Why are cities full of uncomfortable benches?
This one has armrests to prevent you from dozing off. To prevent you from
taking a nap.
Here’s another — again with the arms, the stiff metal.
And this one — it’s brand new.
The MTA in New York began installing them as part of a subway enhancement
plan.
And they don’t call it a bench. They prefer the term "leaning bars." So what if i
told you it was designed with discomfort in mind? New York City is filled with
some of the most innovative architecture and urban planning in the world.
Today, nearly every kind of public space here has been developed with close
attention to detail. So these benches are no mistake. They are designed to
allow you to sit but not get too cozy. And that is intentional.
The concept stems from a school of thought that goes by many names, but
today we'll use "defensive design." Defensive design is about moderating
behavior. The goal is to limit the ways an object can be misused. These
benches have armrests because that will prevent anyone from laying down.
Their short back is another nod to say, “This bench isn’t yours forever." This
trend is worldwide. And it’s not just in the benches.
When you start looking for defensive designs in New York City, you’ll find
examples everywhere. It’s the presence of security cameras in subway
turnstiles or Times Square. It’s these spikes on this column, meant to deter
birds. It’s the knobs on these ledges, to discourage skateboarders.
And there were once sprinklers underneath the awning of this bookstore, to
prevent people from sleeping there. It's sidewalk barriers. It’s even these
regular streetlights.
Streetlights are probably some of the most recognizable defensive designs.
When they surfaced in the 19th-century Western cities, the dynamic of urban
life changed. More people spent time outside at night, which drove economic
development and a reduction in crime.
Most hostile architecture tries to influence behavior in a similar way. The
designs attempt to make public space a bit more hospitable, more ideal.
Defensive designs can deter crime. It can prevent the destruction of public
property. And it can prevent loitering. But there is a reason why defensive
design is characterized as “hostile.”
Take the example of the bench again. Disability advocates have a problem with
that appearing in the MTA. One advocate pointed out that "People who travel
who have disabilities or just get tired sometimes need a bench to sit on, not a
wall to lean against." And while no one likes an uncomfortable bench, these
additions mean something more for people who are experiencing
homelessness.
The United States is currently experiencing a decline in the overall homeless
population. But in New York, the homeless population is growing. About 1800
people were found to have been sleeping in the subway. That’s because
emergency shelter isn’t always a viable option. There are several examples of
hostile architecture that target people who are homeless.
These designs imply that public space is not where homeless people should be.
As it goes, city planners have a dilemma — how do they design inclusive cities?
As for the enhanced subway initiative, the MTA’s mock designs highlight new
USB ports and electronic signage in stations. But you won’t find any press
materials highlighting this uncomfortable bench. Excuse me, the "leaning bar."
That’s because it makes for an uncomfortable discussion about who we design
public space for — and who gets left out.