0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views12 pages

Structural Calculation 2

The document outlines the design calculations for a free-standing solar carport located at 901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL, adhering to relevant building codes and standards. It includes detailed information on design actions, seismic and wind load considerations, and structural analysis for components such as round HSS columns. The document emphasizes the confidential nature of the information and is intended solely for the use of STECH INT’L's client.

Uploaded by

dauda suleiman
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views12 pages

Structural Calculation 2

The document outlines the design calculations for a free-standing solar carport located at 901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL, adhering to relevant building codes and standards. It includes detailed information on design actions, seismic and wind load considerations, and structural analysis for components such as round HSS columns. The document emphasizes the confidential nature of the information and is intended solely for the use of STECH INT’L's client.

Uploaded by

dauda suleiman
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Project Job Ref.

Calculation for free standing Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
1
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
16/01/2026 16/01/2026 ENGR. Richard 16/01/2026
Richard Dylan .S John Weiskopf

DESIGN INFORMATION
CODE OF PRACTICE
All civil and structural works are designed according to the latest edition of the following relevant Standards
and Codes of Practice:
• International Building Code (IBC) 2021
• International Residential Code (IRC) 2021
• ASCE 7-22 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
• 2023 8th Edition Florida Building code (ASCE 7-22)
• AISC 360 Specification for Structural Steel Building.

1.2 DESIGN ACTIONS

Load Type Load (psf)


Self (material)
Self-Weight

SDL for Roof


(Flooring material) 10

SDL for Roof 10


(Roofing Materials)
Live Load 40

Seismic Design Category


A
Maximum Wind speed Expected 175 mph
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for free standing Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
2
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
16/01/2026 16/01/2026 ENGR. Richard 16/01/2026
Richard Dylan .S John Weiskopf

Table of Content:

Contents
DESIGN INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................................................1
Table of Content: ....................................................................................................................................................................2
Disclaimer: .................................................................................................................................................................................3
SEISMIC DESIGN...............................................................................................................................................................4
WIND LOAD (ASCE 7 – 05)..............................................................................................................................................5
ROUND HSS COLUMN .....................................................................................................................................................6
Column and loading details ........................................................................................................................................6
Section classification ...................................................................................................................................................7
Slenderness ....................................................................................................................................................................7
Second order effects ....................................................................................................................................................7
Compressive strength..................................................................................................................................................8
Flexural strength about the major axis ...................................................................................................................8
Combined forces ...........................................................................................................................................................8
RC WALL DESIGN .............................................................................................................................................................9
PILE ANALYSIS (FHWA) ................................................................................................................................................11
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
3
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

Disclaimer:

This document has been prepared in accordance with the STECH INT’L appointment scope established
with our esteemed client and is strictly governed by the terms outlined in that appointment. It is crucial
to recognize the confidential nature of this document, as it is specifically intended for the exclusive use
and reliance of STECH INT’L's client. It is important to note that STECH INT’L bears no liability for
any utilization of this document by any party other than its designated client, and such utilization is solely
permitted for the explicitly stated purposes outlined within the document, for which it was meticulously
prepared and provided. It is of utmost importance to emphasize that without the prior written permission
of a Director of STECH INT’L, no individual other than the client is authorized to copy (in whole or in
part), utilization or rely upon the contents of this document. Furthermore, it is crucial to approach any
advice, opinions, or recommendations contained within this document with due diligence, ensuring that
they are carefully assessed and relied upon solely within the broader context of the document as a whole.
Lastly, it is imperative to understand that the contents of this document are not intended to serve as a
substitute for professional legal, business, or tax advice or opinion.
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
4
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

SEISMIC DESIGN
In accordance with ASCE 7-22
Tedds calculation version 3.1.05

Site parameters
Site class; D
Mapped acceleration parameters (Section 11.4.3)
at short period; SS = 0.05
at 1 sec period; S1 = 0.04
Spectral response acceleration parameters
at short period (cl. 11.4.3); SMS = 0.100
at 1 sec period (cl. 11.4.3); SM1 = 0.040
Design spectral acceleration parameters (Sect 11.4.4)
at short period (Eq. 11.4-1); SDS = 2 / 3  SMS = 0.067
at 1 sec period (Eq. 11.4-1); SD1 = 2 / 3  SM1 = 0.027

Seismic design category


Risk category (Table 1.5-1); II

Seismic design category based on short period response acceleration (Table 11.6-1)
A
Seismic design category based on 1 sec period response acceleration (Table 11.6-2)
A
Seismic design category; A
Seismic base shear (Sect 11.7)
Effective seismic weight of the structure; W = 225.0 kips
Seismic base shear (Eq. 9.5.3-1); V = 0.01  W = 2.25 kips

Vertical distribution of seismic forces (Sect 11.7)


Lateral force induce at level i; Fx = 0.01  wx

Vertical force distribution table


Portion of effective Lateral force induced at
Height from base to
Level seismic weight assigned Level i
Level i (ft), hx
to Level i (kips) (kips),
1 13.00 225.0; 2.3;
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
5
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

WIND LOAD (ASCE 7 – 05)


TEDDS calculation version 1.2.04

Classification summary
Structure is a building
Structure is Rigid
Mean roof height; h = 13.0 ft
Projected area normal to wind; Af = 108.0 ft2
Roof angle;  = 0.0 deg

Procedure
Occupancy category (table 1-1); Category = 2
Basic wind speed (sect. 6.5.4); V = 175.0 mph
Region; Hurricane Prone
Importance factor ( table 6-1); I = 1.00
Exposure category (sect. 6.5.6); C
Wind directionality factor; Kd = 0.85
Topographic factor; Kzt = 1.00
Design procedure - analytical procedure (Method2)
Structure is open
Velocity pressure at mean roof height ‘h’(ASCE 7-05, cl. 6.5.10)
Case of loading system (table 6-3); Case = 2
Velocity pressure exposure coefficient; Kh = 0.85
Velocity pressure at mean roof height ‘h’; qh = 0.00256  Kh  Kzt  Kd  V2  I  1 psf / mph2 = 56.64 psf

Design wind force for monoslope roof of open buildings


Velocity pressure at mean roof height ‘h’; qh = 56.64 psf
Wind direction;  = 180
Type of wind flow; Clear
Load case; A
Gust effect factor (sect. 6.5.8); G = 0.85
Net pressure coefficient for windward half of roof; CNW = 1.20
Net pressure coefficient for leeward half of roof; CNL = 0.30
Net design pres. for windward half of roof (eq. 6.25); pWW = qh  G  CNW = 57.78 psf
Net design pres. for leeward half of roof (eq. 6.25); pLW = qh  G  CNL = 14.44 psf
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
6
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

ROUND HSS COLUMN


Steel column design in accordance with AISC360-16 and the LRFD method
Tedds calculation version 1.0.11

Column and loading details


Column details
Column section; HSS 5x0.500
Design loading
Required axial strength; Pr = 35 kips; (Compression)
Moment about x axis at end 1; Mx1 = 3.6 kips_ft
Moment about x axis at end 2; Mx2 = 0.0 kips_ft
Single curvature bending about x axis
Maximum moment about x axis; Mx = max(abs(Mx1), abs(Mx2)) = 3.6 kips_ft
Moment about y axis at end 1; My1 = 3.6 kips_ft
Moment about y axis at end 2; My2 = 0.0 kips_ft
Single curvature bending about y axis
Maximum moment about y axis; My = max(abs(My1), abs(My2)) = 3.6 kips_ft
Maximum shear force parallel to y axis; Vry = 1.0 kips
Maximum shear force parallel to x axis; Vrx = 1.0 kips
Material details
Steel grade; A500 Gr. B
Yield strength; Fy = 42 ksi
Ultimate strength; Fu = 58 ksi
Modulus of elasticity; E = 29000 ksi
Shear modulus of elasticity; G = 11200 ksi
Unbraced lengths
For buckling about x axis; Lx = 84 in
For buckling about y axis; Ly = 84 in
For torsional buckling; Lz = 84 in
Effective length factors
For buckling about x axis; Kx = 1.00
For buckling about y axis; Ky = 1.00
For torsional buckling; Kz = 1.00
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
7
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

Effective unbraced lengths


For buckling about x axis; Lcx = Lx  Kx = 84 in
For buckling about y axis; Lcy = Ly  Ky = 84 in
For torsional buckling; Lcz = Lz  Kz = 84 in

Section classification
Section classification for local buckling (cl. B4)
Width to thickness ratio;  = Do / t = 10.753

Compression
Limit for nonslender section; r_c = 0.11  E / Fy = 75.952
The section is nonslender in compression
Flexure
Limit for compact section; p_f = 0.07  E / Fy = 48.333
Limit for noncompact section; r_f = 0.31  E / Fy = 214.048
The section is compact in flexure

Slenderness
Member slenderness
Slenderness ratio about x axis; SRx = Lcx / rx = 52.2
Slenderness ratio about y axis; SRy = Lcy / ry = 52.2

Second order effects


Second order effects for bending about x axis (cl. C2.1b)
Coefficient Cm; Cmx = 0.6 + 0.4  Mx2 / Mx1 = ;0.600
Coefficient ;  = 1.0
Elastic critical buckling stress; Pe1x = 2  E  Ix / (K1x  Lx)2 = 697.7 kips
P- amplifier; B1x = max(1.0, Cmx / (1 -   Pr / Pe1x)) = 1.000
Required flexural strength; Mrx = B1x  Mx = 3.6 kips_ft

Second order effects for bending about y axis (cl. C2.1b)


Coefficient Cm; Cmy = 0.6 + 0.4  My2 / My1 = ;0.600
Coefficient ;  = 1.0
Elastic critical buckling stress; Pe1y = 2  E  Iy / (K1y  Ly)2 = 697.7 kips
P- amplifier; B1y = max(1.0, Cmy / (1 -   Pr / Pe1y)) = 1.000
Required flexural strength; Mry = B1y  My = 3.6 kips_ft

Design of members for shear parallel to y axis - Chapter G


Required shear strength; Vry = 1.000 kips
Nominal shear strength - eq G5-1; Vny = 0.6  Fy  A / 2 = 83.412 kips
Resistance factor for shear; v = 0.90
Design shear strength; Vcy = v  Vny = 75.071 kips

Design of members for shear parallel to x axis - Chapter G


Required shear strength; Vrx = 1.000 kips
Nominal shear strength - eq G5-1; Vnx = 0.6  Fy  A / 2 = 83.412 kips
Resistance factor for shear; v = 0.90
Design shear strength; Vcx = v  Vnx = 75.071 kips
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
8
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

Compressive strength
Flexural buckling about x axis (cl. E3)
Elastic critical buckling stress; Fex = 2  E / (SRx)2 = 105.1 ksi
Flexural buckling stress; Fcrx = (0.658Fy / Fex)  Fy = 35.5 ksi
Nominal compressive strength for flexural buckling; Pnx = Fcrx  A = 235.2 kips

Flexural buckling about y axis (cl. E3)


Elastic critical buckling stress; Fey = 2  E / (SRy)2 = 105.1 ksi
Flexural buckling stress; Fcry = (0.658Fy / Fey)  Fy = 35.5 ksi
Nominal compressive strength for flexural buckling; Pny = Fcry  A = 235.2 kips

Design compressive strength (cl.E1)


Resistance factor for compression; c = 0.90
Design compressive strength; Pc = c  min(Pnx, Pny) = ;211.7; kips
PASS - The design compressive strength exceeds the required compressive strength

Flexural strength about the major axis


Yielding (cl. F8.1)
Nominal flexural strength; Mnx_yld = Mny_yld = Fy  Z = 33.6 kips_ft

Design flexural strength (cl. F1)


Resistance factor for flexure; b = 0.90
Design flexural strength; Mcx = Mcy = b  Mnx_yld = ;30.2; kips_ft
PASS - The design flexural strength about the x axis exceeds the required flexural strength
PASS - The design flexural strength about the y axis exceeds the required flexural strength

Combined forces
Member utilization (cl. H1.1)
Equation H1-1b; UR = abs(Pr) / (2  Pc) + (Mrx / Mcx + Mry / Mcy) = 0.321
PASS - The member is adequate for the combined forces
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
9
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

RC WALL DESIGN
In accordance with ACI 318-19 (22)
Tedds calculation version 1.2.08

Geometry of wall
Depth of wall; h = 9.00 in
Clear cover to reinforcement (both sides); cc = 1.50 in
Unsupported height of wall; lu = 36.0 in
Effective height factor; k = 1.00
Reinforcement of wall
Numbers of reinforcement layers; Nl = 2
Vertical steel bar diameter number; Dver_num = 3
Spacing of vertical steel; sv = 12.00 in
Diameter of vertical steel bar; Dver = 0.375 in
Horizontal steel bar diameter number; Dhor_num = 3
Spacing of horizontal steel; sh = 7.00 in
Diameter of horizontal bar; Dhor = 0.375 in
Specified yield strength of reinforcement; fy = 60000 psi
Specified compressive strength of concrete; f'c = 3000 psi
Modulus of elasticity of bar reinforcement; Es = 29  106 psi
Modulus of elasticity of concrete; Ec = 57000  f’c1/2  (1psi)1/2 = 3122019 psi
Ultimate design strain; c = 0.003 in/in
Compression-controlled strain limit ty = 0.00207

Check for minimum area of vertical steel of double layer reinforcement wall to cl. 11.6.1
Gross area of wall per running foot length; Ag = h 12in = 108.000 in2
Numbers of vertical bars per running foot length; Nv = 12in/sv = 1.000
Area of vertical steel per running foot length; Ast_v =2 Nv  ( Dver2) / 4 = 0.221 in2
Minimum area of vertical steel required; Ast_v_min= 0.130 in2
PASS- Minimum vertical steel check
Check for minimum area of horizontal steel of double layer reinforcement wall to cl. 11.6.1
Gross area of wall per running foot length; Ag = h 12in = 108.000 in2
Number of horizontal bar per running foot height; Nh = 12in / sh = 1.714
Area of horizontal steel per running foot height; Ast_h = 2Nh  ( Dhor2) / 4 = 0.379 in2
Minimum area of horizontal steel required; Ast_h_min= 0.216 in2
PASS- Minimum horizontal steel check
Unbraced wall slenderness check to 6.2.5
Permissible slenderness ratio; sr_perm = 22 = 22.0
Radius of gyration; rmin = 0.3  h = 2.70 in
Actual slenderness ratio; sr_act = k  lu / rmin = 13.33
Wall is unbraced short wall
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
10
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

Design loads for wall subjected to shear and axial load


Ultimate axial force per running foot; Pu_act = 50.00 kips/ft
Ultimate shear force per running foot; Vu_act = 7.50 kips/ft
Check for axial load carrying capacity of wall subjected to shear and axial load cl. [Link]
Strength reduction factor;  = 0.65
Ultimate axial load capacity of wall; Pu =0.8(0.85f’c(Ag - Ast_v)/1ft+fyAst_v/1ft) = 149.807 kips/ft
PASS- Wall is safe in axial loading
Check for shear capacity of wall cl. 22.5
Required shear strength Vu_act = 7.500 kips/ft
Strength reduction factor v = 0.75
Effective cover to reinforcement; d’ = cc + (Dver/2) = 1.688 in
Depth of tension steel; dt = h - d’ = 7.313 in
Size effect factor – cl. [Link].3 s = min((2 / (1 + (dt / 1 in) / 10)),1.0) = 1.00
Ratio of longitudinal reinforcement  w = As / (dt  12 in)= 0.001
Maximum shear force resisting capacity of wall Vmax = 5 ×   (f’c × 1 psi)  dt = 24.031 kips/ft
Shear strength provided by concrete Vc1 = (8 × s ×   ( w)1/3  (f’c × 1 psi) + Pu_act / (6  Ag)  12 in)  dt = 10.922
kips/ft
Design shear capacity of section Vc = v × min(Vc1, Vmax)= 8.192 kips/ft
PASS- Wall is safe in shear force
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
11
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

PILE ANALYSIS (FHWA)


In accordance with ASD method
Tedds calculation version 1.0.08

Pile details
Installation method; Driven
Shape; 12 in diameter
Length; L = 6.67 ft
Material details
Material; Concrete
Concrete strength; f’c = 3000 psi
Modulus of elasticity; E = 57000  (f'c  1 psi) = 3122 ksi

Geometric properties
Pile section depth; h = 12 in
Bearing area; Abearing =   h2 / 4 = 113.1 in2
Pile perimeter; Perimpile =   h = 37.7 in
Moment of inertia; I =   h4 / 64 = 1018 in4
Section modulus; S =   h3 / 32 = 169.65 in3

Stratum details
Stratum Geomaterial Thickness, t stratai Service unit Service unit side Service unit side
(ft) bearing, qbi friction, fsi friction, uplift
(ksf) (ksf) fsUi (ksf)
1 Cohesive 2 - 0.95 0.76
2 Cohesionless 1 - 1.44 1.15
3 Cohesive 1 - 1.23 0.99
4 Cohesive 3 51.7 2.59 2.07

Loading details
Design axial load, compression; Pc = 75 kips
Design axial load, uplift; Pt = 22.5 kips
Project Job Ref.

Calculation for Solar Carport 34


Address: Sheet no./rev.
901 E. Kenedy Blvd, Tampa, FL 33602
12
BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE APP'D BY DATE
RICHARD DYLAN .S 16/01/2026 JOHN WEISKOPF 16/01/2026 ENGR. RICHARD 16/01/2026

Axial compression resistance


Service axial bearing resistance; Rb = Abearing  qb = 40.6 kips
Service axial friction resistance per stratum
Stratum 1; Rs1 = fs1  Perimpile  tstrata1 = 6 kips
Stratum 2; Rs2 = fs2  Perimpile  tstrata2 = 4.5 kips
Stratum 3; Rs3 = fs3  Perimpile  tstrata3 = 3.9 kips
Stratum 4; Rs4 = fs4  Perimpile  (L - Dstrata4) = 21.7 kips
Service axial friction resistance; Rs = Rs1 + Rs2 + Rs3 + Rs4 = 36.1 kips
Allowable axial design load; Rn = Rb + Rs = 76.7 kips
Pc / Rn = 0.978
PASS - Allowable axial load exceeds design load
Axial uplift resistance (FHWA HI-98-032, [Link])
Service axial friction uplift resistance per stratum
Stratum 1; RsU1 = (fsU1  Perimpile  tstrata1) = 4.8 kips
Stratum 2; RsU2 = (fsU2  Perimpile  tstrata2) = 3.6 kips
Stratum 3; RsU3 = (fsU3  Perimpile  tstrata3) = 3.1 kips
Stratum 4; RsU4 = (fsU4  Perimpile  (L - Dstrata4)) = 17.4 kips
Service axial friction uplift resistance; RsU = RsU1 + RsU2 + RsU3 + RsU4 = 28.9 kips
Allowable axial uplift design load; RnU = RsU = 28.9 kips
Pt / RnU = 0.78
PASS - Allowable axial uplift design load exceeds uplift design load

You might also like