Syntax
Introductory Concepts
Syntactic categories
Category Abbreviation Example
a. noun N John, London, computer, city, stupidity, event
b. verb V hear, think, kill, shorten, eavesdrop, exist
c. adjective A good, obscene, lovely, schoolmasterly
d. preposition P by, in, with, from, to, at, inside, despite
e. adverb Adv slowly, often, now, mostly
f. determiner D, Det a, the, this - these, that - those
a. Nouns denote people, places or things.
b. Verbs denote events, activities or states.
c. Adjectives denote properties.
D. Adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, clauses
More satisfactory are definitions based on morphological and syntactic criteria.
Examples of morphological criteria for categories (for English only!):
a. Nouns can take plural –s or one of its allomorphs: dogs, children
b. Verbs have inflection for person, tense, number: she talks/talked; she sings/sang
c. If a word can take comparative/superlative affixes, it is an adjective: taller/tallest
d. If -ly can be added to a word to form an adverb, that word is an adjective (slowly).
Examples of syntactic criteria for categories in English (Assume that each pair of
brackets is filled by only one word):
a. They have no [N ]
b. the [A ] [N ]
c. She did this very [Adv ]
d. They are very [A ]
e. They can [V ]
Constituent structure
That man likes that woman.
S = D+N+V+D+N
Sentences (S) are formed by combining words with other words to form larger groups of
words (=constituents).
Constituents combine with other constituents to form bigger constituents, until we have
sentences.
noun phrases (NPs) are constituents containing a noun and material describing it, e.g. D
+N, That man
S may contain NP V NP., e.g. That man likes that woman.
Tests for constituents:
How to determine whether a string (i.e. group of words) is a constituent or not.
Tests for constituents:
a) Proform test. If you can replace a string with a proform, the string is a constituent.
Proforms may stand for constituents, e.g. pronouns (which replace NPs; she/him/they etc).
Other proforms: somewhere, do so, there, then).
a. The lady running the group handed in her resignation at noon.
b. She handed in her resignation. [The lady running the group is a constituent]
c. The lady running it handed in her resignation. [the group is a constituent]
d. The lady running the group did so at noon. [handed in her resignation is a constituent]
e. The lady running the group handed in her resignation then. [at noon is a constituent]
Question test. A string is a constituent if you can ask about it using a wh-expression
(e.g. where/how/when/why/what/who(m); with whom?, at what time?, in whose house?).
The answer to the question is also a constituent.
a. A: What did the lady running the group hand in at noon?
B: Her resignation.
b. A: Who handed in her resignation at noon?
B: The lady running the group
c. A: When did the lady running the group hand in her resignation?
B: At noon
Phrases and the notion of 'head'
Phrases = constituents larger than a word. Each word-level category (N,V,P etc.) has a
corresponding phrase containing the word-level category itself and material adding
additional information to it or dependent on it.
Examples of phrases:
a. Noun Phrase (NP): the (biggest) tree (in the garden)
b. Verb Phrase (VP): (often) played (in a band) (on Saturday nights)
c. Prepositional Phrase (PP): (right) under the window
c. Adjective Phrase (AP): (very) proud (of his children)
Underlined are the heads of the phrases. The head of a phrase is the word that
determines the properties of the whole phrase.
Heads are obligatory in phrases. Everything in a phrase depends on the head (e.g. gives
info about the head, is in the phrase because the head requires or allows it).
Types of phrases
Noun Phrase (NP)
a. the woman; a (big) tree; (this) coffee, (our) existence
b. a (famous) diva (of exceptional talent) (who got run over by a truck)
c. a (renowned) expert (on indigenous Australian music) (from Brisbane)
d. (the) (most important) representatives (of workers' interests) (at the conference)
Why these are called NPs (i.e. why the underlined noun is the head):
[Link] whole NPs refer to (instances of) the entity/concept named by the noun.
b. All the material in the phrase gives information about the noun.
Pronouns (she/her/he/him/it/they/them) are proforms for NPs, not just nouns.
a. They found [NP a big tree] and sat under it.
NPs consisting of only one word:
Mass/plural indefinites: [NP [N Italians]] like [NP [N wine]]
Pronouns: [NP they] like [NP it]
Proper names: [NP Maria] likes [NP England]
Verb phrase (VP)
Which of the structures is correct?
Why do we assume that VPs exist? Constituents tests show that VPs exist.
Why is V seen as the head of the constituent? Why do we call it a VP? Answer: All
material in the phrase gives information about the situation expressed by the verb.
Other examples of VPs (note that some can consist solely of a verb):
a. (suddenly) died (of cancer) (at a young age)
b. (blindly) rely on the advice of a counsellor
c. (often) called him a maladjusted sociopath
d. give Basil the book; e. sings (many songs)
Some characteristics of VP:
Putting an appropriate NP (called a subject) in front of the VP yields a full sentence.
Most VPs start with V, but sometimes there is an adverb in front of the verb – see examples
above
Prepositional Phrase (PP)
a. [PP near [NP the fireplace]]
b. [PP towards [NP the building]]
c. [PP of [NP her parents]] d. [PP despite [NP the situation]]
PPs are not a type of NP. Unlike NPs, PPs mostly denote locations or directions and never
denote entities.
PPs can’t be replaced by the proforms for NPs:
a. I went [PP into [NP the building]] [PP with [NP the other people]]
b. I went [PP into [NP IT]] [PP with [NP THEM]]
c. *I went IT THEM.
Proform for spatial PPs: there; for temporal PPs: then. Other PPs can’t be replaced by
proforms, e.g. PPs headed by of, about, despite.
Prepositional phrases usually consist of P+NP, but sometimes P+PP:
[PP from [PP under [NP the table]]]
Most PPs start with the preposition, but sometimes the preposition is preceded by adverbs
and other measure phrases give info about the place/direction expressed by the PP:
[PP RIGHT near [NP them]] [PP STRAIGHT towards [NP it]] [PP BACK to [NP
London]]
[PP TEN MINUTES before [NP the meeting]] [PP TEN KILOMETRES into [NP the
desert]]
Adjective Phrase (AP)
a. (very) angry (at the rest of the human race)
b. dull (to the extreme)
c. (soul-destroyingly) boring
d. devoid of content
e. interested (in art) (to some extent)
APs typically describe NPs. They may appear either inside or outside the NP:
[NP a [AP very angry] person] shouted at him.
b. [NP a person [AP very angry about the situation]] shouted at him.
c. [NP the people] became [AP very angry]
Adverb Phrase (AdvP)
a. (very) slowly
b. (extremely) well
c. (completely) independently of the approval of his superiors
AdvPs occur
(a) inside VP, describing the situation named by the verb,
(b) inside Aps indicating the degree to which the adjective is applicable,
(c) inside the AdvPs headed by other adverbs, also indicating the degree to which the main
adverb is applicable.
[S [NP Mary] [VP [AdvP very quickly] memorised [NP the material] [AdvP perfectly]]]
[AP [AdvP vaguely/incredibly/(so) very/somewhat] interesting]]
[AdvP [AdvP incredibly/(so) very/somewhat] skillfully]]
Putting the pieces together: Analysing whole sentences
Basic rule of sentence structure: S = NP + VP. Thus, NP and VP are immediate
constituents of sentences.
Words are the ultimate constituents.
The NP outside VP is called the subject. (Subjects determine the verb’s inflection:
His mother writes books vs. I write books.)
Older, unnecessary term for VP: predicate.
An example of a structure for a whole sentence:
[S[NP [D The] [AP [A old] [N man] [PP [P in] [NP [D the] [N café]]]] [VP [Adv(P) often]
reads [NP books by French authors] [PP on Saturday nights]]]
More on notation: Constituents can be represented with either trees (=phrase markers,
tree diagrammes) or (labelled) bracketing
Each node (=point in tree with a category label) stands for a constituent.
Triangle notation abbreviates constituents whose internal structure is not of interest:
Coordination (=the linking of material using conjunctions and, or) obeys two basic
principles:
a. Coordination is possible only with constituents of the same category.
b. Coordination forms a phrase of the same category as that of the coordinated
constituents.
Possessive ‘s attaches to NPs, not nouns
a. [That lady]'s husband left.
b. [That lady near the door]'s husband left. (=the husband of that lady near the door)
c. [That lady you talked to]'s husband left. (=the husband of that lady you talked to)
d. [That lady you saw]'s husband left. (=the husband of that lady you saw)
Remember: the possessor (the person/thing that has the noun heading the whole phrase) is
always a full NP which combines with ‘s to form a (definite) determiner.
Possessor NPs are the only type of NP that can’t be replaced by a normal pronoun: Ann’s
car ≠ *she’s car.
This is because there are special possessive determiners: her car. These act as proforms for
the D constituent in the tree.
Auxiliaries and lexical verbs
Auxiliaries (hard-to-define verb-like words with grammatical functions):
Modal auxiliaries: can, may, must, shall, will, as well as need in some uses.
Other auxiliaries: be, as well as have and do in some uses.
Auxiliaries differ from normal verbs (lexical verbs) as follows:
A) In question inversion, auxiliaries go before the subject NP, lexical verbs do not:
Does she work? vs *Works she? Has she worked vs. *Worked she?
B) Thus, in tag questions an auxiliary can appear but not a lexical verb:
She has worked, hasn't/didn't she? vs. *She worked, worked she?
C) Negative particles (not, n't) can negate auxiliaries but not lexical verbs:
she mustn't/must not smoke vs. *she smokes not
D) Lexical verbs can be transitive (i.e. take an object), auxiliaries cannot:
he wants/needs a drink vs. *he must a drink
E) Lexical verbs can take a complement VP introduced by to. Auxiliaries cannot.
He wants to VP, she tried to VP; he must VP, she did VP
With inversion, tag questions, negation, if there is no auxiliary, a dummy auxiliary do
must be inserted. This phenomenon is called do-support:
a. *smokes she? should be . does she smoke?
b. *she smokes not should be . she does not smoke
c. *she smokes, smokes she? should be . she smokes, doesn't she
Some verbs can be used either as lexical verbs or as auxiliaries.
HAVE is an auxiliary if used in forming the perfect tense. Otherwise it is lexical:
a. Have (aux) you eaten? b. Don't you have (lex) a pencil?
DO as a transitive verb is a lexical verb. Otherwise it is an auxiliary (e.g. in do-support and
its emphatic use)
a. Did (aux) you do (lex) work/a dance?
b. Martians DO (aux) exist, I DID (aux) see one!
NEED always behaves like a lexical verb when transitive, and means ‘have to have’.
When it means just ‘have to’ it can be either a lexical verb or an auxiliary. If used as an
auxiliary, it is uninflected and is mainly confined to negative contexts and questions (Need
he go? He needn’t go. *He need go.).
he doesn't need (lex) a pencil
a. He need (aux) (*s/*ed) not do that. b. He doesn’t need to do that.