0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views5 pages

Chapter 3

Chapter 3 discusses the process of selecting a research problem and formulating research questions. It emphasizes the importance of identifying personal interests, defining research gaps, and ensuring that questions are feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant. Additionally, it provides guidelines for writing both quantitative and qualitative research questions, as well as ethical considerations in conducting research.

Uploaded by

Lê Lâm Bảo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views5 pages

Chapter 3

Chapter 3 discusses the process of selecting a research problem and formulating research questions. It emphasizes the importance of identifying personal interests, defining research gaps, and ensuring that questions are feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant. Additionally, it provides guidelines for writing both quantitative and qualitative research questions, as well as ethical considerations in conducting research.

Uploaded by

Lê Lâm Bảo
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CHAPTER 3: SELECTING A PROBLEM &

PREVIEWING THE RESEARCH

1. Selecting a problem
 Choose an area of your interests
 Be ready to accept change
 Do something that is doable
 Do something that is worth doing
2. Define your interests
 Personal experiences and firsthand knowledge
 The literature
 Link the experiences and the literature
 Talk to your adviser
 Use ideas from the limitations and/or Future’s studies sections in articles
 The gap, also considered the missing piece or pieces in the research
literature, is the area that has not yet been explored or is under-
explored. This could be a population or sample (size, type, location,
etc.), research method, data collection and/or analysis, or other
research variables or conditions.
 It is important to keep in mind; however, that just because you
identify a gap in the research, it doesn’t necessarily mean that your
research question is worthy of exploration. You will want to make
sure that your research will have valuable practical and/or theoretical
implications.
3. From idea to research question (RQ)
 Ideas are full of those products of luxurious thinking: beliefs, conceptions,
suppositions, assumptions, what if, guesses, and more.
 Research questions are the articulation, best done in writing, of those ideas
that at the least imply a relationship between variables.
4. A research question
 F – feasible: can be answered under objective aspects like time, scope,
available resources, ability to collect data, or funding.
 I – interesting: is not only to the researcher but also to community
 N – novel: brings new insights to the field of study you are investigating
and may confirm or extend previous findings on the topic you are
researching.
 E – ethical: must be something that review boards and the appropriate
authorities will approve.
 R – relevant: should be relevant to the scientific community and people
involved in your area of study; should also be relevant to the public’s
interest.
5. Writing Research Questions
 The question is feasible (i.e., it can be investigated without expending an
undue amount of time, enerygy, or money).
 The question is clear (i.e., most people would agree as to what the key
words in the question mean)
 The question is significant (i.e., it is worth investigating because it will
contribute important knowledge about the human condition; make a
contribution to educational theory or practice. The problem may fill in gaps
in current knowledge or help resolve some of the inconsistencies in
previous research.)
 The question is ethical (i.e., it will not involve physical or psychological
harm or damage to human beings or to the natural or social environment of
which they are a part).
6. Tips to write research questions
 Quantitative research questions: begin with how, what, why
o Descriptive research questions
 How much fast food fo Americans consume per week?
 What factors positively impact employee turnover rates of
hourly workers?
 Why do Asian-American students outscore other student
groups on AP Calculus Exams?
o Relationship-based research questions
 How does [independent variable] relate to [dependent
variable] for [participants]?
 “What is the relationship” between or amongst independent
and dependent variables, amongst or between two or more
groups?
E.g:
 How does quarterly sales volume relate to emplyee morale for
Hispanic-American hourly workers?
 What is the relationship between age and fast food preference
in Australia?
o Comparative research questions
 The question asks the respondents, “what is the difference” a
dependent variable between two or more groups”
E.g:
 What is the difference in time spent on video games between
people aged 12 to 17 and 18 to 25?
 What is the difference in attitude toward rock music between
Gen-Z and Millenials?
 Is there any significant difference in the satisfaction level
between software A and software B?
 Qualitative research questions: begin with “How” or “What” and avoid
“Why” (this is a quantitative term that implies cause and effect)
 What is [the central phenomenon] of/for [participants] at/in
[research site]?
E.g:
 What is the role of store managers in employee satisfaction of
hourly workers at Stapies?
 What is the process of the curriculum committee in making
decisions about courses?
 How does a President’s leadership style impact employee
engagement at Saint Leo’s University?
7. Form idea to research question to hypothesis
 A well-written hypothesis:
o is stated in declarative form
o posits a relationship between variables
o reflects a theory or body of literature upon which it is based
o is brief and to the point
o is testable
 4 main objectives:
 Survey the lit in your chosen area of study
 Synthesize the info in that lit into a summary
 Critically analyze the infro gathered by identifying gaps in current
knowledge
 By showing limitations of theories and points of view
 By formulating areas for further research
 Present the lit in an organized way
 Chronological (by date)
 Broad-to-specific
 Major models or major theories
 Prominent authors
 Contrasting schools of thought
 Reviewing the Literature:
 Objectivity:
 What is the intended purpose of the information?
 Is the information facts or opinions?
 Is the information biased?
 Currency:
 When was the information published?
 Is the information current or out-dated?
 Does currency matter in this topic?
 Coverage:
 Does the information covered meet your information needs?
 Does it provide basic or in depth coverage?
 Ethics in Research:
 Protection from harm: doing NO harm
 Must be prevented from physical or psychological harm
 Involved in any significant risks => then the experiment
SHOULD NOT be approved
 Maintenance of privacy: anonymity
 Being anonymous within a research contrast
 Use a single master sheet which contains both the names of the
participants and their participant number
 Use numbers in scoring sheets, code sheets, or other testing
materials
 Keep names and numbers in a secure place out of the public eye
 Don’t invade another’s private space to observe behavior and
collect data
 Voluntary participants: do not force people to participate
 People SHOULDN’T be forced, for whatever reason into
participant in study
 Informed consent: let the participants know the nature of the
research
 To ensure ethical behavior
 The researcher has to use the informed consent form or letter to
inform, not to force
 Confidentiality: keep the data in strict control
 Disguise information when necessary
 Keep data in secret
 To minimize the number of people who see or handle the data
 Debriefing: let the participants know the results
 Talk to participants immediately following the session
 Or send a newsletter telling them the general intent and results of
the study
 Sharing benefits: evey participants should receive the treatment, its it
is beneficial
 All direct participants in the experiment should benefit equally.

You might also like