0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views15 pages

Spps

This document presents a statistical analysis comparing the distances from home to campus among three groups of respondents using ANOVA. The results indicate that the null hypothesis is accepted, suggesting no significant difference in distances among the groups, as evidenced by a significance value of 0.826. Additionally, the data shows homogeneity of variance across the groups.

Uploaded by

ifanaharits942
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views15 pages

Spps

This document presents a statistical analysis comparing the distances from home to campus among three groups of respondents using ANOVA. The results indicate that the null hypothesis is accepted, suggesting no significant difference in distances among the groups, as evidenced by a significance value of 0.826. Additionally, the data shows homogeneity of variance across the groups.

Uploaded by

ifanaharits942
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

TUGAS MATA KULIAH STATISTIK

UJI BEDA PARAMTERIK DAN NON PARAMETRIK

Disusun oleh:
Anggit Dwi Putra P1337430323110

PRODI RADIOLOGI PURWOKERTO PROGRAM DIPLOMA TIGA


JURUSAN TEKNIK RADIODIAGNOSTIK DAN RADIOTERAPI
POLITEKNIK KESEHATAN KEMENTERIAN KESEHATAN SEMARANG
2025
1. Tabel data jarak dari rumah ke kampus dari 3 kelompok responden

Responden Jarak
1 41
1 24
1 35
1 17
1 19
1 10
1 25
1 15
1 32
1 38
2 30
2 17
2 16
2 17
2 17
2 20
2 39
2 39
2 40
2 13
3 12
3 15
3 33
3 17
3 27
3 38
3 10
3 15
3 29
3 30
2. Hasil Pengujian ANOVA

Explore

Notes
Output Created 05-DEC-2025 17:35:36
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 30
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined missing
Handling values for dependent
variables are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on
cases with no missing
values for any
dependent variable or
factor used.
Syntax EXAMINE
VARIABLES=Jarak BY
Responden
/PLOT BOXPLOT
STEMLEAF NPPLOT
/COMPARE GROUPS
/STATISTICS
DESCRIPTIVES
/CINTERVAL 95
/MISSING LISTWISE
/NOTOTAL.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.88


Elapsed Time 00:00:00.65
Responden

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
Responden N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jarak 1 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 10 100.0%
2 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 10 100.0%
3 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 10 100.0%

Descriptives
Responden Statistic Std. Error
Jarak 1 Mean 25.60 3.327
95% Confidence Interval Lower 18.07
for Mean Bound
Upper 33.13
Bound
5% Trimmed Mean 25.61
Median 24.50
Variance 110.711
Std. Deviation 10.522
Minimum 10
Maximum 41
Range 31
Interquartile Range 19
Skewness .088 .687
Kurtosis -1.337 1.334
2 Mean 24.80 3.470
95% Confidence Interval Lower 16.95
for Mean Bound
Upper 32.65
Bound
5% Trimmed Mean 24.61
Median 18.50
Variance 120.400
Std. Deviation 10.973
Minimum 13
Maximum 40
Range 27
Interquartile Range 22
Skewness .580 .687
Kurtosis -1.743 1.334
3 Mean 22.60 3.124
95% Confidence Interval Lower 15.53
for Mean Bound
Upper 29.67
Bound
5% Trimmed Mean 22.44
Median 22.00
Variance 97.600
Std. Deviation 9.879
Minimum 10
Maximum 38
Range 28
Interquartile Range 17
Skewness .185 .687
Kurtosis -1.625 1.334

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Responden Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Jarak 1 .135 10 .200 *
.955 10 .727
2 .269 10 .039 .803 10 .016
3 .215 10 .200 *
.912 10 .297
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Jarak

Stem-and-Leaf Plots

Jarak Stem-and-Leaf Plot for


Responden= 1

Frequency Stem & Leaf

4.00 1 . 0579
2.00 2 . 45
3.00 3 . 258
1.00 4 . 1

Stem width: 10
Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Jarak Stem-and-Leaf Plot for


Responden= 2

Frequency Stem & Leaf

5.00 1 . 36777
1.00 2 . 0
3.00 3 . 099
1.00 4 . 0

Stem width: 10
Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Jarak Stem-and-Leaf Plot for


Responden= 3

Frequency Stem & Leaf


2.00 1 . 02
3.00 1 . 557
.00 2 .
2.00 2 . 79
2.00 3 . 03
1.00 3 . 8

Stem width: 10
Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Normal Q-Q Plots


Detrended Normal Q-Q Plots
Oneway
Notes
Output Created 05-DEC-2025 17:37:28
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 30
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined missing
Handling values are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each
analysis are based on
cases with no missing
data for any variable in
the analysis.
Syntax ONEWAY Jarak BY
Responden
/ES=OVERALL
/STATISTICS
DESCRIPTIVES
HOMOGENEITY
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/CRITERIA=CILEVEL(0.
95)
/POSTHOC=TUKEY
BONFERRONI
ALPHA(0.05).

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00


Elapsed Time 00:00:00.01

Descriptives
Jarak
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper Minimu
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound m
1 10 25.60 10.522 3.327 18.07 33.13 10
2 10 24.80 10.973 3.470 16.95 32.65 13
3 10 22.60 9.879 3.124 15.53 29.67 10
Total 30 24.33 10.182 1.859 20.53 28.14 10

Descriptives
Jarak

Maximum
1 41
2 40
3 38
Total 41

Tests of Homogeneity of Variances


Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Jarak Based on Mean .192 2 27 .826
Based on Median .003 2 27 .997
Based on Median and .003 2 18.110 .997
with adjusted df
Based on trimmed mean .175 2 27 .841

ANOVA
Jarak
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 48.267 2 24.133 .220 .804
Groups
Within Groups 2958.400 27 109.570
Total 3006.667 29

ANOVA Effect Sizesa,b


95% Confidence
Point Interval
Estimate Lower Upper
Jarak Eta-squared .016 .000 .134
Epsilon-squared -.057 -.074 .069
Omega-squared Fixed- -.055 -.071 .067
effect
Omega-squared -.027 -.034 .035
Random-effect
a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-
effect model.
b. Negative but less biased estimates are retained, not rounded to zero.

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Jarak
95%
Confidence
Mean Interval
(I) (J) Difference (I- Lower
Responden Responden J) Std. Error Sig. Bound
Tukey 1 2 .800 4.681 .984 -10.81
HSD 3 3.000 4.681 .799 -8.61
2 1 -.800 4.681 .984 -12.41
3 2.200 4.681 .886 -9.41
3 1 -3.000 4.681 .799 -14.61
2 -2.200 4.681 .886 -13.81
Bonferroni 1 2 .800 4.681 1.000 -11.15
3 3.000 4.681 1.000 -8.95
2 1 -.800 4.681 1.000 -12.75
3 2.200 4.681 1.000 -9.75
3 1 -3.000 4.681 1.000 -14.95
2 -2.200 4.681 1.000 -14.15

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Jarak
95%
Confidence
Interval
(I) (J) Upper
Responden Responden Bound
1 2 12.41
Tukey 3 14.61
HSD 2 1 10.81
3 13.81
3 1 8.61
2 9.41
Bonferroni 1 2 12.75
3 14.95
2 1 11.15
3 14.15
3 1 8.95
2 9.75

Homogeneous Subsets

Jarak
Subset for
alpha = 0.05
Responden N 1
Tukey HSD 3 a
10 22.60
2 10 24.80
1 10 25.60
Sig. .799
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are
displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 10.000.

3. Homogenitas uji Ho

-Ho diterima bila nilai sig > 0,05

-Ho ditolak bila nilai sig < 0,05

Sig = 0.826 > 0.05

Maka Kesimpulan dari data tersebut adalah homogen


4. KURVA

Diketahui :

F Hitung = 0,220

K = Jumlah Variabel / Kelompok = 3

N = Jumlah Sampel = 30

Jawab :

df1= K-1

= 3-1

=2

df2= N-K

= 30-3

= 27

Maka, f tabel yang di dapatkan adalah 3,35

Sehingga F hitung < f tabel. Kesimpulan yang dapat di ambil adalah

Ha ditolak dan H0 diterima.

You might also like