CHAPTER 3: SELECTING A PROBLEM &
PREVIEWING THE RESEARCH
1. Selecting a problem
Choose an area of your interests
Be ready to accept change
Do something that is doable
Do something that is worth doing
2. Define your interests
Personal experiences and firsthand knowledge
The literature
Link the experiences and the literature
Talk to your adviser
Use ideas from the limitations and/or Future’s studies sections in articles
The gap, also considered the missing piece or pieces in the research
literature, is the area that has not yet been explored or is under-
explored. This could be a population or sample (size, type, location,
etc.), research method, data collection and/or analysis, or other
research variables or conditions.
It is important to keep in mind; however, that just because you
identify a gap in the research, it doesn’t necessarily mean that your
research question is worthy of exploration. You will want to make
sure that your research will have valuable practical and/or theoretical
implications.
3. From idea to research question (RQ)
Ideas are full of those products of luxurious thinking: beliefs, conceptions,
suppositions, assumptions, what if, guesses, and more.
Research questions are the articulation, best done in writing, of those ideas
that at the least imply a relationship between variables.
4. A research question
F – feasible: can be answered under objective aspects like time, scope,
available resources, ability to collect data, or funding.
I – interesting: is not only to the researcher but also to community
N – novel: brings new insights to the field of study you are investigating
and may confirm or extend previous findings on the topic you are
researching.
E – ethical: must be something that review boards and the appropriate
authorities will approve.
R – relevant: should be relevant to the scientific community and people
involved in your area of study; should also be relevant to the public’s
interest.
5. Writing Research Questions
The question is feasible (i.e., it can be investigated without expending an
undue amount of time, enerygy, or money).
The question is clear (i.e., most people would agree as to what the key
words in the question mean)
The question is significant (i.e., it is worth investigating because it will
contribute important knowledge about the human condition; make a
contribution to educational theory or practice. The problem may fill in gaps
in current knowledge or help resolve some of the inconsistencies in
previous research.)
The question is ethical (i.e., it will not involve physical or psychological
harm or damage to human beings or to the natural or social environment of
which they are a part).
6. Tips to write research questions
Quantitative research questions: begin with how, what, why
o Descriptive research questions
How much fast food fo Americans consume per week?
What factors positively impact employee turnover rates of
hourly workers?
Why do Asian-American students outscore other student
groups on AP Calculus Exams?
o Relationship-based research questions
How does [independent variable] relate to [dependent
variable] for [participants]?
“What is the relationship” between or amongst independent
and dependent variables, amongst or between two or more
groups?
E.g:
How does quarterly sales volume relate to emplyee morale for
Hispanic-American hourly workers?
What is the relationship between age and fast food preference
in Australia?
o Comparative research questions
The question asks the respondents, “what is the difference” a
dependent variable between two or more groups”
E.g:
What is the difference in time spent on video games between
people aged 12 to 17 and 18 to 25?
What is the difference in attitude toward rock music between
Gen-Z and Millenials?
Is there any significant difference in the satisfaction level
between software A and software B?
Qualitative research questions: begin with “How” or “What” and avoid
“Why” (this is a quantitative term that implies cause and effect)
What is [the central phenomenon] of/for [participants] at/in
[research site]?
E.g:
What is the role of store managers in employee satisfaction of
hourly workers at Stapies?
What is the process of the curriculum committee in making
decisions about courses?
How does a President’s leadership style impact employee
engagement at Saint Leo’s University?
7. Form idea to research question to hypothesis
A well-written hypothesis:
o is stated in declarative form
o posits a relationship between variables
o reflects a theory or body of literature upon which it is based
o is brief and to the point
o is testable
4 main objectives:
Survey the lit in your chosen area of study
Synthesize the info in that lit into a summary
Critically analyze the infro gathered by identifying gaps in current
knowledge
By showing limitations of theories and points of view
By formulating areas for further research
Present the lit in an organized way
Chronological (by date)
Broad-to-specific
Major models or major theories
Prominent authors
Contrasting schools of thought
Reviewing the Literature:
Objectivity:
What is the intended purpose of the information?
Is the information facts or opinions?
Is the information biased?
Currency:
When was the information published?
Is the information current or out-dated?
Does currency matter in this topic?
Coverage:
Does the information covered meet your information needs?
Does it provide basic or in depth coverage?
Ethics in Research:
Protection from harm: doing NO harm
Must be prevented from physical or psychological harm
Involved in any significant risks => then the experiment
SHOULD NOT be approved
Maintenance of privacy: anonymity
Being anonymous within a research contrast
Use a single master sheet which contains both the names of the
participants and their participant number
Use numbers in scoring sheets, code sheets, or other testing
materials
Keep names and numbers in a secure place out of the public eye
Don’t invade another’s private space to observe behavior and
collect data
Voluntary participants: do not force people to participate
People SHOULDN’T be forced, for whatever reason into
participant in study
Informed consent: let the participants know the nature of the
research
To ensure ethical behavior
The researcher has to use the informed consent form or letter to
inform, not to force
Confidentiality: keep the data in strict control
Disguise information when necessary
Keep data in secret
To minimize the number of people who see or handle the data
Debriefing: let the participants know the results
Talk to participants immediately following the session
Or send a newsletter telling them the general intent and results of
the study
Sharing benefits: evey participants should receive the treatment, its it
is beneficial
All direct participants in the experiment should benefit equally.