Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
1
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

DESIGN INFORMATION
CODE OF PRACTICE
All civil and structural works are designed according to the latest
edition of the following relevant Standards and Codes of Practice:
• International Building Code (IBC) 2021
• International Residential Code (IRC) 2021
• ASCE 7-22 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
• The 2018 National Design Specification (NDS) for Wood Construction

1.2 DESIGN ACTIONS

Load Type Load (psf)

Self
Self-Weight (material)

SDL
for Roof 10
(Flooring material)
SDL for Roof 10
(Roofing
Materials)
Live Load 40

Roof Live Load

12(20)
Seismic Design Category B
Termite Risk Very Heavy
Ground Snow Load
0
Wind speed
115 mph
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
2
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Table of Content:

Contents
DESIGN INFORMATION .........................................................................................................................................................1
Table of Content: .......................................................................................................................................................2
Disclaimer: .........................................................................................................................................................................3
SEISMIC FORCES ..............................................................................................................................................................4
WIND LOADING ...................................................................................................................................................................6
STRUCTURAL GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER (GLULAM) MEMBER ANALYSIS & DESIGN (NDS) ...............12
WOOD MEMBER DESIGN (NDS 2018) ........................................................................................................................15
Design section 1 ...................................................................................................................................................15
Design section 2 ...................................................................................................................................................16
Footing analysis .......................................................................................................................................................18
Footing design ............................................................................................................................................................20
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
3
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Disclaimer:

This document has been prepared in accordance with the STECH INT’L
appointment scope established with our esteemed client and is strictly
governed by the terms outlined in that appointment. It is crucial to
recognize the confidential nature of this document, as it is
specifically intended for the exclusive use and reliance of STECH
INT’L's client. It is important to note that STECH INT’L bears no
liability for any utilization of this document by any party other than
its designated client, and such utilization is solely permitted for the
explicitly stated purposes outlined within the document, for which it
was meticulously prepared and provided. It is of utmost importance to
emphasize that without the prior written permission of a Director of
STECH INT’L, no individual other than the client is authorized to copy
(in whole or in part), utilization or rely upon the contents of this
document. Furthermore, it is crucial to approach any advice, opinions,
or recommendations contained within this document with due diligence,
ensuring that they are carefully assessed and relied upon solely within
the broader context of the document as a whole. Lastly, it is imperative
to understand that the contents of this document are not intended to
serve as a substitute for professional legal, business, or tax advice
or opinion.
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
4
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

SEISMIC FORCES
In accordance with ASCE 7-22
Tedds calculation version 3.1.05

Site parameters
Site class; C
Mapped acceleration parameters (Section 11.4.3)
at short period; SS = 0.195
at 1 sec period; S1 = 0.07
Spectral response acceleration parameters
at short period (cl. 11.4.3); SMS = 0.210
at 1 sec period (cl. 11.4.3); SM1 = 0.125
Design spectral acceleration parameters (Sect 11.4.4)
at short period (Eq. 11.4-1); SDS = 2 / 3  SMS = 0.140
at 1 sec period (Eq. 11.4-1); SD1 = 2 / 3  SM1 = 0.083
Seismic design category
Risk category (Table 1.5-1); II

Seismic design category based on short period response acceleration (Table 11.6-1)
A
Seismic design category based on 1 sec period response acceleration (Table 11.6-2)
B
Seismic design category; B
Approximate fundamental period
Height above base to highest level of building; hn = 11 ft

From Table 12.8-2:

Structure type; All other systems
Building period parameter Ct; Ct = 0.02
Building period parameter x; x = 0.75

Approximate fundamental period (Eq 12.8-7); Ta = Ct ´ (hn)x ´ 1sec / (1ft)x=

0.121 sec
Building fundamental period (Sect 12.8.2); T = Ta = 0.121 sec
Long-period transition period; TL = 12 sec
Multi-Period Design Response Spectrum
5%-damped design spectral resp. acc. parameter; Sa = 0.14
Maximum Sa value; Sa,max = 0.21
Period T at which Sa is maximum; TSa,max = 0.15 s
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
5
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Seismic response coefficient

Seismic force-resisting system (Table 12.2-1); B_BUILDING_FRAME_SYSTEMS
3. Ordinary steel concentrically braced frames
Response modification factor (Table 12.2-1); R = 3.25
Seismic importance factor (Table 1.5-2); Ie = 1.000
Seismic response coefficient (Sect [Link])
Calculated (Eq 12.8-2); Cs_calc = Sa,max / (R / Ie) = 0.0646
Minimum (Eq.12.8-6); Cs_min = max(0.044  SDS  Ie,0.01) = 0.0100
Seismic response coefficient; Cs = 0.0646
Seismic base shear (Sect 12.8.1)
Effective seismic weight of the structure; W = 225.0 kips
Seismic response coefficient; Cs = 0.0646
Seismic base shear (Eq 12.8-1); V = Cs ´ W = 14.5 kips
Vertical distribution of seismic forces (Sect 12.8.3)
Vertical distribution factor (Eq 12.8-12); Cvx = wx  hxk / S(wi ´ hik)
Lateral force induced at level i (Eq 12.8-11); Fx = Cvx  V
Vertical force distribution table
Portion of
effective Distributio Lateral
Height from Vertical
seismic n exponent force
base to distributio
Level weight related to induced at
Level i n factor,
assigned to building Level i
(ft), hx Cvx
Level i period, k (kips), Fx;
(kips), wx
1 11.0; 225.0; 1.00; 1.000; 14.5;
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
6
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

WIND LOADING
In accordance with ASCE7-22
Using the directional design method
Tedds calculation version 2.1.19

Building data
Type of roof; Flat
Length of building; b = 24.00 ft
Width of building; d = 12.00 ft
Height to eaves; H = 10.00 ft
Height of parapet; hp = 0.50 ft
Mean height; h = 10.00 ft
General wind load requirements
Basic wind speed; V = 115.0 mph
Risk category; II
Wind directionality factor (Table 26.6-1); Kd = 0.85
Ground elevation above sea level; zgl = 2640 ft
Ground elevation factor; Ke = exp(-0.0000362 ´ zgl/1ft) = 0.91
Exposure category (cl 26.7.3); C
Enclosure classification (cl.26.12); Partially enclosed buildings
Internal pressure coef +ve (Table 26.13-1); GCpi_p = 0.55
Internal pressure coef –ve (Table 26.13-1); GCpi_n = -0.55
Gust effect factor; Gf = 0.85
Minimum roof design wind load (cl.27.1.5); pmin_r = 8 psf
Minimum wall design wind load (cl.27.1.5); pmin_w = 16 psf
Topography
Topography factor not significant; Kzt = 1.0
Velocity pressure equation; q = 0.00256  Kz  Kzt  Ke  V2  1psf/mph2
Velocity pressures table
z (ft) Kz (Table 26.10-1) qz (psf)
10.00 0.85 26.15
10.50 0.85 26.15
Peak velocity pressure for internal pressure
Peak velocity pressure – internal (as roof press.); qi = 26.15 psf
Parapet pressures and forces
Velocity pressure at top of parapet; qp = 26.15 psf
Combined net pressure coefficient, leeward; GCpnl = -1.0
Combined net parapet pressure, leeward; ppl = Kd  qp  GCpnl = -22.23 psf
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
7
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Combined net pressure coefficient, windward; GCpnw = 1.5

Combined net parapet pressure, windward; ppw = Kd  qp  GCpnw = 33.35 psf
Wind direction 0 deg:
Leeward parapet force; Fw,wpl_0 = ppl  hp  b = -0.3 kips
Windward parapet force; Fw,wpw_0 = ppw  hp  b = 0.4 kips
Wind direction 90 deg:
Leeward parapet force; Fw,wpl_90 = ppl  hp  d = -0.1 kips
Windward parapet force; Fw,wpw_90 = ppw  hp  d = 0.2 kips
Pressures and forces
Net pressure; p = Kd  q  Gf  Cpe - Kd  qi  GCpi;
Net force; Fw = p ´ Aref;
Roof load case 1 - Wind 0, GCpi 0.55, -cpe
Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A (-ve) 10.00 -1.16 26.15 -34.06 120.00 -4.09

B (-ve) 10.00 -0.77 26.15 -26.71 120.00 -3.21
C (-ve) 10.00 -0.63 26.15 -24.20 48.00 -1.16
Total vertical net force; Fw,v = -8.45 kips
Total horizontal net force; Fw,h = 0.00 kips
Walls load case 1 - Wind 0, GCpi 0.55, -cpe
Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A 10.00 0.80 26.15 2.89 240.00 0.69

B 10.00 -0.50 26.15 -21.68 240.00 -5.20
C 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -25.46 120.00 -3.05
D 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -25.46 120.00 -3.05
Overall loading
Projected vertical plan area of wall; Avert_w_0 = b  (H+ hp) = 252.00 ft2
Projected vertical area of roof; Avert_r_0 = 0.00 ft2
Minimum overall horizontal loading; Fw,total_min = pmin_w  Avert_w_0 + pmin_r  Avert_r_0 = 4.03 kips
Leeward net force; Fl = Fw,wB + Fw,wpl_0 = -5.5 kips
Windward net force; Fw = Fw,wA + Fw,wpw_0 = 1.1 kips
Overall horizontal loading; Fw,total = max(Fw - Fl + Fw,h, Fw,total_min) = 6.6 kips
Roof load case 2 - Wind 0, GCpi -0.55, -1cpe
Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A (+ve) 10.00 -0.18 26.15 8.83 120.00 1.06

B (+ve) 10.00 -0.18 26.15 8.83 120.00 1.06
C (+ve) 10.00 -0.18 26.15 8.83 48.00 0.42
Total vertical net force; Fw,v = 2.54 kips
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
8
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Total horizontal net force; Fw,h = 0.00 kips

Walls load case 2 - Wind 0, GCpi -0.55, -1cpe
Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A 10.00 0.80 26.15 27.34 240.00 6.56

B 10.00 -0.50 26.15 2.78 240.00 0.67
C 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -1.00 120.00 -0.12
D 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -1.00 120.00 -0.12
Overall loading
Projected vertical plan area of wall; Avert_w_0 = b  (H+ hp) = 252.00 ft2
Projected vertical area of roof; Avert_r_0 = 0.00 ft2
Minimum overall horizontal loading; Fw,total_min = pmin_w  Avert_w_0 + pmin_r  Avert_r_0 = 4.03 kips
Leeward net force; Fl = Fw,wB + Fw,wpl_0 = 0.4 kips
Windward net force; Fw = Fw,wA + Fw,wpw_0 = 7.0 kips
Overall horizontal loading; Fw,total = max(Fw - Fl + Fw,h, Fw,total_min) = 6.6 kips
Roof load case 3 - Wind 90, GCpi 0.55, -cpe
Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A (-ve) 10.00 -0.90 26.15 -29.23 60.00 -1.75

B (-ve) 10.00 -0.90 26.15 -29.23 60.00 -1.75
C (-ve) 10.00 -0.50 26.15 -21.68 120.00 -2.60
D (-ve) 10.00 -0.30 26.15 -17.90 48.00 -0.86
Total vertical net force; Fw,v = -6.97 kips
Total horizontal net force; Fw,h = 0.00 kips
Walls load case 3 - Wind 90, GCpi 0.55, -cpe
Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A 10.00 0.80 26.15 2.89 120.00 0.35

B 10.00 -0.30 26.15 -17.90 120.00 -2.15
C 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -25.46 240.00 -6.11
D 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -25.46 240.00 -6.11
Overall loading
Projected vertical plan area of wall; Avert_w_90 = d  (H+ hp) = 126.00 ft2
Projected vertical area of roof; Avert_r_90 = 0.00 ft2
Minimum overall horizontal loading; Fw,total_min = pmin_w  Avert_w_90 + pmin_r  Avert_r_90 = 2.02 kips
Leeward net force; Fl = Fw,wB + Fw,wpl_90 = -2.3 kips
Windward net force; Fw = Fw,wA + Fw,wpw_90 = 0.5 kips
Overall horizontal loading; Fw,total = max(Fw - Fl + Fw,h, Fw,total_min) = 2.8 kips
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
9
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Roof load case 4 - Wind 90, GCpi -0.55, +cpe

Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A (+ve) 10.00 -0.18 26.15 8.83 60.00 0.53

B (+ve) 10.00 -0.18 26.15 8.83 60.00 0.53
C (+ve) 10.00 -0.18 26.15 8.83 120.00 1.06
D (+ve) 10.00 -0.18 26.15 8.83 48.00 0.42
Total vertical net force; Fw,v = 2.54 kips
Total horizontal net force; Fw,h = 0.00 kips
Walls load case 4 - Wind 90, GCpi -0.55, +cpe
Ext
Peak Net
Ref. pressure Area Net force
velocity pressure
Zone height coefficient Aref Fw
pressure qp p
(ft) cpe (ft2) (kips)
(psf) (psf)

A 10.00 0.80 26.15 27.34 120.00 3.28

B 10.00 -0.30 26.15 6.56 120.00 0.79
C 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -1.00 240.00 -0.24
D 10.00 -0.70 26.15 -1.00 240.00 -0.24
Overall loading
Projected vertical plan area of wall; Avert_w_90 = d  (H+ hp) = 126.00 ft2
Projected vertical area of roof; Avert_r_90 = 0.00 ft2
Minimum overall horizontal loading; Fw,total_min = pmin_w  Avert_w_90 + pmin_r  Avert_r_90 = 2.02 kips
Leeward net force; Fl = Fw,wB + Fw,wpl_90 = 0.7 kips
Windward net force; Fw = Fw,wA + Fw,wpw_90 = 3.5 kips
Overall horizontal loading; Fw,total = max(Fw - Fl + Fw,h, Fw,total_min) = 2.8 kips
Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
10
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR
Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
11
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
12
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

STRUCTURAL GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER (GLULAM) MEMBER ANALYSIS & DESIGN (NDS)
In accordance with the ANSI/AF&PA NDS-2018 using the ASD method
Tedds calculation version 1.7.10

Load Envelope - Combina on 1

0.050

0.0
24
A 1 B

Bending Moment Envelope

kip_
0.0

3.600
3.6
24
A 1 B

Shear Force Envelope

kips
0.6
0.600

0.0

-0.600
-0.6
24
A 1 B

Applied loading
Beam loads
Dead full UDL 10 lb/ft
Live full UDL 40 lb/ft
Load combinations
Load combination 1 Support A Dead ´ 1.00
Live ´ 1.00
Span 1 Dead ´ 1.00
Live ´ 1.00
Support B Dead ´ 1.00
Live ´ 1.00
Analysis results
Maximum moment; Mmax = 3600 lb_ft; Mmin = 0 lb_ft
Design moment; M = max(abs(Mmax),abs(Mmin)) = 3600 lb_ft
Maximum shear; Fmax = 600 lb; Fmin = -600 lb
Design shear; F = max(abs(Fmax),abs(Fmin)) = 600 lb
Total load on member; Wtot = 1200 lb
Reaction at support A; RA_max = 600 lb; RA_min = 600 lb
Unfactored dead load reaction at support A; RA_Dead = 120 lb
Unfactored live load reaction at support A; RA_Live = 480 lb
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
13
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Reaction at support B; RB_max = 600 lb; RB_min = 600 lb

Unfactored dead load reaction at support B; RB_Dead = 120 lb
Unfactored live load reaction at support B; RB_Live = 480 lb

5.5''

4''

Glulam section details

Net finished breadth of sections; b = 5.5 in
Net finished depth of sections; d = 9.5 in
Number of sections in member; N = 1
Overall breadth of member; bb = N  b = 5.5 in
Alignment of laminations; Horizontal
Stress class; 20F-1.5E
Tension parallel to grain; Ft = 725 lb/in2
Compression parallel to grain; Fc = 925 lb/in2
Bending about X-X axis properties (loaded perpendicular to wide faces of laminations):
Positive bending; Fbx_pos = 2000 lb/in2
Negative bending; Fbx_neg = 1100 lb/in2
Compression perpendicular to grain; Fc_perp = 425 lb/in2
Shear parallel to grain; Fv = 195 lb/in2
Modulus of elasticity; E = 1500000 lb/in2
Modulus of elasticity, stability calculations; Emin = 790000 lb/in2
2
Mean shear modulus; Gdef = E / 16 = 93750 lb/in
Bending about Y-Y axis properties (loaded parallel to wide faces of laminations):
Bending; Fby = 800 lb/in2
Modulus of elasticity; stability calculations; Eymin = 630000 lb/in2
Member details
Service condition; Dry
Length of span; Ls1 = 24 ft
Length of bearing; Lb = 4 in
Load duration; Ten years
Section properties
Cross sectional area of member; A = N  b  d = 52.25 in2
Section modulus; Sx = N  b  d2 / 6 = 82.73 in3
Sy = d  (N  b)2 / 6 = 47.90 in3
Second moment of area; Ix = N  b  d3 / 12 = 392.96 in4
Iy = d  (N  b)3 / 12 = 131.71 in4
Adjustment factors
Load duration factor - Table 2.3.2; CD = 1.00
Temperature factor - Table 2.3.3; Ct = 1.00
Flat use factor - Table 5A; Cfu = 1.07
Bearing area factor - cl.3.10.4; Cb = 1.00
Length of beam between points of zero moment; L0 = 24 ft
For species other than Southern Pine; x = 10
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
14
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Volume factor - eq.5.3-1; CV = min((21 ft / L0)1/x ´ (12 in / d)1/x ´ (5.125 in / b)1/x,

1) = 1.00
Depth-to-breadth ratio; d / (N ´ b) = 1.73
- Beam is fully restrained
Beam stability factor - cl.3.3.3; CL = 1.00
Bearing perpendicular to grain - cl.3.10.2
Design compression perpendicular to grain; Fc_perp' = Fc_perp  Ct  Cb = 425
lb/in2
Applied compression stress perpendicular to grain; fc_perp = RA_max / (N  b  Lb) = 27
lb/in2
fc_perp / Fc_perp' = 0.064
PASS - Design compressive stress exceeds applied compressive stress at bearing
Strength in bending - cl.3.3.1
Design bending stress; Fb' = Fbx_pos  CD  Ct  min(CL, CV)  Cc = 2000 lb/in2
Actual bending stress; fb = Mmax / Sx = 522 lb/in2
fb / Fb' = 0.261
PASS - Design bending stress exceeds actual bending stress
Strength in shear parallel to grain - cl.3.4.1
Design shear stress; Fv' = Fv  CD  Ct = 195 lb/in2
Actual shear stress - eq.3.4-2; fv = 3  F / (2  A) = 17 lb/in2
fv / Fv' = 0.088
PASS - Design shear stress exceeds actual shear stress
Deflection - cl.3.5.1
Modulus of elasticity for deflection; E' = Ex  CME  Ct = 1500000 lb/in2
Design deflection; adm = 0.003 ´ Ls1 = 0.864 in
Total deflection; db_s1 = 0.633 in
b_s1 / dadm = 0.733
PASS - Total deflection is less than design deflection
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
15
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

WOOD MEMBER DESIGN (NDS 2018)

In accordance with the ANSI/AF&PA NDS 2018 using the ASD method
Tedds calculation version 2.2.24

Design summary
Overall design utilisation; 0.645
Overall design status; PASS

Design section s1 results Unit Capacity Maximum Utilization Result

summary
Compressive stress lb/in2 748 17 0.022 PASS
Design section s2 results Unit Capacity Maximum Utilization Result
summary
Bending stress lb/in2 720 250 0.347 PASS
Compressive stress lb/in2 748 17 0.022 PASS
Bending and axial force 0.645 PASS
Design section 1
User note: Check column at base
Member details
Service condition; Dry
Glulam section details
Number of sawn lumber sections in member; N = 1
Breadth of sections; b = 6 in
Depth of sections; d = 6 in
Material; Glulam, 16F-1.3E grade

Span details
Unbraced length - Major axis; Lx = 9.2 ft
Effective bending length - Major axis; Le,x = 1.63 ´ Lx + 3 ´ b = 16.496 ft
Column buckling length - Major axis; Lb,x = Lx = 9.2 ft
Unbraced length - Minor axis; Ly = 9.2 ft
Effective bending length - Minor axis; Le,y = 1.63 ´ Ly + 3 ´ d = 16.496 ft
Column buckling length - Minor axis; Lb,y = Ly = 9.2 ft
Analysis results
Design axial compression force; P = 600 lb
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
16
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Adjustment factors - Table 5.3.1

Permanent load duration factor - Table 2.3.2; CD = 0.9
*
Reference compression design value; Fc = Fc ´ CD = 833 lb/in2
Adjusted modulus of elasticity; Exmin' = Exmin = 690000 lb/in2
Critical buckling design value; FcE = 0.822 ´ Eymin' / (Lb,y / b)2 = 1408 lb/in2
Column stability factor - eq.3.7-1
CP = (1 + (FcE / Fc)) / 1.8 - (((1 + (FcE / Fc*)) / 1.8)2 - (FcE / Fc) / 0.9) = 0.898
Compression members - General - cl.3.6
Design axial compression force; P = 600 lb
Design compression parallel to grain - Table 5.3.1; Fc' = Fc  CD  CP = 748 lb/in2
Actual compression parallel to grain; fc = P / (b  d) = 17 lb/in2
fc / Fc' = 0.022
PASS - Design compression stress exceeds actual compression stress

Design section 2
User note: Check beam at mid-height
Member details
Service condition; Dry
Glulam section details
Number of sawn lumber sections in member; N = 1
Breadth of sections; b = 6 in
Depth of sections; d = 6 in
Material; Glulam, 16F-1.3E grade

Span details
Unbraced length - Major axis; Lx = 9.2 ft
Effective bending length - Major axis; Le,x = 1.63 ´ Lx + 3 ´ b = 16.496 ft
Column buckling length - Major axis; Lb,x = Lx = 9.2 ft
Unbraced length - Minor axis; Ly = 9.2 ft
Effective bending length - Minor axis; Le,y = 1.63 ´ Ly + 3 ´ d = 16.496 ft
Column buckling length - Minor axis; Lb,y = Ly = 9.2 ft
Analysis results
Design bending moment - Major axis; Mx = 1250 lb_ft
Design bending moment - Minor axis; My = 750 lb_ft
Design axial compression force; P = 600 lb
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
17
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Adjustment factors - Table 5.3.1

Permanent load duration factor - Table 2.3.2; CD = 0.9
Flat use factor - Table 5A; Cfu = (12 in / b)1/9 = 1.08
Depth-to-breadth ratio; d / b = 1.00
Slenderness ratio - eq.3.3-5; RB = (Le,y  d / b2) = 5.744
Reference bending design value; Fb* = Fbx_pos ´ CD = 1440 lb/in2
Adjusted modulus of elasticity; Eymin' = Eymin = 580000 lb/in2
Critical buckling design value - cl.[Link]; FbE = 1.2 ´ Eymin' / RB2 = 21096
lb/in2
Beam stability factor - eq.3.3-6
CL = [1 + (FbE / Fb*)] / 1.9 - Ö[([1 + (FbE / Fb)] / 1.9)2 - (FbE / Fb*) / 0.95] = 0.996
Reference compression design value; Fc = Fc  CD = 833 lb/in2
Adjusted modulus of elasticity; Exmin' = Exmin = 690000 lb/in2
Critical buckling design value; FcE = 0.822  Eymin' / (Lb,y / b)2 = 1408 lb/in2
Column stability factor - eq.3.7-1
CP = (1 + (FcE / Fc*)) / 1.8 - Ö(((1 + (FcE / Fc)) / 1.8)2 - (FcE / Fc*) / 0.9) = 0.898
Compression members - General - cl.3.6
Design axial compression force; P = 600 lb
Design compression parallel to grain - Table 5.3.1; Fc' = Fc ´ CD ´ CP = 748 lb/in2
Actual compression parallel to grain; fc = P / (b ´ d) = 17 lb/in2
fc / Fc' = 0.022
PASS - Design compression stress exceeds actual compression stress
Bending members - Flexure - cl.3.3
Design bending moment; Mx = 1250 lb_ft
[Link] (+ve mom) in x-axis - Table 5.3.1; Fb,x' = Fbx_pos ´ CD ´ CL = 1435
lb/in2
Actual bending stress in x-axis - eq.3.3-2; fb,x = Mx / Sx = 417 lb/in2
fb,x / Fb,x' = 0.290
PASS - Design bending stress exceeds actual bending stress in x-axis
Design bending moment; My = 750 lb_ft
Design bending stress in y-axis - Table 5.3.1; Fb,y' = Fby  CD = 720 lb/in2
Actual bending stress in y-axis - eq.3.3-2; fb,y = My / Sy = 250 lb/in2
fb,y / Fb,y' = 0.347
PASS - Design bending stress exceeds actual bending stress in y-axis
Combined bending and axial loading - cl.3.9
Critical buckling design value in x-axis; FcE1 = 0.822 ´ Exmin' / (Lb,x / d)2
= 1675 lb/in2
Critical buckling design value in y-axis; FcE2 = 0.822 ´ Eymin' / (Lb,y / b)2
= 1408 lb/in2
Biaxial bending and compression check - eqs.3.9-3 and 3.9-4
max((fc / Fc')2 + fb,x / (Fb,x' ´ (1 - (fc / FcE1))) + fb,y / (Fb,y' ´ (1 - (fc / FcE2))), (fc / FcE2) +
fb,y / (Fb,y' ´ (1 - (fc / FcE2)))) = 0.645; < 1.0
PASS - Combined bending and compressive stresses are within permissible limits
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
18
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

FOOTING ANALYSIS
In accordance with ACI318-19 (22)
Tedds calculation version 3.3.11

Summary results
Overall design status; PASS;
Overall design utilisation; 0.735
Description Unit Applied Resisting FoS Result
Uplift verification kips 5.1 Pass
Description Unit Applied Resisting Utilizatio Result
n
Soil bearing ksf 2.574 3.5 0.735 Pass
Description Unit Required Provided Utilizatio Result
n
Moment, positive, y-direction kip_ft 0.9 11.8 0.073 Pass
Shear, one-way, y-direction kips 0.1 5.7 0.014 Pass
2
[Link] of reinf, bot., y-direction in 0.259 0.310 Pass
[Link], bot, y-direction in 18.0 12.0 Pass
[Link] of reinf, S&T, x-direction in 2 0.518 1.320 Pass
[Link], S&T, x-direction in 18.0 8.0 Pass
Strip footing details - considering a one foot strip
Length of footing; Lx = 1 ft
Width of footing; Ly = 2 ft
Footing area; A = Lx ´ Ly = 2 ft2
Depth of footing; h = 12 in
Depth of soil over footing; hsoil = 24 in
Density of concrete; gconc = 150.0 lb/ft3
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
19
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Wall no.1 details

Width of wall; ly1 = 6 in
position in y-axis; y1 = 12 in

Soil properties
Gross allowable bearing pressure; qallow_Gross = 3.5 ksf;
Density of soil; soil = 120.0 lb/ft3
Angle of internal friction; fb = 30.0 deg
Design base friction angle; bb = 30.0 deg
Coefficient of base friction; tan(dbb) = 0.577
Footing loads
Self weight; Fswt = h ´ gconc = 150 psf
Soil weight; Fsoil = hsoil  soil = 240 psf
Wall no.1 loads per linear foot
Dead load in z; FDz1 = 4.5 kips
Footing analysis for soil and stability
Load combinations per ASCE 7-22
1.0D (0.735)
1.0D + 1.0L (0.735)
1.0D + 1.0Lr (0.735)
1.0D + 0.7S (0.735)
1.0D + 1.0R (0.735)
1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr (0.735)
1.0D + 0.75L + 0.525S (0.735)
1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75R (0.735)
Combination 1 results: 1.0D
Forces on footing per linear foot
Force in z-axis; Fdz = gD  A  (Fswt + Fsoil) + D ´ (FDz1 - lx1 ´ ly1 ´ hsoil ´
gsoil) = 5.1 kips
Moments on footing per linear foot
Moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Mdy = D ´ (A ´ (Fswt + Fsoil) ´ Ly / 2) + gD  (((FDz1 - lx1 
ly1  hsoil  soil)) ´ y1) = 5.1 kip_ft
Uplift verification
Vertical force; Fdz = 5.148 kips
PASS - Footing is not subject to uplift
Stability against sliding
Resistance due to base friction; FRFriction = max(Fdz, 0 kN) ´ tan(dbb) = 2.972 kips
Bearing resistance
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 0.000 in
Strip base pressures
q1 = Fdz ´ (1 - 6 ´ edy / Ly) / (Ly ´ 1 ft) = 2.574 ksf
q2 = Fdz ´ (1 + 6 ´ edy / Ly) / (Ly ´ 1 ft) = 2.574 ksf
Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1,q2) = 2.574 ksf
Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1,q2) = 2.574 ksf
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
20
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Allowable bearing capacity

Allowable bearing capacity; qallow = qallow_Gross = 3.5 ksf
qmax / qallow = 0.735
PASS - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure

FOOTING DESIGN
In accordance with ACI318-19 (22)
Tedds calculation version 3.3.11

Material details
Compressive strength of concrete; f’c = 4000 psi
Yield strength of reinforcement; fy = 60000 psi
Compression-controlled strain limit (21.2.2); ety = 0.00200
Cover to top of footing; cnom_t = 3 in
Cover to side of footing; cnom_s = 3 in
Cover to bottom of footing; cnom_b = 3 in
Concrete type; Normal weight
Concrete modification factor;  = 1.00
Wall type; Concrete
Analysis and design of concrete footing
Load combinations per ASCE 7-22
1.4D (0.073)
1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.063)
1.2D + 1.6L + 0.3S (0.063)
1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5R (0.063)
1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6Lr (0.063)
1.2D + 1.0L + 1.0S (0.063)
1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6R (0.063)
Combination 1 results: 1.4D
Forces on footing per linear foot
Ultimate force in z-axis; Fuz = gD  A  (Fswt + Fsoil) + D ´ (FDz1 - lx1 ´ ly1 ´ hsoil ´
gsoil) = 7.2 kips
Moments on footing per linear foot
Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Muy = D ´ (A ´ (Fswt + Fsoil) ´ Ly / 2) + gD  (((FDz1 -
lx1  ly1  hsoil  soil)) ´ y1) = 7.2 kip_ft
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = 0.000 in
Strip base pressures
qu1 = Fuz  (1 - 6  euy / Ly) / (Ly  1 ft) = 3.604 ksf
qu2 = Fuz  (1 + 6  euy / Ly) / (Ly  1 ft) = 3.604 ksf
Minimum ultimate base pressure; qumin = min(qu1,qu2) = 3.604 ksf
Maximum ultimate base pressure; qumax = max(qu1,qu2) = 3.604 ksf
Shear diagram (kips)
 Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
21
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

Moment diagram (kip_ft)

Moment design, y direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; [Link] = 0.861 kip_ft
Tension reinforcement provided; No.5 bars at 12.0 in c/c bottom
Area of tension reinforcement provided; [Link] = 0.31 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement ([Link]); [Link] = 0.0018  Lx  h = 0.259
in2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement ([Link]); smax = min(3 ´ h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom_b - [Link] / 2 = 8.688 in
Depth of compression block; a = [Link]  fy / (0.85  f'c  Lx) = 0.456 in
Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85
Depth to neutral axis; c = a / b1 = 0.536 in
Strain in tensile reinforcement; t = 0.003 ´ d / c - 0.003 = 0.04559
Minimum tensile strain([Link]); emin = ty + 0.003 = 0.00500
PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = [Link] ´ fy ´ (d - a / 2) = 13.112 kip_ft
Flexural strength reduction factor; ff = min(max(0.65 + 0.25  (t - ety) / (0.003), 0.65), 0.9)
= 0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f ´ Mn = 11.801 kip_ft
[Link] / fMn = 0.073
PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, y direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.y = 0.082 kips
Depth to reinforcement; dv = h - cnom_b - [Link] / 2 = 8.687 in
Size effect factor ([Link].3); ls = 1
Ratio of longitudinal reinforcement; w = [Link] / (Lx ´ dv) =
0.00297
Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75
Nominal shear capacity (Eq. [Link]); Vn = min(8  s ´ l ´ (rw)1/3  (f'c  1 psi)  Lx  dv, 5 
  (f'c  1 psi)  Lx  dv) = 7.585 kips
Design shear capacity; fVn = fv  Vn = 5.689 kips
Vu.y / Vn = 0.014
PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Shrinkage and temperature requirements, x direction
Reinforcement provided; No.6 bars at 8.0 in c/c bottom
Reinforcement area provided in full width; [Link] = 1.32 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement ([Link].2); [Link] = 0.0018  Ly  h = 0.518
in2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum reinforcement spacing ([Link].3); [Link] = min(5  h, 18 in) = 18 in
Project Job Ref.

Structural Calculation for Patio Cover 34

Address: Sheet no./rev.
2405 W Rubicon Sky Pl, Oro Valley, AZ
22
by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
John Weiskopf 21/01/2026 John Weiskopf ENGR

PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing