The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
Bhoomika, A., Malavika, D., & Sowmiya. S .M,
7LANG: Academic Writing
Miss. Swathi K.M.
February 11, 2025
The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
2
“Good vibes only”, A phrase often thrown around in our daily dictionary, but is it always helpful
to look at the bright side in life?. While the concept of “positivity” has been majorly linked to
‘good mental health’, it may not always be beneficial to maintain an overly optimistic mindset.
The mental health of an individual can play an essential role in maintaining their overall
wellbeing, it shapes their perceptions, thoughts, feelings and even responses in their day-to-day
lives. Excessive amounts of positivity is said to have an opposite effect from building resilience
on an individual's mental health. This article dwells deeper into the concept of positivity and its
toxic conflict, also referred to as “toxic positivity”, and the impact it may have on our mental
health. Furthermore, it provides certain strategies to encourage positive practices in our lives and
eliminate its negative counterpart.
Positivity refers to maintaining an optimistic outlook on life. It involves indulging in
positive thoughts, experiencing uplifting emotions, as well as exhibiting behaviors like kindness
and generosity. (Moberl & Watkins, 2008). It involves positive reasoning, changing the negative
musings into positive contemplations and seeing positive parts of a circumstance (Bekhet &
Zauszniewski 2013). Positive thinking around the globe is believed to be a major contributor for
good mental health.
The concept of mental health encompasses an individual's overall psychological
well-being. It is an umbrella term consists of various topics ranging from interpersonal
relationships, coping strategies, and self [Link] good mental health extends
beyond the mere absence of psychological illnesses, rather it refers to the presence of positive
attributes such as emotional resilience and overall psychological well-being. (Shoshtarirezvani,
M et al, 2021). The term ‘positive mental health’ refers to a state of well-being where an
The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
3
individual recognizes their potential and is able to cope well with stress, and contribute to their
life in a productive manner.
Positivity and optimism does in fact have an impact on mental health components, like
self-esteem, life satisfaction, and subjective well-being. This was demonstrated by an experiment
conducted by Shazeen Qamar and Nadia Yaqoob which showed that positivity is significantly
associated with better mental health, meaning etc and that individuals with higher levels of
optimism, are more likely to harbor better mental health. (Qamar S, Yaqoob N, 2023). These
results have been generalized over multiple studies in the past. (Pressman & Cohen, 2005; Ostir,
Markides, Peek, & Goodwin, 2001; Blanchflower & Oswald, 2007). Similarly, according to a
study done among university students by Shazeen and Nadia implies that people with high levels
of positivity are more strongly associated with components such as self-esteem and life
satisfaction. Thus proving that in general positivity is a crucial part in the life of humans
(Prinzing, 2021). Positivity can be inculcated by using strategies like coping techniques which
includes changing perception, planning time and seeking social support, majorly help in coping
with stressors, specifically in adolescents. Similarly enhancing one's problem solving skills and
cognitive restructuring is shown to be helpful in coping with stressful situations, in turn reducing
depression rates as studies have shown that problem-focused and emotion-focused coping
strategies protect individuals from depression (Dafogianni .C et al, 2020). On contrary, a very
high level of positivity is called toxic positivity and not considered healthy due to its harmful
nature.
Toxic positivity refers to being excessively optimistic and positive regardless of the
situation leading to a denial attitude towards an issue and suppression of negative feelings
(Wibowo,. 2020, p. 1). It instills the belief that one should always be in a positive frame of mind
The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
4
irrespective of the situation which invalidates unpleasant emotions (Zukerman,J. 2021).
According to a business psychologist Joshua Caraballo, toxic positivity occurs when there is
deliberate suppressing and dismissing of negative feelings (Korpar, 2022).
Toxic positivity has increased immensely due to social media influencing (Radin,. 2021).
The influencers have created a notion that ‘positivity’ is the solution to everything by flooding
and trending phrases like “good vibes only” on social media sites. (Chou., H,T,G. &,Edge.,N.
2012). The rise of toxic positivity is also attributed to the cultural expectations (Yakushko.,O.,
Blodgett.,E.,2021) like in Yoga and Hindu traditions, the concept of "santosha" focuses on
having a positive attitude despite the situational factors (Sharma.,N., 2012). Similarly, in Brazil,
the concept of "jeitinho brasileiro" states that one should work through difficult situations while
keeping the stress and disappointment hidden (Drury, J. & DaMatta, R. 2020). A study
conducted in the Middle East revealed that the cultural norms there do not encourage display of
negative feelings to preserve social harmony and uphold family honor (Dwairy., M. 2006). These
cultural expectations often build pressure on the individual to conceal their emotions and always
appear positive in order to conform to societal norms, hence promoting toxic positivity (Ji., L,J et
al. 2021).
Due to intense focus of the cultural norms and social media on toxic positivity on positive
thoughts and emotions, it often results in encouragement of suppression of negative feelings
leading to adverse psychological problems (Feltner., M.E., 2023). This suppression of emotions
results in weaker social support, reduced closeness in relationships, reduction in intensity of
positive emotions and increased cardiovascular activity. This claim is supported by a research
conducted by Megan Spokas, Jane A. Luterek, and Richard G. Heimberg which suggests that
toxic positivity promotes suppression of emotions which can lead to social anxiety (Spokas et al.,
The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
5
2008, p. 283). It has been noted that toxic positivity can cause more harm than good to the
mental well-being of an individual. This was demonstrated by an experiment conducted by
Joanne Wood, W.Q. Elaine Perunovic, and John W. Lee. The result of this experiment showed
that individuals who had low self-esteem reported a negative effect on their moods after
repeating positive statements like “I am a lovable person.”(Wood et al.,2009). A research by
Watson and Pennebaker (1989) indicates that there is correlation between frequency of
suppression of emotions and the intensity of psychological distress experienced over time.
Similarly, a study indicated an inverse correlation between suppression of emotions and level of
psychological distress (Ji., L,J. et al. 2021). Many researchers also suggest that having an overly
optimistic mind-frame can create a barrier in the acknowledgement of true emotions leading to
hindered emotional resilience and growth (Forgas.,J.P.,2013; Quoidbach.,J et al.,2015). A
research by Ehrenreich states that overemphasis on positivity can create hindrance in the
acceptance and resolving of true emotions.
It has been observed that not expressing emotions results in declined emotional
resilience, elevated stress levels and have a negative impact on interpersonal relationships
(Gross., J.J. & John., O.P. 2003; Butler., E.A. et al. 2003)). If the suppression of emotions
continues for a long duration, it can cause psychosomatic disorders, anxiety, depression etc
(Richards., J.M. & Gross., J.J. 2000). A study on emotional restraint and harmony revealed that
holding back of emotions is associated with increased intensity of symptoms of depression and
anxiety (Zhou., Q. et al. 2015). A research by American Psychological Association (2016)
revealed that individuals who do not suppress their emotions and rather accept it tend to have
lower stress levels and overall better mental well-being. Similarly, a study suggested that
individuals who let themselves experience emotions like sadness without self judgement have
The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
6
comparatively better emotional regulation and resilience (Zeidner., M., Matthews., G., &
Roberts., R.D. 2012). As toxic positivity has been noted to cause more harm than good to the
mental well-being of an individual, it is important to maintain an optimal level of positivity.
To counter toxic positivity, individuals can use Mindfulness- Based Stress Reduction
(MBSR) technique which allows them to acknowledge their thoughts and bodily sensations in
the present without any judgement (Kabat-Zinn, 2013). The individuals can also opt for
emotional intelligence training which involves activities like active listening, practicing empathy
etc(Hoe., S.L. & Greulich-Smith., T. 2022). In research, CBT has also been proved to be efficient
for long term mental health as it facilitates realistic thinking by taking into consideration both
negative and positive aspects (Beck., J.S. 2020). These strategies allow the individuals to
maintain their positivity at an adequate level ensuring that it is neither too low or high.
Positivity, while being widely known to foster a good state of mental well-being, it is
important to maintain it to an optimum level and distinguish it from its counterpart, toxic
positivity. While a balanced level of optimism leads to the development of healthy coping
strategies, and can foster emotional stability and resilience, exceeding the optimum level of
positivity can lead to psychological distress and suppressed emotions. Understanding negative
emotions and learning to accept them are crucial for an individual's overall well-being.
Identifying toxic positivity and learning how to strategize and counter it, is the key to achieving
good mental health.
References:
Bhattacharyya, R., Bhattacharyya, M. N., & Sharaff, M. S. (2021). Toxic Positivity and Mental
Health–It is ok to Not Be ok. Design Engineering, 5109-5127.
The fine line between positivity and toxic positivity
7
Dafogianni, C.; Pappa, D.; Mangoulia, P.; Kourti, F.E.; Koutelekos, I.; Dousis, E.; Margari, N.;
Ferentinou, E.; Stavropoulou, A.; Gerogianni, G.; et al. Anxiety, Stress and the Resilience of
University Students during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Healthcare 2022, 10,
2573–2584
Feltner, M. E. (2023). Toxic positivity and perceptions of mental health.
Qamar, S., & Yaqoob, N. (2023). Positivity level predicts better health and mental health among
adults. Journal of Current Health Sciences, 3(1), 13-20.
Shoshtarirezvani, M., Jaladati, S. F., Hojatansari, Z., & Bahrami, M. (2021). The effectiveness of
positivity education on students' mental health. New Approach in Educational Sciences, 3(1),
40-45
Wanjie, T.; Qian, D. Depressive symptoms among first-year Chinese undergraduates: The roles
of socio-demographics, coping style, and social support. Psychiatry Res. 2018, 270, 89–96.
Wyatt, Z. (2024). The Dark Side of# PositiveVibes: Understanding Toxic Positivity in Modern
Culture. Psychiatry.