer:
As the starting fabric was unbleached fabric that was fully finished in Singapore the Made Up Textile
Articles ROO has been met.
The CC ROO has been met by the change from chapter 52 to chapter 63. The bed sheeting is
therefore originating.
An important characteristic of the fabric, clothing and some of the made-up textile articles rules is
that they can be considered to involve “full cumulation”. Full cumulation is where all manufacturing
and processing operations carried out in FTA parties is counted for the purposes of origin
determination.
In example 4 above, the parts for the tracksuit could be cut in Viet Nam (a Party to the AANZFTA)
and then assembled in Cambodia. The parts cut in Viet Nam can be taken into account in
determining whether the tracksuits assembled in Cambodia are originating whether or not the parts
themselves are AANZFTA originating. Full cumulation is important as it allows business to establish
manufacturing operations which best suit their long term requirements.
Example
8. Question:
Cotton tracksuits (FOB $10, HS 6112.11) are made in Cambodia from cotton fabric ($5, HS
5208.31) imported from China.
15
Originating cotton thread and elastic are imported from Thailand.
A factory in Viet Nam cuts the fabric and the Cambodian factory sews the parts together.
The PSR subheading 6112.11 is “RVC(40) provided that the good is cut or knit to shape and
assembled in the territory of one or more of the parties or CC”.
Answer:
The manufacturer has chosen to use the combination RVC and Specific Process of Production
ROO as the manufacturer knows the good meets the RVC(40) ROO.
AANZFTA
Parties
Vietnam
Cambodia
The tracksuits were cut in Viet Nam an AANZFTA Party and assembled in Cambodia also an
AANZFTA Party.
This is in accordance with the requirement that the good is cut or knit to shape and assembled in
the territory of one or more of the Parties. The tracksuits are therefore originating.
16